SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS
    • By Type
      Passive Bookshelf Speakers Passive Floor-standing Speakers Passive Center Channel Speakers Passive In-wall Speakers All Passive Speakers Powered Subwoofers Powered Stereo Speakers
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Front Firing Port Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      By Brand
      Acoustic Energy Aperion ATC Audio-Technica Audioengine Bluesound Bowers Wilkins Buchardt Cambridge Audio Canton DALI Definitive Technology Dynaudio ELAC Emotiva Fluance Focal Fyne Audio Genelec GoldenEar Harbeth Jamo JBL Kanto KEF KLH Klipsch Leak Mackie Magnepan MartinLogan McIntosh Mission MoFi Monitor Audio Nuvo Onkyo OSD Paradigm Perlisten Polk Audio PS Audio PSB Q Acoustics REL Revel Russound Sennheiser Sonos Sonus faber Sony Spendor SVS Tannoy Technics Triangle Velodyne Victrola Wharfedale Wilson Audio Yamaha
  • AMPLIFIERS
    • By Type
      All Amplifiers Integrated Amplifiers Stereo Receivers Streaming Amplifiers Power Amplifiers Compact Amplifiers
      By Power
      Up to 60 watts 61 to 90 watts 91 to 120 watts 121 to 180 watts Over 180 watts
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      Home Theater
      All Home Theater Receivers Anthem ARCAM Denon Integra JBL Marantz McIntosh NAD Onkyo Sony Yamaha
      Headphone Amps
      All Headphone Amplifiers Cambridge Audio iFi Audio McIntosh Naim Pro-Ject Rotel Schiit Audio Sennheiser Yamaha
      Multi-Zone
      All Multi-Zone Amplifiers JBL McIntosh OSD Rotel Russound Sonos
      By Brand
      Accuphase Advance Paris Anthem Arcam Audio Research AudioControl Audioengine Audiolab Bluesound Bose Buchardt Cambridge Audio Cayin Denon Devialet ELAC Emotiva Eversolo FiiO Fosi Audio Hegel HiFi Rose Integra JBL Layer Audio Design LEAK Luxman Marantz Mark Levinson McIntosh Michi MISSION MOON Musical Fidelity NAD Naim Onkyo OSD Parasound Pass Labs Peachtree PrimaLuna Primare PS Audio Rega Rogue Audio Roksan Rotel Schiit Audio Sonos Sony SVS T+A TEAC Technics Vincent WiiM Yamaha
  • SMART FIND
  • TOOLS
  • BLOG
  1. Home
  2. MartinLogan Speakers
  3. MartinLogan ESL C vs MartinLogan EFX

MartinLogan ESL C vs MartinLogan EFX Comparison

x
Speaker to replace
Change

MartinLogan ESL C

Passive Center Channel | 66-23k Hz

MartinLogan ElectroMotion ESL C
Check price atAmazon›
Change
    
MartinLogan EFX

Passive Surround | 68-22k Hz

MartinLogan EFX
Check price atAmazon›
MartinLogan ESL C MartinLogan ESL C
Check price atAmazon›
MartinLogan EFX MartinLogan EFX
Check price atAmazon›
MartinLogan ESL C
See at AMAZON
MartinLogan EFX
See at AMAZON

MartinLogan ESL C vs MartinLogan EFX Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing two different types of speakers by MartinLogan. MartinLogan ElectroMotion ESL C is a Center Channel speaker whereas the EFX is a Surround speaker.

Let's have a brief look at the main features of MartinLogan ESL C and MartinLogan EFX first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Key SpecsMartinLogan ESL CMartinLogan EFX
BrandMartinLogan
United States · founded 1982
MartinLogan
United States · founded 1982
Design3-way2-way
Tweeter1 x 1-7/16" Folded MotionElectrostatic
Midrange9 x 6.375"—
Woofer2 x 5.25" high-rigidity aluminum woofers6.5" Aluminium
Frequency response66-23k Hz68-22k Hz
Sensitivity89 dB90 dB
Impedance4 ohms6 ohms
Power range20-300 watts20-300 watts
Weight14.55kg / 32lbs11.10kg / 24.4lbs
Dimensions (H x W x D)7-5/8" x 22-7/8" x 16-1/8"
194.0 x 582.0 x 410.0mm
48-3/4" x 9-3/8" x 6-1/2"
1239.0 x 238.0 x 165.0mm

ElectroMotion ESL C and EFX are members of MartinLogan's ElectroMotion series of speakers. Below you can find the loudspeakers from this series.

