SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS
    • By Type
      Passive Bookshelf Speakers Passive Floor-standing Speakers Passive Center Channel Speakers Passive In-wall Speakers All Passive Speakers Powered Subwoofers Powered Stereo Speakers
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Front Firing Port Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      By Brand
      Acoustic Energy Aperion ATC Audio-Technica Audioengine Bluesound Bowers Wilkins Buchardt Cambridge Audio Canton DALI Definitive Technology Dynaudio ELAC Emotiva Fluance Focal Fyne Audio Genelec GoldenEar Harbeth Jamo JBL Kanto KEF KLH Klipsch Leak Mackie Magnepan MartinLogan McIntosh Mission MoFi Monitor Audio Nuvo Onkyo OSD Paradigm Perlisten Polk Audio PS Audio PSB Q Acoustics REL Revel Russound Sennheiser Sonos Sonus faber Sony Spendor SVS Tannoy Technics Triangle Velodyne Victrola Wharfedale Wilson Audio Yamaha
  • AMPLIFIERS
    • By Type
      All Amplifiers Integrated Amplifiers Stereo Receivers Streaming Amplifiers Power Amplifiers Compact Amplifiers
      By Power
      Up to 60 watts 61 to 90 watts 91 to 120 watts 121 to 180 watts Over 180 watts
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      Home Theater
      All Home Theater Receivers Anthem ARCAM Denon Integra JBL Marantz McIntosh NAD Onkyo Sony Yamaha
      Headphone Amps
      All Headphone Amplifiers Cambridge Audio iFi Audio McIntosh Naim Pro-Ject Rotel Schiit Audio Sennheiser Yamaha
      Multi-Zone
      All Multi-Zone Amplifiers JBL McIntosh OSD Rotel Russound Sonos
      By Brand
      Accuphase Advance Paris Anthem Arcam Audio Research AudioControl Audioengine Audiolab Bluesound Bose Buchardt Cambridge Audio Cayin Denon Devialet ELAC Emotiva Eversolo FiiO Fosi Audio Hegel HiFi Rose Integra JBL Layer Audio Design LEAK Luxman Marantz Mark Levinson McIntosh Michi MISSION MOON Musical Fidelity NAD Naim Onkyo OSD Parasound Pass Labs Peachtree PrimaLuna Primare PS Audio Rega Rogue Audio Roksan Rotel Schiit Audio Sonos Sony SVS T+A TEAC Technics Vincent WiiM Yamaha
  • SMART FIND
  • TOOLS
  • BLOG
  1. Home
  2. Passive Floor-standing Speakers
  3. JBL 4369 vs KLH Kendall

JBL 4369 vs KLH Kendall Comparison

x
Speaker to replace
Change

JBL 4369

Passive Floor-standing | 28-25k Hz

JBL 4369
Check price atAmazon›
Change
    
KLH Kendall

Passive Floor-standing | 25-23k Hz

KLH Kendall
Check price atAmazon›
JBL 4369 JBL 4369
Check price atAmazon›
KLH Kendall KLH Kendall
Check price atAmazon›
JBL 4369
See at AMAZON
KLH Kendall
See at AMAZON

JBL 4369 vs KLH Kendall Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing 4369 and Kendall, two Passive Floor-standing speakers from JBL and KLH.

Let's have a brief look at the main features of JBL 4369 and KLH Kendall first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Key SpecsJBL 4369KLH Kendall
BrandJBL
United States · founded 1946
KLH
United States · founded 1957
Design2-way3-way
Tweeter3" Compression Driver1"
Midrange—5.25"
Woofer15" Pure Pulp2 x 6.5" Woven Kevlar
Frequency response28-25k Hz25-23k Hz
Sensitivity93 dB96 dB
Impedance6 ohms8 ohms
Power rangeup to 350 wattsup to 250 watts
Weight63.50kg / 139.7lbs22.14kg / 48.7lbs
Dimensions (H x W x D)44-1/8" x 24-13/16" x 18-1/2"
1120.0 x 630.0 x 470.0mm
40-3/16" x 8-5/16" x 14-15/16"
1021.0 x 212.0 x 380.0mm

The sections below take each area in turn: drivers, frequency response, physical size and what you get in the box.


Drivers

One of the fundamental differences between these two speakers is that 4369 is a 2-way design whereas the Kendall is a 3-way speaker. 3-way designs utilize a midrange driver in addition to the tweeter and woofer on 2-way designs. Designing a crossover for a 3-way speaker is a complicated process and generally increases the overall cost of the speaker.

Tweeter - 3 inchWoofer - 15 inch
JBL 4369
Tweeter - 1 inchMidrange - 5.25 inchWoofer - 6.5 inchWoofer - 6.5 inch
KLH Kendall

TweeterMidrangeWoofer

Front view, drawn to scale - cabinets and drivers share one scale, so sizes are directly comparable. Hover a driver for its size.

