SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS
    • By Type
      Passive Bookshelf Speakers Passive Floor-standing Speakers Passive Center Channel Speakers Passive In-wall Speakers All Passive Speakers Powered Subwoofers Powered Stereo Speakers
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Front Firing Port Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      By Brand
      Acoustic Energy Aperion ATC Audio-Technica Audioengine Bluesound Bowers Wilkins Buchardt Cambridge Audio Canton DALI Definitive Technology Dynaudio ELAC Emotiva Fluance Focal Fyne Audio Genelec GoldenEar Harbeth Jamo JBL Kanto KEF KLH Klipsch Leak Mackie Magnepan MartinLogan McIntosh Mission MoFi Monitor Audio Nuvo Onkyo OSD Paradigm Perlisten Polk Audio PS Audio PSB Q Acoustics REL Revel Russound Sennheiser Sonos Sonus faber Sony Spendor SVS Tannoy Technics Triangle Velodyne Victrola Wharfedale Wilson Audio Yamaha
  • AMPLIFIERS
    • By Type
      All Amplifiers Integrated Amplifiers Stereo Receivers Streaming Amplifiers Power Amplifiers Compact Amplifiers
      By Power
      Up to 60 watts 61 to 90 watts 91 to 120 watts 121 to 180 watts Over 180 watts
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      Home Theater
      All Home Theater Receivers Anthem ARCAM Denon Integra JBL Marantz McIntosh NAD Onkyo Sony Yamaha
      Headphone Amps
      All Headphone Amplifiers Cambridge Audio iFi Audio McIntosh Naim Pro-Ject Rotel Schiit Audio Sennheiser Yamaha
      Multi-Zone
      All Multi-Zone Amplifiers JBL McIntosh OSD Rotel Russound Sonos
      By Brand
      Accuphase Advance Paris Anthem Arcam Audio Research AudioControl Audioengine Audiolab Bluesound Bose Buchardt Cambridge Audio Denon Devialet ELAC Emotiva Eversolo FiiO Fosi Audio Hegel HiFi Rose Integra JBL LEAK Luxman Marantz Mark Levinson McIntosh Michi MISSION MOON Musical Fidelity NAD Naim Onkyo OSD Parasound Pass Labs Peachtree PrimaLuna Primare PS Audio Rega Rogue Audio Roksan Rotel Schiit Audio Sonos Sony SVS T+A TEAC Technics Vincent WiiM Yamaha
  • SMART FIND
  • TOOLS
  • BLOG
  1. Home
  2. Passive Floor-standing Speakers
  3. Focal Vestia No4 vs GoldenEar Triton Five

Focal Vestia No4 vs GoldenEar Triton Five Comparison

x
Speaker to replace
Change

Focal Vestia No4

Passive Floor-standing | 40-30k Hz

Focal Vestia No4
Check price atAmazon›
Change
    
GoldenEar Triton Five

Passive Floor-standing | 26-35k Hz

GoldenEar Triton Five
Check price atAmazon›
Focal Vestia No4 Focal Vestia No4
Check price atAmazon›
GoldenEar Triton Five GoldenEar Triton Fiv...
Check price atAmazon›
Focal Vestia No4
See at AMAZON
GoldenEar Triton Fiv...
See at AMAZON

Focal Vestia No4 vs GoldenEar Triton Five Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing Vestia No4 and Triton Five, two Passive Floor-standing speakers from Focal and GoldenEar.

Let's have a brief look at the main features of Focal Vestia No4 and GoldenEar Triton Five first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Key SpecsFocal Vestia No4GoldenEar Triton Five
BrandFocal
France · founded 1979
GoldenEar
United States · founded 2010
Design3-way2-way
Tweeter1" inverted domeFolded Ribbon
Midrange6.5"—
Woofer2 x 8" Slatefiber2 x 6" Polypropylene
Frequency response40-30k Hz26-35k Hz
Sensitivity92 dB90 dB
Impedance8 ohms8 ohms
Power range40-350 watts15-400 watts
Weight31.50kg / 69.3lbs18.18kg / 40lbs
Dimensions (H x W x D)44-3/8" x 12" x 16-7/8"
1128.0 x 305.0 x 429.0mm
44-1/2" x 11-1/16" x 16-9/16"
1131.0 x 281.0 x 421.0mm

What size room are the Focal Vestia No4 and GoldenEar Triton Five speakers good for?

The size of the room in which you are planning to use these loudspeakers is an important decision factor. Here we have compared their suitability to various sizes of environments considering their size and max power parameters:

Listening Environment* Focal Vestia No4 GoldenEar Triton Five
Near-field Are you nuts? Are you nuts?
Small Room Poor Poor
Mid-size Room Average Average
Large Room Good Good
Very Large Room Good Good

(* Approximate Room sizes: Small < 100sq. ft / 9 m2, Mid-size: 100-220 sq. ft / 9-20 m2, Large 220-400 sq. ft / 20-36 m2, Very Large: > 400 sq. ft / 36 m2. Average Floor Height: 9" / 2.7m. Typical room sizes differ from country to country, and the actual listening experience changes depending on floor height, room shape, surface materials, listening position, speaker locations, etc.)

