SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS
    • By Type
      Passive Bookshelf Speakers Passive Floor-standing Speakers Passive Center Channel Speakers Passive In-wall Speakers All Passive Speakers Powered Subwoofers Powered Stereo Speakers
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Front Firing Port Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      By Brand
      Acoustic Energy Aperion ATC Audio-Technica Audioengine Bluesound Bowers Wilkins Buchardt Cambridge Audio Canton DALI Definitive Technology Dynaudio ELAC Emotiva Fluance Focal Fyne Audio Genelec GoldenEar Harbeth Jamo JBL Kanto KEF KLH Klipsch Leak Mackie Magnepan MartinLogan McIntosh Mission MoFi Monitor Audio Nuvo Onkyo OSD Paradigm Perlisten Polk Audio PS Audio PSB Q Acoustics REL Revel Russound Sennheiser Sonos Sonus faber Sony Spendor SVS Tannoy Technics Triangle Velodyne Victrola Wharfedale Wilson Audio Yamaha
  • AMPLIFIERS
    • By Type
      All Amplifiers Integrated Amplifiers Stereo Receivers Streaming Amplifiers Power Amplifiers Compact Amplifiers
      Home Theater
      All Home Theater Receivers AnthemARCAMDenonIntegraJBLMarantzMcIntoshNADOnkyoSonyYamaha
      By Power
      Up to 60 watts 61 to 90 watts 91 to 120 watts 121 to 180 watts Over 180 watts
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      By Brand
      Accuphase Advance Paris Anthem Arcam Audio Research AudioControl Audioengine Audiolab Bluesound Bose Buchardt Cambridge Audio Denon Devialet ELAC Emotiva Eversolo FiiO Fosi Audio Hegel HiFi Rose Integra JBL LEAK Luxman Marantz Mark Levinson McIntosh Michi MISSION MOON Musical Fidelity NAD Naim Onkyo OSD Parasound Pass Labs Peachtree PrimaLuna Primare PS Audio Rega Rogue Audio Roksan Rotel Schiit Audio Sonos Sony SVS T+A TEAC Technics Vincent WiiM Yamaha
  • SMART FIND
  • TOOLS
  • BLOG
  1. Home
  2. Passive Bookshelf Speakers
  3. B&W 607 S3 vs KEF Q150

B&W 607 S3 vs KEF Q150 Comparison

x
Speaker to replace
Change

B&W 607 S3

Passive Bookshelf | 52-28k Hz

Bowers & Wilkins 607 S3
Check price atAmazon›
Change
    
KEF Q150

Passive Bookshelf | 51-28k Hz

KEF Q150
Check price atAmazon›
B&W 607 S3 B&W 607 S3
Check price atAmazon›
KEF Q150 KEF Q150
Check price atAmazon›
B&W 607 S3
See at AMAZON
KEF Q150
See at AMAZON

B&W 607 S3 vs KEF Q150 Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing 607 S3 and Q150, two Passive Bookshelf speakers from Bowers Wilkins and KEF.

Let's have a brief look at the main features of B&W 607 S3 and KEF Q150 first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Key SpecsB&W 607 S3KEF Q150
BrandBowers Wilkins
United Kingdom · founded 1966
KEF
United Kingdom · founded 1961
Design2-way2-way
Uni-Q driver—11th Generation Uni-Q
Tweeter1" Decoupled Double Dome Titanium1" Dome
Woofer5" Continuum5.25" Aluminum
Frequency response52-28k Hz51-28k Hz
Sensitivity84 dB86 dB
Impedance8 ohms8 ohms
Power range30-100 watts10-100 watts
Weight4.65kg / 10.2lbs5.60kg / 12.3lbs
Dimensions (H x W x D)11.8" x 6.5" x 9.3"
300.0 x 166.0 x 235.0mm
11.9" x 7.0" x 10.9"
303.0 x 180.0 x 278.0mm

What size room are the B&W 607 S3 and KEF Q150 speakers good for?

The size of the room in which you are planning to use these loudspeakers is an important decision factor. Here we have compared their suitability to various sizes of environments considering their size and max power parameters:

Listening Environment* B&W 607 S3 KEF Q150
Near-field Average Average
Small Room Good Good
Mid-size Room Average Average
Large Room Poor Poor
Very Large Room Bad Bad

(* Approximate Room sizes: Small < 100sq. ft / 9 m2, Mid-size: 100-220 sq. ft / 9-20 m2, Large 220-400 sq. ft / 20-36 m2, Very Large: > 400 sq. ft / 36 m2. Average Floor Height: 9" / 2.7m. Typical room sizes differ from country to country, and the actual listening experience changes depending on floor height, room shape, surface materials, listening position, speaker locations, etc.)

The sections below take each area in turn: drivers, frequency response, physical size and what you get in the box.


**This post contains affiliate links, and we will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through our links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.


Drivers

Both 607 S3 and Q150 are 2-way speakers.

Tweeter - 1 inchWoofer - 5 inch
B&W 607 S3
Tweeter - 1 inchWoofer - 5.25 inch
KEF Q150

TweeterWoofer

Front view, drawn to scale - cabinets and drivers share one scale, so sizes are directly comparable. Hover a driver for its size.

