SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS
    • By Type
      Passive Bookshelf Speakers Passive Floor-standing Speakers Passive Center Channel Speakers Passive In-wall Speakers All Passive Speakers Powered Subwoofers Powered Stereo Speakers
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Front Firing Port Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      By Brand
      Acoustic Energy Aperion ATC Audio-Technica Audioengine Bluesound Bowers Wilkins Buchardt Cambridge Audio Canton DALI Definitive Technology Dynaudio ELAC Emotiva Fluance Focal Fyne Audio Genelec GoldenEar Harbeth Jamo JBL Kanto KEF KLH Klipsch Leak Mackie Magnepan MartinLogan McIntosh Mission MoFi Monitor Audio Nuvo Onkyo OSD Paradigm Perlisten Polk Audio PS Audio PSB Q Acoustics REL Revel Russound Sennheiser Sonos Sonus faber Sony Spendor SVS Tannoy Technics Triangle Velodyne Victrola Wharfedale Wilson Audio Yamaha
  • AMPLIFIERS
    • By Type
      All Amplifiers Integrated Amplifiers Stereo Receivers Streaming Amplifiers Power Amplifiers Compact Amplifiers
      By Power
      Up to 60 watts 61 to 90 watts 91 to 120 watts 121 to 180 watts Over 180 watts
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      Home Theater
      All Home Theater Receivers Anthem ARCAM Denon Integra JBL Marantz McIntosh NAD Onkyo Sony Yamaha
      Headphone Amps
      All Headphone Amplifiers Cambridge Audio iFi Audio McIntosh Naim Pro-Ject Rotel Schiit Audio Sennheiser Yamaha
      Multi-Zone
      All Multi-Zone Amplifiers JBL McIntosh OSD Rotel Russound Sonos
      By Brand
      Accuphase Advance Paris Anthem Arcam Audio Research AudioControl Audioengine Audiolab Bluesound Bose Buchardt Cambridge Audio Cayin Denon Devialet ELAC Emotiva Eversolo FiiO Fosi Audio Hegel HiFi Rose Integra JBL Layer Audio Design LEAK Luxman Marantz Mark Levinson McIntosh Michi MISSION MOON Musical Fidelity NAD Naim Onkyo OSD Parasound Pass Labs Peachtree PrimaLuna Primare PS Audio Rega Rogue Audio Roksan Rotel Schiit Audio Sonos Sony SVS T+A TEAC Technics Vincent WiiM Yamaha
  • SMART FIND
  • TOOLS
  • BLOG
  1. Home
  2. Amplifiers
  3. Mark Levinson No.534 vs Mark Levinson No.536
Mark Levinson No.534 vs Mark Levinson No.536
x
Amp to replace
Change

Mark Levinson No.534

Power Amplifier | 250 watts RMS into 8-ohms

Mark Levinson No.534
Check price atAmazon›
Change
    
Mark Levinson No.536

Power Amplifier | 400 watts RMS into 8-ohms

Mark Levinson No.536
Check price atAmazon›
Mark Levinson No.534 Mark Levinson No.534
Check price atAmazon›
Mark Levinson No.536 Mark Levinson No.536
Check price atAmazon›
Mark Levinson No.534
See at AMAZON
Mark Levinson No.536
See at AMAZON

Mark Levinson No.534 vs Mark Levinson No.536 Power Amplifier Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing two different types of amplifiers by Mark Levinson. Mark Levinson No.534 is a Stereo Power Amplifier speaker whereas the No.536 is a Mono Power Amplifier speaker.

Let's have a brief look at the main features of Mark Levinson No.534 and Mark Levinson No.536 first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Key SpecsMark Levinson No.534Mark Levinson No.536
BrandMark Levinson
United States · founded 1972
Mark Levinson
United States · founded 1972
Power250 watts x 2 channels into 8 ohms and 500 watts x 2 channels into 4 ohms, with 2 ohm stability400 watts into 8 ohms and 800 watts into 4 ohms, per chassis, with 2 ohm stability. This is a monoblock: a stereo system needs two
Amplifier classClass A/BClass A/B
Built-in DACNoNo
Phono inputNoNo
Headphone outputNoNo
BluetoothNoNo
Weight—45.36kg / 99.8lbs

What size room are the Mark Levinson No.534 and Mark Levinson No.536 Amplifiers good for?

