SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS
    • By Type
      Passive Bookshelf Speakers Passive Floor-standing Speakers Passive Center Channel Speakers Passive In-wall Speakers All Passive Speakers Powered Subwoofers Powered Stereo Speakers
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Front Firing Port Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      By Brand
      Acoustic Energy Aperion ATC Audio-Technica Audioengine Bluesound Bowers Wilkins Buchardt Cambridge Audio Canton DALI Definitive Technology Dynaudio ELAC Emotiva Fluance Focal Fyne Audio Genelec GoldenEar Harbeth Jamo JBL Kanto KEF KLH Klipsch Leak Mackie Magnepan MartinLogan McIntosh Mission MoFi Monitor Audio Nuvo Onkyo OSD Paradigm Perlisten Polk Audio PS Audio PSB Q Acoustics REL Revel Russound Sennheiser Sonos Sonus faber Sony Spendor SVS Tannoy Technics Triangle Velodyne Victrola Wharfedale Wilson Audio Yamaha
  • AMPLIFIERS
    • By Type
      All Amplifiers Integrated Amplifiers Stereo Receivers Streaming Amplifiers Power Amplifiers Compact Amplifiers
      By Power
      Up to 60 watts 61 to 90 watts 91 to 120 watts 121 to 180 watts Over 180 watts
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      Home Theater
      All Home Theater Receivers Anthem ARCAM Denon Integra JBL Marantz McIntosh NAD Onkyo Sony Yamaha
      Headphone Amps
      All Headphone Amplifiers Cambridge Audio iFi Audio McIntosh Naim Pro-Ject Rotel Schiit Audio Sennheiser Yamaha
      Multi-Zone
      All Multi-Zone Amplifiers JBL McIntosh OSD Rotel Russound Sonos
      By Brand
      Accuphase Advance Paris Anthem Arcam Audio Research AudioControl Audioengine Audiolab Bluesound Bose Buchardt Cambridge Audio Cayin Denon Devialet ELAC Emotiva Eversolo FiiO Fosi Audio Hegel HiFi Rose Integra JBL Layer Audio Design LEAK Luxman Marantz Mark Levinson McIntosh Michi MISSION MOON Musical Fidelity NAD Naim Onkyo OSD Parasound Pass Labs Peachtree PrimaLuna Primare PS Audio Rega Rogue Audio Roksan Rotel Schiit Audio Sonos Sony SVS T+A TEAC Technics Vincent WiiM Yamaha
  • SMART FIND
  • TOOLS
  • BLOG
  1. Home
  2. Amplifiers
  3. Onkyo Muse Y-50 vs NAD C 389
Onkyo Muse Y-50 vs NAD C 389
x
Amp to replace
Change

Onkyo Muse Y-50

Integrated Amplifier | 125 watts RMS into 8-ohms

Onkyo Muse Y-50
Check price atAmazon›
Change
    
NAD C 389

Integrated Amplifier | 130 watts RMS into 8-ohms

NAD C 389
Check price atAmazon›
Onkyo Muse Y-50 Onkyo Muse Y-50
Check price atAmazon›
NAD C 389 NAD C 389
Check price atAmazon›
Onkyo Muse Y-50
See at AMAZON
NAD C 389
See at AMAZON

Onkyo Muse Y-50 vs NAD C 389 Integrated Amplifier Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing two different types of amplifiers. Onkyo Muse Y-50 is a Streaming Integrated Amplifier speaker whereas the C 389 is a Integrated Amplifier with built-in DAC speaker.

Let's have a brief look at the main features of Onkyo Muse Y-50 and NAD C 389 first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Key SpecsOnkyo Muse Y-50NAD C 389
BrandOnkyo
Japan · founded 1946
NAD
Canada · founded 1972
Power125 watts x 2 channels into 8 ohms and 250 watts x 2 channels into 4 ohms130 watts x 2 channels into 8 ohms and 130 watts x 2 channels into 4 ohms
Amplifier classClass DClass D
Built-in DACYesYes
Phono inputYesYes
Headphone output1/41/4
BluetoothYesYes
Weight4.90kg / 10.8lbs8.70kg / 19.1lbs
Dimensions (H x W x D)3-15/16" x 13-13/16" x 13-3/4"
100.0 x 350.8 x 349.2 mm
3-15/16" x 17-1/8" x 15-7/16"
100 x 435 x 392 mm

The rest of this page covers where each one wins, how they compare in size, their inputs and outputs, the full specifications and a verdict.


