SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS
    • By Type
      Passive Bookshelf Speakers Passive Floor-standing Speakers Passive Center Channel Speakers Passive In-wall Speakers All Passive Speakers Powered Subwoofers Powered Stereo Speakers
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Front Firing Port Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      By Brand
      Acoustic Energy Aperion ATC Audio-Technica Audioengine Bluesound Bowers Wilkins Buchardt Cambridge Audio Canton DALI Definitive Technology Dynaudio ELAC Emotiva Fluance Focal Fyne Audio Genelec GoldenEar Harbeth Jamo JBL Kanto KEF KLH Klipsch Leak Mackie Magnepan MartinLogan McIntosh Mission MoFi Monitor Audio Nuvo Onkyo OSD Paradigm Perlisten Polk Audio PS Audio PSB Q Acoustics REL Revel Russound Sennheiser Sonos Sonus faber Sony Spendor SVS Tannoy Technics Triangle Velodyne Victrola Wharfedale Wilson Audio Yamaha
  • AMPLIFIERS
    • By Type
      All Amplifiers Integrated Amplifiers Stereo Receivers Streaming Amplifiers Power Amplifiers Compact Amplifiers
      By Power
      Up to 60 watts 61 to 90 watts 91 to 120 watts 121 to 180 watts Over 180 watts
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      Home Theater
      All Home Theater Receivers Anthem ARCAM Denon Integra JBL Marantz McIntosh NAD Onkyo Sony Yamaha
      Headphone Amps
      All Headphone Amplifiers Cambridge Audio iFi Audio McIntosh Naim Pro-Ject Rotel Schiit Audio Sennheiser Yamaha
      Multi-Zone
      All Multi-Zone Amplifiers JBL McIntosh OSD Rotel Russound Sonos
      By Brand
      Accuphase Advance Paris Anthem Arcam Audio Research AudioControl Audioengine Audiolab Bluesound Bose Buchardt Cambridge Audio Cayin Denon Devialet ELAC Emotiva Eversolo FiiO Fosi Audio Hegel HiFi Rose Integra JBL Layer Audio Design LEAK Luxman Marantz Mark Levinson McIntosh Michi MISSION MOON Musical Fidelity NAD Naim Onkyo OSD Parasound Pass Labs Peachtree PrimaLuna Primare PS Audio Rega Rogue Audio Roksan Rotel Schiit Audio Sonos Sony SVS T+A TEAC Technics Vincent WiiM Yamaha
  • SMART FIND
  • TOOLS
  • BLOG
  1. Home
  2. Amplifiers
  3. Arcam SA35 vs Cambridge Audio Evo 150 SE
Arcam SA35 vs Cambridge Audio Evo 150 SE
x
Amp to replace
Change

Arcam SA35

Integrated Amplifier | 120 watts RMS into 8-ohms

Arcam SA35
Check price atAmazon›
Change
    
Cambridge Audio Evo 150 SE

Integrated Amplifier | 150 watts RMS into 8-ohms

Cambridge Audio Evo 150 SE
Check price atAmazon›
Arcam SA35 Arcam SA35
Check price atAmazon›
Cambridge Audio Evo 150 SE Cambridge Audio Evo...
Check price atAmazon›
Arcam SA35
See at AMAZON
Cambridge Audio Evo...
See at AMAZON

Arcam SA35 vs Cambridge Audio Evo 150 SE Integrated Amplifier Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing SA35 and Audio Evo 150 SE, two Integrated Amplifiers from Arcam and Cambridge Audio. Let's have a brief look at the main features of Arcam SA35 and Cambridge Audio Evo 150 SE first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Key SpecsArcam SA35Cambridge Audio Evo 150 SE
BrandArcam
United Kingdom · founded 1976
Cambridge Audio
United Kingdom · founded 1968
Power120 watts x 2 channels into 8 ohms and 200 watts x 2 channels into 4 ohms150 watts x 2 channels into 8 ohms and 250 watts x 2 channels into 4 ohms
Amplifier classClass GClass D
Built-in DACYesYes
Phono input2Yes
Headphone outputNo3.5mm
BluetoothYesYes
Weight12.00kg / 26.4lbs5.30kg / 11.7lbs
Dimensions (H x W x D)3-15/16" x 17-1/16" x 14-5/16"
100.0 x 433.4 x 363.5 mm
3-1/2" x 12-9/16" x 14-5/8"
88.9 x 319.1 x 371.5 mm

The rest of this page covers where each one wins, how they compare in size, their inputs and outputs, the full specifications and a verdict.


