A valve amplifier against a solid-state one. They are not really rivals: they differ in character, in what they will drive and in what owning them involves, so start there rather than with the watts.
| Area | Better | Why |
|---|
| Power | B | NAD C 389 has more power - 130W against 50W into 8 ohms. That is about 4.1dB, so it plays usefully louder before it runs out and has more in hand on peaks. |
| Room size | depends | We rate Vincent SV-500 MK the better fit for desk or near-field listening and a small room, and NAD C 389 for a mid-size room, a large room and a very large room. Match the amplifier to the room you actually have, not the one you want. |
| Grip on hard loads | A | Vincent SV-500 MK holds up better into a 4-ohm load: its output increases strongly to 80W, where the other barely increases. That matters with demanding speakers far more than the 8-ohm figure does. |
| Built-in DAC | evenly matched | Both have a DAC on board with much the same capability. |
| Analogue inputs | evenly matched | The same number of line-level inputs (3). |
| Phono stage | depends | NAD C 389 has a built-in phono stage (MM) and Vincent SV-500 MK does not. Decisive if you own a turntable, completely irrelevant if you do not - and an outboard phono stage is easy to add later either way. |
| Headphones | depends | Only NAD C 389 has a headphone output. Worth something if you listen late, nothing if you never do. |
| Amplifier type | depends | Vincent SV-500 MK is Hybrid and NAD C 389 is Solid State. Valve designs are usually warmer and softer at the limits and need their tubes replaced eventually; solid state is the lower-maintenance choice. This is a taste and ownership decision, not a quality one. |
| Price | A | Vincent SV-500 MK costs less - $1,700 against $1,999 at list. |
| Watts per dollar | B | NAD C 389 is the cheaper watt - about $15 per watt against $34. A blunt measure, and it says nothing about how either sounds, but it is the honest one for raw output. |
A Vincent SV-500 MK B NAD C 389
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both amplifiers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.
Which should you choose?
The usual trade-off: NAD C 389 measures better, Vincent SV-500 MK costs about 15% less. With most speakers in most rooms that gap is smaller in practice than it looks here. If your speakers are a difficult load - 4 ohms nominal, big woofers, or a sensitivity in the low 80s - Vincent SV-500 MK is the safer partner, because how an amplifier behaves when the impedance drops matters more than its 8-ohm rating. Start with the room. In a large or open-plan room, or with speakers that are hard to drive - low sensitivity, or an impedance that dips - NAD C 389 has the headroom, and headroom is what stops an amplifier hardening up on peaks. At desk distance or in a small room, 50 watts is already more than most people ever use, and the extra 80 watts would be headroom you pay for and never hear - we rate NAD C 389 poorly for near-field use for exactly that reason.
What a spec sheet cannot show: how either sounds with your speakers, how the controls feel day to day, and what the app is like to live with - which is where most all-in-one amplifiers are actually won or lost. Power figures are the manufacturers' own and are not measured to a common standard, so treat small differences as noise. If you can hear both, that will tell you more than any row above.