One is a streaming all-in-one and the other is an amplifier. Judge them on how many boxes you want and what you already own, not on the spec sheet alone.
| Area | Better | Why |
|---|
| Power | evenly matched | Effectively the same output - 80W against 90W into 8 ohms is under 1dB, which is not an audible difference in loudness. |
| Grip on hard loads | B | Arcam SA20 holds up better into a 4-ohm load: its output increases strongly to 150W, where the other increases strongly. That matters with demanding speakers far more than the 8-ohm figure does. |
| Noise floor | evenly matched | Much the same signal-to-noise ratio (105dB vs 106dB). |
| Built-in DAC | A | Both decode on board. Cambridge CXA81 II goes higher - 384kHz against 192kHz. Very few recordings exist above 192kHz, so treat this as headroom, not as sound quality. |
| Streaming | evenly matched | Only Cambridge CXA81 II has Roon. Neither list is longer in a way that matters - check the one service you actually pay for. |
| Analogue inputs | A | Cambridge CXA81 II takes more analogue sources - 5 against 4. |
| Phono stage | depends | Arcam SA20 has a built-in phono stage (MM) and Cambridge CXA81 II does not. Decisive if you own a turntable, completely irrelevant if you do not - and an outboard phono stage is easy to add later either way. |
| Room to grow | evenly matched | The same expansion options on both. |
| Amplifier class | depends | Cambridge CXA81 II is Class A/B and Arcam SA20 is Class G. Class A/B runs warm and is the long-established mainstream choice; Class G/H switches its supply rails to cut the heat a Class A/B design wastes. Modern examples of both measure well - judge by the rest of the page. |
| Price | A | Cambridge CXA81 II costs less - $1,199 against $1,650 at list. |
A Cambridge CXA81 II B Arcam SA20
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both amplifiers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.
Which should you choose?
Cambridge CXA81 II has the edge on paper, though not by much. The rows marked "depends" are more likely to decide this than the score is. If your speakers are a difficult load - 4 ohms nominal, big woofers, or a sensitivity in the low 80s - Arcam SA20 is the safer partner, because how an amplifier behaves when the impedance drops matters more than its 8-ohm rating. If you play records, Arcam SA20 saves you buying a phono stage; if you do not, ignore that row entirely.
What a spec sheet cannot show: how either sounds with your speakers, how the controls feel day to day, and what the app is like to live with - which is where most all-in-one amplifiers are actually won or lost. Power figures are the manufacturers' own and are not measured to a common standard, so treat small differences as noise. If you can hear both, that will tell you more than any row above.