MartinLogan ElectroMotion Series History
Model Body Frequency SensitivityImpedance Woofer
MartinLogan ESL C
Center Channel 66-23k Hz 89 dB4Ω 2 x 5.25"
MartinLogan ESL X
  
Floor-standing 41-22k Hz 91 dB6Ω 2 x 8"
MartinLogan ESL
  
Floor-standing 42-22k Hz 91 dB6Ω 1 x 8"
MartinLogan EFX
Surround 68-22k Hz 90 dB6Ω 1 x 6.5"
MartinLogan ElectroMotion FX2
  
Surround 55-25k Hz 93 dB5Ω 1 x 6.5"

What size room are the MartinLogan ESL C and MartinLogan EFX speakers good for?

The size of the room in which you are planning to use these loudspeakers is an important decision factor. Here we have compared their suitability to various sizes of environments considering their size and max power parameters:

Listening Environment* MartinLogan ESL C MartinLogan EFX
Near-field Poor Good
Small Room Poor Good
Mid-size Room Good Average
Large Room Good Poor
Very Large Room Average No way

(* Approximate Room sizes: Small < 100sq. ft / 9 m2, Mid-size: 100-220 sq. ft / 9-20 m2, Large 220-400 sq. ft / 20-36 m2, Very Large: > 400 sq. ft / 36 m2. Average Floor Height: 9" / 2.7m. Typical room sizes differ from country to country, and the actual listening experience changes depending on floor height, room shape, surface materials, listening position, speaker locations, etc.)

The sections below take each area in turn: drivers, frequency response, physical size and what you get in the box.


Drivers

One of the fundamental differences between these two speakers is that ElectroMotion ESL C is a 3-way design whereas the EFX is a 2-way speaker. 3-way designs utilize a midrange driver in addition to the tweeter and woofer on 2-way designs. Designing a crossover for a 3-way speaker is a complicated process and generally increases the overall cost of the speaker.

Woofer - 5.25 inchWoofer - 5.25 inch
MartinLogan ESL C
Woofer - 6.5 inch
MartinLogan EFX

Woofer

Front view, drawn to scale - cabinets and drivers share one scale, so sizes are directly comparable. Hover a driver for its size.

Driver MartinLogan ESL C MartinLogan EFX
Driver Setup 3-way 2-way
Tweeter 1 x 1-7/16-inch -inch
Midrange 1 x 9 x 6.375-inch -
Woofer 2 x 5.25-inch 1 x 6.5-inch

ElectroMotion ESL C features a 1 x 1-7/16" Folded Motion Tweeter, a 9 x 6.375" Midrange and 2 x 5.25" high-rigidity aluminum woofers Woofer. On the other hand, the EFX features a " Electrostatic panel Electrostatic Tweeter and 1 x 6.5" Aluminium Woofer with a Crossover frequency at 530Hz.

Frequency Response

ElectroMotion ESL C has a frequency range of 66-23k Hz whereas EFX has a frequency range of 68-22k Hz. With a minimum frequency of 66Hz, the ElectroMotion ESL C can go slightly deeper then the EFX's min frequency of 68Hz.

The graph below depicts how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average Low Frequency values of other speakers in the Center Channel class in our database.

Low Frequency

Center Channel Speakers

ElectroMotion ESL C
EFX
Min
Average
Median

Neither pair reaches down to 20Hz, the usual definition of full-range, which is normal for speakers of this size. If you want the bottom octave for movies or bass-heavy music, add a subwoofer to whichever you choose. Visit our Powered Subwoofers section to find out more about the available options.

Impedance and Sensitivity

ElectroMotion ESL C is a 4 ohms speaker compared to the EFX which has a nominal impedance of 6 ohms. Lower impedance speakers, especially the ones that are rated at 4 ohms may put more pressure on the amplifier unit especially when played at high volume levels, so make sure the amp you pair with the ElectroMotion ESL C can provide this impedance level.

