SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS
    • By Type
      Passive Bookshelf Speakers Passive Floor-standing Speakers Passive Center Channel Speakers Passive In-wall Speakers All Passive Speakers Powered Subwoofers Powered Stereo Speakers
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Front Firing Port Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      By Brand
      Acoustic Energy Aperion ATC Audio-Technica Audioengine Bluesound Bowers Wilkins Buchardt Cambridge Audio Canton DALI Definitive Technology Dynaudio ELAC Emotiva Fluance Focal Fyne Audio Genelec GoldenEar Harbeth Jamo JBL Kanto KEF KLH Klipsch Leak Mackie Magnepan MartinLogan McIntosh Mission MoFi Monitor Audio Nuvo Onkyo OSD Paradigm Perlisten Polk Audio PS Audio PSB Q Acoustics REL Revel Russound Sennheiser Sonos Sonus faber Sony Spendor SVS Tannoy Technics Triangle Velodyne Victrola Wharfedale Wilson Audio Yamaha
  • AMPLIFIERS
    • By Type
      All Amplifiers Integrated Amplifiers Stereo Receivers Streaming Amplifiers Power Amplifiers Compact Amplifiers
      By Power
      Up to 60 watts 61 to 90 watts 91 to 120 watts 121 to 180 watts Over 180 watts
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      Home Theater
      All Home Theater Receivers Anthem ARCAM Denon Integra JBL Marantz McIntosh NAD Onkyo Sony Yamaha
      Headphone Amps
      All Headphone Amplifiers Cambridge Audio iFi Audio McIntosh Naim Pro-Ject Rotel Schiit Audio Sennheiser Yamaha
      Multi-Zone
      All Multi-Zone Amplifiers JBL McIntosh OSD Rotel Russound Sonos
      By Brand
      Accuphase Advance Paris Anthem Arcam Audio Research AudioControl Audioengine Audiolab Bluesound Bose Buchardt Cambridge Audio Cayin Denon Devialet ELAC Emotiva Eversolo FiiO Fosi Audio Hegel HiFi Rose Integra JBL Layer Audio Design LEAK Luxman Marantz Mark Levinson McIntosh Michi MISSION MOON Musical Fidelity NAD Naim Onkyo OSD Parasound Pass Labs Peachtree PrimaLuna Primare PS Audio Rega Rogue Audio Roksan Rotel Schiit Audio Sonos Sony SVS T+A TEAC Technics Vincent WiiM Yamaha
  • SMART FIND
  • TOOLS
  • BLOG
  1. Home
  2. Amplifiers
  3. Eversolo Play vs NAD C 328
Eversolo Play vs NAD C 328
x
Amp to replace
Change

Eversolo Play

Integrated Amplifier | 60 watts RMS into 8-ohms

Eversolo Play
Check price atAmazon›
Change
    
NAD C 328

Integrated Amplifier | 40 watts RMS into 8-ohms

NAD C 328
Check price atAmazon›
Eversolo Play Eversolo Play
Check price atAmazon›
NAD C 328 NAD C 328
Check price atAmazon›
Eversolo Play
See at AMAZON
NAD C 328
See at AMAZON

Eversolo Play vs NAD C 328 Integrated Amplifier Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing two different types of amplifiers. Eversolo Play is a Streaming Integrated Amplifier speaker whereas the C 328 is a Integrated Amplifier with built-in DAC speaker.

Let's have a brief look at the main features of Eversolo Play and NAD C 328 first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Key SpecsEversolo PlayNAD C 328
BrandEversolo
China · founded 2023
NAD
Canada · founded 1972
Power60 watts x 2 channels into 8 ohms and 110 watts x 2 channels into 4 ohms40 watts x 2 channels into 8 ohms and 40 watts x 2 channels into 4 ohms
Amplifier classClass DClass D
Damping factor107—
Built-in DACYesYes
Phono inputYesYes
Headphone outputYes1/4
BluetoothYesYes
App controlYes—
Weight2.59kg / 5.7lbs4.91kg / 10.8lbs
Dimensions (H x W x D)2-15/16" x 9-1/16" x 9-1/16"
75 x 230 x 230 mm
2-13/16" x 17-1/8" x 12-3/16"
72.0mm x 435.0mm x 310.0mm

What size room are the Eversolo Play and NAD C 328 Amplifiers good for?

The size of the room in which you are planning to use these amplifiers is an important decision factor. Here we have compared their suitability to various sizes of environments considering their max power parameters:

Listening Environment Eversolo Play NAD C 328
Near-field Average Good
Small Room Good Good
Mid-size Room Average Average
Large Room Poor Poor
Very Large Room Bad No way

The rest of this page covers where each one wins, how they compare in size, their inputs and outputs, the full specifications and a verdict.