Driver B&W 607 S3 KEF Q150
Driver Setup 2-way 2-way
Tweeter 1-inch 1-inch
Midrange - -
Woofer 1 x 5-inch 1 x 5.25-inch

607 S3 features a 1" Titanium Decoupled Double Dome Titanium Tweeter and 1 x 5" Continuum Woofer. On the other hand, the Q150 features a 1" vented aluminum Dome Tweeter and 1 x 5.25" Aluminum Woofer with a Crossover frequency at 2500Hz.

Frequency Response

607 S3 has a frequency range of 52-28k Hz whereas Q150 has a frequency range of 51-28k Hz. With a minimum frequency of 51Hz, the Q150 can go slightly deeper then the 607 S3's min frequency of 52Hz.

The graph below depicts how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average Low Frequency values of other speakers in the Bookshelf class in our database.

Low Frequency

Bookshelf Speakers

607 S3
Q150
Min
Average
Median

Neither pair reaches down to 20Hz, the usual definition of full-range, which is normal for speakers of this size. If you want the bottom octave for movies or bass-heavy music, add a subwoofer to whichever you choose. Visit our Powered Subwoofers section to find out more about the available options.

Impedance and Sensitivity

607 S3 and Q150 have the same Impedance of 8 ohms but where they differ is the sensitivity levels. 607 S3 sensitivity is rated at 84 dB and the Q150's is at 86 dB. This 2 dB difference makes the KEF Q150 a more sensitive speaker compared to B&W 607 S3, hence will play louder with the same amount of watts.

Sensitivity

Bookshelf Speakers

607 S3
Q150
Min
Average
Median

Power Range

Power range is the range of input power in watts RMS that a loudspeaker is designed to handle. Staying within that range gives nominal performance; driving the speaker beyond its maximum wattage can damage it.

Both handle the same maximum of 100 watts RMS, though 607 S3 is rated 30-100 watts and Q150 10-100 watts.

Note that higher power handling does not make a speaker louder: that depends mainly on sensitivity and impedance. The calculator below shows how loud each of these actually plays on a real amplifier.

Which plays louder on your amplifier?

Starting with a popular amplifier - change it to the one you own, or any you are considering, and watch both numbers move.

B&W 607 S3
 
KEF Q150
 

Input Type and Bi-Amping / Bi-Wiring

607 S3 features Binding post posts which make bi-amping or bi-wiring possible. Q150 has a Post which doesn't feature bi-amping/bi-wiring.

B&W 607 S3 Terminals
B&W 607 S3's Binding post terminals allows Bi-amping or bi-wiring

KEF Q150 Terminals
KEF Q150's Post terminals

Cabinet Type and Port Position

Both 607 S3 and Q150 have rear firing ports. Rear ported speakers generally need more room between the backside of the speaker and the wall compared to sealed and front/bottom ported speakers. Placing the speakers too close to the walls may cause the bass to sound boomy.

If you are limited in space and can't get the speakers away from the backwall, check our Speakers with Front Firing Ports page.

KEF Q150  Port
KEF Q150 Port

Physical Specs

The size of a speaker can sometimes be an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare B&W 607 S3's and KEF Q150's external dimensions. B&W 607 S3 has external dimensions of 300.0 x 166.0 x 235.0mm (11.8 x 6.5 x 9.3inch) whereas KEF Q150 has external dimensions of 303.0 x 180.0 x 278.0mm (11.9 x 7.0 x 10.9inch).

KEF Q150 is clearly the larger of the two speakers. Its body is 14mm wider, 3mm taller and 43mm deeper than B&W 607 S3.

Below you can see the front view size comparison of B&W 607 S3 and KEF Q150 in scale.

B&W 607 S3 vs KEF Q150 Size Comparison - Front View
Comparison image of B&W 607 S3 and KEF Q150 Size and External Dimensions

Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited. The base surface area of the B&W 607 S3 is approximately 390.1cm2 / 60.5inch2 and base area of the KEF Q150 is approximately 500.4cm2 / 77.6inch2. The 607 S3 requires 22% less surface area than the Q150 which gives it a small advantage on placement in tight spaces.

Here is another comparison that shows both speakers on a BDI Octave Media Cabinet, next to a standard size amplifier and turntable in scale:

B&W 607 S3 vs KEF Q150 Size Comparison on a Media Console
Size Comparison image of B&W 607 S3 and KEF Q150 on a Media Console
Weight Comparison

The weight of a loudspeaker can become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often. Weight of a speaker can also "sometimes" be an indicator of the rigidity of the enclosure and the quality of the internal components used. The B&W 607 S3 weighs 4.65kg / 10.2lbs and the KEF Q150 weighs 5.60kg / 12.3lbs. This makes the Q150 20% heavier than the 607 S3.

Here is a comparison of how 607 S3 and Q150's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Passive Bookshelf class.

Weight
All Bookshelf Speakers
B&W 607 S3
KEF Q150
Min
Average
Max

What's in the Box of B&W 607 S3?

