SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS
    • By Type
      Passive Bookshelf Speakers Passive Floor-standing Speakers Passive Center Channel Speakers Passive In-wall Speakers All Passive Speakers Powered Subwoofers Powered Stereo Speakers
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Front Firing Port Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      By Brand
      Acoustic Energy Aperion ATC Audio-Technica Audioengine Bluesound Bowers Wilkins Buchardt Cambridge Audio Canton DALI Definitive Technology Dynaudio ELAC Emotiva Fluance Focal Fyne Audio Genelec GoldenEar Harbeth Jamo JBL Kanto KEF KLH Klipsch Leak Mackie Magnepan MartinLogan McIntosh Mission MoFi Monitor Audio Nuvo Onkyo OSD Paradigm Perlisten Polk Audio PS Audio PSB Q Acoustics REL Revel Russound Sennheiser Sonos Sonus faber Sony Spendor SVS Tannoy Technics Triangle Velodyne Victrola Wharfedale Wilson Audio Yamaha
  • AMPLIFIERS
    • By Type
      All Amplifiers Integrated Amplifiers Stereo Receivers Streaming Amplifiers Power Amplifiers Compact Amplifiers
      By Power
      Up to 60 watts 61 to 90 watts 91 to 120 watts 121 to 180 watts Over 180 watts
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      Home Theater
      All Home Theater Receivers Anthem ARCAM Denon Integra JBL Marantz McIntosh NAD Onkyo Sony Yamaha
      Headphone Amps
      All Headphone Amplifiers Cambridge Audio iFi Audio McIntosh Naim Pro-Ject Rotel Schiit Audio Sennheiser Yamaha
      Multi-Zone
      All Multi-Zone Amplifiers JBL McIntosh OSD Rotel Russound Sonos
      By Brand
      Accuphase Advance Paris Anthem Arcam Audio Research AudioControl Audioengine Audiolab Bluesound Bose Buchardt Cambridge Audio Cayin Denon Devialet ELAC Emotiva Eversolo FiiO Fosi Audio Hegel HiFi Rose Integra JBL Layer Audio Design LEAK Luxman Marantz Mark Levinson McIntosh Michi MISSION MOON Musical Fidelity NAD Naim Onkyo OSD Parasound Pass Labs Peachtree PrimaLuna Primare PS Audio Rega Rogue Audio Roksan Rotel Schiit Audio Sonos Sony SVS T+A TEAC Technics Vincent WiiM Yamaha
  • SOUNDBARS
    • Soundbars
      Soundbars Home All Soundbars (filter + sort) Size Simulator
      By TV Size
      43-50 inch TVs 55 inch TVs 65 inch and larger
      By Feature
      Dolby Atmos height channels Subwoofer included Can add rear speakers Compact (30 in or narrower) Under $500
      By Brand
      Bluesound Bose Denon Devialet Dual Furrion Harman Kardon JBL KEF Klipsch Marshall Polk Audio Samsung Sennheiser Sonos Sony WiiM Yamaha
  • SMART FIND
  • TOOLS
  • BLOG
  1. Home
  2. Passive In-wall Speakers
  3. JBL Studio 2 55IW vs Polk Audio 255c-LS

JBL Studio 2 55IW vs Polk Audio 255c-LS Comparison

x
Speaker to replace
Change

JBL Studio 2 55IW

Passive In-wall | 40-20kHz

JBL Studio 2 55IW
Check price atAmazon›
Change
    
Polk Audio 255c-LS

Passive In-wall | 44-29kHz

Polk Audio 255c-LS
Check price atAmazon›
JBL Studio 2 55IW JBL Studio 2 55IW
Check price atAmazon›
Polk Audio 255c-LS Polk Audio 255c-LS
Check price atAmazon›
JBL Studio 2 55IW
See at AMAZON
Polk Audio 255c-LS
See at AMAZON

JBL Studio 2 55IW vs Polk Audio 255c-LS Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing Studio 2 55IW and 255c-LS, two Passive In-wall speakers from JBL and Polk Audio.

Let's have a brief look at the main features of JBL Studio 2 55IW and Polk Audio 255c-LS first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Key SpecsJBL Studio 2 55IWPolk Audio 255c-LS
BrandJBL
United States · founded 1946
Polk Audio
United States · founded 1972
Design2-way2-way
Tweeter1" Hard-Dome1.0" Ring radiator
Woofer2 x 5.25" PolyPlas2 x 5.25" Aerated polypropylene
Frequency response40-20kHz44-29kHz
Sensitivity88 dB91 dB
Impedance8 ohms8 ohms
Power rangeup to 120 watts10-150 watts
Weight—3.12kg / 6.9lbs
Dimensions (H x W x D)14.1250" x 6.4375" x 3.3750"
359.0 x 164.0 x 86.0mm
7.6250" x 13.1250" x 7-3/8"
194.0 x 334.0 x 187.5mm

What size room are the JBL Studio 2 55IW and Polk Audio 255c-LS speakers good for?