These two speakers also have different sensitivity levels. ElectroMotion ESL C sensitivity is rated at 89 dB and the EFX's is rated at 90 dB. This 1 dB difference makes the MartinLogan EFX a more sensitive speaker compared to MartinLogan ESL C, hence will play louder with the same amount of watts.

Sensitivity

Center Channel Speakers

ElectroMotion ESL C
EFX
Min
Average
Median

Power Range

Power range is the range of input power in watts RMS that a loudspeaker is designed to handle. Staying within that range gives nominal performance; driving the speaker beyond its maximum wattage can damage it.

ElectroMotion ESL C and EFX have the same power range of 20-300 watts.

Note that higher power handling does not make a speaker louder: that depends mainly on sensitivity and impedance. The calculator below shows how loud each of these actually plays on a real amplifier.

Which plays louder on your amplifier?

Starting with a popular amplifier - change it to the one you own, or any you are considering, and watch both numbers move.

MartinLogan ESL C
 
MartinLogan EFX
 

Input Type and Bi-Amping / Bi-Wiring

ElectroMotion ESL C features Binding post type posts and EFX has a Binding post type posts. None of these speakers feature bi-amping/bi-wiring.

MartinLogan ESL C Terminals
MartinLogan ESL C's Binding post terminals

Physical Specs

The size of a speaker can sometimes be an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare MartinLogan ESL C's and MartinLogan EFX's external dimensions. MartinLogan ESL C has external dimensions of 194.0 x 582.0 x 410.0mm (7-5/8 x 22-7/8 x 16-1/8inch) whereas MartinLogan EFX has external dimensions of 1239.0 x 238.0 x 165.0mm (48-3/4 x 9-3/8 x 6-1/2inch).

MartinLogan EFX is 344mm narrower and 245mm less deeper than MartinLogan ESL C but it is also 1045mm taller.

Size, drawn to scale

FRONTMartinLogan ESL C front: 582 x 194 mm (22.9 x 7.6 in)MartinLogan EFX front: 238 x 1239 mm (9.4 x 48.8 in)MartinLogan ESL C582 × 194 mmMartinLogan EFX238 × 1239 mmTOP / FOOTPRINTMartinLogan ESL C footprint: 582 x 410 mm (22.9 x 16.1 in)MartinLogan EFX footprint: 238 x 165 mm (9.4 x 6.5 in)MartinLogan ESL C582 × 410 mmMartinLogan EFX238 × 165 mm
Both speakers and both views share one scale, so everything here is directly comparable. Hover a box for its dimensions.

One scale for both, standing on the same surface and pushed back to the same wall, so the deeper one visibly sticks out further.

MartinLogan ESL C needs about 508% more floor or shelf area. MartinLogan ESL C is 245mm deeper, so it stands that much further out from the wall. MartinLogan EFX is 1045mm taller.

Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited. The base surface area of the MartinLogan ESL C is approximately 2386.2cm2 / 369.9inch2 and base area of the MartinLogan EFX is approximately 392.7cm2 / 60.9inch2. The ElectroMotion ESL C requires 508% more surface area than the EFX which gives it a small disadvantage on placement in tight spaces.

What's in the Box of MartinLogan ESL C?

Here are the items that are included inside the box of ElectroMotion ESL C:
  • Center-channel loudspeaker
  • Grille
  • AC power supply (attached 10-feet DC cord)
  • User-feets Manual (En/Fr)
  • Product Registration Card


Reasons to choose MartinLogan ElectroMotion ESL C over MartinLogan EFX

Driver Setup 3-way vs 2-way Have a dedicated mid-range driver
Number of Woofers 2 vs 1 More woofers
Low Frequency Response 66 Hz vs 68 Hz Generates deeper bass
High Frequency Response 23k Hz vs 22k Hz Generates higher frequency
Height 194mm vs 1239mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces
Price per pair* 1700USD vs 4400USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)