Reasons to choose Onkyo Muse Y-50 over NAD C 389
Watts into 4-ohms 250 watts vs 130 watts Delivers higher power into 4-ohms speakers
Signal to Noise Ratio 100 dB vs 95 dB Higher ratings results in cleaner sound
Apple AirPlay Yes vs No Compatible with Apple Devices with AirPlay
Apple AirPlay 2 Yes vs No Compatible with Apple Devices with AirPlay 2
Built-in Chromecast Yes vs No Compatible with Chromecast Streaming
Built-in Chromecast Yes vs No Compatible with Chromecast Streaming
Base Surface Area 1225.0cm2/ 189.9inch2 vs 1705.0cm2/ 264.3inch2 takes less space in your room

Reasons to choose NAD C 389 over Onkyo Muse Y-50
MSRP Price(*) 1,499USD vs 1,500USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)
Handheld Remote Yes vs No Control the amplifier by the included RC
Watts into 8-ohms 130 watts vs 125 watts Delivers higher power into 8-ohms speakers
Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) 0.02% vs 0.08% Less Harmonic Distortion
Optical Digital Inputs 2 vs 1 More options for connecting Digital sources
Coaxial Digital Inputs 2 vs 1 More options for connecting Digital sources
Max Bit Depth 32-bit vs 24-bit Play higher resolution range media
Max Sample Rate 384kHz vs 192kHz Play higher resolution media

Size, drawn to scale

FRONTOnkyo Muse Y-50 front: 351 x 100 mm (13.8 x 3.9 in)NAD C 389 front: 435 x 100 mm (17.1 x 3.9 in)Onkyo Muse Y-50351 × 100 mmNAD C 389435 × 100 mmTOP / FOOTPRINTOnkyo Muse Y-50 footprint: 351 x 349 mm (13.8 x 13.7 in)NAD C 389 footprint: 435 x 392 mm (17.1 x 15.4 in)Onkyo Muse Y-50351 × 349 mmNAD C 389435 × 392 mm
Both amplifiers and both views share one scale, so everything here is directly comparable. Hover a box for its dimensions.

One scale for both, aligned at the back panels the way they would sit against a wall, so the deeper one visibly stands further out.

NAD C 389 needs about 39% more shelf area. NAD C 389 is 43mm deeper - the measurement that decides whether a rack door closes.

Inputs and Outputs

The input and output selections that are offered is an important factor when comparing two amplifiers. Here you can find how the I/O selections of the Onkyo Muse Y-50 and NAD C 389 differs from each other.

Onkyo Muse Y-50 Inputs
  • Phono Input
  • 1 Optical Digital Input
  • 1 Coaxial Digital Input
  • USB Input:
NAD C 389 Inputs
  • Total Number of Analog Inputs: 3
  • Phono Input
  • 2 Optical Digital Input
  • 2 Coaxial Digital Input
  • USB Input:
    • USB-A(Service Only)
  • HDMI eARC
Outputs
  • Preamp Outputs
  • 1/4 Headphone Output
Outputs
  • Stereo RCA, Sub Preamp Outputs
  • 1/4 Headphone Output
  • Subwoofer Output
NAD C 389 Back View
NAD C 389 Back View (Click the image for the larger version)

Onkyo Muse Y-50 vs NAD C 389 full specifications

Every spec we hold for both, side by side
SpecificationOnkyo Muse Y-50NAD C 389
Overview
BrandOnkyoNAD
TypeStreaming Integrated AmplifierIntegrated Amplifier with built-in DAC
Channels22
Amplifier classClass DClass D
Output devicesSolid StateSolid State
Released2026May 2022
List price$1,500$1,499
SeriesMuseClassic
Power and performance
Power into 8 ohms125 W RMS130 W RMS
Power into 4 ohms250 W RMS130 W RMS
Power, as rated125 watts x 2 channels into 8 ohms and 250 watts x 2 channels into 4 ohms130 watts x 2 channels into 8 ohms and 130 watts x 2 channels into 4 ohms
Minimum impedance4 ohms4 ohms
Signal-to-noise ratio100 dB95 dB
THD0.08%0.02%
Frequency bandwidth20 Hz-20 kHz20 Hz-20 kHz
Digital and DAC
Built-in DACYesYes
DAC chip–ESS Sabre ES9028
Max bit depth24-bit32-bit
Max sample rate192 kHz384 kHz
Network and streaming
Wi-Fi802.11–
Ethernet–No
BluetoothYesYes
Bluetooth version5.1–
Bluetooth codecs–AptX,AAC,SBC
Bluetooth transmitter–Yes
AirPlay 2YesNo
ChromecastYesNo
RoonNoNo
BluOSNoNo
HEOSNoNo
DTS Play-FiNoNo
Inputs
Analogue inputs–3
RCA inputs3–
XLR inputsNo–
Phono inputYesYes
Phono type–MM
Optical digital12
Coaxial digital12
USB inputYesYes
USB type–USB-A(Service Only)
HDMI input1Yes
HDMI ARC / eARC–eARC
Outputs
Preamp outputsYesStereo RCA, Sub
Pre-out / main-in loopNoNo
Subwoofer output–Yes
Headphone output1/41/4
A/B speaker terminals–Yes
Features and control
Room correctionOnkyo Room EQ–
CD playerNoNo
Handheld remote–Yes
Physical
Dimensions (H x W x D)100.0 x 350.8 x 349.2 mm100 x 435 x 392 mm
Dimensions, inches3-15/16 x 13-13/16 x 13-3/4 inch3-15/16 x 7-1/8 x 15-7/16 inch
Weight4.90 kg (10.80 lbs)8.70 kg (19.10 lbs)
Finishes–Black
Removable power cordIEC 2-prongIEC 3-prong
Parts warranty2 Years2 Years
Labour warranty2 Years2 Years