Driver JBL 4369 KLH Kendall
Driver Setup 2-way 3-way
Tweeter 3-inch 1-inch
Midrange - 1 x 5.25-inch
Woofer 1 x 15-inch 2 x 6.5-inch

4369 features a 3" Teonex Compression Driver Tweeter and 1 x 15" Pure Pulp Woofer with a Crossover frequency at 800 Hz. On the other hand, the Kendall features a 1" anodized aluminum Tweeter, a 5.25" Midrange and 2 x 6.5" Woven Kevlar Woofer.

Frequency Response

4369 has a frequency range of 28-25k Hz whereas Kendall has a frequency range of 25-23k Hz. With a minimum frequency of 25Hz, the Kendall can go slightly deeper then the 4369's min frequency of 28Hz.

The graph below depicts how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average Low Frequency values of other speakers in the Floor-standing class in our database.

Low Frequency

Floor-standing Speakers

4369
Kendall
Min
Average
Median

Neither pair reaches down to 20Hz, the usual definition of full-range, which is normal for speakers of this size. If you want the bottom octave for movies or bass-heavy music, add a subwoofer to whichever you choose. Visit our Powered Subwoofers section to find out more about the available options.

Impedance and Sensitivity

4369 is a 6 ohms speaker compared to the Kendall which has a nominal impedance of 8 ohms.

These two speakers also have different sensitivity levels. 4369 sensitivity is rated at 93 dB and the Kendall's is rated at 96 dB. This 3 dB difference makes the KLH Kendall a more sensitive speaker compared to JBL 4369, hence will play louder with the same amount of watts.

Sensitivity

Floor-standing Speakers

4369
Kendall
Min
Average
Median

Power Range

Power range is the range of input power in watts RMS that a loudspeaker is designed to handle. Staying within that range gives nominal performance; driving the speaker beyond its maximum wattage can damage it.

4369 can handle a max power of 350 watts RMS, whereas Kendall has a max power handling value of 250 watts RMS, 100 watts less than the 4369.

Note that higher power handling does not make a speaker louder: that depends mainly on sensitivity and impedance. The calculator below shows how loud each of these actually plays on a real amplifier.

Which plays louder on your amplifier?

Starting with a popular amplifier - change it to the one you own, or any you are considering, and watch both numbers move.

JBL 4369
 
KLH Kendall
 

Input Type and Bi-Amping / Bi-Wiring

Both 4369 and Kendall features dual binding post speaker terminals for bi-amping or bi-wiring.

KLH KendallBinding post Terminals
KLH Kendall's Binding post terminals allows Bi-amping or bi-wiring

Physical Specs

The size of a speaker can sometimes be an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare JBL 4369's and KLH Kendall's external dimensions. JBL 4369 has external dimensions of 1120.0 x 630.0 x 470.0mm (44-1/8 x 24-13/16 x 18-1/2inch) whereas KLH Kendall has external dimensions of 1021.0 x 212.0 x 380.0mm (40-3/16 x 8-5/16 x 14-15/16inch).

JBL 4369 is clearly the larger of the two speakers. Its body is 418mm wider, 99mm taller and 90mm deeper than KLH Kendall.

Size, drawn to scale

FRONTJBL 4369 front: 630 x 1120 mm (24.8 x 44.1 in)KLH Kendall front: 212 x 1021 mm (8.3 x 40.2 in)JBL 4369630 × 1120 mmKLH Kendall212 × 1021 mmTOP / FOOTPRINTJBL 4369 footprint: 630 x 470 mm (24.8 x 18.5 in)KLH Kendall footprint: 212 x 380 mm (8.3 x 15 in)JBL 4369630 × 470 mmKLH Kendall212 × 380 mm
Both speakers and both views share one scale, so everything here is directly comparable. Hover a box for its dimensions.

One scale for both, standing on the same surface and pushed back to the same wall, so the deeper one visibly sticks out further.

JBL 4369 needs about 268% more floor or shelf area. JBL 4369 is 90mm deeper, so it stands that much further out from the wall. JBL 4369 is 99mm taller.

Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited. The base surface area of the JBL 4369 is approximately 2961.0cm2 / 459.0inch2 and base area of the KLH Kendall is approximately 805.6cm2 / 124.9inch2. The 4369 requires 268% more surface area than the Kendall which gives it a small disadvantage on placement in tight spaces.

Weight Comparison

The weight of a loudspeaker can become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often. Weight of a speaker can also "sometimes" be an indicator of the rigidity of the enclosure and the quality of the internal components used. The JBL 4369 weighs 63.50kg / 139.7lbs and the KLH Kendall weighs 22.14kg / 48.7lbs. This makes the 4369 187% heavier than the Kendall.

Here is a comparison of how 4369 and Kendall's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Passive Floor-standing class.

Weight
All Floor-standing Speakers
JBL 4369
KLH Kendall
Min
Average
Max

What's in the Box of KLH Kendall?

