SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS
    • By Type
      Passive Bookshelf Speakers Passive Floor-standing Speakers Passive Center Channel Speakers Passive In-wall Speakers All Passive Speakers Powered Subwoofers Powered Stereo Speakers
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Front Firing Port Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      By Brand
      Acoustic Energy Aperion ATC Audio-Technica Audioengine Bluesound Bowers Wilkins Buchardt Cambridge Audio Canton DALI Definitive Technology Dynaudio ELAC Emotiva Fluance Focal Fyne Audio Genelec GoldenEar Harbeth Jamo JBL Kanto KEF KLH Klipsch Leak Mackie Magnepan MartinLogan McIntosh Mission MoFi Monitor Audio Nuvo Onkyo OSD Paradigm Perlisten Polk Audio PS Audio PSB Q Acoustics REL Revel Russound Sennheiser Sonos Sonus faber Sony Spendor SVS Tannoy Technics Triangle Velodyne Victrola Wharfedale Wilson Audio Yamaha
  • AMPLIFIERS
    • By Type
      All Amplifiers Integrated Amplifiers Stereo Receivers Streaming Amplifiers Power Amplifiers Compact Amplifiers
      By Power
      Up to 60 watts 61 to 90 watts 91 to 120 watts 121 to 180 watts Over 180 watts
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      Home Theater
      All Home Theater Receivers Anthem ARCAM Denon Integra JBL Marantz McIntosh NAD Onkyo Sony Yamaha
      Headphone Amps
      All Headphone Amplifiers Cambridge Audio iFi Audio McIntosh Naim Pro-Ject Rotel Schiit Audio Sennheiser Yamaha
      Multi-Zone
      All Multi-Zone Amplifiers JBL McIntosh OSD Rotel Russound Sonos
      By Brand
      Accuphase Advance Paris Anthem Arcam Audio Research AudioControl Audioengine Audiolab Bluesound Bose Buchardt Cambridge Audio Cayin Denon Devialet ELAC Emotiva Eversolo FiiO Fosi Audio Hegel HiFi Rose Integra JBL Layer Audio Design LEAK Luxman Marantz Mark Levinson McIntosh Michi MISSION MOON Musical Fidelity NAD Naim Onkyo OSD Parasound Pass Labs Peachtree PrimaLuna Primare PS Audio Rega Rogue Audio Roksan Rotel Schiit Audio Sonos Sony SVS T+A TEAC Technics Vincent WiiM Yamaha
  • SOUNDBARS
    • Soundbars
      Soundbars Home All Soundbars (filter + sort) Size Simulator
      By TV Size
      43-50 inch TVs 55 inch TVs 65 inch and larger
      By Feature
      Dolby Atmos height channels Subwoofer included Can add rear speakers Compact (30 in or narrower) Under $500
      By Brand
      Bluesound Bose Denon Devialet Dual Furrion Harman Kardon JBL KEF Klipsch Marshall Polk Audio Samsung Sennheiser Sonos Sony WiiM Yamaha
  • SMART FIND
  • TOOLS
  • BLOG
  1. Home
  2. Amplifiers
  3. ARCAM AVA25 vs NAD T 778
ARCAM AVA25 vs NAD T 778
x
Amp to replace
Change

ARCAM AVA25

Home Theater Receiver | 120 watts RMS into 8-ohms (2 channels driven)

ARCAM AVA25
Check price atAmazon›
Change
    
NAD T 778

Home Theater Receiver | 140 watts RMS into 8-ohms (2 channels driven)

NAD T 778
Check price atAmazon›
ARCAM AVA25 ARCAM AVA25
Check price atAmazon›
NAD T 778 NAD T 778
Check price atAmazon›
ARCAM AVA25
See at AMAZON
NAD T 778
See at AMAZON

ARCAM AVA25 vs NAD T 778 Home Theater Receiver Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing AVA25 and T 778, two Home Theater Receivers from ARCAM and NAD. Let's have a brief look at the main features of ARCAM AVA25 and NAD T 778 first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Key SpecsARCAM AVA25NAD T 778
BrandARCAM
United Kingdom · founded 1976
NAD
Canada · founded 1972
Amplifier classABD
Phono inputNoYes
Weight21.50kg / 47.3lbs12.11kg / 26.6lbs
Dimensions (H x W x D)6.75" x 17.06" x 18.81"
171.5 x 433.3 x 477.8mm
5.56" x 17.13" x 17.94"
141.2 x 435.1 x 455.7mm

The rest of this page covers where each one wins, how they compare in size, their inputs and outputs, the full specifications and a verdict.


Reasons to choose ARCAM AVA25 over NAD T 778
Total Analog Inputs 3 vs 2 More options for connecting Analog sources

Reasons to choose NAD T 778 over ARCAM AVA25
MSRP Price(*) 4,799USD vs 5,500USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)
Watts into 8-ohms 140 watts vs 120 watts Delivers higher power into 8-ohms speakers
PhonoInput Yes vs No Connect a turntable directly to your amp
Preamp Outputs 11.2-channel vs No Connect a powered subwoofer or second amplifier.
Base Surface Area 1982.8cm2/ 307.3inch2 vs 2070.3cm2/ 320.9inch2 takes less space in your room
Height 141mm vs 171mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces

Size, drawn to scale

FRONTARCAM AVA25 front: 433 x 172 mm (17.1 x 6.8 in)NAD T 778 front: 435 x 141 mm (17.1 x 5.6 in)ARCAM AVA25433 × 172 mmNAD T 778435 × 141 mmTOP / FOOTPRINTARCAM AVA25 footprint: 433 x 478 mm (17.1 x 18.8 in)NAD T 778 footprint: 435 x 456 mm (17.1 x 17.9 in)ARCAM AVA25433 × 478 mmNAD T 778435 × 456 mm
Both amplifiers and both views share one scale, so everything here is directly comparable. Hover a box for its dimensions.

