SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS
    • By Type
      Passive Bookshelf Speakers Passive Floor-standing Speakers Passive Center Channel Speakers Passive In-wall Speakers All Passive Speakers Powered Subwoofers Powered Stereo Speakers
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Front Firing Port Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      By Brand
      Acoustic Energy Aperion ATC Audio-Technica Audioengine Bluesound Bowers Wilkins Buchardt Cambridge Audio Canton DALI Definitive Technology Dynaudio ELAC Emotiva Fluance Focal Fyne Audio Genelec GoldenEar Harbeth Jamo JBL Kanto KEF KLH Klipsch Leak Mackie Magnepan MartinLogan McIntosh Mission MoFi Monitor Audio Nuvo Onkyo OSD Paradigm Perlisten Polk Audio PS Audio PSB Q Acoustics REL Revel Russound Sennheiser Sonos Sonus faber Sony Spendor SVS Tannoy Technics Triangle Velodyne Victrola Wharfedale Wilson Audio Yamaha
  • AMPLIFIERS
    • By Type
      All Amplifiers Integrated Amplifiers Stereo Receivers Streaming Amplifiers Power Amplifiers Compact Amplifiers
      By Power
      Up to 60 watts 61 to 90 watts 91 to 120 watts 121 to 180 watts Over 180 watts
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      Home Theater
      All Home Theater Receivers Anthem ARCAM Denon Integra JBL Marantz McIntosh NAD Onkyo Sony Yamaha
      Headphone Amps
      All Headphone Amplifiers Cambridge Audio iFi Audio McIntosh Naim Pro-Ject Rotel Schiit Audio Sennheiser Yamaha
      Multi-Zone
      All Multi-Zone Amplifiers JBL McIntosh OSD Rotel Russound Sonos
      By Brand
      Accuphase Advance Paris Anthem Arcam Audio Research AudioControl Audioengine Audiolab Bluesound Bose Buchardt Cambridge Audio Cayin Denon Devialet ELAC Emotiva Eversolo FiiO Fosi Audio Hegel HiFi Rose Integra JBL Layer Audio Design LEAK Luxman Marantz Mark Levinson McIntosh Michi MISSION MOON Musical Fidelity NAD Naim Onkyo OSD Parasound Pass Labs Peachtree PrimaLuna Primare PS Audio Rega Rogue Audio Roksan Rotel Schiit Audio Sonos Sony SVS T+A TEAC Technics Vincent WiiM Yamaha
  • SMART FIND
  • TOOLS
  • BLOG
  1. Home
  2. Powered Subwoofers
  3. Wharfedale Nova 15 vs Klipsch R-100SW
Wharfedale Nova 15 vs Klipsch R-100SW Comparison
x
Subwoofer to replace
Change

Wharfedale Nova 15

Powered Subwoofer | 28 Hz (-6dB)

Wharfedale Nova 15
Check price atAmazon›
Change
    
Klipsch R-100SW

Powered Subwoofer | 32-120 Hz

Klipsch R-100SW
Check price atAmazon›
Wharfedale Nova 15 Wharfedale Nova 15
Check price atAmazon›
Klipsch R-100SW Klipsch R-100SW
Check price atAmazon›
Wharfedale Nova 15
See at AMAZON
Klipsch R-100SW
See at AMAZON

Wharfedale Nova 15 vs Klipsch R-100SW Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing Nova 15 and R-100SW, two Powered Subwoofer speakers from Wharfedale and Klipsch. Being Powered subwoofers, they both have built-in amplifiers so you don't need an external power amp or an integrated amp to power them. Let's have a brief look at the main features of Wharfedale Nova 15 and Klipsch R-100SW first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Key SpecsWharfedale Nova 15Klipsch R-100SW
BrandWharfedale
United Kingdom · founded 1932
Klipsch
United States · founded 1946
Driver15" Paper10" Copper-spun IMG
Amplifier360 watts RMS150 watts RMS
EnclosurePassive RadiatorPorted
Frequency response28 Hz (-6dB)32-120 Hz
Weight47.80kg / 105.2lbs10.91kg / 24lbs
Dimensions (H x W x D)21.61" x 21.26" x 23.9"
549.0 x 540.0 x 607.0mm
14-5/8" x 12-9/16" x 18-1/16"
372.0 x 320.0 x 459.0mm
Woofer - 15 inch
Wharfedale Nova 15
Woofer - 10 inch
Klipsch R-100SW