The size of the room in which you are planning to use these loudspeakers is an important decision factor. Here we have compared their suitability to various sizes of environments considering their size and max power parameters:

Listening Environment* JBL Studio 2 55IW Polk Audio 255c-LS
Near-field Poor Poor
Small Room Average Average
Mid-size Room Good Good
Large Room Average Average
Very Large Room Poor Poor

(* Approximate Room sizes: Small < 100sq. ft / 9 m2, Mid-size: 100-220 sq. ft / 9-20 m2, Large 220-400 sq. ft / 20-36 m2, Very Large: > 400 sq. ft / 36 m2. Average Floor Height: 9" / 2.7m. Typical room sizes differ from country to country, and the actual listening experience changes depending on floor height, room shape, surface materials, listening position, speaker locations, etc.)

The sections below take each area in turn: drivers, frequency response, physical size and what you get in the box.


Drivers

Both Studio 2 55IW and 255c-LS are 2-way speakers.

Tweeter - 1 inchWoofer - 5.25 inchWoofer - 5.25 inch
JBL Studio 2 55IW
Woofer - 5.25 inchTweeter - 1 inchWoofer - 5.25 inch
Polk Audio 255c-LS

TweeterWoofer

Front view, drawn to scale - cabinets and drivers share one scale, so sizes are directly comparable. Hover a driver for its size.

Driver JBL Studio 2 55IW Polk Audio 255c-LS
Driver Setup 2-way 2-way
Tweeter 1-inch 1.0-inch
Midrange - -
Woofer 2 x 5.25-inch 2 x 5.25-inch

Studio 2 55IW features a 1" Hard-Dome Tweeter and 2 x 5.25" PolyPlas Woofer. On the other hand, the 255c-LS features a 1.0" Ring radiator Tweeter and 2 x 5.25" Aerated polypropylene Woofer.

Frequency Response

Studio 2 55IW has a frequency range of 40-20kHz whereas 255c-LS has a frequency range of 44-29kHz. With a minimum frequency of 40Hz, the Studio 2 55IW can go slightly deeper then the 255c-LS's min frequency of 44Hz.

The graph below depicts how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average Low Frequency values of other speakers in the In-wall class in our database.

Low Frequency

In-wall Speakers

Studio 2 55IW
255c-LS
Min
Average
Median

Neither pair reaches down to 20Hz, the usual definition of full-range, which is normal for speakers of this size. If you want the bottom octave for movies or bass-heavy music, add a subwoofer to whichever you choose. Visit our Powered Subwoofers section to find out more about the available options.

Impedance and Sensitivity

Studio 2 55IW and 255c-LS have the same Impedance of 8 ohms but where they differ is the sensitivity levels. Studio 2 55IW sensitivity is rated at 88 dB and the 255c-LS's is at 91 dB. This 3 dB difference makes the Polk Audio 255c-LS a more sensitive speaker compared to JBL Studio 2 55IW, hence will play louder with the same amount of watts.

Sensitivity

In-wall Speakers

Studio 2 55IW
255c-LS
Min
Average
Median

Power Range

Power range is the range of input power in watts RMS that a loudspeaker is designed to handle. Staying within that range gives nominal performance; driving the speaker beyond its maximum wattage can damage it.

255c-LS can handle a max power of 150 watts RMS, whereas Studio 2 55IW has a max power handling value of 120 watts RMS, 30 watts less than the 255c-LS.

Note that higher power handling does not make a speaker louder: that depends mainly on sensitivity and impedance. The calculator below shows how loud each of these actually plays on a real amplifier.

Which plays louder on your amplifier?

Starting with a popular amplifier - change it to the one you own, or any you are considering, and watch both numbers move.

JBL Studio 2 55IW
 
Polk Audio 255c-LS
 

Input Type and Bi-Amping / Bi-Wiring

Studio 2 55IW features Spring post type posts and 255c-LS has a Spring post type posts. None of these speakers feature bi-amping/bi-wiring.

Physical Specs

The size of a speaker can sometimes be an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare JBL Studio 2 55IW's and Polk Audio 255c-LS's external dimensions. JBL Studio 2 55IW has external dimensions of 359.0 x 164.0 x 86.0mm (14.1250-inch x 6.4375-inch x 3.3750-inch) whereas Polk Audio 255c-LS has external dimensions of 194.0 x 334.0 x 187.5mm (7.6250-inch x 13.1250-inch x 0.0000-inch).

JBL Studio 2 55IW is 170mm narrower and 101.5mm less deeper than Polk Audio 255c-LS but it is also 165mm taller.

Size, drawn to scale

FRONTJBL Studio 2 55IW front: 164 x 359 mm (6.5 x 14.1 in)Polk Audio 255c-LS front: 334 x 194 mm (13.1 x 7.6 in)JBL Studio 2 55IW164 × 359 mmPolk Audio 255c-LS334 × 194 mmTOP / FOOTPRINTJBL Studio 2 55IW footprint: 164 x 86 mm (6.5 x 3.4 in)Polk Audio 255c-LS footprint: 334 x 188 mm (13.1 x 7.4 in)JBL Studio 2 55IW164 × 86 mmPolk Audio 255c-LS334 × 188 mm
Both speakers and both views share one scale, so everything here is directly comparable. Hover a box for its dimensions.