One scale for both, aligned at the back panels the way they would sit against a wall, so the deeper one visibly stands further out.

Near-identical footprints. ARCAM AVA25 is 22mm deeper - the measurement that decides whether a rack door closes. ARCAM AVA25 is 30mm taller.

Inputs and Outputs

The input and output selections that are offered is an important factor when comparing two amplifiers. Here you can find how the I/O selections of the ARCAM AVA25 and NAD T 778 differs from each other.

ARCAM AVA25 Inputs
  • Total Number of Analog Inputs: 3
  • 2 Optical Digital Input
  • 2 Coaxial Digital Input
  • USB Input:
NAD T 778 Inputs
  • Total Number of Analog Inputs: 2
  • Phono Input
  • 2 Optical Digital Input
  • 2 Coaxial Digital Input
  • USB Input:
Outputs
Outputs
  • 11.2-channel Preamp Outputs

ARCAM AVA25 vs NAD T 778 full specifications

Every spec we hold for both, side by side
SpecificationARCAM AVA25NAD T 778
Overview
BrandARCAMNAD
TypeHome Theater ReceiverHome Theater Receiver
Channels99
Amplifier classABD
Output devicesSolid StateSolid State
List price$5,500$4,799
SeriesRadia–
Power and performance
Power into 8 ohms120 W RMS140 W RMS
Minimum impedance4 ohms4 ohms
Inputs
Analogue inputs32
Phono inputNoYes
Optical digital22
Coaxial digital22
USB inputYesYes
HDMI input76
Outputs
Preamp outputsNo11.2-channel
Subwoofer output1-5 (assignable)Dual
HDMI output22
Features and control
Room correction systemDirac LiveDirac Live
Radio tunerNoNo
Physical
Dimensions (H x W x D)171.5 x 433.3 x 477.8mm141.2 x 435.1 x 455.7mm
Weight21.50 kg (47.40 lbs)12.11 kg (26.70 lbs)

A dash means the manufacturer does not publish that figure, or it does not apply. 22 specifications compared.

Verdict

No single best amplifier here. What decides it is what you have to drive, what you need to plug in, and how much of the system you want in one box.

AreaBetterWhy
Powerevenly matchedEffectively the same output - 120W against 140W into 8 ohms is under 1dB, which is not an audible difference in loudness.
Analogue inputsAARCAM AVA25 takes more analogue sources - 3 against 2.
Phono stagedependsNAD T 778 has a built-in phono stage and ARCAM AVA25 does not. Decisive if you own a turntable, completely irrelevant if you do not - and an outboard phono stage is easy to add later either way.
Room to growBOnly NAD T 778 offers preamp outputs - which decides whether you can add a subwoofer or a power amplifier later without replacing the box.
Amplifier classdependsARCAM AVA25 is AB and NAD T 778 is D. Class A/B runs warm and is the long-established mainstream choice; Class D runs cool and draws almost nothing at idle. Modern examples of both measure well - judge by the rest of the page.
PriceBNAD T 778 costs less - $4,799 against $5,500 at list.
Watts per dollarBNAD T 778 is the cheaper watt - about $34 per watt against $46. A blunt measure, and it says nothing about how either sounds, but it is the honest one for raw output.

A ARCAM AVA25  B NAD T 778
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both amplifiers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.

Which should you choose?

NAD T 778 has the edge on paper, though not by much. The rows marked "depends" are more likely to decide this than the score is. If you play records, NAD T 778 saves you buying a phono stage; if you do not, ignore that row entirely.

What a spec sheet cannot show: how either sounds with your speakers, how the controls feel day to day, and what the app is like to live with - which is where most all-in-one amplifiers are actually won or lost. Power figures are the manufacturers' own and are not measured to a common standard, so treat small differences as noise. If you can hear both, that will tell you more than any row above.

LATEST BLOG POSTS
We Built 11 Free Speaker and Amplifier Tools, and Every One Shows Its Working
Michi X430 vs Rotel RA-6000: 500 Dollars More Buys an HDMI Socket
Soundbars Are Now on Speaker Decision: 60 Models, Comparisons and a TV Size Simulator
Fosi's DISC Nano Is a 100 Dollar Pocket CD Player. The Cheapest CD Drive in Our Amplifiers Is 650.
Wharfedale Nova vs SW Subwoofers: What 450 to 800 Dollars More Buys
JBL Summit Makalu: 44,995 Dollars and 12 Times the Amplifier of the Everest
NAD M33 V2 vs M33: Same 200 Watts, and 48 Percent More Than in 2020
PSB iQ2 vs iQ1: What 400 Dollars Buys Is a Cable You Do Not Need

Most Popular Amplifiers
Yamaha RX500A
Yamaha RX500A
70 watts into 8-ohms
Marantz Cinema 50 Series 2
Marantz Cinema 50 Series 2
110 watts into 8-ohms
Denon AVR-X2900H
Denon AVR-X2900H
95 watts into 8-ohms
Yamaha RX300A
Yamaha RX300A
70 watts into 8-ohms
ARCAM AVA15
ARCAM AVA15
85 watts into 8-ohms
ARCAM AVA35
ARCAM AVA35
145 watts into 8-ohms
Denon AVR-X3900H
Denon AVR-X3900H
105 watts into 8-ohms
Yamaha RX-V6A
Yamaha RX-V6A
100 watts into 8-ohms
Onkyo TX-RZ70
Onkyo TX-RZ70
140 watts into 8-ohms
Denon AVR-X6800H
Denon AVR-X6800H
140 watts into 8-ohms
This site contains affiliate links. We may be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through one of them. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Copyright © 2026 by SpeakerDecision
About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

Report a Correction