Reasons to choose Eversolo Play over NAD C 328
Built-in Room Correction Yes vs No Adjusts audio output to compensate for acoustic anomalies in a listening space
Full-color Display Yes vs No Displays Album and device Info
App-Based Control Yes vs None Control the amplifier via an app
Watts into 8-ohms 60 watts vs 40 watts Delivers higher power into 8-ohms speakers
Watts into 4-ohms 110 watts vs 40 watts Delivers higher power into 4-ohms speakers
Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) 0.0037% vs 0.03% Less Harmonic Distortion
Signal to Noise Ratio 109 dB vs 100 dB Higher ratings results in cleaner sound
Optical Digital Inputs Yes vs 2 More options for connecting Digital sources
Coaxial Digital Inputs Yes vs 2 More options for connecting Digital sources
USB Input Yes vs No Connect Sources via USB
Roon Ready vs No Roon Compatibility
Max Bit Depth 32-bit vs 24-bit Play higher resolution range media
Max Sample Rate 768kHz vs 192kHz Play higher resolution media
Base Surface Area 529.0cm2/ 82.0inch2 vs 1348.5cm2/ 209.0inch2 takes less space in your room
Radio Tuner Internet radio vs Not stated Built-in radio, so no extra box for broadcast listening

Reasons to choose NAD C 328 over Eversolo Play
Height 72mm vs 75mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces

Size, drawn to scale

FRONTEversolo Play front: 230 x 75 mm (9.1 x 3 in)NAD C 328 front: 435 x 72 mm (17.1 x 2.8 in)Eversolo Play230 × 75 mmNAD C 328435 × 72 mmTOP / FOOTPRINTEversolo Play footprint: 230 x 230 mm (9.1 x 9.1 in)NAD C 328 footprint: 435 x 310 mm (17.1 x 12.2 in)Eversolo Play230 × 230 mmNAD C 328435 × 310 mm
Both amplifiers and both views share one scale, so everything here is directly comparable. Hover a box for its dimensions.

One scale for both, aligned at the back panels the way they would sit against a wall, so the deeper one visibly stands further out.

NAD C 328 needs about 155% more shelf area. NAD C 328 is 80mm deeper - the measurement that decides whether a rack door closes.

Inputs and Outputs

The input and output selections that are offered is an important factor when comparing two amplifiers. Here you can find how the I/O selections of the Eversolo Play and NAD C 328 differs from each other.

Eversolo Play Inputs
  • Total Number of Analog Inputs: 2
  • RCA Line Input
  • Phono Input
  • Yes Optical Digital Input
  • Yes Coaxial Digital Input
  • USB Input:
  • HDMI Yes
  • Ethernet Port
NAD C 328 Inputs
  • Total Number of Analog Inputs: 2
  • Phono Input
  • 2 Optical Digital Input
  • 2 Coaxial Digital Input
Outputs
  • Yes Headphone Output
  • Subwoofer Output
Outputs
  • Sub Preamp Outputs
  • 1/4 Headphone Output
  • Subwoofer Output
NAD C 328 Back View
NAD C 328 Back View (Click the image for the larger version)

What's in the Box of NAD C 328?

Here are the items that come with the C 328:
  • Stereo integrated amplifier
  • 6-feet AC power cord
  • Remote control (AMP 3)
  • CR2025 3V battery (installed in remote)
  • Bluetooth antenna
  • Quick Setup Guide
  • Warranty Card

Eversolo Play vs NAD C 328 full specifications

Every spec we hold for both, side by side
SpecificationEversolo PlayNAD C 328
Overview
BrandEversoloNAD
TypeStreaming Integrated AmplifierIntegrated Amplifier with built-in DAC
CategoryStreaming Amplifier–
Channels22
Amplifier classClass DClass D
Output devicesSolid StateSolid State
Released2025November 2017
List price$699$699
SeriesPlayClassic
Power and performance
Power into 8 ohms60 W RMS40 W RMS
Power into 4 ohms110 W RMS40 W RMS
Power, as rated60 watts x 2 channels into 8 ohms and 110 watts x 2 channels into 4 ohms40 watts x 2 channels into 8 ohms and 40 watts x 2 channels into 4 ohms
Minimum impedance4 ohms4 ohms
Damping factor107–
Signal-to-noise ratio109 dB100 dB
THD0.0037%0.03%
Frequency bandwidth–20 Hz-20 kHz
Digital and DAC
Built-in DACYesYes
Max bit depth32-bit24-bit
Max sample rate768 kHz192 kHz
DSDYes, DSD512–
Network and streaming
Wi-FiYes–
EthernetYes–
BluetoothYesYes
Bluetooth version–4.0
AirPlay 2–No
Chromecast–No
RoonReadyNo
BluOS–No
HEOS–No
DTS Play-Fi–No
Streaming servicesTidal, Qobuz, Amazon Music–
Inputs
Analogue inputs22
RCA inputsYes–
XLR inputsNo–
Phono inputYesYes
Phono typeMMMM
Optical digitalYes2
Coaxial digitalYes2
USB inputYesNo
HDMI inputYes–
HDMI ARC / eARCYes–
Outputs
Preamp outputs–Sub
Pre-out / main-in loop–No
Subwoofer outputYesYes
Headphone outputYes1/4
Speaker terminalsBinding posts–
Features and control
DisplayYes–
TouchscreenYes–
Tone controls–Yes
Room correctionYes–
CD playerNoNo
Radio tunerInternet radio–
Handheld remoteYesYes
Remote model–AMP 3
App controlYes–
Physical
Dimensions (H x W x D)75 x 230 x 230 mm72.0mm x 435.0mm x 310.0mm
Dimensions, inches2-15/16 x 9-1/16 x 9-1/16 inch2-13/16inch x 17-1/8inch x 12-3/16inch
Weight2.59 kg (5.70 lbs)4.91 kg (10.80 lbs)
FinishesBlack,Silver–
Removable power cord–IEC 2-prong
Parts warranty–2 Years
Labour warranty–2 Years

