SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS
    • By Type
      Passive Bookshelf Speakers Passive Floor-standing Speakers Passive Center Channel Speakers Passive In-wall Speakers All Passive Speakers Powered Subwoofers Powered Stereo Speakers
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Front Firing Port Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      By Brand
      Acoustic Energy Aperion ATC Audio-Technica Audioengine Bluesound Bowers Wilkins Buchardt Cambridge Audio Canton DALI Definitive Technology Dynaudio ELAC Emotiva Fluance Focal Fyne Audio Genelec GoldenEar Harbeth Jamo JBL Kanto KEF KLH Klipsch Leak Mackie Magnepan MartinLogan McIntosh Mission MoFi Monitor Audio Nuvo Onkyo OSD Paradigm Perlisten Polk Audio PS Audio PSB Q Acoustics REL Revel Russound Sennheiser Sonos Sonus faber Sony Spendor SVS Tannoy Technics Triangle Velodyne Victrola Wharfedale Wilson Audio Yamaha
  • AMPLIFIERS
    • By Type
      All Amplifiers Integrated Amplifiers Stereo Receivers Streaming Amplifiers Power Amplifiers Compact Amplifiers
      Home Theater
      All Home Theater Receivers AnthemARCAMDenonIntegraJBLMarantzMcIntoshNADOnkyoSonyYamaha
      By Power
      Up to 60 watts 61 to 90 watts 91 to 120 watts 121 to 180 watts Over 180 watts
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      By Brand
      Accuphase Advance Paris Anthem Arcam Audio Research AudioControl Audioengine Audiolab Bluesound Bose Buchardt Cambridge Audio Denon Devialet ELAC Emotiva Eversolo FiiO Fosi Audio Hegel HiFi Rose Integra JBL LEAK Luxman Marantz Mark Levinson McIntosh Michi MISSION MOON Musical Fidelity NAD Naim Onkyo OSD Parasound Pass Labs Peachtree PrimaLuna Primare PS Audio Rega Rogue Audio Roksan Rotel Schiit Audio Sonos Sony SVS T+A TEAC Technics Vincent WiiM Yamaha
  • SMART FIND
  • TOOLS
  • BLOG
  1. Home
  2. Passive In-wall Speakers
  3. Monitor Audio CP-WT260 vs Polk Audio 265-LS

Monitor Audio CP-WT260 vs Polk Audio 265-LS Comparison

x
Speaker to replace
Change

Monitor Audio CP-WT260

Passive In-wall | 65-25kHz

Monitor Audio CP-WT260
Check price atAmazon›
Change
    
Polk Audio 265-LS

Passive In-wall | 28-33kHz

Polk Audio 265-LS
Check price atAmazon›
Monitor Audio CP-WT260 Monitor Audio CP-WT2...
Check price atAmazon›
Polk Audio 265-LS Polk Audio 265-LS
Check price atAmazon›
Monitor Audio CP-WT2...
See at AMAZON
Polk Audio 265-LS
See at AMAZON

Monitor Audio CP-WT260 vs Polk Audio 265-LS Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing CP-WT260 and 265-LS, two Passive In-wall speakers from Monitor Audio and Polk Audio.

Let's have a brief look at the main features of Monitor Audio CP-WT260 and Polk Audio 265-LS first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Key SpecsMonitor Audio CP-WT260Polk Audio 265-LS
BrandMonitor Audio
United Kingdom · founded 1972
Polk Audio
United States · founded 1972
Design2-way3-way
Tweeter1" Hard-Dome1" Ring Radiator
Midrange—6.5"
Woofer6" C-CAM6.5" Aerated polypropylene
Frequency response65-25kHz28-33kHz
Sensitivity88 dB91 dB
Impedance6 ohms8 ohms
Power range20-65 watts10-200 watts
Weight—4.09kg / 9lbs
Dimensions (H x W x D)14.9375" x 8.9375" x 3.7500"
380.0 x 228.0 x 96.0mm
19.1875" x 7.2500" x 3-3/4"
488.0 x 185.0 x 95.3mm

What size room are the Monitor Audio CP-WT260 and Polk Audio 265-LS speakers good for?

The size of the room in which you are planning to use these loudspeakers is an important decision factor. Here we have compared their suitability to various sizes of environments considering their size and max power parameters:

Listening Environment* Monitor Audio CP-WT260 Polk Audio 265-LS
Near-field Good Poor
Small Room Good Average
Mid-size Room Average Good
Large Room Poor Average
Very Large Room No way Poor

(* Approximate Room sizes: Small < 100sq. ft / 9 m2, Mid-size: 100-220 sq. ft / 9-20 m2, Large 220-400 sq. ft / 20-36 m2, Very Large: > 400 sq. ft / 36 m2. Average Floor Height: 9" / 2.7m. Typical room sizes differ from country to country, and the actual listening experience changes depending on floor height, room shape, surface materials, listening position, speaker locations, etc.)