Woofer

Front view, drawn to scale - cabinets and drivers share one scale, so sizes are directly comparable. Hover a driver for its size.

The sections below take each area in turn: driver and amplifier, frequency response, physical size and connectivity.

Drivers

The efficiency of a subwoofer is directly proportional to the total radiating are squared hence the woofer quantity and diameter.Both Wharfedale Nova 15and Klipsch R-100SW have a single woofer setup however the Wharfedale Nova 15's woofer is 15-inch whereas the Klipsch R-100SW features a 10-inch woofer.

Frequency Response

Nova 15 has a frequency range of 28 Hz (-6dB) whereas R-100SW has a frequency range of 32-120 Hz. With a minimum frequency of 28Hz, the Nova 15 can go slightly deeper then the R-100SW's min frequency of 32Hz.

Below graphs depict how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average values of the Min and Max Frequencies of other speakers in the Subwoofer class in our database.

Low Frequency

Subwoofer Speakers

Wharfedale Nova 15
Klipsch R-100SW
Min
Average
Max
High Frequency

Subwoofer Speakers

Wharfedale Nova 15
Klipsch R-100SW
Min
Average
Max

Cabinet Type

The Wharfedale Nova 15 has a Passive Radiator type cabinet. Passive Radiator type subwoofers sports a non-powered cone that moves in response to the main woofer to move air out in order to generate stronger bass in a smaller body compared to ported or sealed designs. On the other hand the Klipsch R-100SW have Bass reflex type enclosure.

Physical Specs

The size of a speaker can sometimes be an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare Wharfedale Nova 15's and Klipsch R-100SW's external dimensions. Wharfedale Nova 15 has external dimensions of 549.0 x 540.0 x 607.0mm (21.61inch x 21.26inch x 23.9inch) whereas Klipsch R-100SW has external dimensions of 372.0 x 320.0 x 459.0mm (14-5/8 x 12-9/16 x 18-1/16inch).

Wharfedale Nova 15 is clearly the larger of the two speakers. Its body is 220mm wider, 177mm taller and 148mm deeper than Klipsch R-100SW.

Size, drawn to scale

FRONTWharfedale Nova 15 front: 540 x 549 mm (21.3 x 21.6 in)Klipsch R-100SW front: 320 x 372 mm (12.6 x 14.6 in)Wharfedale Nova 15540 × 549 mmKlipsch R-100SW320 × 372 mmTOP / FOOTPRINTWharfedale Nova 15 footprint: 540 x 607 mm (21.3 x 23.9 in)Klipsch R-100SW footprint: 320 x 459 mm (12.6 x 18.1 in)Wharfedale Nova 15540 × 607 mmKlipsch R-100SW320 × 459 mm
Both speakers and both views share one scale, so everything here is directly comparable. Hover a box for its dimensions.

One scale for both, standing on the same surface and pushed back to the same wall, so the deeper one visibly sticks out further.

Wharfedale Nova 15 needs about 123% more floor or shelf area. Wharfedale Nova 15 is 148mm deeper, so it stands that much further out from the wall. Wharfedale Nova 15 is 177mm taller.

Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited. The base surface area of the Wharfedale Nova 15 is approximately 3277.8cm2 / 508.1inch2 and base area of the Klipsch R-100SW is approximately 1468.8cm2 / 227.7inch2. The Nova 15 requires 123% more surface area than the R-100SW which gives it a small disadvantage on placement in tight spaces.

