In this review, we will be comparing RP-404C II and S 83 CEN, two Passive Center Channel speakers from Klipsch and Jamo.
Let's have a brief look at the main features
of Klipsch RP-404C II and Jamo S 83 CEN first before getting into our more
detailed comparison.
| Key Specs | Klipsch RP-404C II | Jamo S 83 CEN |
|---|
| Brand | Klipsch
United States · founded 1946 | Jamo
Denmark · founded 1966 |
|---|
| Design | 2-way | 2-way |
|---|
| Tweeter | 1" Tractrix Horn | 1" soft dome with an integrated waveguide |
|---|
| Woofer | 4 x 4" Cerametallic cone | 2 x 5" polyfiber |
|---|
| Frequency response | 87-25k Hz | 65-26k Hz |
|---|
| Sensitivity | 94 dB | 87 dB |
|---|
| Impedance | 8 ohms | 8 ohms |
|---|
| Power range | up to 125 watts | up to 80 watts |
|---|
| Weight | 9.20kg / 20.2lbs | 6.80kg / 15lbs |
|---|
| Dimensions (H x W x D) | 5-3/4" x 26-7/8" x 6-1/2"
147.0 x 683.0 x 166.0mm | 8-1/2" x 19-5/8" x 9-11/16"
216.0 x 499.0 x 247.0mm |
|---|
What size room are the Klipsch RP-404C II and Jamo S 83 CEN speakers good for?
The size of the room in which you are planning to use these loudspeakers is an important decision
factor. Here we have compared their suitability to various sizes of environments considering their size
and max power parameters:
| Listening Environment* |
Klipsch RP-404C II |
Jamo S 83 CEN |
| Near-field |
Poor |
Average |
| Small Room |
Average |
Good |
| Mid-size Room |
Good |
Average |
| Large Room |
Average |
Poor |
| Very Large Room |
Poor |
Bad |
(* Approximate Room sizes: Small < 100sq. ft / 9 m2,
Mid-size: 100-220 sq. ft / 9-20 m2, Large 220-400 sq. ft / 20-36 m2, Very Large: >
400 sq. ft / 36 m2.
Average Floor Height: 9" / 2.7m. Typical room sizes differ from country to country, and the actual
listening experience changes depending on floor height, room shape, surface materials, listening
position, speaker locations, etc.)
The sections below take each area in turn: drivers, frequency response, physical size and what you get in the box.
Drivers
Both RP-404C II and S 83 CEN are 2-way speakers.
Klipsch RP-404C IIJamo S 83 CEN
TweeterWoofer
Front view, drawn to scale - cabinets and drivers share one scale, so sizes are directly comparable. Hover a driver for its size.
| Driver |
Klipsch RP-404C II |
Jamo S 83 CEN |
|
Driver Setup
|
2-way
|
2-way
|
|
Tweeter
|
1-inch
|
1-inch
|
|
Midrange
|
- |
- |
|
Woofer
|
4 x 4-inch
|
2 x 5-inch
|
RP-404C II features a 1" titanium Tractrix Horn Tweeter and 4 x 4" Cerametallic cone Woofer with a Crossover frequency at 1900 Hz. On the other hand, the S 83 CEN features a 1" soft dome with an integrated waveguide Tweeter and 2 x 5" polyfiber Woofer with a Crossover frequency at 2000Hz.
Frequency Response
RP-404C II has a frequency range of 87-25k Hz whereas S 83 CEN has a frequency range of 65-26k Hz. With a minimum frequency of 65Hz, the S 83 CEN can go significantly deeper on the low side and provide stronger bass compared to the RP-404C II's min frequency of 87Hz.
The graph below depicts how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average Low Frequency values of other speakers in the Center Channel class in our database.
Low Frequency
Center Channel Speakers
Neither pair reaches down to 20Hz, the usual definition of full-range, which is normal for speakers of this size. If you want the bottom octave for movies or bass-heavy music, add a subwoofer to whichever you choose. Visit our Powered Subwoofers section to find out more about the available options.