Reasons to choose Arcam SA35 over Cambridge Audio Evo 150 SE
Bluetooth Version v5.4 vs v4.2 Higher transfer rate and range
Coaxial Digital Inputs 2 vs 1 More options for connecting Digital sources

Reasons to choose Cambridge Audio Evo 150 SE over Arcam SA35
MSRP Price(*) 3,299USD vs 3,300USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)
Watts into 8-ohms 150 watts vs 120 watts Delivers higher power into 8-ohms speakers
Watts into 4-ohms 250 watts vs 200 watts Delivers higher power into 4-ohms speakers
Headphone Output 3.5mm vs No Connect your headphone to the amplifier
Base Surface Area 1185.5cm2/ 183.8inch2 vs 1575.4cm2/ 244.2inch2 takes less space in your room
Height 88mm vs 100mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces

Size, drawn to scale

FRONTArcam SA35 front: 433 x 100 mm (17.1 x 3.9 in)Cambridge Audio Evo 150 SE front: 319 x 89 mm (12.6 x 3.5 in)Arcam SA35433 × 100 mmCambridge Audio Evo 150 SE319 × 89 mmTOP / FOOTPRINTArcam SA35 footprint: 433 x 364 mm (17.1 x 14.3 in)Cambridge Audio Evo 150 SE footprint: 319 x 372 mm (12.6 x 14.6 in)Arcam SA35433 × 364 mmCambridge Audio Evo 150 SE319 × 372 mm
Both amplifiers and both views share one scale, so everything here is directly comparable. Hover a box for its dimensions.

One scale for both, aligned at the back panels the way they would sit against a wall, so the deeper one visibly stands further out.

Arcam SA35 needs about 33% more shelf area.

Inputs and Outputs

The input and output selections that are offered is an important factor when comparing two amplifiers. Here you can find how the I/O selections of the Arcam SA35 and Cambridge Audio Evo 150 SE differs from each other.

Arcam SA35 Inputs
  • 2 Optical Digital Input
  • 2 Coaxial Digital Input
  • USB Input:
Cambridge Audio Evo 150 SE Inputs
  • Phono Input
  • 2 Optical Digital Input
  • 1 Coaxial Digital Input
  • USB Input:
  • Ethernet Port
Outputs
  • Preamp Outputs
Outputs
  • Preamp Outputs
  • 3.5mm Headphone Output

Balanced connections

Cambridge Audio Evo 150 SE has balanced XLR connections and Arcam SA35 does not. A balanced cable carries the signal twice, on two conductors of opposite polarity. Interference picked up along the way lands on both equally and cancels when the two are recombined at the far end, so the longer the cable run and the noisier the surroundings, the more it is worth. Whether it also yields more power depends on how the amplifier is built inside - some are balanced end to end, others convert to single-ended internally and deliver the same either way.

Arcam SA35 vs Cambridge Audio Evo 150 SE full specifications

Every spec we hold for both, side by side
SpecificationArcam SA35Cambridge Audio Evo 150 SE
Overview
BrandArcamCambridge Audio
TypeStreaming Integrated AmplifierStreaming Integrated Amplifier
Channels22
Amplifier classClass GClass D
Output devicesSolid StateSolid State
ReleasedOctober 2024July 2025
List price$3,300$3,299
SeriesSAEvo
Power and performance
Power into 8 ohms120 W RMS150 W RMS
Power into 4 ohms200 W RMS250 W RMS
Power, as rated120 watts x 2 channels into 8 ohms and 200 watts x 2 channels into 4 ohms150 watts x 2 channels into 8 ohms and 250 watts x 2 channels into 4 ohms
Minimum impedance4 ohms4 ohms
Signal-to-noise ratio110 dB–
THD0.5%–
Frequency bandwidth20 Hz-20 kHz20 Hz-20 kHz
Digital and DAC
Built-in DACYesYes
Max bit depth32-bit32-bit
Max sample rate384 kHz384 kHz
DSD–Yes
Network and streaming
Wi-Fi802.11ax802.11ac
Ethernet–Yes
BluetoothYesYes
Bluetooth version5.44.2
AirPlay 2YesYes
ChromecastYesYes
RoonReadyReady
BluOSNoNo
HEOSNoNo
DTS Play-FiNoNo
Streaming services–Spotify, Tidal
Inputs
RCA inputs31
XLR inputsNo1
Phono input2Yes
Phono type–MM
Optical digital22
Coaxial digital21
USB inputYesYes
HDMI input11
HDMI ARC / eARC–ARC
Outputs
Preamp outputsYesYes
Pre-out / main-in loopNoNo
Subwoofer outputDualSingle
Headphone outputNo3.5mm
Features and control
Room correctionDirac LiveNo
CD playerNoNo
Physical
Dimensions (H x W x D)100.0 x 433.4 x 363.5 mm88.9 x 319.1 x 371.5 mm
Dimensions, inches3-15/16 x 17-1/16 x 14-5/16 inch3-1/2 x 12-9/16 x 14-5/8 inch
Weight12.00 kg (26.46 lbs)5.30 kg (11.68 lbs)
Removable power cordIEC 2-prongIEC 3-prong
Parts warranty5 Years2 Years
Labour warranty5 Years2 Years

A dash means the manufacturer does not publish that figure, or it does not apply. 51 specifications compared.