Weight Comparison

The weight of a subwoofer may become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often to find the optimal positioning, also known as 'Subwoofer Crawling'. The Wharfedale Nova 15 weighs 47.80kg / 105.2lbs and the Klipsch R-100SW weighs 10.91kg / 24lbs. This makes the Nova 15 338% heavier than the R-100SW.

Here is a comparison of how Nova 15 and R-100SW's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Powered Subwoofer class.

Weight
All Subwoofer Speakers
Wharfedale Nova 15
Klipsch R-100SW
Min
Average
Max

What's in the Box of Wharfedale Nova 15?

Here are the items that are included inside the box of Nova 15:
  • Subwoofer
  • Power cord
  • Manual
  • Rubber feet pads

What's in the Box of Klipsch R-100SW?

Here are the items that come with the R-100SW:
  • Powered sub
  • Grille (installed)
  • 6.5-feet AC power cord
  • User Manual
  • Important Safety Instructions
  • Warranty Information


Reasons to choose Wharfedale Nova 15 over Klipsch R-100SW
Woofer Size 15 inches vs 10 inches Larger woofer
Low Frequency Response 28 Hz vs 32 Hz Generates deeper bass
Passive Radiator 1 x 15-inch vs None Increases the bass performance
Reasons to choose Klipsch R-100SW over Wharfedale Nova 15
High Frequency Response 120 Hz vs Hz Generates higher frequency
Height 372mm vs 549mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces
Base Surface Area 1468cm2 vs 3277cm2 Takes less floor space
Price per pair* 275USD vs 1999USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)

Size, drawn to scale

FRONTWharfedale Nova 15 front: 540 x 549 mm (21.3 x 21.6 in)Klipsch R-100SW front: 320 x 372 mm (12.6 x 14.6 in)Wharfedale Nova 15540 × 549 mmKlipsch R-100SW320 × 372 mmTOP / FOOTPRINTWharfedale Nova 15 footprint: 540 x 607 mm (21.3 x 23.9 in)Klipsch R-100SW footprint: 320 x 459 mm (12.6 x 18.1 in)Wharfedale Nova 15540 × 607 mmKlipsch R-100SW320 × 459 mm
Both subwoofers and both views share one scale, so everything here is directly comparable. Hover a box for its dimensions.

One scale for both, standing on the same floor and pushed back to the same wall, so the bigger one visibly takes more of the room.

Wharfedale Nova 15 needs about 123% more floor area. Wharfedale Nova 15 stands 148mm further into the room. Wharfedale Nova 15 is 177mm taller.

Wharfedale Nova 15 vs Klipsch R-100SW Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications
General Wharfedale Nova 15 Klipsch R-100SW
Brand Wharfedale Klipsch
Speaker Type Powered Subwoofer Powered Subwoofer
Max Amplifier Output 360 watts 150 watts
Frequency Response 28 Hz (-6dB) 32-120 Hz
Amplifier
Watts RMS (Continuous) 360-watt RMS 150-watt RMS
Watts Peak (Max) 770-watt RMS 300-watt RMS
Drivers
Woofer Quantity 1 1
Woofer Size 15" 10"
Woofer Composition Paper Copper-spun IMG
Tweeter Size - -
Aimable Tweeter No No
Midrange Driver No No
Firing Direction n/a front
Physical Specs
Height 549.0mm (21.6") 372.0mm (14.6")
Width 540.0mm (21.3") 320.0mm (12.6")
Depth 607.0mm (23.9") 459.0mm (18.1")
Weight 47.80kg (105.2lbs) 10.91kg (24lbs)
Enclosure Passive Radiator Bass reflex
Finish Matte Black n/a
Available Colors Black n/a
Grille Yes Yes
Moisture Resistancy No No
Connections
USB Port USB port for firmware updates n/a
Other
Parts Warranty 2 Years
Labor Warranty 2 Years

Verdict

A passive radiator subwoofer against a ported one. That is the most consequential line on this page: it decides how the bass rolls off, how it behaves in a small room, and how much output you get for the size of the box.

