Both are JBL, from different ranges - the engineering approach is shared and the differences are mostly in power, connectivity and price.
| Area | Better | Why |
|---|
| Power | evenly matched | Effectively the same output - 110W against 125W into 8 ohms is under 1dB, which is not an audible difference in loudness. |
| Analogue inputs | evenly matched | The same number of line-level inputs (2). |
| Room to grow | evenly matched | The same expansion options on both. |
| Price | A | JBL MA710 costs less - $880 against $1,320 at list. |
| Watts per dollar | A | JBL MA710 is the cheaper watt - about $8 per watt against $11. A blunt measure, and it says nothing about how either sounds, but it is the honest one for raw output. |
A JBL MA710 B JBL MA7100HP
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both amplifiers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.
Which should you choose?
JBL MA710 has the edge on paper, though not by much. The rows marked "depends" are more likely to decide this than the score is. Think about the whole system: the roughly $440 saved by taking the cheaper one would buy better speakers or a subwoofer, which does more for the sound than the difference between two competent amplifiers.
What a spec sheet cannot show: how either sounds with your speakers, how the controls feel day to day, and what the app is like to live with - which is where most all-in-one amplifiers are actually won or lost. Power figures are the manufacturers' own and are not measured to a common standard, so treat small differences as noise. If you can hear both, that will tell you more than any row above.