The sections below take each area in turn: drivers, frequency response, physical size and what you get in the box.


**This post contains affiliate links, and we will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through our links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.


Drivers

One of the fundamental differences between these two speakers is that CP-WT260 is a 2-way design whereas the 265-LS is a 3-way speaker. 3-way designs utilize a midrange driver in addition to the tweeter and woofer on 2-way designs. Designing a crossover for a 3-way speaker is a complicated process and generally increases the overall cost of the speaker.

Tweeter - 1 inchWoofer - 6 inch
Monitor Audio CP-WT260
Tweeter - 1 inchMidrange - 6.5 inchWoofer - 6.5 inch
Polk Audio 265-LS

TweeterMidrangeWoofer

Front view, drawn to scale - cabinets and drivers share one scale, so sizes are directly comparable. Hover a driver for its size.

Driver Monitor Audio CP-WT260 Polk Audio 265-LS
Driver Setup 2-way 3-way
Tweeter 1-inch 1-inch
Midrange - 1 x 6.5-inch
Woofer 1 x 6-inch 1 x 6.5-inch

CP-WT260 features a 1" Hard-Dome Tweeter and 1 x 6" C-CAM Woofer. On the other hand, the 265-LS features a 1" Ring Radiator Tweeter, a 6.5" Midrange and 1 x 6.5" Aerated polypropylene Woofer.

Frequency Response

CP-WT260 has a frequency range of 65-25kHz whereas 265-LS has a frequency range of 28-33kHz. With a minimum frequency of 28Hz, the 265-LS can go significantly deeper on the low side and provide stronger bass compared to the CP-WT260's min frequency of 65Hz.

The graph below depicts how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average Low Frequency values of other speakers in the In-wall class in our database.

Low Frequency

In-wall Speakers

CP-WT260
265-LS
Min
Average
Median

Neither pair reaches down to 20Hz, the usual definition of full-range, which is normal for speakers of this size. If you want the bottom octave for movies or bass-heavy music, add a subwoofer to whichever you choose. Visit our Powered Subwoofers section to find out more about the available options.

Impedance and Sensitivity

CP-WT260 is a 6 ohms speaker compared to the 265-LS which has a nominal impedance of 8 ohms.

These two speakers also have different sensitivity levels. CP-WT260 sensitivity is rated at 88 dB and the 265-LS's is rated at 91 dB. This 3 dB difference makes the Polk Audio 265-LS a more sensitive speaker compared to Monitor Audio CP-WT260, hence will play louder with the same amount of watts.

Sensitivity

In-wall Speakers

CP-WT260
265-LS
Min
Average
Median

Power Range

Power range is the range of input power in watts RMS that a loudspeaker is designed to handle. Staying within that range gives nominal performance; driving the speaker beyond its maximum wattage can damage it.

265-LS can handle a max power of 200 watts RMS, whereas CP-WT260 has a max power handling value of 65 watts RMS, 135 watts less than the 265-LS.

Note that higher power handling does not make a speaker louder: that depends mainly on sensitivity and impedance. The calculator below shows how loud each of these actually plays on a real amplifier.

Which plays louder on your amplifier?

Starting with a popular amplifier - change it to the one you own, or any you are considering, and watch both numbers move.

Monitor Audio CP-WT260
 
Polk Audio 265-LS
 

Input Type and Bi-Amping / Bi-Wiring

CP-WT260 features Spring post type posts and 265-LS has a Spring post type posts. None of these speakers feature bi-amping/bi-wiring.

Physical Specs

The size of a speaker can sometimes be an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare Monitor Audio CP-WT260's and Polk Audio 265-LS's external dimensions. Monitor Audio CP-WT260 has external dimensions of 380.0 x 228.0 x 96.0mm (14.9375-inch x 8.9375-inch x 3.7500-inch) whereas Polk Audio 265-LS has external dimensions of 488.0 x 185.0 x 95.3mm (19.1875-inch x 7.2500-inch x 0.0000-inch).

Polk Audio 265-LS is 43mm narrower and 0.7mm less deeper than Monitor Audio CP-WT260 but it is also 108mm taller.

What's in the Box of Monitor Audio CP-WT260?

Here are the items that are included inside the box of CP-WT260:
  • In-wall speaker
  • Magnetic grille
  • Cosmetic scrim
  • Installation Guide
  • Important Safety Instructions
  • Limited Warranty/Registration Card
  • MountingTemplate

What's in the Box of Polk Audio 265-LS?

