SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS
    • By Type
      Passive Bookshelf Speakers Passive Floor-standing Speakers Passive Center Channel Speakers Passive In-wall Speakers All Passive Speakers Powered Subwoofers Powered Stereo Speakers
      By Brand
      Acoustic Energy Aperion ATC Audio-Technica Audioengine Bluesound Bowers Wilkins Buchardt Cambridge Audio Canton DALI Definitive Technology Dynaudio ELAC Emotiva Fluance Focal Fyne Audio Genelec GoldenEar Harbeth Jamo JBL Kanto KEF KLH Klipsch Leak Mackie Magnepan MartinLogan McIntosh Mission MoFi Monitor Audio Nuvo Onkyo OSD Paradigm Perlisten Polk Audio PS Audio PSB Q Acoustics REL Revel Russound Sennheiser Sonos Sonus faber Sony Spendor SVS Tannoy Technics Triangle Velodyne Victrola Wharfedale Wilson Audio Yamaha
  • AMPLIFIERS
    • By Type
      All Amplifiers Integrated Amplifiers Stereo Receivers Streaming Amplifiers Power Amplifiers
      By Brand
      Accuphase Advance Paris Anthem Arcam Audio Research AudioControl Audioengine Audiolab Bluesound Bose Buchardt Cambridge Audio Denon Devialet ELAC Emotiva Eversolo FiiO Fosi Audio Hegel HiFi Rose Integra JBL LEAK Luxman Marantz Mark Levinson McIntosh Michi MISSION MOON Musical Fidelity NAD Naim Onkyo OSD Parasound Pass Labs Peachtree PrimaLuna Primare PS Audio Rega Rogue Audio Roksan Rotel Schiit Audio Sonos Sony SVS T+A TEAC Technics Vincent WiiM Yamaha
  • SMART FIND
  • TOOLS
  • BLOG
  1. Home
  2. Passive Floor-standing Speakers
  3. KEF Blade One Meta vs Revel PerformaBe F328Be

KEF Blade One Meta vs Revel PerformaBe F328Be Comparison

x
Speaker to replace
Change

KEF Blade One Meta

Passive Floor-standing | 35-35k Hz

KEF Blade One Meta
Check price atAmazon›
Change
    
Revel PerformaBe F328Be

Passive Floor-standing | 26-40k Hz

Revel PerformaBe F328Be
Check price atAmazon›
KEF Blade One Meta KEF Blade One Meta
Check price atAmazon›
Revel PerformaBe F328Be Revel PerformaBe F32...
Check price atAmazon›
KEF Blade One Meta
See at AMAZON
Revel PerformaBe F32...
See at AMAZON

KEF Blade One Meta vs Revel PerformaBe F328Be Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing Blade One Meta and F328Be, two Passive Floor-standing speakers from KEF and Revel.

Let's have a brief look at the main features of KEF Blade One Meta and Revel PerformaBe F328Be first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Key SpecsKEF Blade One MetaRevel PerformaBe F328Be
Design3-way3-way
Uni-Q driver12th Generation Uni-Q—
Tweeter1" aluminium dome with MAT1"
Midrange5"5.25"
Woofer4 x 9" aluminium cone3 x 8.0" Aluminum
Frequency response35-35k Hz26-40k Hz
Sensitivity88 dB91 dB
Impedance4 ohms8 ohms
Power range50-400 watts50-300 watts
Weight57.20kg / 125.8lbs51.18kg / 112.6lbs
Dimensions (H x W x D)62.5" x 14.3" x 21.2"
1590 x 363 x 540 mm
50-15/16" x 13-1/2" x 17-5/8"
1294.0 x 343.0 x 448.0mm

What size room are the KEF Blade One Meta and Revel PerformaBe F328Be speakers good for?

The size of the room in which you are planning to use these loudspeakers is an important decision factor. Here we have compared their suitability to various sizes of environments considering their size and max power parameters:

Listening Environment* KEF Blade One Meta Revel PerformaBe F328Be
Near-field Are you nuts? Bad
Small Room Poor Poor
Mid-size Room Average Average
Large Room Good Good
Very Large Room Good Average

(* Approximate Room sizes: Small < 100sq. ft / 9 m2, Mid-size: 100-220 sq. ft / 9-20 m2, Large 220-400 sq. ft / 20-36 m2, Very Large: > 400 sq. ft / 36 m2. Average Floor Height: 9" / 2.7m. Typical room sizes differ from country to country, and the actual listening experience changes depending on floor height, room shape, surface materials, listening position, speaker locations, etc.)

The sections below take each area in turn: drivers, frequency response, physical size and what you get in the box.


**This post contains affiliate links, and we will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through our links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.


Drivers

Both Blade One Meta and F328Be are 3-way speakers.

Tweeter - 1 inchMidrange - 5 inchWoofer - 9 inchWoofer - 9 inchWoofer - 9 inchWoofer - 9 inch
KEF Blade One Meta
Tweeter - 1 inchMidrange - 5.25 inchWoofer - 8 inchWoofer - 8 inchWoofer - 8 inch
Revel PerformaBe F328Be

TweeterMidrangeWoofer

Front view, drawn to scale - cabinets and drivers share one scale, so sizes are directly comparable. Hover a driver for its size.

