SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS
    • By Type
      Passive Bookshelf Speakers Passive Floor-standing Speakers Passive Center Channel Speakers Passive In-wall Speakers All Passive Speakers Powered Subwoofers Powered Stereo Speakers
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Front Firing Port Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      By Brand
      Acoustic Energy Aperion ATC Audio-Technica Audioengine Bluesound Bowers Wilkins Buchardt Cambridge Audio Canton DALI Definitive Technology Dynaudio ELAC Emotiva Fluance Focal Fyne Audio Genelec GoldenEar Harbeth Jamo JBL Kanto KEF KLH Klipsch Leak Mackie Magnepan MartinLogan McIntosh Mission MoFi Monitor Audio Nuvo Onkyo OSD Paradigm Perlisten Polk Audio PS Audio PSB Q Acoustics REL Revel Russound Sennheiser Sonos Sonus faber Sony Spendor SVS Tannoy Technics Triangle Velodyne Victrola Wharfedale Wilson Audio Yamaha
  • AMPLIFIERS
    • By Type
      All Amplifiers Integrated Amplifiers Stereo Receivers Streaming Amplifiers Power Amplifiers Compact Amplifiers
      Home Theater
      All Home Theater Receivers AnthemARCAMDenonIntegraJBLMarantzMcIntoshNADOnkyoSonyYamaha
      By Power
      Up to 60 watts 61 to 90 watts 91 to 120 watts 121 to 180 watts Over 180 watts
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      By Brand
      Accuphase Advance Paris Anthem Arcam Audio Research AudioControl Audioengine Audiolab Bluesound Bose Buchardt Cambridge Audio Denon Devialet ELAC Emotiva Eversolo FiiO Fosi Audio Hegel HiFi Rose Integra JBL LEAK Luxman Marantz Mark Levinson McIntosh Michi MISSION MOON Musical Fidelity NAD Naim Onkyo OSD Parasound Pass Labs Peachtree PrimaLuna Primare PS Audio Rega Rogue Audio Roksan Rotel Schiit Audio Sonos Sony SVS T+A TEAC Technics Vincent WiiM Yamaha
  • SMART FIND
  • TOOLS
  • BLOG
  1. Home
  2. Passive Floor-standing Speakers
  3. KEF R11 Meta vs Klipsch RP-8000F II

KEF R11 Meta vs Klipsch RP-8000F II Comparison

x
Speaker to replace
Change

KEF R11 Meta

Passive Floor-standing | 46-28k Hz

KEF R11 Meta
Check price atAmazon›
Change
    
Klipsch RP-8000F II

Passive Floor-standing | 32-25k Hz

Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-8000F II
Check price atAmazon›
KEF R11 Meta KEF R11 Meta
Check price atAmazon›
Klipsch RP-8000F II Klipsch RP-8000F II
Check price atAmazon›
KEF R11 Meta
See at AMAZON
Klipsch RP-8000F II
See at AMAZON

KEF R11 Meta vs Klipsch RP-8000F II Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing R11 Meta and RP-8000F II, two Passive Floor-standing speakers from KEF and Klipsch.

Let's have a brief look at the main features of KEF R11 Meta and Klipsch RP-8000F II first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Key SpecsKEF R11 MetaKlipsch RP-8000F II
BrandKEF
United Kingdom · founded 1961
Klipsch
United States · founded 1946
Design3-way2-way
Uni-Q driver12th Generation Uni-Q—
Tweeter1" Vented dome1" Tractrix Horn
Midrange5"—
Woofer4 x 6.5" Hybrid Aluminum2 x 8" Cerametallic cone
Frequency response46-28k Hz32-25k Hz
Sensitivity90 dB98 dB
Impedance4 ohms8 ohms
Power range15-300 wattsup to 150 watts
Weight36.59kg / 80.5lbs28.00kg / 61.6lbs
Dimensions (H x W x D)51" x 12-1/4" x 15-1/8"
1296.0 x 312.0 x 385.0mm
43-3/16" x 10-7/8" x 17-9/16"
1097.0 x 277.0 x 447.0mm

What size room are the KEF R11 Meta and Klipsch RP-8000F II speakers good for?