Here are the items that are included inside the box of 607 S3:
  • 2 Bookshelf loudspeakers
  • 2 Grilles
  • 2 Two-piece foam port plugs
  • 8 Self-adhesive rubber feet
  • 4 Jumper-straps (pre-installed)
  • Manual
  • Bowers & Wilkins brochure
  • Warranty Information

What's in the Box of KEF Q150?

Here are the items that come with the Q150:
  • 2 Bookshelf loudspeakers
  • 2 Foam port plugs
  • 8 Self-adhesive rubber feet
  • Owner's Manual
  • Warranty Registration Card


Reasons to choose Bowers & Wilkins 607 S3 over KEF Q150

Bi-Amping and Bi-Wiring Yes vs No Allows bi-amping and bi-wiring connections
Height 300mm vs 303mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces
Base Surface Area 390cm2 vs 500cm2 Takes less floor space

Reasons to choose KEF Q150 over Bowers & Wilkins 607 S3

Sensitivity 86 dB vs 84 dB Play louder with same amount of amplification power
Minimum Impedance 3.7 ohms vs 3.0 ohms Very low impedance levels puts more pressure on amplifier
Woofer Size 5.25 inches vs 5 inches Larger woofer
Low Frequency Response 51 Hz vs 52 Hz Generates deeper bass
Price per pair* 600USD vs 900USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)

B&W 607 S3 vs KEF Q150 Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications
General Bowers & Wilkins 607 S3 KEF Q150
Brand Bowers Wilkins KEF
Speaker Type Bookshelf speakers Bookshelf speakers
Power Range 30-100 watts 10-100 watts
Sensitivity 84 dB 86 dB
Impedance 8 ohms 8 ohms
Impedance 3.0 ohms 3.7 ohms
Frequency Response 52-28k Hz 51-28k Hz
Drivers
Woofer Quantity 1 1
Woofer Size 5" 5.25"
Woofer Composition Continuum Aluminum
Woofer Surround Material Rubber Rubber
Tweeter Size 1" 1"
Tweeter Type Decoupled Double Dome Titanium Dome
Aimable Tweeter No No
Midrange Driver No No
Crossover Frequency n/a 2500Hz
Firing Direction rear rear
Physical Specs
Height 300.0mm (11.8") 303.0mm (11.9")
Width 166.0mm (6.5") 180.0mm (7.1")
Depth 235.0mm (9.3") 278.0mm (10.9")
Weight 4.65kg (10.2lbs) 5.60kg (12.3lbs)
Enclosure Bass Reflex Bass Reflex
Finish MDF/Vinyl MDF/Vinyl-wrapped
Available Colors Matte Black, Matte White, Oak, Red Cherry Black, Walnut, White
Mounting Bracket No No
Recommended Stand Height 24-26" 18-24"
Grille Yes Yes
Moisture Resistancy No No
Connections
Biamp Inputs Yes No
Other
Parts Warranty 5 Years 5 Years
Labor Warranty 5 Years 5 Years

Verdict

A generation apart: B&W 607 S3 is the newer design, against a 2019 model. Newer is not automatically better, but the older one is more likely to be discounted or near run-out.

AreaBetterWhy
Bassevenly matchedMuch the same reach (52Hz vs 51Hz).
Amplifier needsBKEF Q150 is more sensitive (86dB vs 84dB), so it goes louder on the same amplifier.
Headroomevenly matchedSimilar power handling (100W vs 100W).
SizedependsB&W 607 S3 is easier to place; KEF Q150 is bigger, which usually goes with fuller bass. Your room decides.
ExpandabilitydependsB&W 607 S3: bi-amping. KEF Q150 sits in a wider range (7 models), so a matched surround system is easier later.
PriceBKEF Q150 is cheaper - $600 against $900, about 33% less.

A B&W 607 S3  B KEF Q150
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both speakers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.

Which should you choose?

KEF Q150 has the edge on paper, though the margin is not large. The rows marked "depends" may matter more to you than the score does. If your amplifier is modest, vintage or valve-based, KEF Q150 is the safer partner - the other will want more current or more watts to sound its best. Think about the whole system, not just the speakers: the roughly $300 saved by taking the cheaper pair would buy a subwoofer or a better amplifier, and either usually does more for the sound than the difference between these two.

And remember what a spec sheet cannot show: how each looks in your room and whether the finish suits it, what dealer support and warranty are like where you live, and how they actually sound to you. If you can hear them first - ideally with your own music - that will tell you more than any number above.


Most Popular Speakers
Klipsch Reference R-51M
Klipsch R-51M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
2-way | 87 dB | 6 ohms
Wharfedale Elysian 2
Wharfedale Elysian 2
3-way | 89 dB | 4 ohms
KEF Q150
KEF Q150
2-way | 86 dB | 8 ohms
Bowers & Wilkins 606 S2 Anniversary Edition
B&W 606 S2
2-way | 88 dB | 8 ohms
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-500M
Klipsch RP-500M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
Wharfedale EVO5.1
Wharfedale EVO5.1
2-way | 87 dB | 4 ohms
Wharfedale EVO4.1
Wharfedale EVO4.1
2-way | 87 dB | 8 ohms
Copyright © 2026 by SpeakerDecision
About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

Report a Correction