Here are the items that come with the 265-LS:
  • In-wall loudspeaker
  • White metal grille
  • Power Port plug
  • Mounting template
  • Owners Manual


Reasons to choose Monitor Audio CP-WT260 over Polk Audio 265-LS

Height 380mm vs 488mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces

Reasons to choose Polk Audio 265-LS over Monitor Audio CP-WT260

Max Input Power 200 watts vs 65 watts Handle more power from your amplifier
Driver Setup 3-way vs 2-way Have a dedicated mid-range driver
Sensitivity 91 dB vs 88 dB Play louder with same amount of amplification power
Nominal Impedance 8 ohms vs 6 ohms Less selective with amplifiers
Woofer Size 6.5 inches vs 6 inches Larger woofer
Low Frequency Response 28 Hz vs 65 Hz Generates deeper bass
High Frequency Response 33k Hz vs 25k Hz Generates higher frequency
Base Surface Area 176cm2 vs 218cm2 Takes less floor space
Price per pair* 758USD vs 1100USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)

Monitor Audio CP-WT260 vs Polk Audio 265-LS Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications
General Monitor Audio CP-WT260 Polk Audio 265-LS
Brand Monitor Audio Polk Audio
Speaker Type Passive In-wall Speaker Passive In-wall Speaker
Power Range 20-65 watts 10-200 watts
Sensitivity 88 dB 91 dB
Impedance 6 ohms 8 ohms
Frequency Response 65-25kHz 28-33kHz
Drivers
Woofer Quantity 1 1
Woofer Size 6" 6.5"
Woofer Composition C-CAM Aerated polypropylene
Woofer Surround Material Rubber Rubber
Tweeter Size 1" 1"
Tweeter Type Hard-Dome Ring Radiator
Aimable Tweeter No No
Midrange Driver No 6.5"
Physical Specs
Height 380.0mm (15") 488.0mm (19.2")
Width 228.0mm (9") 185.0mm (7.3")
Depth 96.0mm (3.8") 95.3mm (3.8")
Weight n/a 4.09kg (9lbs)
Enclosure In-wall In-wall
Moisture Resistancy No No
Connections
Biamp Inputs No No
Other
Parts Warranty Lifetime Lifetime
Labor Warranty Lifetime Lifetime

Verdict

A generation apart: Monitor Audio CP-WT260 is the newer design, against a 2010 model. Newer is not automatically better, but the older one is more likely to be discounted or near run-out.

AreaBetterWhy
BassBPolk Audio 265-LS digs deeper - 28Hz against 65Hz.
Amplifier needsBPolk Audio 265-LS is more sensitive (91dB vs 88dB), so it goes louder on the same amplifier.
Amplifier matchBPolk Audio 265-LS is the easier load at 8 ohms.
HeadroomBPolk Audio 265-LS takes more power (200W vs 65W) - more in hand in a big room.
SizedependsSimilar cabinet size - neither is easier to fit.
ExpandabilitydependsNeither adds bi-amping, a sub output or height drivers. Monitor Audio CP-WT260 sits in a wider range (5 models), so a matched surround system is easier later.
PriceBPolk Audio 265-LS is cheaper - $758 against $1,100, about 31% less.

A Monitor Audio CP-WT260  B Polk Audio 265-LS
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both speakers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.

Which should you choose?

Polk Audio 265-LS is the easier recommendation: it leads on most of the measured areas and costs less. Take Monitor Audio CP-WT260 if its size, looks or fit in your room suit you better. If a subwoofer is in your plans, the bass gap largely stops mattering - you would be crossing over above 65Hz anyway, so judge these on the other rows instead. Match it to your room: we rate Monitor Audio CP-WT260 the better fit for near-field listening and a small room, and Polk Audio 265-LS for a mid-size room and a large room.

And remember what a spec sheet cannot show: how each looks in your room and whether the finish suits it, what dealer support and warranty are like where you live, and how they actually sound to you. If you can hear them first - ideally with your own music - that will tell you more than any number above.


Most Popular Speakers
Klipsch Reference R-51M
Klipsch R-51M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
2-way | 87 dB | 6 ohms
Wharfedale Elysian 2
Wharfedale Elysian 2
3-way | 89 dB | 4 ohms
KEF Q150
KEF Q150
2-way | 86 dB | 8 ohms
Bowers & Wilkins 606 S2 Anniversary Edition
B&W 606 S2
2-way | 88 dB | 8 ohms
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-500M
Klipsch RP-500M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
Wharfedale EVO5.1
Wharfedale EVO5.1
2-way | 87 dB | 4 ohms
Wharfedale EVO4.1
Wharfedale EVO4.1
2-way | 87 dB | 8 ohms
Copyright © 2026 by SpeakerDecision
About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

Report a Correction