SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS by TYPE
    • Passive Bookshelf Speakers
    • Passive Floor-standing Speakers
    • Passive Center Channel Speakers
    • Passive In-wall Speakers
    • All Passive Speakers
    • Powered Subwoofers
    • Powered Stereo Speakers
  • AMPLIFIERS
  • SMART FIND
Polk Audio Polk Monitor XT12 vs Klipsch R-100SW Comparison
x
Subwoofer to replace
Change

Polk Monitor XT12

Powered Subwoofer | 24-160 Hz

Polk Monitor XT12
CHECK PRICE
Change
    
Klipsch R-100SW

Powered Subwoofer | 32-120 Hz

Klipsch R-100SW
CHECK PRICE
Polk Monitor XT12 Polk Monitor XT12
See at AMAZON
Klipsch R-100SW Klipsch R-100SW
See at AMAZON
Polk Monitor XT12
See at AMAZON
Klipsch R-100SW
See at AMAZON
Polk Monitor XT12 vs Klipsch R-100SW Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing Monitor XT12 and R-100SW, two Powered Subwoofer speakers from Polk Audio and Klipsch. Being Powered subwoofers, they both have built-in amplifiers so you don't need an external power amp or an integrated amp to power them. Let's have a brief look at the main features of Polk Monitor XT12 and Klipsch R-100SW first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Polk Monitor XT12 Key Specs

  • 12" Bi-laminate paper Woofer
  • 24-160 Hz Frequency Response
  • 50 watts Max Amplifier Output
  • Weight:17.73kg
  • Dimensions (H x W x D): 418.0" x 16-1/16" x 19-1/16"( 418.0 x 408.0 x 485.0mm )

Klipsch R-100SW Key Specs

  • 10" Copper-spun IMG Woofer
  • 32-120 Hz Frequency Response
  • 150 watts Max Amplifier Output
  • Weight:10.91kg
  • Dimensions (H x W x D): 372.0" x 12-9/16" x 18-1/16"( 372.0 x 320.0 x 459.0mm )

In the following sections, we will get into details in order to better understand how the Polk Monitor XT12 and Klipsch R-100SW compare and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one of these subwoofers is the better choice for you.


**This post contains affiliate links, and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through my links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Drivers

The efficiency of a subwoofer is directly proportional to the total radiating are squared hence the woofer quantity and diameter.Both Polk Monitor XT12and Klipsch R-100SW have a single woofer setup however the Polk Monitor XT12's woofer is 12-inch whereas the Klipsch R-100SW features a 10-inch woofer.

Frequency Response

Monitor XT12 has a frequency range of 24-160 Hz whereas R-100SW has a frequency range of 32-120 Hz. With a minimum frequency of 24Hz, the Monitor XT12 can go significantly deeper on the low side and provide stronger bass compared to the R-100SW's min frequency of 32Hz.

Below graphs depict how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average values of the Min and Max Frequencies of other speakers in the Subwoofer class in our database.

Low Frequency

Subwoofer Speakers

Polk Monitor XT12
Klipsch R-100SW
Min
Average
Max
High Frequency

Subwoofer Speakers

Polk Monitor XT12
Klipsch R-100SW
Min
Average
Max

Cabinet Type

The Polk Monitor XT12 has a Bass Reflex type cabinet. Bass Reflex type subwoofers (aka Ported, Vented or Reflex Port) have enclosures that uses a port, hole or vent cut into the cabinet. Ported designs are generally more efficient than the Sealed designs. On the other hand the Klipsch R-100SW have Bass reflex type enclosure.

Physical Specs

Size of a speaker can sometimes become an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare Polk Monitor XT12's and Klipsch R-100SW's external dimensions. Polk Monitor XT12 has external dimensions of 418.0 x 408.0 x 485.0mm ( 16-7/16inch x 16-1/16inch x 19-1/16inch ) whereas Klipsch R-100SW has external dimensions of 372.0 x 320.0 x 459.0mm ( 14-5/8 x 12-9/16 x 18-1/16inch) .

Polk Monitor XT12 is clearly the larger of the two speakers. Its body is 88mm wider, 46mm taller and 26mm deeper than Klipsch R-100SW.

Below you can see the front view size comparison of Polk Monitor XT12 and Klipsch R-100SW in scale.

Polk Monitor XT12 vs Klipsch R-100SW Size Comparison - Front View
Comparison image of Polk Monitor XT12 and Klipsch R-100SW Size and External Dimensions

Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited. The base surface area of the Polk Monitor XT12 is approximately 1978.8cm2 / 306.7inch2 and base area of the Klipsch R-100SW is approximately 1468.8cm2 / 227.7inch2. The Monitor XT12 requires 35% more surface area than the R-100SW which gives it a small disadvantage on placement in tight spaces.