The size of the room in which you are planning to use these amplifiers is an important decision factor. Here we have compared their suitability to various sizes of environments considering their max power parameters:

Listening Environment Mark Levinson No.534 Mark Levinson No.536
Near-field Are you nuts? Are you nuts?
Small Room Bad Bad
Mid-size Room Poor Poor
Large Room Good Good
Very Large Room Good Good

No.534 and No.536 are members of Mark Levinson's No series of speakers. Below you can find the loudspeakers from this series.

Mark Levinson No Series History
Model Watts RMS (8-ohms) Minimum Impedance Built-in DAC
Mark Levinson No.536
400 watts2-ohmsNo
Mark Levinson No.585.5
  
200 watts4-ohmsYes
Mark Levinson No.534
250 watts2-ohmsNo

The rest of this page covers where each one wins, how they compare in size, their inputs and outputs, the full specifications and a verdict.


Reasons to choose Mark Levinson No.534 over Mark Levinson No.536

Reasons to choose Mark Levinson No.536 over Mark Levinson No.534
MSRP Price(*) 18,500USD vs 25,000USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)
Watts into 8-ohms 400 watts vs 250 watts Delivers higher power into 8-ohms speakers
Watts into 4-ohms 800 watts vs 500 watts Delivers higher power into 4-ohms speakers

Inputs and Outputs

The input and output selections that are offered is an important factor when comparing two amplifiers. Here you can find how the I/O selections of the Mark Levinson No.534 and Mark Levinson No.536 differs from each other.

Mark Levinson No.534 Inputs
  • Total Number of Analog Inputs: 2
  • RCA Line Input
  • XLR Input Port
Mark Levinson No.536 Inputs
  • Total Number of Analog Inputs: 2
  • RCA Line Input
  • XLR Input Port
Outputs
Outputs

Balanced connections

Both have balanced XLR connections. A balanced cable carries the signal twice, on two conductors of opposite polarity. Interference picked up along the way lands on both equally and cancels when the two are recombined at the far end, so the longer the cable run and the noisier the surroundings, the more it is worth. Whether it also yields more power depends on how the amplifier is built inside - some are balanced end to end, others convert to single-ended internally and deliver the same either way.

Mark Levinson No.534 vs Mark Levinson No.536 full specifications

Every spec we hold for both, side by side
SpecificationMark Levinson No.534Mark Levinson No.536
Overview
BrandMark LevinsonMark Levinson
TypeStereo Power AmplifierMono Power Amplifier
Channels21
Amplifier classClass A/BClass A/B
Output devicesSolid StateSolid State
Released20162016
List price$25,000$18,500
SeriesNoNo
Power and performance
Power into 8 ohms250 W RMS400 W RMS
Power into 4 ohms500 W RMS800 W RMS
Power, as rated250 watts x 2 channels into 8 ohms and 500 watts x 2 channels into 4 ohms, with 2 ohm stability400 watts into 8 ohms and 800 watts into 4 ohms, per chassis, with 2 ohm stability. This is a monoblock: a stereo system needs two
Minimum impedance2 ohms2 ohms
Digital and DAC
Built-in DACNoNo
Network and streaming
Wi-FiNoNo
EthernetNoNo
BluetoothNoNo
Inputs
Analogue inputs22
RCA inputsYesYes
XLR inputsYesYes
Phono inputNoNo
HDMI inputNoNo
Outputs
Headphone outputNoNo
Speaker terminalsBinding postsBinding posts
Features and control
CD playerNoNo
Handheld remoteNoNo
Physical
Weight–45.36 kg (100.00 lbs)
FinishesBlackBlack

A dash means the manufacturer does not publish that figure, or it does not apply. 27 specifications compared.

