SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS
    • By Type
      Passive Bookshelf Speakers Passive Floor-standing Speakers Passive Center Channel Speakers Passive In-wall Speakers All Passive Speakers Powered Subwoofers Powered Stereo Speakers
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Front Firing Port Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      By Brand
      Acoustic Energy Aperion ATC Audio-Technica Audioengine Bluesound Bowers Wilkins Buchardt Cambridge Audio Canton DALI Definitive Technology Dynaudio ELAC Emotiva Fluance Focal Fyne Audio Genelec GoldenEar Harbeth Jamo JBL Kanto KEF KLH Klipsch Leak Mackie Magnepan MartinLogan McIntosh Mission MoFi Monitor Audio Nuvo Onkyo OSD Paradigm Perlisten Polk Audio PS Audio PSB Q Acoustics REL Revel Russound Sennheiser Sonos Sonus faber Sony Spendor SVS Tannoy Technics Triangle Velodyne Victrola Wharfedale Wilson Audio Yamaha
  • AMPLIFIERS
    • By Type
      All Amplifiers Integrated Amplifiers Stereo Receivers Streaming Amplifiers Power Amplifiers Compact Amplifiers
      By Power
      Up to 60 watts 61 to 90 watts 91 to 120 watts 121 to 180 watts Over 180 watts
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      Home Theater
      All Home Theater Receivers Anthem ARCAM Denon Integra JBL Marantz McIntosh NAD Onkyo Sony Yamaha
      Headphone Amps
      All Headphone Amplifiers Cambridge Audio iFi Audio McIntosh Naim Pro-Ject Rotel Schiit Audio Sennheiser Yamaha
      Multi-Zone
      All Multi-Zone Amplifiers JBL McIntosh OSD Rotel Russound Sonos
      By Brand
      Accuphase Advance Paris Anthem Arcam Audio Research AudioControl Audioengine Audiolab Bluesound Bose Buchardt Cambridge Audio Cayin Denon Devialet ELAC Emotiva Eversolo FiiO Fosi Audio Hegel HiFi Rose Integra JBL Layer Audio Design LEAK Luxman Marantz Mark Levinson McIntosh Michi MISSION MOON Musical Fidelity NAD Naim Onkyo OSD Parasound Pass Labs Peachtree PrimaLuna Primare PS Audio Rega Rogue Audio Roksan Rotel Schiit Audio Sonos Sony SVS T+A TEAC Technics Vincent WiiM Yamaha
  • SMART FIND
  • TOOLS
  • BLOG
  1. Home
  2. Passive Floor-standing Speakers
  3. Wilson Audio WATT/Puppy vs KLH Kendall

Wilson Audio WATT/Puppy vs KLH Kendall Comparison

x
Speaker to replace
Change

Wilson Audio WATT/Puppy

Passive Floor-standing | 26-30k Hz

Wilson Audio WATT/Puppy
Check price atAmazon›
Change
    
KLH Kendall

Passive Floor-standing | 25-23k Hz

KLH Kendall
Check price atAmazon›
Wilson Audio WATT/Puppy Wilson Audio WATT/Pu...
Check price atAmazon›
KLH Kendall KLH Kendall
Check price atAmazon›
Wilson Audio WATT/Pu...
See at AMAZON
KLH Kendall
See at AMAZON

Wilson Audio WATT/Puppy vs KLH Kendall Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing WATT/Puppy and Kendall, two Passive Floor-standing speakers from Wilson Audio and KLH.

Let's have a brief look at the main features of Wilson Audio WATT/Puppy and KLH Kendall first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Key SpecsWilson Audio WATT/PuppyKLH Kendall
BrandWilson Audio
United States · founded 1974
KLH
United States · founded 1957
Design3-way3-way
Tweeter1" Dome1"
Midrange7"5.25"
Woofer2 x 8" Paper pulp2 x 6.5" Woven Kevlar
Frequency response26-30k Hz25-23k Hz
Sensitivity89 dB96 dB
Impedance4 ohms8 ohms
Power rangefrom 25 wattsup to 250 watts
Weight72.57kg / 159.7lbs22.14kg / 48.7lbs
Dimensions (H x W x D)41-5/16" x 12" x 18-11/16"
1050.0 x 305.0 x 474.0mm
40-3/16" x 8-5/16" x 14-15/16"
1021.0 x 212.0 x 380.0mm

The sections below take each area in turn: drivers, frequency response, physical size and what you get in the box.