A dash means the manufacturer does not publish that figure, or it does not apply. 57 specifications compared.

Verdict

One is a streaming all-in-one and the other is an amplifier. Judge them on how many boxes you want and what you already own, not on the spec sheet alone.

AreaBetterWhy
Powerevenly matchedEffectively the same output - 125W against 130W into 8 ohms is under 1dB, which is not an audible difference in loudness.
Grip on hard loadsAOnkyo Muse Y-50 holds up better into a 4-ohm load: its output nearly doubles to 250W, where the other barely increases. That matters with demanding speakers far more than the 8-ohm figure does.
Noise floorAOnkyo Muse Y-50 is the quieter design on paper - 100dB against 95dB. Audible mainly with sensitive speakers in a quiet room.
Built-in DACBBoth decode on board. NAD C 389 goes higher - 384kHz against 192kHz. Very few recordings exist above 192kHz, so treat this as headroom, not as sound quality.
StreamingAOnly Onkyo Muse Y-50 has AirPlay 2 and Chromecast.
Room to growevenly matchedThe same expansion options on both.
Shelf spacedependsOnkyo Muse Y-50 takes up about 28% less shelf area (1225cm² against 1705cm²), and it is 43mm shallower, which is the measurement that decides whether a rack door shuts.
Priceevenly matchedPriced within a few per cent of each other.

A Onkyo Muse Y-50  B NAD C 389
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both amplifiers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.

Which should you choose?

Onkyo Muse Y-50 has the edge on paper, though not by much. The rows marked "depends" are more likely to decide this than the score is. If your speakers are a difficult load - 4 ohms nominal, big woofers, or a sensitivity in the low 80s - Onkyo Muse Y-50 is the safer partner, because how an amplifier behaves when the impedance drops matters more than its 8-ohm rating.

What a spec sheet cannot show: how either sounds with your speakers, how the controls feel day to day, and what the app is like to live with - which is where most all-in-one amplifiers are actually won or lost. Power figures are the manufacturers' own and are not measured to a common standard, so treat small differences as noise. If you can hear both, that will tell you more than any row above.

LATEST BLOG POSTS
Marantz Cinema Series 2 Costs 200 Dollars More With the Same Power and Weight. Here Is What Changed.
SVS Won Best Budget Home Theater at CEDIA. Here Is the Bill, and Three Cheaper Ways to Build It
Dirac Live Is on 35 of the Amplifiers We List, and Nine of Them Charge Extra
Monitor Audio's In-Wall Subwoofers Show What Hiding Bass Really Costs
TAD's New Class D Amplifier Weighs 29 kg. Only One of the 72 We List Is Heavier.
The Marantz MCR 60n Has a CD Player, a Phono Stage and HDMI eARC. Nothing Else We List Has All Three.
Kanto Replaced the TUK With Two Speakers. Neither Has the Phono Stage.
A Triode Switch Used to Start at 3,495 Dollars. The Cayin Jazz 70 Is 1,399.

Most Popular Amplifiers
Yamaha A-S301
Yamaha A-S301
60 watts into 8-ohms
Audiolab 7000A
Audiolab 7000A
70 watts into 8-ohms
Yamaha A-S801
Yamaha A-S801
100 watts into 8-ohms
Yamaha A-S501
Yamaha A-S501
85 watts into 8-ohms
Sonos Amp
Sonos Amp
125 watts into 8-ohms
Denon PMA-900HNE
Denon PMA-900HNE
50 watts into 8-ohms
Denon PMA-600NE
Denon PMA-600NE
45 watts into 8-ohms
WiiM Amp Pro
WiiM Amp Pro
60 watts into 8-ohms
Denon PMA-1700NE
Denon PMA-1700NE
70 watts into 8-ohms
Marantz PM6007
Marantz PM6007
45 watts into 8-ohms
This site contains affiliate links. We may be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through one of them. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Copyright © 2026 by SpeakerDecision
About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

Report a Correction