One is a streaming all-in-one and the other is an amplifier. Judge them on how many boxes you want and what you already own, not on the spec sheet alone.
| Area | Better | Why |
|---|
| Power | B | Parasound NewClassic 200 Integrated has more power - 125W against 80W into 8 ohms. That is about 1.9dB, which is a small step in loudness but real headroom on peaks. |
| Room size | depends | We rate Cambridge CXA81 II the better fit for a small room, and Parasound NewClassic 200 Integrated for a large room and a very large room. Match the amplifier to the room you actually have, not the one you want. |
| Grip on hard loads | A | Cambridge CXA81 II holds up better into a 4-ohm load: its output increases strongly to 120W, where the other barely increases. That matters with demanding speakers far more than the 8-ohm figure does. |
| Noise floor | A | Cambridge CXA81 II is the quieter design on paper - 105dB against 100dB. Audible mainly with sensitive speakers in a quiet room. |
| Built-in DAC | A | Both decode on board. Cambridge CXA81 II goes higher - 384kHz against 192kHz. Very few recordings exist above 192kHz, so treat this as headroom, not as sound quality. |
| Streaming | evenly matched | Only Cambridge CXA81 II has Roon. Neither list is longer in a way that matters - check the one service you actually pay for. |
| Analogue inputs | A | Cambridge CXA81 II takes more analogue sources - 5 against 4. |
| Phono stage | depends | Parasound NewClassic 200 Integrated has a built-in phono stage (MM,MC) and Cambridge CXA81 II does not. Decisive if you own a turntable, completely irrelevant if you do not - and an outboard phono stage is easy to add later either way. |
| Room to grow | evenly matched | The same expansion options on both. |
| Amplifier class | depends | Cambridge CXA81 II is Class A/B and Parasound NewClassic 200 Integrated is Class D. Class A/B runs warm and is the long-established mainstream choice; Class D runs cool and draws almost nothing at idle. Modern examples of both measure well - judge by the rest of the page. |
| Shelf space | depends | Cambridge CXA81 II takes up about 15% less shelf area (1595cm² against 1870cm²), and it is 56mm shallower, which is the measurement that decides whether a rack door shuts. |
| Price | A | Cambridge CXA81 II costs less - $1,199 against $1,399 at list. |
| Watts per dollar | B | Parasound NewClassic 200 Integrated is the cheaper watt - about $11 per watt against $15. A blunt measure, and it says nothing about how either sounds, but it is the honest one for raw output. |
A Cambridge CXA81 II B Parasound NewClassic 200 Integrated
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both amplifiers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.
Which should you choose?
Cambridge CXA81 II is the easier recommendation: it leads on most of the measured areas and costs less. Take Parasound NewClassic 200 Integrated if one of the "depends" rows above describes your system. If your speakers are a difficult load - 4 ohms nominal, big woofers, or a sensitivity in the low 80s - Cambridge CXA81 II is the safer partner, because how an amplifier behaves when the impedance drops matters more than its 8-ohm rating. If you play records, Parasound NewClassic 200 Integrated saves you buying a phono stage; if you do not, ignore that row entirely.
What a spec sheet cannot show: how either sounds with your speakers, how the controls feel day to day, and what the app is like to live with - which is where most all-in-one amplifiers are actually won or lost. Power figures are the manufacturers' own and are not measured to a common standard, so treat small differences as noise. If you can hear both, that will tell you more than any row above.