SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS
    • By Type
      Passive Bookshelf Speakers Passive Floor-standing Speakers Passive Center Channel Speakers Passive In-wall Speakers All Passive Speakers Powered Subwoofers Powered Stereo Speakers
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Front Firing Port Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      By Brand
      Acoustic Energy Aperion ATC Audio-Technica Audioengine Bluesound Bowers Wilkins Buchardt Cambridge Audio Canton DALI Definitive Technology Dynaudio ELAC Emotiva Fluance Focal Fyne Audio Genelec GoldenEar Harbeth Jamo JBL Kanto KEF KLH Klipsch Leak Mackie Magnepan MartinLogan McIntosh Mission MoFi Monitor Audio Nuvo Onkyo OSD Paradigm Perlisten Polk Audio PS Audio PSB Q Acoustics REL Revel Russound Sennheiser Sonos Sonus faber Sony Spendor SVS Tannoy Technics Triangle Velodyne Victrola Wharfedale Wilson Audio Yamaha
  • AMPLIFIERS
    • By Type
      All Amplifiers Integrated Amplifiers Stereo Receivers Streaming Amplifiers Power Amplifiers Compact Amplifiers
      By Power
      Up to 60 watts 61 to 90 watts 91 to 120 watts 121 to 180 watts Over 180 watts
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      Home Theater
      All Home Theater Receivers Anthem ARCAM Denon Integra JBL Marantz McIntosh NAD Onkyo Sony Yamaha
      Headphone Amps
      All Headphone Amplifiers Cambridge Audio iFi Audio McIntosh Naim Pro-Ject Rotel Schiit Audio Sennheiser Yamaha
      Multi-Zone
      All Multi-Zone Amplifiers JBL McIntosh OSD Rotel Russound Sonos
      By Brand
      Accuphase Advance Paris Anthem Arcam Audio Research AudioControl Audioengine Audiolab Bluesound Bose Buchardt Cambridge Audio Cayin Denon Devialet ELAC Emotiva Eversolo FiiO Fosi Audio Hegel HiFi Rose Integra JBL Layer Audio Design LEAK Luxman Marantz Mark Levinson McIntosh Michi MISSION MOON Musical Fidelity NAD Naim Onkyo OSD Parasound Pass Labs Peachtree PrimaLuna Primare PS Audio Rega Rogue Audio Roksan Rotel Schiit Audio Sonos Sony SVS T+A TEAC Technics Vincent WiiM Yamaha
  • SMART FIND
  • TOOLS
  • BLOG
  1. Home
  2. Amplifiers
  3. Advance Paris X-i75 vs Onkyo Icon A-50
Advance Paris X-i75 vs Onkyo Icon A-50
x
Amp to replace
Change

Advance Paris X-i75

Integrated Amplifier | 75 watts RMS into 8-ohms

Advance Paris X-i75
Check price atAmazon›
Change
    
Onkyo Icon A-50

Integrated Amplifier | 110 watts RMS into 8-ohms

Onkyo Icon A-50
Check price atAmazon›
Advance Paris X-i75 Advance Paris X-i75
Check price atAmazon›
Onkyo Icon A-50 Onkyo Icon A-50
Check price atAmazon›
Advance Paris X-i75
See at AMAZON
Onkyo Icon A-50
See at AMAZON

Advance Paris X-i75 vs Onkyo Icon A-50 Integrated Amplifier Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing two different types of amplifiers. Advance Paris X-i75 is a Integrated Amplifier with built-in DAC speaker whereas the Icon A-50 is a Streaming Integrated Amplifier speaker.

Let's have a brief look at the main features of Advance Paris X-i75 and Onkyo Icon A-50 first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Key SpecsAdvance Paris X-i75Onkyo Icon A-50
BrandAdvance Paris
France · founded 1995
Onkyo
Japan · founded 1946
Power75 watts x 2 channels into 8 ohms and 110 watts x 2 channels into 4 ohms110 watts x 2 channels into 8 ohms and 180 watts x 2 channels into 4 ohms
Amplifier classClass AB-TClass A/B
Built-in DACYesYes
Phono inputYesYes
Headphone output1/41/4
BluetoothNoYes
Weight8.60kg / 18.9lbs10.61kg / 23.3lbs
Dimensions (H x W x D)4-13/16" x 17" x 13-5/8"
122.2 x 431.8 x 346.1 mm
5-5/16" x 17-1/8" x 14-13/16"
134.9 x 435.0 x 376.2 mm

The rest of this page covers where each one wins, how they compare in size, their inputs and outputs, the full specifications and a verdict.