The size of the room in which you are planning to use these loudspeakers is an important decision factor. Here we have compared their suitability to various sizes of environments considering their size and max power parameters:

Listening Environment* KEF R11 Meta Klipsch RP-8000F II
Near-field Are you nuts? Bad
Small Room Poor Poor
Mid-size Room Average Good
Large Room Good Good
Very Large Room Good Poor

(* Approximate Room sizes: Small < 100sq. ft / 9 m2, Mid-size: 100-220 sq. ft / 9-20 m2, Large 220-400 sq. ft / 20-36 m2, Very Large: > 400 sq. ft / 36 m2. Average Floor Height: 9" / 2.7m. Typical room sizes differ from country to country, and the actual listening experience changes depending on floor height, room shape, surface materials, listening position, speaker locations, etc.)

The sections below take each area in turn: drivers, frequency response, physical size and what you get in the box.


**This post contains affiliate links, and we will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through our links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.


Drivers

One of the fundamental differences between these two speakers is that R11 Meta is a 3-way design whereas the RP-8000F II is a 2-way speaker. 3-way designs utilize a midrange driver in addition to the tweeter and woofer on 2-way designs. Designing a crossover for a 3-way speaker is a complicated process and generally increases the overall cost of the speaker.

Tweeter - 1 inchMidrange - 5 inchWoofer - 6.5 inchWoofer - 6.5 inchWoofer - 6.5 inchWoofer - 6.5 inch
KEF R11 Meta
Tweeter - 1 inchWoofer - 8 inchWoofer - 8 inch
Klipsch RP-8000F II

TweeterMidrangeWoofer

Front view, drawn to scale - cabinets and drivers share one scale, so sizes are directly comparable. Hover a driver for its size.

Driver KEF R11 Meta Klipsch RP-8000F II
Driver Setup 3-way 2-way
Tweeter 1-inch 1-inch
Midrange 1 x 5-inch -
Woofer 4 x 6.5-inch 2 x 8-inch

R11 Meta features a 1" Aluminum with MAT absorber Vented dome Tweeter, a 5" Midrange and 4 x 6.5" Hybrid Aluminum Woofer with a Crossover frequency at 330Hz and 2500Hz. On the other hand, the RP-8000F II features a 1" titanium Tractrix Horn Tweeter and 2 x 8" Cerametallic cone Woofer with a Crossover frequency at 1630 Hz.

KEF R11 Meta driver frequency bandsKEF R11 MetaKlipsch RP-8000F II46-33032-1.6kWoofer330-2.5kMidrange2.5k-28k1.6k-25kTweeter20501002005001k2k5k10k20k40kHz, log scale

Frequency Response

R11 Meta has a frequency range of 46-28k Hz whereas RP-8000F II has a frequency range of 32-25k Hz. With a minimum frequency of 32Hz, the RP-8000F II can go significantly deeper on the low side and provide stronger bass compared to the R11 Meta's min frequency of 46Hz.

The graph below depicts how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average Low Frequency values of other speakers in the Floor-standing class in our database.

Low Frequency

Floor-standing Speakers

R11 Meta
RP-8000F II
Min
Average
Median

Neither pair reaches down to 20Hz, the usual definition of full-range, which is normal for speakers of this size. If you want the bottom octave for movies or bass-heavy music, add a subwoofer to whichever you choose. Visit our Powered Subwoofers section to find out more about the available options.

Impedance and Sensitivity

R11 Meta is a 4 ohms speaker compared to the RP-8000F II which has a nominal impedance of 8 ohms. Lower impedance speakers, especially the ones that are rated at 4 ohms may put more pressure on the amplifier unit especially when played at high volume levels, so make sure the amp you pair with the R11 Meta can provide this impedance level.

These two speakers also have different sensitivity levels. R11 Meta sensitivity is rated at 90 dB and the RP-8000F II's is rated at 98 dB. This 8 dB difference makes the Klipsch RP-8000F II a more sensitive speaker compared to KEF R11 Meta, hence will play louder with the same amount of watts.

Sensitivity

Floor-standing Speakers

R11 Meta
RP-8000F II
Min
Average
Median

Power Range

Power range is the range of input power in watts RMS that a loudspeaker is designed to handle. Staying within that range gives nominal performance; driving the speaker beyond its maximum wattage can damage it.

R11 Meta can handle a max power of 300 watts RMS, whereas RP-8000F II has a max power handling value of 150 watts RMS, 150 watts less than the R11 Meta.