Impedance and Sensitivity
RP-404C II and S 83 CEN have the same Impedance of 8 ohms but where they differ is the sensitivity levels. RP-404C II sensitivity is rated at 94 dB and the S 83 CEN's is at 87 dB. This 7 dB difference makes the Klipsch RP-404C II a more sensitive speaker compared to Jamo S 83 CEN, hence will play louder with the same amount of watts.
Sensitivity
Center Channel Speakers
Power Range
Power
range is the range of input power in watts RMS that a loudspeaker is designed to handle. Staying
within that range gives nominal performance; driving the speaker beyond its maximum wattage can damage it.
RP-404C II can handle a max power of 125 watts RMS, whereas S 83 CEN has a max power handling value of 80 watts RMS, 45 watts less than the RP-404C II.
Note that higher power handling does not make a speaker louder: that depends mainly on
sensitivity and impedance. The calculator below shows how loud each of these actually plays
on a real amplifier.
Which plays louder on your amplifier?
Starting with a popular amplifier - change it to the one you own, or any you are
considering, and watch both numbers move.
Input Type and Bi-Amping / Bi-Wiring
RP-404C II features Binding post type posts and S 83 CEN has a Binding post type posts. None of these speakers feature bi-amping/bi-wiring.
Klipsch RP-404C II's Binding post terminals
Jamo S 83 CEN's Binding post terminals
Physical Specs
The size of a speaker can sometimes be an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare Klipsch RP-404C II's and Jamo S 83 CEN's external dimensions. Klipsch RP-404C II has external dimensions of 147.0 x 683.0 x 166.0mm (5-3/4 x 26-7/8 x 6-1/2inch) whereas Jamo S 83 CEN has external dimensions of 216.0 x 499.0 x 247.0mm (8-1/2 x 19-5/8 x 9-11/16inch).
Klipsch RP-404C II is 69mm shorter and 81mm less deeper than Jamo S 83 CEN but it is also 184mm wider.
Below you can see the front view size comparison of Klipsch RP-404C II and Jamo S 83 CEN in scale.
Comparison image of Klipsch RP-404C II and Jamo S 83 CEN Size and External Dimensions
Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited.
The base surface area of the Klipsch RP-404C II is approximately 1133.8cm2 / 175.7inch2 and base area of the Jamo S 83 CEN is approximately 1232.5cm2 / 191.0inch2. The RP-404C II requires 8% less surface area than the S 83 CEN which gives it a small advantage on placement in tight spaces.
Weight Comparison The weight of a loudspeaker can become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often. Weight of a speaker can also "sometimes" be an indicator of the rigidity of the enclosure and the quality of the internal components used. The Klipsch RP-404C II weighs 9.20kg / 20.2lbs and the Jamo S 83 CEN weighs 6.80kg / 15lbs. This makes the RP-404C II 35% heavier than the S 83 CEN.
Here is a comparison of how RP-404C II and S 83 CEN's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Passive Center Channel class.
Weight
All Center Channel Speakers
What's in the Box of Klipsch RP-404C II?
Here are the items that are included inside the box of RP-404C II:
- Center channel loudspeaker
- Grille
- User Manual
- Important Safety Instructions
- Warranty Information
What's in the Box of Jamo S 83 CEN?