One scale for both, standing on the same surface and pushed back to the same wall, so the deeper one visibly sticks out further.

Polk Audio 255c-LS needs about 344% more floor or shelf area. Polk Audio 255c-LS is 102mm deeper, so it stands that much further out from the wall. JBL Studio 2 55IW is 165mm taller.

What's in the Box of JBL Studio 2 55IW?

Here are the items that are included inside the box of Studio 2 55IW:
  • In-wall loudspeaker
  • Grille
  • Cloth scrim
  • Cut-Out Template
  • Instruction Manual

What's in the Box of Polk Audio 255c-LS?

Here are the items that come with the 255c-LS:
  • In-wall loudspeaker
  • White metal grille
  • Mounting template
  • Owners Manual


Reasons to choose JBL Studio 2 55IW over Polk Audio 255c-LS

Low Frequency Response 40 Hz vs 44 Hz Generates deeper bass
Base Surface Area 141cm2 vs 626cm2 Takes less floor space

Reasons to choose Polk Audio 255c-LS over JBL Studio 2 55IW

Max Input Power 150 watts vs 120 watts Handle more power from your amplifier
Sensitivity 91 dB vs 88 dB Play louder with same amount of amplification power
High Frequency Response 29k Hz vs 20k Hz Generates higher frequency
Height 194mm vs 359mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces
Price per pair* 598USD vs 600USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)

JBL Studio 2 55IW vs Polk Audio 255c-LS Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications
General JBL Studio 2 55IW Polk Audio 255c-LS
Brand JBL Polk Audio
Speaker Type Passive In-wall Speaker Passive In-wall Speaker
Power Range up to 120 watts 10-150 watts
Sensitivity 88 dB 91 dB
Impedance 8 ohms 8 ohms
Frequency Response 40-20kHz 44-29kHz
Drivers
Woofer Quantity 2 2
Woofer Size 5.25" 5.25"
Woofer Composition PolyPlas Aerated polypropylene
Woofer Surround Material Rubber Rubber
Tweeter Size 1" 1.0"
Tweeter Type Hard-Dome Ring radiator
Aimable Tweeter Yes No
Midrange Driver No No
Physical Specs
Height 359.0mm (14.1") 194.0mm (7.6")
Width 164.0mm (6.5") 334.0mm (13.1")
Depth 86.0mm (3.4") 187.5mm (7.4")
Weight n/a 3.12kg (6.9lbs)
Enclosure In-wall In-wall
Moisture Resistancy No No
Connections
Biamp Inputs No No
Other
Parts Warranty 5 Years Lifetime
Labor Warranty 5 Years Lifetime

Verdict

A generation apart: JBL Studio 2 55IW is the newer design, against a 2010 model. Newer is not automatically better, but the older one is more likely to be discounted or near run-out.

AreaBetterWhy
BassAJBL Studio 2 55IW digs deeper - 40Hz against 44Hz. A subwoofer would even that out.
Amplifier needsBPolk Audio 255c-LS is more sensitive (91dB vs 88dB), so it goes louder on the same amplifier.
HeadroomBPolk Audio 255c-LS takes more power (150W vs 120W) - more in hand in a big room.
SizedependsJBL Studio 2 55IW is easier to place; Polk Audio 255c-LS is bigger, which usually goes with fuller bass. Your room decides.
ExpandabilitydependsNeither adds bi-amping, a sub output or height drivers. JBL Studio 2 55IW sits in a wider range (15 models), so a matched surround system is easier later.
Priceevenly matchedMuch the same money ($600 vs $598 a pair).

A JBL Studio 2 55IW  B Polk Audio 255c-LS
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both speakers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.

Which should you choose?

Polk Audio 255c-LS has the edge on paper, though the margin is not large. The rows marked "depends" may matter more to you than the score does. In a large or open-plan room, Polk Audio 255c-LS has the cabinet volume to fill it more easily; in a small room, near a wall or at desk distance, JBL Studio 2 55IW is the easier speaker to get right. If your amplifier is modest, vintage or valve-based, Polk Audio 255c-LS is the safer partner - the other will want more current or more watts to sound its best.

And remember what a spec sheet cannot show: how each looks in your room and whether the finish suits it, what dealer support and warranty are like where you live, and how they actually sound to you. If you can hear them first - ideally with your own music - that will tell you more than any number above.


Most Popular Speakers
Klipsch Reference R-51M
Klipsch R-51M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
2-way | 87 dB | 6 ohms
Wharfedale Elysian 2
Wharfedale Elysian 2
3-way | 89 dB | 4 ohms
KEF Q150
KEF Q150
2-way | 86 dB | 8 ohms
Bowers & Wilkins 606 S2 Anniversary Edition
B&W 606 S2
2-way | 88 dB | 8 ohms
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-500M
Klipsch RP-500M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
Wharfedale EVO5.1
Wharfedale EVO5.1
2-way | 87 dB | 4 ohms
Wharfedale EVO4.1
Wharfedale EVO4.1
2-way | 87 dB | 8 ohms
This site contains affiliate links. We may be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through one of them. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Copyright © 2026 by SpeakerDecision
About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

Report a Correction