Note that higher power handling does not make a speaker louder: that depends mainly on sensitivity and impedance. The calculator below shows how loud each of these actually plays on a real amplifier.

Which plays louder on your amplifier?

Starting with a popular amplifier - change it to the one you own, or any you are considering, and watch both numbers move.

KEF R11 Meta
 
Klipsch RP-8000F II
 

Input Type and Bi-Amping / Bi-Wiring

Both R11 Meta and RP-8000F II features dual binding post speaker terminals for bi-amping or bi-wiring.

KEF R11 Meta Terminals
KEF R11 Meta's Custom 5-way bi-wire tool-less binding posts terminals allows Bi-amping or bi-wiring

Klipsch RP-8000F IIBinding post Terminals
Klipsch RP-8000F II's Binding post terminals allows Bi-amping or bi-wiring

Cabinet Type and Port Position

Both R11 Meta and RP-8000F II have rear firing ports. Rear ported speakers generally need more room between the backside of the speaker and the wall compared to sealed and front/bottom ported speakers. Placing the speakers too close to the walls may cause the bass to sound boomy.

If you are limited in space and can't get the speakers away from the backwall, check our Speakers with Front Firing Ports page.

KEF R11 Meta  Port
KEF R11 Meta Port

Physical Specs

The size of a speaker can sometimes be an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare KEF R11 Meta's and Klipsch RP-8000F II's external dimensions. KEF R11 Meta has external dimensions of 1296.0 x 312.0 x 385.0mm (51-inch x 12-1/4-inch x 15-1/8-inch) whereas Klipsch RP-8000F II has external dimensions of 1097.0 x 277.0 x 447.0mm (43-3/16 x 10-7/8 x 17-9/16inch).

Klipsch RP-8000F II is 35mm narrower and 199mm shorter than KEF R11 Meta but it is also 62mm deeper.

Below you can see the front view size comparison of KEF R11 Meta and Klipsch RP-8000F II in scale.

KEF R11 Meta vs Klipsch RP-8000F II Size Comparison - Front View
Comparison image of KEF R11 Meta and Klipsch RP-8000F II Size and External Dimensions

Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited. The base surface area of the KEF R11 Meta is approximately 1201.2cm2 / 186.2inch2 and base area of the Klipsch RP-8000F II is approximately 1238.2cm2 / 191.9inch2. The R11 Meta requires 3% less surface area than the RP-8000F II which gives it a small advantage on placement in tight spaces.

Weight Comparison

The weight of a loudspeaker can become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often. Weight of a speaker can also "sometimes" be an indicator of the rigidity of the enclosure and the quality of the internal components used. The KEF R11 Meta weighs 36.59kg / 80.5lbs and the Klipsch RP-8000F II weighs 28.00kg / 61.6lbs. This makes the R11 Meta 31% heavier than the RP-8000F II.

Here is a comparison of how R11 Meta and RP-8000F II's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Passive Floor-standing class.

Weight
All Floor-standing Speakers
KEF R11 Meta
Klipsch RP-8000F II
Min
Average
Max

What's in the Box of KEF R11 Meta?

Here are the items that are included inside the box of R11 Meta:
  • R11 Meta
  • Microfiber grille
  • Plinth and spike accessories
  • Port bungs
  • User manual and warranty information

What's in the Box of Klipsch RP-8000F II?

Here are the items that come with the RP-8000F II:
  • Floorstanding loudspeaker
  • Stabilizer feet (pre-installed)
  • Grille
  • 2 Terminal jumpers (pre-installed)
  • Rubber cap (pre-installed)
  • User Manual
  • Important Safety Instructions
  • Warranty Information


Reasons to choose KEF R11 Meta over Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-8000F II

Max Input Power 300 watts vs 150 watts Handle more power from your amplifier
Driver Setup 3-way vs 2-way Have a dedicated mid-range driver
Number of Woofers 4 vs 2 More woofers
High Frequency Response 28k Hz vs 25k Hz Generates higher frequency
Base Surface Area 1201cm2 vs 1238cm2 Takes less floor space

Reasons to choose Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-8000F II over KEF R11 Meta

Sensitivity 98 dB vs 90 dB Play louder with same amount of amplification power
Nominal Impedance 8 ohms vs 4 ohms Less selective with amplifiers
Woofer Size 8 inches vs 6.5 inches Larger woofer
Low Frequency Response 32 Hz vs 46 Hz Generates deeper bass
Dolby Atmos Drivers Optional vs No Dolby Atmos Compatibility
Height 1097mm vs 1296mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces
Price per pair* 1798USD vs 6498USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)