Driver KEF Blade One Meta Revel PerformaBe F328Be
Driver Setup 3-way 3-way
Tweeter 1-inch 1-inch
Midrange 1 x 5-inch 1 x 5.25-inch
Woofer 4 x 9-inch 3 x 8.0-inch

Blade One Meta features a 1" aluminium dome with MAT Tweeter, a 5" Midrange and 4 x 9" aluminium cone Woofer with a Crossover frequency at 350Hz and 2000Hz. On the other hand, the F328Be features a 1" Tweeter, a 5.25" Midrange and 3 x 8.0" Aluminum Woofer.

Frequency Response

Blade One Meta has a frequency range of 35-35k Hz whereas F328Be has a frequency range of 26-40k Hz. With a minimum frequency of 26Hz, the F328Be can go significantly deeper on the low side and provide stronger bass compared to the Blade One Meta's min frequency of 35Hz.

The graph below depicts how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average Low Frequency values of other speakers in the Floor-standing class in our database.

Low Frequency

Floor-standing Speakers

Blade One Meta
F328Be
Min
Average
Median

Neither pair reaches down to 20Hz, the usual definition of full-range, which is normal for speakers of this size. If you want the bottom octave for movies or bass-heavy music, add a subwoofer to whichever you choose. Visit our Powered Subwoofers section to find out more about the available options.

Impedance and Sensitivity

Blade One Meta is a 4 ohms speaker compared to the F328Be which has a nominal impedance of 8 ohms. Lower impedance speakers, especially the ones that are rated at 4 ohms may put more pressure on the amplifier unit especially when played at high volume levels, so make sure the amp you pair with the Blade One Meta can provide this impedance level.

These two speakers also have different sensitivity levels. Blade One Meta sensitivity is rated at 88 dB and the F328Be's is rated at 91 dB. This 3 dB difference makes the Revel PerformaBe F328Be a more sensitive speaker compared to KEF Blade One Meta, hence will play louder with the same amount of watts.

Sensitivity

Floor-standing Speakers

Blade One Meta
F328Be
Min
Average
Median

Power Range

Power range is the range of input power in watts RMS that a loudspeaker is designed to handle. Staying within that range gives nominal performance; driving the speaker beyond its maximum wattage can damage it.

Blade One Meta can handle a max power of 400 watts RMS, whereas F328Be has a max power handling value of 300 watts RMS, 100 watts less than the Blade One Meta.

Note that higher power handling does not make a speaker louder: that depends mainly on sensitivity and impedance. The calculator below shows how loud each of these actually plays on a real amplifier.

Which plays louder on your amplifier?

Starting with a popular amplifier — change it to the one you own, or any you are considering, and watch both numbers move.

KEF Blade One Meta
 
Revel PerformaBe F328Be
 

Input Type and Bi-Amping / Bi-Wiring

F328Be features 5-way posts posts which make bi-amping or bi-wiring possible. Blade One Meta has a Binding posts which doesn't feature bi-amping/bi-wiring.

Physical Specs

The size of a speaker can sometimes be an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare KEF Blade One Meta's and Revel PerformaBe F328Be's external dimensions. KEF Blade One Meta has external dimensions of 1590 x 363 x 540 mm (62.5 x 14.3 x 21.2 in.) whereas Revel PerformaBe F328Be has external dimensions of 1294.0 x 343.0 x 448.0mm (50-15/16 x 13-1/2 x 17-5/8inch).

KEF Blade One Meta is clearly the larger of the two speakers. Its body is 20mm wider, 296mm taller and 92mm deeper than Revel PerformaBe F328Be.

Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited. The base surface area of the KEF Blade One Meta is approximately 1960.2cm2 / 303.8inch2 and base area of the Revel PerformaBe F328Be is approximately 1536.6cm2 / 238.2inch2. The Blade One Meta requires 28% more surface area than the F328Be which gives it a small disadvantage on placement in tight spaces.

Weight Comparison

The weight of a loudspeaker can become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often. Weight of a speaker can also "sometimes" be an indicator of the rigidity of the enclosure and the quality of the internal components used. The KEF Blade One Meta weighs 57.20kg / 125.8lbs and the Revel PerformaBe F328Be weighs 51.18kg / 112.6lbs. This makes the Blade One Meta 12% heavier than the F328Be.

Here is a comparison of how Blade One Meta and F328Be's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Passive Floor-standing class.

Weight
All Floor-standing Speakers
KEF Blade One Meta
Revel PerformaBe F328Be
Min
Average
Max

What's in the Box of Revel PerformaBe F328Be?

