SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS
    • By Type
      Passive Bookshelf Speakers Passive Floor-standing Speakers Passive Center Channel Speakers Passive In-wall Speakers All Passive Speakers Powered Subwoofers Powered Stereo Speakers
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Front Firing Port Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      By Brand
      Acoustic Energy Aperion ATC Audio-Technica Audioengine Bluesound Bowers Wilkins Buchardt Cambridge Audio Canton DALI Definitive Technology Dynaudio ELAC Emotiva Fluance Focal Fyne Audio Genelec GoldenEar Harbeth Jamo JBL Kanto KEF KLH Klipsch Leak Mackie Magnepan MartinLogan McIntosh Mission MoFi Monitor Audio Nuvo Onkyo OSD Paradigm Perlisten Polk Audio PS Audio PSB Q Acoustics REL Revel Russound Sennheiser Sonos Sonus faber Sony Spendor SVS Tannoy Technics Triangle Velodyne Victrola Wharfedale Wilson Audio Yamaha
  • AMPLIFIERS
    • By Type
      All Amplifiers Integrated Amplifiers Stereo Receivers Streaming Amplifiers Power Amplifiers Compact Amplifiers
      By Power
      Up to 60 watts 61 to 90 watts 91 to 120 watts 121 to 180 watts Over 180 watts
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      Home Theater
      All Home Theater Receivers Anthem ARCAM Denon Integra JBL Marantz McIntosh NAD Onkyo Sony Yamaha
      Headphone Amps
      All Headphone Amplifiers Cambridge Audio iFi Audio McIntosh Naim Pro-Ject Rotel Schiit Audio Sennheiser Yamaha
      Multi-Zone
      All Multi-Zone Amplifiers JBL McIntosh OSD Rotel Russound Sonos
      By Brand
      Accuphase Advance Paris Anthem Arcam Audio Research AudioControl Audioengine Audiolab Bluesound Bose Buchardt Cambridge Audio Denon Devialet ELAC Emotiva Eversolo FiiO Fosi Audio Hegel HiFi Rose Integra JBL LEAK Luxman Marantz Mark Levinson McIntosh Michi MISSION MOON Musical Fidelity NAD Naim Onkyo OSD Parasound Pass Labs Peachtree PrimaLuna Primare PS Audio Rega Rogue Audio Roksan Rotel Schiit Audio Sonos Sony SVS T+A TEAC Technics Vincent WiiM Yamaha
  • SMART FIND
  • TOOLS
  • BLOG
  1. Home
  2. Amplifiers
  3. NAD C 379 vs NAD D 3020 V2
NAD C 379 vs NAD D 3020 V2
x
Amp to replace
Change

NAD C 379

Integrated Amplifier | 80 watts RMS into 8-ohms

NAD C 379
Check price atAmazon›
Change
    
NAD D 3020 V2

Integrated Amplifier | 30 watts RMS into 8-ohms

NAD D 3020 V2
Check price atAmazon›
NAD C 379 NAD C 379
Check price atAmazon›
NAD D 3020 V2 NAD D 3020 V2
Check price atAmazon›
NAD C 379
See at AMAZON
NAD D 3020 V2
See at AMAZON

NAD C 379 vs NAD D 3020 V2 Integrated Amplifier Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing C 379 and D 3020 V2, two Integrated Amplifiers by NAD. Let's have a brief look at the main features of NAD C 379 and NAD D 3020 V2 first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Key SpecsNAD C 379NAD D 3020 V2
BrandNAD
Canada · founded 1972
NAD
Canada · founded 1972
Power80 watts x 2 channels into 8 ohms and 80 watts x 2 channels into 4 ohms30 watts x 2 channels into 8 ohms
Amplifier classClass DClass D
Built-in DACYesYes
Phono inputYesYes
Headphone output1/43.5mm
BluetoothYesYes
Weight8.68kg / 19.1lbs1.41kg / 3.1lbs
Dimensions (H x W x D)4" x 17-1/8" x 16-3/8"
102.0mm x 435.0mm x 416.0mm
7-3/8" x 2-5/16" x 9-3/4"
188.0mm x 59.0mm x 248.0mm

The rest of this page covers where each one wins, how they compare in size, their inputs and outputs, the full specifications and a verdict.


