A valve amplifier against a solid-state one. They are not really rivals: they differ in character, in what they will drive and in what owning them involves, so start there rather than with the watts.
| Area | Better | Why |
|---|
| Power | B | Arcam SA20 has more power - 90W against 50W into 8 ohms. That is about 2.6dB, so it plays usefully louder before it runs out and has more in hand on peaks. |
| Room size | depends | We rate Vincent SV-500 MK the better fit for desk or near-field listening and a small room, and Arcam SA20 for a mid-size room, a large room and a very large room. Match the amplifier to the room you actually have, not the one you want. |
| Grip on hard loads | evenly matched | Both behave much the same into 4 ohms - output increases strongly (80W and 150W). |
| Built-in DAC | evenly matched | Both have a DAC on board with much the same capability. |
| Analogue inputs | B | Arcam SA20 takes more analogue sources - 4 against 3. |
| Phono stage | depends | Arcam SA20 has a built-in phono stage (MM) and Vincent SV-500 MK does not. Decisive if you own a turntable, completely irrelevant if you do not - and an outboard phono stage is easy to add later either way. |
| Headphones | depends | Only Arcam SA20 has a headphone output. Worth something if you listen late, nothing if you never do. |
| Amplifier type | depends | Vincent SV-500 MK is Hybrid and Arcam SA20 is Solid State. Valve designs are usually warmer and softer at the limits and need their tubes replaced eventually; solid state is the lower-maintenance choice. This is a taste and ownership decision, not a quality one. |
| Price | evenly matched | Priced within a few per cent of each other. |
| Watts per dollar | B | Arcam SA20 is the cheaper watt - about $18 per watt against $34. A blunt measure, and it says nothing about how either sounds, but it is the honest one for raw output. |
A Vincent SV-500 MK B Arcam SA20
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both amplifiers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.
Which should you choose?
Arcam SA20 has the edge on paper, though not by much. The rows marked "depends" are more likely to decide this than the score is. Start with the room. In a large or open-plan room, or with speakers that are hard to drive - low sensitivity, or an impedance that dips - Arcam SA20 has the headroom, and headroom is what stops an amplifier hardening up on peaks. At desk distance or in a small room, 50 watts is already more than most people ever use, and the extra 40 watts would be headroom you pay for and never hear - we rate Arcam SA20 poorly for near-field use for exactly that reason. If you play records, Arcam SA20 saves you buying a phono stage; if you do not, ignore that row entirely.
What a spec sheet cannot show: how either sounds with your speakers, how the controls feel day to day, and what the app is like to live with - which is where most all-in-one amplifiers are actually won or lost. Power figures are the manufacturers' own and are not measured to a common standard, so treat small differences as noise. If you can hear both, that will tell you more than any row above.