The sections below take each area in turn: drivers, frequency response, physical size and what you get in the box.


Drivers

One of the fundamental differences between these two speakers is that Vestia No4 is a 3-way design whereas the Triton Five is a 2-way speaker. 3-way designs utilize a midrange driver in addition to the tweeter and woofer on 2-way designs. Designing a crossover for a 3-way speaker is a complicated process and generally increases the overall cost of the speaker.

Tweeter - 1 inchMidrange - 6.5 inchWoofer - 8 inchWoofer - 8 inch
Focal Vestia No4
Woofer - 6 inchWoofer - 6 inch
GoldenEar Triton Five

TweeterMidrangeWoofer

Front view, drawn to scale - cabinets and drivers share one scale, so sizes are directly comparable. Hover a driver for its size.

Driver Focal Vestia No4 GoldenEar Triton Five
Driver Setup 3-way 2-way
Tweeter 1-inch -inch
Midrange 1 x 6.5-inch -
Woofer 2 x 8-inch 2 x 6-inch

Vestia No4 features a 1" Al/Mg inverted dome Tweeter, a 6.5" Midrange and 2 x 8" Slatefiber Woofer with a Crossover frequency at 280Hz and 2800Hz. On the other hand, the Triton Five features a " Folded Ribbon Tweeter and 2 x 6" Polypropylene Woofer.

Frequency Response

Vestia No4 has a frequency range of 40-30k Hz whereas Triton Five has a frequency range of 26-35k Hz. With a minimum frequency of 26Hz, the Triton Five can go significantly deeper on the low side and provide stronger bass compared to the Vestia No4's min frequency of 40Hz.

The graph below depicts how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average Low Frequency values of other speakers in the Floor-standing class in our database.

Low Frequency

Floor-standing Speakers

Vestia No4
Triton Five
Min
Average
Median

Neither pair reaches down to 20Hz, the usual definition of full-range, which is normal for speakers of this size. If you want the bottom octave for movies or bass-heavy music, add a subwoofer to whichever you choose. Visit our Powered Subwoofers section to find out more about the available options.

Impedance and Sensitivity

Vestia No4 and Triton Five have the same Impedance of 8 ohms but where they differ is the sensitivity levels. Vestia No4 sensitivity is rated at 92 dB and the Triton Five's is at 90 dB. This 2 dB difference makes the Focal Vestia No4 a more sensitive speaker compared to GoldenEar Triton Five, hence will play louder with the same amount of watts.

Sensitivity

Floor-standing Speakers

Vestia No4
Triton Five
Min
Average
Median

Power Range

Power range is the range of input power in watts RMS that a loudspeaker is designed to handle. Staying within that range gives nominal performance; driving the speaker beyond its maximum wattage can damage it.

Triton Five can handle a max power of 400 watts RMS, whereas Vestia No4 has a max power handling value of 350 watts RMS, 50 watts less than the Triton Five.

Note that higher power handling does not make a speaker louder: that depends mainly on sensitivity and impedance. The calculator below shows how loud each of these actually plays on a real amplifier.

Which plays louder on your amplifier?

Starting with a popular amplifier - change it to the one you own, or any you are considering, and watch both numbers move.

Focal Vestia No4
 
GoldenEar Triton Five
 

Cabinet Type and Port Position

Vestia No4 has a front firing port whereas Triton Five has a rear firing ports. Focal Vestia No4's front-firing port gives more flexibility in placement in regards to proximity to walls compared to GoldenEar Triton Five with its rear-firing port.

Physical Specs

The size of a speaker can sometimes be an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare Focal Vestia No4's and GoldenEar Triton Five's external dimensions. Focal Vestia No4 has external dimensions of 1128.0 x 305.0 x 429.0mm (44-3/8-inch x 12-inch x 16-7/8-inch) whereas GoldenEar Triton Five has external dimensions of 1131.0 x 281.0 x 421.0mm (44-1/2 x 11-1/16 x 16-9/16inch).

GoldenEar Triton Five is 24mm narrower and 8mm less deeper than Focal Vestia No4 but it is also 3mm taller.

Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited. The base surface area of the Focal Vestia No4 is approximately 1308.5cm2 / 202.8inch2 and base area of the GoldenEar Triton Five is approximately 1183.0cm2 / 183.4inch2. The Vestia No4 requires 11% more surface area than the Triton Five which gives it a small disadvantage on placement in tight spaces.

Weight Comparison

The weight of a loudspeaker can become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often. Weight of a speaker can also "sometimes" be an indicator of the rigidity of the enclosure and the quality of the internal components used. The Focal Vestia No4 weighs 31.50kg / 69.3lbs and the GoldenEar Triton Five weighs 18.18kg / 40lbs. This makes the Vestia No4 73% heavier than the Triton Five.

Here is a comparison of how Vestia No4 and Triton Five's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Passive Floor-standing class.