Here are the items that come with the F328Be:
  • Floorstanding loudspeaker
  • Grille
  • 4 Spike feet
  • 4 Locking rings
  • 4 Washers
  • 2 Terminal jumpers (pre-installed)
  • 2 Foam port plugs
  • Owners Manual


Reasons to choose KEF Blade One Meta over Revel PerformaBe F328Be

Max Input Power 400 watts vs 300 watts Handle more power from your amplifier
Woofer Size 9 inches vs 8.0 inches Larger woofer
Number of Woofers 4 vs 3 More woofers

Reasons to choose Revel PerformaBe F328Be over KEF Blade One Meta

Sensitivity 91 dB vs 88 dB Play louder with same amount of amplification power
Nominal Impedance 8 ohms vs 4 ohms Less selective with amplifiers
Low Frequency Response 26 Hz vs 35 Hz Generates deeper bass
High Frequency Response 40k Hz vs 35k Hz Generates higher frequency
Bi-Amping and Bi-Wiring Yes vs No Allows bi-amping and bi-wiring connections
Height 1294mm vs 1590mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces
Base Surface Area 1536cm2 vs 1960cm2 Takes less floor space
Price per pair* 17600USD vs 35000USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)

KEF Blade One Meta vs Revel PerformaBe F328Be Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications
General KEF Blade One Meta Revel PerformaBe F328Be
Brand KEF Revel
Speaker Type Floor-standing speaker Floor-standing speaker
Power Range 50-400 watts 50-300 watts
Sensitivity 88 dB 91 dB
Impedance 4 ohms 8 ohms
Impedance 2.8 ohms n/a
Frequency Response 35-35k Hz 26-40k Hz
Drivers
Woofer Quantity 4 3
Woofer Size 9" 8.0"
Woofer Composition aluminium cone Aluminum
Tweeter Size 1" 1"
Tweeter Type aluminium dome with MAT n/a
Aimable Tweeter No No
Midrange Driver 5" 5.25"
Crossover Frequency 350Hz and 2000Hz n/a
Firing Direction n/a rear
Physical Specs
Height 1590.0mm (62.6") 1294.0mm (50.9")
Width 363.0mm (14.3") 343.0mm (13.5")
Depth 540.0mm (21.3") 448.0mm (17.6")
Weight 57.20kg (125.8lbs) 51.18kg (112.6lbs)
Enclosure Bass Reflex Bass Reflex
Available Colors Piano Black/Copper, Piano Black/Grey, Frosted Blue/Blue, Frosted Blue/Bronze, Charcoal Grey/Red, Charcoal Grey/Bronze, Racing Red/Grey, Arctic White/Champagne Gloss Black
Grille n/a Yes
Moisture Resistancy No No
Connections
Biamp Inputs No Yes
Other
Parts Warranty 5 years 5 Years
Labor Warranty 5 years 5 Years

Verdict

These sit in different price classes - KEF Blade One Meta costs roughly 2x what Revel PerformaBe F328Be does. Expect it to lead on paper; the question is whether the gap is audible enough in your room to be worth it.

AreaBetterWhy
Bass B Revel PerformaBe F328Be digs deeper - 26Hz against 35Hz. A subwoofer would even that out.
Amplifier needs B Revel PerformaBe F328Be is more sensitive (91dB vs 88dB), so it goes louder on the same amplifier.
Amplifier match B Revel PerformaBe F328Be is the easier load at 8 ohms; the other is 4 ohms and wants an amplifier rated for it.
Headroom A KEF Blade One Meta takes more power (400W vs 300W) - more in hand in a big room.
Size depends Revel PerformaBe F328Be is easier to place; KEF Blade One Meta is bigger, which usually goes with fuller bass. Your room decides.
Expandability B Revel PerformaBe F328Be: bi-amping.
Price B Revel PerformaBe F328Be is cheaper - $17,600 against $35,000, about 50% less; arguably a different class.

A KEF Blade One Meta   B Revel PerformaBe F328Be
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, placement or how you will use them. Only specs published for both speakers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.

Which should you choose?

Revel PerformaBe F328Be is the easier recommendation: it leads on most of the measured areas and costs less. Take KEF Blade One Meta if its size, looks or fit in your room suit you better. If a subwoofer is in your plans, the bass gap largely stops mattering - you would be crossing over above 35Hz anyway, so judge these on the other rows instead. Match it to your room: we rate KEF Blade One Meta the better fit for a very large room; elsewhere the two are rated the same.

And remember what a spec sheet cannot show: how each looks in your room and whether the finish suits it, what dealer support and warranty are like where you live, and how they actually sound to you. If you can hear them first - ideally with your own music - that will tell you more than any number above.


Most Popular Speakers
Klipsch Reference R-51M
Klipsch R-51M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
2-way | 87 dB | 6 ohms
Wharfedale Elysian 2
Wharfedale Elysian 2
3-way | 89 dB | 4 ohms
KEF Q150
KEF Q150
2-way | 86 dB | 8 ohms
Bowers & Wilkins 606 S2 Anniversary Edition
B&W 606 S2
2-way | 88 dB | 8 ohms
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-500M
Klipsch RP-500M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
Wharfedale EVO5.1
Wharfedale EVO5.1
2-way | 87 dB | 4 ohms
Wharfedale EVO4.1
Wharfedale EVO4.1
2-way | 87 dB | 8 ohms
Copyright © 2026 by SpeakerDecision
About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

Report a Correction