Here are the items that come with the S 83 CEN:
- Center-channel loudspeaker
- Grille
- User Manual
- Important Safety Instructions
- Warranty Information
 Max Input Power |
125 watts
vs
80 watts
|
Handle more power from your amplifier |
 Sensitivity |
94 dB
vs
87 dB
|
Play louder with same amount of amplification power |
 Number of Woofers |
4
vs
2
|
More woofers |
 Height |
147mm
vs
216mm
|
Easier to fit in smaller spaces |
 Base Surface Area |
1133cm2
vs
1232cm2
|
Takes less floor space |
|
Woofer Size |
5 inches
vs
4 inches
|
Larger woofer |
|
Low Frequency Response |
65 Hz
vs
87 Hz
|
Generates deeper bass |
 High Frequency Response |
26k Hz
vs
25k Hz
|
Generates higher frequency |
 Price per pair* |
229USD
vs
599USD
|
costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time) |
| General |
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-404C II |
Jamo S 83 CEN |
| Brand |
Klipsch |
Jamo |
| Speaker Type |
Center channel speaker |
Center channel speaker |
| Power Range |
up to 125 watts |
up to 80 watts |
| Sensitivity |
94 dB |
87 dB |
| Impedance |
8 ohms |
8 ohms |
| Frequency Response |
87-25k Hz |
65-26k Hz |
Drivers |
|
|
| Woofer Quantity |
4 |
2 |
| Woofer Size |
4" |
5" |
| Woofer Composition |
Cerametallic cone |
polyfiber |
| Woofer Surround Material |
Rubber |
n/a |
| Tweeter Size |
1" |
1" |
| Tweeter Type |
Tractrix Horn |
soft dome with an integrated waveguide |
| Aimable Tweeter |
No |
No |
| Midrange Driver |
No |
No |
| Crossover Frequency |
1900 Hz |
2000Hz |
| Firing Direction |
n/a |
rear |
Physical Specs |
|
|
| Height |
147.0mm (5.8") |
216.0mm (8.5") |
| Width |
683.0mm (26.9") |
499.0mm (19.6") |
| Depth |
166.0mm (6.5") |
247.0mm (9.7") |
| Weight |
9.20kg (20.2lbs) |
6.80kg (15lbs) |
| Enclosure |
Acoustic Suspension |
Bass Reflex |
| Finish |
MDF/Wood-grain vinyl |
n/a |
| Available Colors |
Walnut, Black |
Black, White, Walnut |
| Grille |
Yes |
Yes |
| Moisture Resistancy |
No |
No |
Connections |
|
|
| Biamp Inputs |
No |
n/a |
Other |
|
|
| Parts Warranty |
5 Years |
5 Years |
| Labor Warranty |
5 Years |
5 Years |
These sit in different price classes - Klipsch RP-404C II costs roughly 2.6x what Jamo S 83 CEN does. Expect it to lead on paper; the question is whether the gap is audible enough in your room to be worth it.
| Area | Better | Why |
|---|
| Bass | B | Jamo S 83 CEN digs deeper - 65Hz against 87Hz. |
| Amplifier needs | A | Klipsch RP-404C II is more sensitive (94dB vs 87dB), so it goes louder on the same amplifier. |
| Headroom | A | Klipsch RP-404C II takes more power (125W vs 80W) - more in hand in a big room. |
| Size | depends | Klipsch RP-404C II is easier to place; Jamo S 83 CEN is bigger, which usually goes with fuller bass. Your room decides. |
| Cabinet | depends | Sealed vs Ported. Sealed is tighter and happier near a wall; ported digs lower but wants space behind it. |
| Expandability | depends | Neither adds bi-amping, a sub output or height drivers. Klipsch RP-404C II sits in a wider range (10 models), so a matched surround system is easier later. |
| Price | B | Jamo S 83 CEN is cheaper - $229 against $599, about 62% less; arguably a different class. |
A Klipsch RP-404C II B Jamo S 83 CEN
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both speakers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.
Which should you choose?
Klipsch RP-404C II is ahead, but only on 1 of the measured areas, and it costs about 2.6x the price. That is a lot of money for a narrow margin on paper - Jamo S 83 CEN looks like the sensible buy unless something else about the Klipsch RP-404C II appeals to you. If a subwoofer is in your plans, the bass gap largely stops mattering - you would be crossing over above 87Hz anyway, so judge these on the other rows instead. Match it to your room: we rate Klipsch RP-404C II the better fit for a mid-size room and a large room, and Jamo S 83 CEN for near-field listening and a small room.
And remember what a spec sheet cannot show: how each looks in your room and whether the finish suits it, what dealer support and warranty are like where you live, and how they actually sound to you. If you can hear them first - ideally with your own music - that will tell you more than any number above.