Weight
All Floor-standing Speakers
Focal Vestia No4
GoldenEar Triton Five
Min
Average
Max

What's in the Box of GoldenEar Triton Five?

Here are the items that come with the Triton Five:
  • Floorstanding loudspeaker
  • 4 Rubber feet (pre-installed)
  • 4 Spikes
  • 4 Locking nuts
  • Owners Manual


Reasons to choose Focal Vestia No4 over GoldenEar Triton Five

Driver Setup 3-way vs 2-way Have a dedicated mid-range driver
Sensitivity 92 dB vs 90 dB Play louder with same amount of amplification power
Woofer Size 8 inches vs 6 inches Larger woofer
Port Position Front vs Rear Gives more flexibility placing close to walls
Height 1128mm vs 1131mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces

Reasons to choose GoldenEar Triton Five over Focal Vestia No4

Max Input Power 400 watts vs 350 watts Handle more power from your amplifier
Low Frequency Response 26 Hz vs 40 Hz Generates deeper bass
High Frequency Response 35k Hz vs 30k Hz Generates higher frequency
Passive Radiator four 8-inch infrasonic planar sub-bass vs None Increases the bass performance
Base Surface Area 1183cm2 vs 1308cm2 Takes less floor space
Price per pair* 2398USD vs 4398USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)

Focal Vestia No4 vs GoldenEar Triton Five Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications
General Focal Vestia No4 GoldenEar Triton Five
Brand Focal GoldenEar
Speaker Type Floor-standing speaker Floor-standing speaker
Power Range 40-350 watts 15-400 watts
Sensitivity 92 dB 90 dB
Impedance 8 ohms 8 ohms
Impedance 2.6 ohms n/a
Frequency Response 40-30k Hz 26-35k Hz
Drivers
Woofer Quantity 2 2
Woofer Size 8" 6"
Woofer Composition Slatefiber Polypropylene
Woofer Surround Material Rubber Rubber
Tweeter Size 1" -
Tweeter Type inverted dome Folded Ribbon
Aimable Tweeter No No
Midrange Driver 6.5" No
Crossover Frequency 280Hz and 2800Hz n/a
Firing Direction front rear
Physical Specs
Height 1128.0mm (44.4") 1131.0mm (44.5")
Width 305.0mm (12") 281.0mm (11.1")
Depth 429.0mm (16.9") 421.0mm (16.6")
Weight 31.50kg (69.3lbs) 18.18kg (40lbs)
Enclosure Bass Reflex Passive Radiator
Finish MDF MDF/Lacquer
Available Colors Black High Gloss, Dark Wood, Light Wood Gloss Black
Grille Yes n/a
Moisture Resistancy No No
Connections
Biamp Inputs No No
Other
Parts Warranty 5 Years
Labor Warranty 5 Years

Verdict

These sit in different price classes - Focal Vestia No4 costs roughly 1.8x what GoldenEar Triton Five does. Expect it to lead on paper; the question is whether the gap is audible enough in your room to be worth it.

AreaBetterWhy
BassBGoldenEar Triton Five digs deeper - 26Hz against 40Hz.
Amplifier needsAFocal Vestia No4 is more sensitive (92dB vs 90dB), so it goes louder on the same amplifier.
Headroomevenly matchedSimilar power handling (350W vs 400W).
SizedependsSimilar cabinet size - neither is easier to fit.
CabinetdependsPorted vs Passive Radiator.
PriceBGoldenEar Triton Five is cheaper - $2,398 against $4,398, about 45% less; arguably a different class.

A Focal Vestia No4  B GoldenEar Triton Five
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both speakers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.

Which should you choose?

Neither runs away with it - they trade advantages. Let the "depends" rows and your own room settle it. If a subwoofer is in your plans, the bass gap largely stops mattering - you would be crossing over above 40Hz anyway, so judge these on the other rows instead. If your amplifier is modest, vintage or valve-based, Focal Vestia No4 is the safer partner - the other will want more current or more watts to sound its best.

And remember what a spec sheet cannot show: how each looks in your room and whether the finish suits it, what dealer support and warranty are like where you live, and how they actually sound to you. If you can hear them first - ideally with your own music - that will tell you more than any number above.


Most Popular Speakers
Klipsch Reference R-51M
Klipsch R-51M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
2-way | 87 dB | 6 ohms
Wharfedale Elysian 2
Wharfedale Elysian 2
3-way | 89 dB | 4 ohms
KEF Q150
KEF Q150
2-way | 86 dB | 8 ohms
Bowers & Wilkins 606 S2 Anniversary Edition
B&W 606 S2
2-way | 88 dB | 8 ohms
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-500M
Klipsch RP-500M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
Wharfedale EVO5.1
Wharfedale EVO5.1
2-way | 87 dB | 4 ohms
Wharfedale EVO4.1
Wharfedale EVO4.1
2-way | 87 dB | 8 ohms
This site contains affiliate links. We may be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through one of them. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Copyright © 2026 by SpeakerDecision
About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

Report a Correction