Weight Comparison

The weight of a subwoofer may become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often to find the optimal positioning, also known as 'Subwoofer Crawling'. The Polk Monitor XT12 weighs 17.73kg / 39lbs and the Klipsch R-100SW weighs 10.91kg / 24lbs. This makes the Monitor XT12 63% heavier than the R-100SW.

Here is a comparison of how Monitor XT12 and R-100SW's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Powered Subwoofer class.

Weight
All Subwoofer Speakers
Polk Monitor XT12
Klipsch R-100SW
Min
Average
Max

What's in the Box of Polk Monitor XT12?

Here are the items that are included inside the box of Monitor XT12:
  • Black powered subwoofer
  • 6.5-feet AC power cord
  • Grille
  • Owners Manual
  • Online registration card
  • What's in the Box of Klipsch R-100SW?

    Here are the items that come with the R-100SW:
  • Powered sub
  • Grille (installed)
  • 6.5-feet AC power cord
  • User Manual
  • Important Safety Instructions
  • Warranty Information

  • Reasons to choose Polk Monitor XT12 over Klipsch R-100SW
    Woofer Size 12 inches vs 10 inches Larger woofer
    Low Frequency Response 24 Hz vs 32 Hz Generates deeper bass
    High Frequency Response 160k Hz vs 120k Hz Generates higher frequency
    Reasons to choose Klipsch R-100SW over Polk Monitor XT12
    Height 372mm vs 418mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces
    Base Surface Area 1468cm2 vs 1978cm2 Takes less floor space
    Price per pair* 275USD vs 399USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)
    Polk Monitor XT12 vs Klipsch R-100SW Specs Table
    Detailed comparison of specifications
    General Polk Monitor XT12 Klipsch R-100SW
    Brand Polk Audio Klipsch
    Speaker Type Powered Subwoofer Powered Subwoofer
    Max Amplifier Output 50 watts 150 watts
    Frequency Response 24-160 Hz 32-120 Hz
    Amplifier
    Watts RMS (Continuous) 50-watt RMS 150-watt RMS
    Watts Peak (Max) n/a 300-watt RMS
    Drivers
    Woofer Quantity 1 1
    Woofer Size 12" 10"
    Woofer Composition Bi-laminate paper Copper-spun IMG
    Tweeter Size - -
    Aimable Tweeter No No
    Midrange Driver No No
    Firing Direction front front
    Physical Specs
    Height 418.0mm (16.5") 372.0mm (14.6")
    Width 408.0mm (16.1") 320.0mm (12.6")
    Depth 485.0mm (19.1") 459.0mm (18.1")
    Weight 17.73kg (39lbs) 10.91kg (24lbs)
    Enclosure Bass Reflex Bass reflex
    Grille Yes Yes
    Moisture Resistancy No No
    Connections
    Other
    Parts Warranty 3 Years 2 Years
    Labor Warranty 3 Years 2 Years

    Latest Powered Subwoofers
    Polk Signature Elite ES12
    Polk Signature Elite ES12
    12-inch Woofer | 22-250 Hz | 300 watts
    Polk Signature Elite ES10
    Polk Signature Elite ES10
    10-inch Woofer | 28-250 Hz | 200 watts
    Polk Signature Elite ES8
    Polk Signature Elite ES8
    8-inch Woofer | 32-180 Hz | 100 watts
    JBL Stage 220P
    JBL Stage 220P
    12-inch Woofer | 29-150 Hz | 250 watts
    JBL Stage 200P
    JBL Stage 200P
    10-inch Woofer | 32-150 Hz | 150 watts
    KEF KC92
    KEF KC92
    9-inch Woofer | 11-200 Hz | 1000 watts
    KEF Kube 15 MIE
    KEF Kube 15 MIE
    15-inch Woofer | 20-140 Hz | 300 watts
    KEF Kube 12 MIE
    KEF Kube 12 MIE
    12-inch Woofer | 22-140 Hz | 300 watts
    KEF Kube 10 MIE
    KEF Kube 10 MIE
    10-inch Woofer | 20-140 Hz | 300 watts
    KEF Kube 8 MIE
    KEF Kube 8 MIE
    8-inch Woofer | 34-140 Hz | 300 watts

    Copyright © 2025 by SpeakerDecision
    About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

    Report a Correction