Verdict

Siblings in Mark Levinson's No range, so they share a design and a house sound. It comes down to power, features and price.

AreaBetterWhy
PowerBMark Levinson No.536 has more power - 400W against 250W into 8 ohms. That is about 2dB, so it plays usefully louder before it runs out and has more in hand on peaks.
Grip on hard loadsevenly matchedBoth behave much the same into 4 ohms - output nearly doubles (500W and 800W).
Analogue inputsevenly matchedThe same number of line-level inputs (2).
PriceBMark Levinson No.536 costs less - $18,500 against $25,000 at list.
Watts per dollarBMark Levinson No.536 is the cheaper watt - about $46 per watt against $100. A blunt measure, and it says nothing about how either sounds, but it is the honest one for raw output.

A Mark Levinson No.534  B Mark Levinson No.536
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both amplifiers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.

Which should you choose?

Mark Levinson No.536 is the easier recommendation: it leads on most of the measured areas and costs less. Take Mark Levinson No.534 if one of the "depends" rows above describes your system. Start with the room. In a large or open-plan room, or with speakers that are hard to drive - low sensitivity, or an impedance that dips - Mark Levinson No.536 has the headroom, and headroom is what stops an amplifier hardening up on peaks. At desk distance or in a small room, 250 watts is already more than most people ever use, and the extra 150 watts would be headroom you pay for and never hear - we rate Mark Levinson No.536 poorly for near-field use for exactly that reason. Think about the whole system: the roughly $6,500 saved by taking the cheaper one would buy better speakers or a subwoofer, which does more for the sound than the difference between two competent amplifiers.

What a spec sheet cannot show: how either sounds with your speakers, how the controls feel day to day, and what the app is like to live with - which is where most all-in-one amplifiers are actually won or lost. Power figures are the manufacturers' own and are not measured to a common standard, so treat small differences as noise. If you can hear both, that will tell you more than any row above.

LATEST BLOG POSTS
JBL Summit Makalu: 44,995 Dollars and 12 Times the Amplifier of the Everest
NAD M33 V2 vs M33: Same 200 Watts, and 48 Percent More Than in 2020
PSB iQ2 vs iQ1: What 400 Dollars Buys Is a Cable You Do Not Need
Bowers & Wilkins 800 D5 vs D4: Same Published Specs, 30 to 56 Percent More Money
Arcam's Cheapest New Receiver Costs 47 Percent More. It Is Also the Only One That Changed.
Triangle Borea BR04 vs BR03: 50 Dollars More Buys 2 Hz, Bi-Wiring and a Bigger Box
Marantz Cinema Series 2 Costs 200 Dollars More With the Same Power and Weight. Here Is What Changed.
SVS Won Best Budget Home Theater at CEDIA. Here Is the Bill, and Three Cheaper Ways to Build It

Most Popular Amplifiers
Yamaha A-S301
Yamaha A-S301
60 watts into 8-ohms
Audiolab 7000A
Audiolab 7000A
70 watts into 8-ohms
Yamaha A-S801
Yamaha A-S801
100 watts into 8-ohms
Yamaha A-S501
Yamaha A-S501
85 watts into 8-ohms
Sonos Amp
Sonos Amp
125 watts into 8-ohms
Denon PMA-900HNE
Denon PMA-900HNE
50 watts into 8-ohms
Denon PMA-600NE
Denon PMA-600NE
45 watts into 8-ohms
WiiM Amp Pro
WiiM Amp Pro
60 watts into 8-ohms
Denon PMA-1700NE
Denon PMA-1700NE
70 watts into 8-ohms
Marantz PM6007
Marantz PM6007
45 watts into 8-ohms
This site contains affiliate links. We may be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through one of them. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Copyright © 2026 by SpeakerDecision
About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

Report a Correction