Reasons to choose NAD C 379 over NAD D 3020 V2
Watts into 8-ohms 80 watts vs 30 watts Delivers higher power into 8-ohms speakers
Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) 0.02% vs 0.1% Less Harmonic Distortion
Optical Digital Inputs 2 vs 1 More options for connecting Digital sources
Coaxial Digital Inputs 2 vs 1 More options for connecting Digital sources
USB Input Yes vs Connect Sources via USB
Max Bit Depth 32-bit vs 24-bit Play higher resolution range media
Max Sample Rate 384kHz vs 96kHz Play higher resolution media
Height 102mm vs 188mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces

Reasons to choose NAD D 3020 V2 over NAD C 379
MSRP Price(*) 499USD vs 1,099USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)
Signal to Noise Ratio 98 dB vs 95 dB Higher ratings results in cleaner sound
Base Surface Area 146.3cm2/ 22.7inch2 vs 1809.6cm2/ 280.5inch2 takes less space in your room
Vertical use Yes vs No Takes less space when placed vertically

Size, drawn to scale

FRONTNAD C 379 front: 435 x 102 mm (17.1 x 4 in)NAD D 3020 V2 front: 59 x 188 mm (2.3 x 7.4 in)NAD C 379435 × 102 mmNAD D 3020 V259 × 188 mmTOP / FOOTPRINTNAD C 379 footprint: 435 x 416 mm (17.1 x 16.4 in)NAD D 3020 V2 footprint: 59 x 248 mm (2.3 x 9.8 in)NAD C 379435 × 416 mmNAD D 3020 V259 × 248 mm
Both amplifiers and both views share one scale, so everything here is directly comparable. Hover a box for its dimensions.

One scale for both, aligned at the back panels the way they would sit against a wall, so the deeper one visibly stands further out.

NAD C 379 needs about 1137% more shelf area. NAD C 379 is 168mm deeper - the measurement that decides whether a rack door closes. NAD D 3020 V2 is 86mm taller.

Inputs and Outputs

The input and output selections that are offered is an important factor when comparing two amplifiers. Here you can find how the I/O selections of the NAD C 379 and NAD D 3020 V2 differs from each other.

NAD C 379 Inputs
  • Phono Input
  • 2 Optical Digital Input
  • 2 Coaxial Digital Input
  • USB Input:
NAD D 3020 V2 Inputs
  • Total Number of Analog Inputs: 1
  • Phono Input
  • 1 Optical Digital Input
  • 1 Coaxial Digital Input
Outputs
  • Preamp Outputs
  • 1/4 Headphone Output
  • Subwoofer Output
Outputs
  • 3.5mm (2) Preamp Outputs
  • 3.5mm Headphone Output
NAD D 3020 V2 Back View
NAD D 3020 V2 Back View (Click the image for the larger version)

What's in the Box of NAD C 379?

Here are the items that are included inside the box of C 379:
  • Integrated amplifier
  • 6-feet AC power cord
  • Remote control (SR 10)
  • 2 -inchAA-inch batteries
  • Antenna
  • Quick Setup Guide
  • Important Safety Instructions
  • Warranty Card

What's in the Box of NAD D 3020 V2?

Here are the items that come with the D 3020 V2:
  • Hybrid digital amplifier
  • 6-feet AC power cord
  • Remote control (AMP 3)
  • CR2025 3V battery
  • Minijack-to-RCA adapter
  • 4 Self-adhesive rubber feet
  • Quick Setup Guide
  • Warranty Card

NAD C 379 vs NAD D 3020 V2 full specifications

Every spec we hold for both, side by side
SpecificationNAD C 379NAD D 3020 V2
Overview
BrandNADNAD
TypeIntegrated Amplifier with built-in DACIntegrated Amplifier with built-in DAC
Channels22
Amplifier classClass DClass D
Output devicesSolid StateSolid State
ReleasedMay 20242018
List price$1,099$499
SeriesClassicCompact
Power and performance
Power into 8 ohms80 W RMS30 W RMS
Power into 4 ohms80 W RMS–
Power, as rated80 watts x 2 channels into 8 ohms and 80 watts x 2 channels into 4 ohms30 watts x 2 channels into 8 ohms
Minimum impedance4 ohms4 ohms
Signal-to-noise ratio95 dB98 dB
THD0.02%0.1%
Frequency bandwidth20 Hz-20 kHz20 Hz-20 kHz
Digital and DAC
Built-in DACYesYes
DAC chipESS ES9028–
Max bit depth32-bit24-bit
Max sample rate384 kHz96 kHz
Network and streaming
BluetoothYesYes
Bluetooth version–4.0
Bluetooth codecs–AptX
Bluetooth transmitter–No
AirPlay 2NoNo
Chromecast–No
RoonNoNo
BluOSNoNo
HEOSNoNo
DTS Play-FiNoNo
Inputs
Analogue inputs–1
Phono inputYesYes
Phono type–MM
Optical digital21
Coaxial digital21
USB inputYes–
HDMI input1No
Outputs
Preamp outputsYes3.5mm (2)
Pre-out / main-in loopNoNo
Subwoofer outputYes–
Headphone output1/43.5mm
Features and control
CD playerNoNo
Handheld remoteYesYes
Remote modelSR 10AMP 3
Physical
Dimensions (H x W x D)102.0mm x 435.0mm x 416.0mm188.0mm x 59.0mm x 248.0mm
Dimensions, inches4inch x 17-1/8inch x 16-3/8inch7-3/8inch x 2-5/16inch x 9-3/4inch
Weight8.68 kg (19.10 lbs)1.41 kg (3.10 lbs)
Removable power cordIEC 3-prongIEC 2-prong
Vertical placement–Yes
Parts warranty2 Years2 Years
Labour warranty2 Years2 Years

A dash means the manufacturer does not publish that figure, or it does not apply. 50 specifications compared.