Verdict

No single best amplifier here. What decides it is what you have to drive, what you need to plug in, and how much of the system you want in one box.

AreaBetterWhy
PowerBCambridge Audio Evo 150 SE has more power - 150W against 120W into 8 ohms. That is about 1dB, which is a small step in loudness but real headroom on peaks.
Grip on hard loadsevenly matchedBoth behave much the same into 4 ohms - output increases strongly (200W and 250W).
Built-in DACBBoth decode on board, but only Cambridge Audio Evo 150 SE handles DSD.
Streamingevenly matchedThe same streaming platforms and services on both.
Room to growevenly matchedThe same expansion options on both.
Room correctionAArcam SA35 has room correction. In an awkward room that does more for the sound than any other difference on this page.
HeadphonesdependsOnly Cambridge Audio Evo 150 SE has a headphone output. Worth something if you listen late, nothing if you never do.
Amplifier classdependsArcam SA35 is Class G and Cambridge Audio Evo 150 SE is Class D. Class G/H switches its supply rails to cut the heat a Class A/B design wastes; Class D runs cool and draws almost nothing at idle. Modern examples of both measure well - judge by the rest of the page.
Shelf spacedependsCambridge Audio Evo 150 SE takes up about 25% less shelf area (1185cm² against 1575cm²).
Priceevenly matchedPriced within a few per cent of each other.
Watts per dollarBCambridge Audio Evo 150 SE is the cheaper watt - about $22 per watt against $28. A blunt measure, and it says nothing about how either sounds, but it is the honest one for raw output.

A Arcam SA35  B Cambridge Audio Evo 150 SE
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both amplifiers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.

Which should you choose?

Cambridge Audio Evo 150 SE has the edge on paper, though not by much. The rows marked "depends" are more likely to decide this than the score is.

What a spec sheet cannot show: how either sounds with your speakers, how the controls feel day to day, and what the app is like to live with - which is where most all-in-one amplifiers are actually won or lost. Power figures are the manufacturers' own and are not measured to a common standard, so treat small differences as noise. If you can hear both, that will tell you more than any row above.

LATEST BLOG POSTS
Marantz Cinema Series 2 Costs 200 Dollars More With the Same Power and Weight. Here Is What Changed.
SVS Won Best Budget Home Theater at CEDIA. Here Is the Bill, and Three Cheaper Ways to Build It
Dirac Live Is on 35 of the Amplifiers We List, and Nine of Them Charge Extra
Monitor Audio's In-Wall Subwoofers Show What Hiding Bass Really Costs
TAD's New Class D Amplifier Weighs 29 kg. Only One of the 72 We List Is Heavier.
The Marantz MCR 60n Has a CD Player, a Phono Stage and HDMI eARC. Nothing Else We List Has All Three.
Kanto Replaced the TUK With Two Speakers. Neither Has the Phono Stage.
A Triode Switch Used to Start at 3,495 Dollars. The Cayin Jazz 70 Is 1,399.

Most Popular Amplifiers
Yamaha A-S301
Yamaha A-S301
60 watts into 8-ohms
Audiolab 7000A
Audiolab 7000A
70 watts into 8-ohms
Yamaha A-S801
Yamaha A-S801
100 watts into 8-ohms
Yamaha A-S501
Yamaha A-S501
85 watts into 8-ohms
Sonos Amp
Sonos Amp
125 watts into 8-ohms
Denon PMA-900HNE
Denon PMA-900HNE
50 watts into 8-ohms
Denon PMA-600NE
Denon PMA-600NE
45 watts into 8-ohms
WiiM Amp Pro
WiiM Amp Pro
60 watts into 8-ohms
Denon PMA-1700NE
Denon PMA-1700NE
70 watts into 8-ohms
Marantz PM6007
Marantz PM6007
45 watts into 8-ohms
This site contains affiliate links. We may be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through one of them. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Copyright © 2026 by SpeakerDecision
About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

Report a Correction