Reasons to choose Advance Paris X-i75 over Onkyo Icon A-50
MSRP Price(*) 1,299USD vs 1,600USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)
Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) 0.1% vs 1% Less Harmonic Distortion
Coaxial Digital Inputs 2 vs 1 More options for connecting Digital sources
Base Surface Area 1494.5cm2/ 231.6inch2 vs 1636.5cm2/ 253.7inch2 takes less space in your room
Height 122mm vs 134mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces

Reasons to choose Onkyo Icon A-50 over Advance Paris X-i75
Watts into 8-ohms 110 watts vs 75 watts Delivers higher power into 8-ohms speakers
Watts into 4-ohms 180 watts vs 110 watts Delivers higher power into 4-ohms speakers
Signal to Noise Ratio 104 dB vs 90 dB Higher ratings results in cleaner sound
Bluetooth Yes vs No Stream music via Bluetooth devices
Apple AirPlay Yes vs No Compatible with Apple Devices with AirPlay
Apple AirPlay 2 Yes vs No Compatible with Apple Devices with AirPlay 2
Built-in Chromecast Yes vs No Compatible with Chromecast Streaming
Roon Ready vs No Roon Compatibility
Built-in Chromecast Yes vs No Compatible with Chromecast Streaming
Max Bit Depth 32-bit vs 24-bit Play higher resolution range media
Max Sample Rate 768kHz vs 192kHz Play higher resolution media

Size, drawn to scale

FRONTAdvance Paris X-i75 front: 432 x 122 mm (17 x 4.8 in)Onkyo Icon A-50 front: 435 x 135 mm (17.1 x 5.3 in)Advance Paris X-i75432 × 122 mmOnkyo Icon A-50435 × 135 mmTOP / FOOTPRINTAdvance Paris X-i75 footprint: 432 x 346 mm (17 x 13.6 in)Onkyo Icon A-50 footprint: 435 x 376 mm (17.1 x 14.8 in)Advance Paris X-i75432 × 346 mmOnkyo Icon A-50435 × 376 mm
Both amplifiers and both views share one scale, so everything here is directly comparable. Hover a box for its dimensions.

One scale for both, aligned at the back panels the way they would sit against a wall, so the deeper one visibly stands further out.

Onkyo Icon A-50 needs about 10% more shelf area. Onkyo Icon A-50 is 30mm deeper - the measurement that decides whether a rack door closes. Onkyo Icon A-50 is 13mm taller.

Inputs and Outputs

The input and output selections that are offered is an important factor when comparing two amplifiers. Here you can find how the I/O selections of the Advance Paris X-i75 and Onkyo Icon A-50 differs from each other.

Advance Paris X-i75 Inputs
  • Phono Input
  • 1 Optical Digital Input
  • 2 Coaxial Digital Input
  • USB Input:
Onkyo Icon A-50 Inputs
  • Phono Input
  • 1 Optical Digital Input
  • 1 Coaxial Digital Input
  • USB Input:
Outputs
  • Preamp Outputs
  • Pre-out/Main-in Loop
  • 1/4 Headphone Output
Outputs
  • Preamp Outputs
  • 1/4 Headphone Output

Advance Paris X-i75 vs Onkyo Icon A-50 full specifications

Every spec we hold for both, side by side
SpecificationAdvance Paris X-i75Onkyo Icon A-50
Overview
BrandAdvance ParisOnkyo
TypeIntegrated Amplifier with built-in DACStreaming Integrated Amplifier
Channels22
Amplifier classClass AB-TClass A/B
Output devicesSolid StateSolid State
Released20222025
List price$1,299$1,600
Series–Icon
Power and performance
Power into 8 ohms75 W RMS110 W RMS
Power into 4 ohms110 W RMS180 W RMS
Power, as rated75 watts x 2 channels into 8 ohms and 110 watts x 2 channels into 4 ohms110 watts x 2 channels into 8 ohms and 180 watts x 2 channels into 4 ohms
Minimum impedance4 ohms4 ohms
Signal-to-noise ratio90 dB104 dB
THD0.1%1%
Frequency bandwidth20 Hz-20 kHz20 Hz-20 kHz
Digital and DAC
Built-in DACYesYes
Max bit depth24-bit32-bit
Max sample rate192 kHz768 kHz
Network and streaming
Wi-Fi–802.11ac
BluetoothNoYes
Bluetooth version–5.1
AirPlay 2NoYes
ChromecastNoYes
RoonNoReady
BluOSNoNo
HEOSNoNo
DTS Play-FiNoNo
Inputs
RCA inputs73
XLR inputsNoNo
Phono inputYesYes
Optical digital11
Coaxial digital21
USB inputYesYes
HDMI input–1
Outputs
Preamp outputsYesYes
Pre-out / main-in loopYesNo
Subwoofer outputSingleNo
Headphone output1/41/4
Features and control
Room correctionNoDirac Live
CD playerNoNo
Physical
Dimensions (H x W x D)122.2 x 431.8 x 346.1 mm134.9 x 435.0 x 376.2 mm
Dimensions, inches4-13/16 x 17 x 13-5/8 inch5-5/16 x 17-1/8 x 14-13/16 inch
Weight8.60 kg (18.96 lbs)10.61 kg (23.40 lbs)
Removable power cordIEC 3-prongIEC 2-prong
Parts warranty2 Yr / 3 Yr (registered)2 Years
Labour warranty2 Yr / 3 Yr (registered)2 Years

A dash means the manufacturer does not publish that figure, or it does not apply. 46 specifications compared.