AreaBetterWhy
Bass depthAWharfedale Nova 15 goes deeper - 28Hz against 32Hz. A real difference, though most music has little content below 32Hz.
Amplifier powerAWharfedale Nova 15 has the bigger amplifier - 360W against 150W RMS, about 3.8dB more on tap. In a large room that is headroom before the DSP starts limiting.
Driver areaAWharfedale Nova 15 moves more air: 15" against 10" is 2.25x the cone area, not the 1.5x the diameters suggest. More area means the same output with less excursion, and less distortion with it.
EnclosuredependsWharfedale Nova 15 is passive radiator - a passive radiator behaves like a port without the pipe noise, and suits a slim cabinet; Klipsch R-100SW is ported - a ported box gives more output low down for its size, at the cost of a steeper roll-off below tuning. Neither is better in the abstract; ported tends to suit films and sealed tends to suit music, and both generalisations have exceptions.
Speaker-level inputsAWharfedale Nova 15 takes a speaker-level connection as well as line level. That is what lets it work with an integrated amplifier or a vintage receiver that has no subwoofer output at all.
Cabinet sizedependsKlipsch R-100SW is about 70% smaller by volume. In a subwoofer that is a real trade rather than a preference: box volume is how you get output low down without a bigger amplifier.
PriceBKlipsch R-100SW costs less - $275 against $1,999, about 86% less.

A Wharfedale Nova 15  B Klipsch R-100SW
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both subwoofers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.

Which should you choose?

The usual trade-off: Wharfedale Nova 15 measures better, Klipsch R-100SW costs about 86% less. In a normal room, placement will make a bigger difference than the gap between these two. Check your amplifier first: if it has no subwoofer or preamp output, Wharfedale Nova 15 is the only one of these two you can connect at all. Two small subwoofers beat one big one in most rooms - a pair evens out the room modes in a way no single box can, whatever its specs. At $275 each, two Klipsch R-100SW cost about $550 against $1,999 for one of the other, which is worth a thought.

One thing outweighs everything above: where the subwoofer stands. Room modes can add or remove 10dB or more at a given seat, which is far larger than any difference on this page. Before spending more, try the sub in two or three positions - the crawl test, where you put it in the listening seat and crawl the room to find where the bass sounds best, costs nothing and usually beats an upgrade.


Latest Powered Subwoofers
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1600CSW
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1600CSW
16-inch Woofer | 14.5-175 Hz | 800 watts
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1400CSW
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1400CSW
14-inch Woofer | 15-180 Hz | 500 watts
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1200CSW
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1200CSW
12-inch Woofer | 17-160 Hz | 400 watts
DALI BASIK SUB
DALI BASIK SUB
8-inch Woofer | 33-200 Hz | 170 watts
Wharfedale Nova 15
Wharfedale Nova 15
15-inch Woofer | 28 Hz (-6dB) | 360 watts
Wharfedale Nova 12
Wharfedale Nova 12
12-inch Woofer | 28 Hz (-6dB) | 280 watts
Wharfedale Nova 10
Wharfedale Nova 10
10-inch Woofer | 29 Hz (-6dB) | 230 watts
Wharfedale Nova 8
Wharfedale Nova 8
8-inch Woofer | 33 Hz (-6dB) | 200 watts
Bluesound PULSE SUB
Bluesound PULSE SUB
6.5-inch Woofer | | 350 watts
Emotiva Nostala FT12
Emotiva Nostala FT12
12-inch Woofer | 25-150 Hz | 800 watts

This site contains affiliate links. We may be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through one of them. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Copyright © 2026 by SpeakerDecision
About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

Report a Correction