Verdict

These are not the same size of amplifier: NAD C 379 has roughly 2.7x the power of NAD D 3020 V2. That is about 4.3dB, so it is a question of room size and how hard your speakers are to drive, not of one being the better amplifier.

AreaBetterWhy
PowerANAD C 379 has more power - 80W against 30W into 8 ohms. That is about 4.3dB, so it plays usefully louder before it runs out and has more in hand on peaks.
Noise floorBNAD D 3020 V2 is the quieter design on paper - 98dB against 95dB. Audible mainly with sensitive speakers in a quiet room.
Built-in DACABoth decode on board. NAD C 379 goes higher - 384kHz against 96kHz. Very few recordings exist above 192kHz, so treat this as headroom, not as sound quality.
Use with a TVdependsOnly NAD C 379 has HDMI, so the television can drive it directly and one remote controls the volume. If the system is for music only, this changes nothing.
Room to growevenly matchedThe same expansion options on both.
Shelf spacedependsNAD D 3020 V2 takes up about 92% less shelf area (146cm² against 1810cm²), and it is 168mm shallower, which is the measurement that decides whether a rack door shuts.
PriceBNAD D 3020 V2 costs less - $499 against $1,099 at list.

A NAD C 379  B NAD D 3020 V2
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both amplifiers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.

Which should you choose?

NAD C 379 is ahead, but on only 1 of the measured areas, and it costs about 120% more. That is a lot of money for a narrow margin - NAD D 3020 V2 is the sensible buy unless a specific feature above decides it for you. Start with the room. In a large or open-plan room, or with speakers that are hard to drive - low sensitivity, or an impedance that dips - NAD C 379 has the headroom, and headroom is what stops an amplifier hardening up on peaks. At desk distance or in a small room, 30 watts is already more than most people ever use, and the extra 50 watts would be headroom you pay for and never hear. If this sits under a television, NAD C 379 is the one to buy - HDMI ARC means the TV remote controls the volume and there is no second box in the way.

What a spec sheet cannot show: how either sounds with your speakers, how the controls feel day to day, and what the app is like to live with - which is where most all-in-one amplifiers are actually won or lost. Power figures are the manufacturers' own and are not measured to a common standard, so treat small differences as noise. If you can hear both, that will tell you more than any row above.

LATEST BLOG POSTS
Klipsch Reference Premiere III: Nine Models, Cheaper Than Gen II, and Two Centre Prices That Look Swapped
Klipsch's Compact Subwoofers Are Half the Floor Area and Up to 500 Dollars Cheaper
SVS Has a Third Wireless Adapter Now, and the Cheapest One Is Still the Quickest
AudioQuest's New DragonFly Stops at 24/96 on Purpose. Only Two of Our 152 Amplifiers Do.
DALI's New BASIK SUB Is the SUB C-8 D It Has Sold Since 2018. The Back Panel Says So.
Klipsch's Reference Signature Puts a Three-Way Horn in the Reference Line for the First Time
Only 22 Powered Speakers Have a Built-In Phono Stage, and Klipsch Makes 9 of Them
Denon Rates the Same Receiver at 95 Watts and 125 Watts. Only One Is Full Bandwidth.

Most Popular Amplifiers
Yamaha A-S301
Yamaha A-S301
60 watts into 8-ohms
Audiolab 7000A
Audiolab 7000A
70 watts into 8-ohms
Yamaha A-S801
Yamaha A-S801
100 watts into 8-ohms
Yamaha A-S501
Yamaha A-S501
85 watts into 8-ohms
Sonos Amp
Sonos Amp
125 watts into 8-ohms
Denon PMA-900HNE
Denon PMA-900HNE
50 watts into 8-ohms
Denon PMA-600NE
Denon PMA-600NE
45 watts into 8-ohms
WiiM Amp Pro
WiiM Amp Pro
60 watts into 8-ohms
Denon PMA-1700NE
Denon PMA-1700NE
70 watts into 8-ohms
Marantz PM6007
Marantz PM6007
45 watts into 8-ohms
This site contains affiliate links. We may be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through one of them. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Copyright © 2026 by SpeakerDecision
About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

Report a Correction