Reasons to choose MartinLogan EFX over MartinLogan ElectroMotion ESL C

Sensitivity 90 dB vs 89 dB Play louder with same amount of amplification power
Nominal Impedance 6 ohms vs 4 ohms Less selective with amplifiers
Woofer Size 6.5 inches vs 5.25 inches Larger woofer
Base Surface Area 392cm2 vs 2386cm2 Takes less floor space

MartinLogan ESL C vs MartinLogan EFX Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications
General MartinLogan ElectroMotion ESL C MartinLogan EFX
Brand MartinLogan MartinLogan
Speaker Type Center channel speaker Surround speaker
Power Range 20-300 watts 20-300 watts
Sensitivity 89 dB 90 dB
Impedance 4 ohms 6 ohms
Frequency Response 66-23k Hz 68-22k Hz
Drivers
Woofer Quantity 2 1
Woofer Size 5.25" 6.5"
Woofer Composition high-rigidity aluminum woofers Aluminium
Tweeter Size 1 x 1-7/16" -
Tweeter Type Folded Motion Electrostatic
Aimable Tweeter No No
Midrange Driver 9 x 6.375" No
Crossover Frequency n/a 530Hz
Suggested Break-in Period Allow 72 hours of break-in at 90 dB n/a
Physical Specs
Height 194.0mm (7.6") 1239.0mm (48.8")
Width 582.0mm (22.9") 238.0mm (9.4")
Depth 410.0mm (16.1") 165.0mm (6.5")
Weight 14.55kg (32lbs) 11.10kg (24.4lbs)
Enclosure Passive Radiator Dipole
Available Colors Black n/a
Grille Yes Yes
Moisture Resistancy No No
Connections
Biamp Inputs n/a No
Other
Parts Warranty 5 Yrs w/ Registration
Labor Warranty 5 Yrs w/ Registration

Verdict

Siblings in MartinLogan's ElectroMotion series, so they share a family sound. It comes down to size, output and price.

AreaBetterWhy
Bassevenly matchedMuch the same reach (66Hz vs 68Hz).
Amplifier needsevenly matchedSimilar sensitivity (89dB vs 90dB) - both want much the same power.
Amplifier matchBMartinLogan EFX is the easier load at 6 ohms; the other is 4 ohms and wants an amplifier rated for it.
Headroomevenly matchedSimilar power handling (300W vs 300W).
SizedependsSimilar cabinet size - neither is easier to fit.
TypedependsA Passive Center Channel against a Passive Surround - a different job rather than a better one.
CabinetdependsPassive Radiator vs Dipole.
PriceAMartinLogan ESL C is cheaper - $1,700 against $4,400, about 61% less; arguably a different class.

A MartinLogan ESL C  B MartinLogan EFX
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both speakers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.

Which should you choose?

MartinLogan EFX is ahead, but only on 1 of the measured areas, and it costs about 2.6x the price. That is a lot of money for a narrow margin on paper - MartinLogan ESL C looks like the sensible buy unless something else about the MartinLogan EFX appeals to you. Match it to your room: we rate MartinLogan ESL C the better fit for a mid-size room and a large room, and MartinLogan EFX for near-field listening and a small room. If your amplifier is modest, vintage or valve-based, MartinLogan EFX is the safer partner - the other will want more current or more watts to sound its best.

And remember what a spec sheet cannot show: how each looks in your room and whether the finish suits it, what dealer support and warranty are like where you live, and how they actually sound to you. If you can hear them first - ideally with your own music - that will tell you more than any number above.


Most Popular Speakers
Klipsch Reference R-51M
Klipsch R-51M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
2-way | 87 dB | 6 ohms
Wharfedale Elysian 2
Wharfedale Elysian 2
3-way | 89 dB | 4 ohms
KEF Q150
KEF Q150
2-way | 86 dB | 8 ohms
Bowers & Wilkins 606 S2 Anniversary Edition
B&W 606 S2
2-way | 88 dB | 8 ohms
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-500M
Klipsch RP-500M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
Wharfedale EVO5.1
Wharfedale EVO5.1
2-way | 87 dB | 4 ohms
Wharfedale EVO4.1
Wharfedale EVO4.1
2-way | 87 dB | 8 ohms
This site contains affiliate links. We may be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through one of them. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Copyright © 2026 by SpeakerDecision
About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

Report a Correction