A dash means the manufacturer does not publish that figure, or it does not apply. 63 specifications compared.

Verdict

One is a streaming all-in-one and the other is an amplifier. Judge them on how many boxes you want and what you already own, not on the spec sheet alone.

AreaBetterWhy
PowerAEversolo Play has more power - 60W against 40W into 8 ohms. That is about 1.8dB, which is a small step in loudness but real headroom on peaks.
Room sizedependsWe rate Eversolo Play the better fit for a very large room, and NAD C 328 for desk or near-field listening. Match the amplifier to the room you actually have, not the one you want.
Grip on hard loadsAEversolo Play holds up better into a 4-ohm load: its output nearly doubles to 110W, where the other barely increases. That matters with demanding speakers far more than the 8-ohm figure does.
Noise floorAEversolo Play is the quieter design on paper - 109dB against 100dB. Audible mainly with sensitive speakers in a quiet room.
Built-in DACABoth decode on board. Eversolo Play goes higher - 768kHz against 192kHz. Very few recordings exist above 192kHz, so treat this as headroom, not as sound quality.
Streamingevenly matchedOnly Eversolo Play has Roon. Neither list is longer in a way that matters - check the one service you actually pay for.
Analogue inputsevenly matchedThe same number of line-level inputs (2).
Room to growevenly matchedThe same expansion options on both.
Shelf spacedependsEversolo Play takes up about 61% less shelf area (529cm² against 1349cm²), and it is 80mm shallower, which is the measurement that decides whether a rack door shuts.
Priceevenly matchedPriced within a few per cent of each other.
Watts per dollarAEversolo Play is the cheaper watt - about $12 per watt against $17. A blunt measure, and it says nothing about how either sounds, but it is the honest one for raw output.

A Eversolo Play  B NAD C 328
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both amplifiers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.

Which should you choose?

Eversolo Play has the edge on paper, though not by much. The rows marked "depends" are more likely to decide this than the score is. If your speakers are a difficult load - 4 ohms nominal, big woofers, or a sensitivity in the low 80s - Eversolo Play is the safer partner, because how an amplifier behaves when the impedance drops matters more than its 8-ohm rating.

What a spec sheet cannot show: how either sounds with your speakers, how the controls feel day to day, and what the app is like to live with - which is where most all-in-one amplifiers are actually won or lost. Power figures are the manufacturers' own and are not measured to a common standard, so treat small differences as noise. If you can hear both, that will tell you more than any row above.

LATEST BLOG POSTS
JBL Summit Makalu: 44,995 Dollars and 12 Times the Amplifier of the Everest
NAD M33 V2 vs M33: Same 200 Watts, and 48 Percent More Than in 2020
PSB iQ2 vs iQ1: What 400 Dollars Buys Is a Cable You Do Not Need
Bowers & Wilkins 800 D5 vs D4: Same Published Specs, 30 to 56 Percent More Money
Arcam's Cheapest New Receiver Costs 47 Percent More. It Is Also the Only One That Changed.
Triangle Borea BR04 vs BR03: 50 Dollars More Buys 2 Hz, Bi-Wiring and a Bigger Box
Marantz Cinema Series 2 Costs 200 Dollars More With the Same Power and Weight. Here Is What Changed.
SVS Won Best Budget Home Theater at CEDIA. Here Is the Bill, and Three Cheaper Ways to Build It

Most Popular Amplifiers
Yamaha A-S301
Yamaha A-S301
60 watts into 8-ohms
Audiolab 7000A
Audiolab 7000A
70 watts into 8-ohms
Yamaha A-S801
Yamaha A-S801
100 watts into 8-ohms
Yamaha A-S501
Yamaha A-S501
85 watts into 8-ohms
Sonos Amp
Sonos Amp
125 watts into 8-ohms
Denon PMA-900HNE
Denon PMA-900HNE
50 watts into 8-ohms
Denon PMA-600NE
Denon PMA-600NE
45 watts into 8-ohms
WiiM Amp Pro
WiiM Amp Pro
60 watts into 8-ohms
Denon PMA-1700NE
Denon PMA-1700NE
70 watts into 8-ohms
Marantz PM6007
Marantz PM6007
45 watts into 8-ohms
This site contains affiliate links. We may be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through one of them. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Copyright © 2026 by SpeakerDecision
About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

Report a Correction