Verdict

One is a streaming all-in-one and the other is an amplifier. Judge them on how many boxes you want and what you already own, not on the spec sheet alone.

AreaBetterWhy
PowerBOnkyo Icon A-50 has more power - 110W against 75W into 8 ohms. That is about 1.7dB, which is a small step in loudness but real headroom on peaks.
Grip on hard loadsBOnkyo Icon A-50 holds up better into a 4-ohm load: its output increases strongly to 180W, where the other increases modestly. That matters with demanding speakers far more than the 8-ohm figure does.
Noise floorBOnkyo Icon A-50 is the quieter design on paper - 104dB against 90dB. Audible mainly with sensitive speakers in a quiet room.
Built-in DACBBoth decode on board. Onkyo Icon A-50 goes higher - 768kHz against 192kHz. Very few recordings exist above 192kHz, so treat this as headroom, not as sound quality.
StreamingBOnly Onkyo Icon A-50 has AirPlay 2, Chromecast and Roon.
Room to growAOnly Advance Paris X-i75 offers a subwoofer output and a pre-out/main-in loop - which decides whether you can add a subwoofer or a power amplifier later without replacing the box.
Room correctionBOnkyo Icon A-50 has room correction. In an awkward room that does more for the sound than any other difference on this page.
Amplifier classdependsAdvance Paris X-i75 is Class AB-T and Onkyo Icon A-50 is Class A/B. Class A/B runs warm and is the long-established mainstream choice. Modern examples of both measure well - judge by the rest of the page.
PriceAAdvance Paris X-i75 costs less - $1,299 against $1,600 at list.

A Advance Paris X-i75  B Onkyo Icon A-50
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both amplifiers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.

Which should you choose?

Onkyo Icon A-50 leads across most of the measured areas for a fairly modest premium, so it is the easier pick if the budget stretches. Advance Paris X-i75 is the one to take if it does not. If your speakers are a difficult load - 4 ohms nominal, big woofers, or a sensitivity in the low 80s - Onkyo Icon A-50 is the safer partner, because how an amplifier behaves when the impedance drops matters more than its 8-ohm rating.

What a spec sheet cannot show: how either sounds with your speakers, how the controls feel day to day, and what the app is like to live with - which is where most all-in-one amplifiers are actually won or lost. Power figures are the manufacturers' own and are not measured to a common standard, so treat small differences as noise. If you can hear both, that will tell you more than any row above.

LATEST BLOG POSTS
Marantz Cinema Series 2 Costs 200 Dollars More With the Same Power and Weight. Here Is What Changed.
SVS Won Best Budget Home Theater at CEDIA. Here Is the Bill, and Three Cheaper Ways to Build It
Dirac Live Is on 35 of the Amplifiers We List, and Nine of Them Charge Extra
Monitor Audio's In-Wall Subwoofers Show What Hiding Bass Really Costs
TAD's New Class D Amplifier Weighs 29 kg. Only One of the 72 We List Is Heavier.
The Marantz MCR 60n Has a CD Player, a Phono Stage and HDMI eARC. Nothing Else We List Has All Three.
Kanto Replaced the TUK With Two Speakers. Neither Has the Phono Stage.
A Triode Switch Used to Start at 3,495 Dollars. The Cayin Jazz 70 Is 1,399.

Most Popular Amplifiers
Yamaha A-S301
Yamaha A-S301
60 watts into 8-ohms
Audiolab 7000A
Audiolab 7000A
70 watts into 8-ohms
Yamaha A-S801
Yamaha A-S801
100 watts into 8-ohms
Yamaha A-S501
Yamaha A-S501
85 watts into 8-ohms
Sonos Amp
Sonos Amp
125 watts into 8-ohms
Denon PMA-900HNE
Denon PMA-900HNE
50 watts into 8-ohms
Denon PMA-600NE
Denon PMA-600NE
45 watts into 8-ohms
WiiM Amp Pro
WiiM Amp Pro
60 watts into 8-ohms
Denon PMA-1700NE
Denon PMA-1700NE
70 watts into 8-ohms
Marantz PM6007
Marantz PM6007
45 watts into 8-ohms
This site contains affiliate links. We may be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through one of them. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Copyright © 2026 by SpeakerDecision
About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

Report a Correction