Here are the items that come with the Kendall:
  • Floorstanding loudspeaker
  • Grille
  • Foam port
  • 4 Rubber feet
  • 4 Spike feet (with nuts)
  • 4 Protective discs
  • Manual


Reasons to choose JBL 4369 over KLH Kendall

Max Input Power 350 watts vs 250 watts Handle more power from your amplifier
Woofer Size 15 inches vs 6.5 inches Larger woofer
High Frequency Response 25k Hz vs 23k Hz Generates higher frequency

Reasons to choose KLH Kendall over JBL 4369

Driver Setup 3-way vs 2-way Have a dedicated mid-range driver
Sensitivity 96 dB vs 93 dB Play louder with same amount of amplification power
Nominal Impedance 8 ohms vs 6 ohms Less selective with amplifiers
Number of Woofers 2 vs 1 More woofers
Low Frequency Response 25 Hz vs 28 Hz Generates deeper bass
Height 1021mm vs 1120mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces
Base Surface Area 805cm2 vs 2961cm2 Takes less floor space
Price per pair* 1500USD vs 23200USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)

JBL 4369 vs KLH Kendall Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications
General JBL 4369 KLH Kendall
Brand JBL KLH
Speaker Type Floor-standing speaker Floor-standing speaker
Power Range up to 350 watts up to 250 watts
Sensitivity 93 dB 96 dB
Impedance 6 ohms 8 ohms
Frequency Response 28-25k Hz 25-23k Hz
Drivers
Woofer Quantity 1 2
Woofer Size 15" 6.5"
Woofer Composition Pure Pulp Woven Kevlar
Woofer Surround Material n/a Butyl Rubber
Tweeter Size 3" 1"
Tweeter Type Compression Driver n/a
Aimable Tweeter No No
Midrange Driver No 5.25"
Crossover Frequency 800 Hz n/a
Physical Specs
Height 1120.0mm (44.1") 1021.0mm (40.2")
Width 630.0mm (24.8") 212.0mm (8.3")
Depth 470.0mm (18.5") 380.0mm (15")
Weight 63.50kg (139.7lbs) 22.14kg (48.7lbs)
Enclosure Bass Reflex Bass Reflex
Finish n/a MDF/Wood Veneer
Available Colors n/a Black
Grille Yes Yes
Moisture Resistancy No No
Connections
Biamp Inputs Yes Yes
Other
Parts Warranty 10 Years
Labor Warranty 10 Years

Verdict

These sit in different price classes - JBL 4369 costs roughly 15.5x what KLH Kendall does. Expect it to lead on paper; the question is whether the gap is audible enough in your room to be worth it.

AreaBetterWhy
BassBKLH Kendall digs deeper - 25Hz against 28Hz. A subwoofer would even that out.
Amplifier needsBKLH Kendall is more sensitive (96dB vs 93dB), so it goes louder on the same amplifier.
Amplifier matchBKLH Kendall is the easier load at 8 ohms.
HeadroomAJBL 4369 takes more power (350W vs 250W) - more in hand in a big room.
SizedependsKLH Kendall is easier to place; JBL 4369 is bigger, which usually goes with fuller bass. Your room decides.
ExpandabilitydependsJBL 4369: bi-amping; KLH Kendall: bi-amping. JBL 4369 sits in a wider range (8 models), so a matched surround system is easier later.
PriceBKLH Kendall is cheaper - $1,500 against $23,200, about 94% less; arguably a different class.

A JBL 4369  B KLH Kendall
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both speakers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.

Which should you choose?

KLH Kendall is the easier recommendation: it leads on most of the measured areas and costs less. Take JBL 4369 if its size, looks or fit in your room suit you better. In a large or open-plan room, JBL 4369 has the cabinet volume to fill it more easily; in a small room, near a wall or at desk distance, KLH Kendall is the easier speaker to get right. If your amplifier is modest, vintage or valve-based, KLH Kendall is the safer partner - the other will want more current or more watts to sound its best.

And remember what a spec sheet cannot show: how each looks in your room and whether the finish suits it, what dealer support and warranty are like where you live, and how they actually sound to you. If you can hear them first - ideally with your own music - that will tell you more than any number above.


Most Popular Speakers
Klipsch Reference R-51M
Klipsch R-51M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
2-way | 87 dB | 6 ohms
Wharfedale Elysian 2
Wharfedale Elysian 2
3-way | 89 dB | 4 ohms
KEF Q150
KEF Q150
2-way | 86 dB | 8 ohms
Bowers & Wilkins 606 S2 Anniversary Edition
B&W 606 S2
2-way | 88 dB | 8 ohms
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-500M
Klipsch RP-500M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
Wharfedale EVO5.1
Wharfedale EVO5.1
2-way | 87 dB | 4 ohms
Wharfedale EVO4.1
Wharfedale EVO4.1
2-way | 87 dB | 8 ohms
This site contains affiliate links. We may be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through one of them. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Copyright © 2026 by SpeakerDecision
About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

Report a Correction