KEF R11 Meta vs Klipsch RP-8000F II Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications
General KEF R11 Meta Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-8000F II
Brand KEF Klipsch
Speaker Type Floor-standing speaker Floor-standing speaker
Power Range 15-300 watts up to 150 watts
Sensitivity 90 dB 98 dB
Impedance 4 ohms 8 ohms
Impedance 3.2 ohms n/a
Frequency Response 46-28k Hz 32-25k Hz
Drivers
Woofer Quantity 4 2
Woofer Size 6.5" 8"
Woofer Composition Hybrid Aluminum Cerametallic cone
Woofer Surround Material Rubber Rubber
Tweeter Size 1" 1"
Tweeter Type Vented dome Tractrix Horn
Aimable Tweeter No No
Midrange Driver 5" No
Crossover Frequency 330Hz and 2500Hz 1630 Hz
Firing Direction rear rear
Physical Specs
Height 1296.0mm (51") 1097.0mm (43.2")
Width 312.0mm (12.3") 277.0mm (10.9")
Depth 385.0mm (15.2") 447.0mm (17.6")
Weight 36.59kg (80.5lbs) 28.00kg (61.6lbs)
Enclosure Bass Reflex Bass Reflex
Finish n/a MDF/Wood-grain vinyl
Available Colors Black Gloss, White Gloss, Walnut Walnut, Black
Grille n/a Yes
Moisture Resistancy No No
Connections
Biamp Inputs Yes Yes
Other
Parts Warranty 5 years 5 Years
Labor Warranty 5 years 5 Years

Verdict

These sit in different price classes - KEF R11 Meta costs roughly 3.6x what Klipsch RP-8000F II does. Expect it to lead on paper; the question is whether the gap is audible enough in your room to be worth it.

AreaBetterWhy
BassBKlipsch RP-8000F II digs deeper - 32Hz against 46Hz.
Amplifier needsBKlipsch RP-8000F II is more sensitive (98dB vs 90dB), so it goes louder on the same amplifier.
Amplifier matchBKlipsch RP-8000F II is the easier load at 8 ohms; the other is 4 ohms and wants an amplifier rated for it.
HeadroomAKEF R11 Meta takes more power (300W vs 150W) - more in hand in a big room.
SizedependsSimilar cabinet size - neither is easier to fit.
ExpandabilityBKEF R11 Meta: bi-amping; Klipsch RP-8000F II: bi-amping and Atmos drivers. Klipsch RP-8000F II sits in a wider range (10 models), so a matched surround system is easier later.
PriceBKlipsch RP-8000F II is cheaper - $1,798 against $6,498, about 72% less; arguably a different class.

A KEF R11 Meta  B Klipsch RP-8000F II
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both speakers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.

Which should you choose?

Klipsch RP-8000F II is the easier recommendation: it leads on most of the measured areas and costs less. Take KEF R11 Meta if its size, looks or fit in your room suit you better. If a subwoofer is in your plans, the bass gap largely stops mattering - you would be crossing over above 46Hz anyway, so judge these on the other rows instead. Match it to your room: we rate KEF R11 Meta the better fit for a very large room, and Klipsch RP-8000F II for a mid-size room.

And remember what a spec sheet cannot show: how each looks in your room and whether the finish suits it, what dealer support and warranty are like where you live, and how they actually sound to you. If you can hear them first - ideally with your own music - that will tell you more than any number above.


Most Popular Speakers
Klipsch Reference R-51M
Klipsch R-51M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
2-way | 87 dB | 6 ohms
Wharfedale Elysian 2
Wharfedale Elysian 2
3-way | 89 dB | 4 ohms
KEF Q150
KEF Q150
2-way | 86 dB | 8 ohms
Bowers & Wilkins 606 S2 Anniversary Edition
B&W 606 S2
2-way | 88 dB | 8 ohms
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-500M
Klipsch RP-500M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
Wharfedale EVO5.1
Wharfedale EVO5.1
2-way | 87 dB | 4 ohms
Wharfedale EVO4.1
Wharfedale EVO4.1
2-way | 87 dB | 8 ohms
Copyright © 2026 by SpeakerDecision
About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

Report a Correction