Drivers

Both WATT/Puppy and Kendall are 3-way speakers.

Tweeter - 1 inchMidrange - 7 inchWoofer - 8 inchWoofer - 8 inch
Wilson Audio WATT/Puppy
Tweeter - 1 inchMidrange - 5.25 inchWoofer - 6.5 inchWoofer - 6.5 inch
KLH Kendall

TweeterMidrangeWoofer

Front view, drawn to scale - cabinets and drivers share one scale, so sizes are directly comparable. Hover a driver for its size.

Driver Wilson Audio WATT/Puppy KLH Kendall
Driver Setup 3-way 3-way
Tweeter 1-inch 1-inch
Midrange 1 x 7-inch 1 x 5.25-inch
Woofer 2 x 8-inch 2 x 6.5-inch

WATT/Puppy features a 1" Doped silk fabric Dome Tweeter, a 7" Midrange and 2 x 8" Paper pulp Woofer. On the other hand, the Kendall features a 1" anodized aluminum Tweeter, a 5.25" Midrange and 2 x 6.5" Woven Kevlar Woofer.

Frequency Response

WATT/Puppy has a frequency range of 26-30k Hz whereas Kendall has a frequency range of 25-23k Hz. With a minimum frequency of 25Hz, the Kendall can go slightly deeper then the WATT/Puppy's min frequency of 26Hz.

The graph below depicts how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average Low Frequency values of other speakers in the Floor-standing class in our database.

Low Frequency

Floor-standing Speakers

WATT/Puppy
Kendall
Min
Average
Median

Neither pair reaches down to 20Hz, the usual definition of full-range, which is normal for speakers of this size. If you want the bottom octave for movies or bass-heavy music, add a subwoofer to whichever you choose. Visit our Powered Subwoofers section to find out more about the available options.

Impedance and Sensitivity

WATT/Puppy is a 4 ohms speaker compared to the Kendall which has a nominal impedance of 8 ohms. Lower impedance speakers, especially the ones that are rated at 4 ohms may put more pressure on the amplifier unit especially when played at high volume levels, so make sure the amp you pair with the WATT/Puppy can provide this impedance level.

These two speakers also have different sensitivity levels. WATT/Puppy sensitivity is rated at 89 dB and the Kendall's is rated at 96 dB. This 7 dB difference makes the KLH Kendall a more sensitive speaker compared to Wilson Audio WATT/Puppy, hence will play louder with the same amount of watts.

Sensitivity

Floor-standing Speakers

WATT/Puppy
Kendall
Min
Average
Median

Power Range

Power range is the range of input power in watts RMS that a loudspeaker is designed to handle. Staying within that range gives nominal performance; driving the speaker beyond its maximum wattage can damage it.

Kendall can handle a max power of 250 watts RMS, whereas WATT/Puppy has a max power handling value of watts RMS, 250 watts less than the Kendall.

Note that higher power handling does not make a speaker louder: that depends mainly on sensitivity and impedance. The calculator below shows how loud each of these actually plays on a real amplifier.

Which plays louder on your amplifier?

Starting with a popular amplifier - change it to the one you own, or any you are considering, and watch both numbers move.

Wilson Audio WATT/Puppy
 
KLH Kendall
 

Input Type and Bi-Amping / Bi-Wiring

Kendall features Binding post posts which make bi-amping or bi-wiring possible. WATT/Puppy has a Binding post which doesn't feature bi-amping/bi-wiring.

KLH KendallBinding post Terminals
KLH Kendall's Binding post terminals allows Bi-amping or bi-wiring

Physical Specs

The size of a speaker can sometimes be an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare Wilson Audio WATT/Puppy's and KLH Kendall's external dimensions. Wilson Audio WATT/Puppy has external dimensions of 1050.0 x 305.0 x 474.0mm (41-5/16 x 12 x 18-11/16inch) whereas KLH Kendall has external dimensions of 1021.0 x 212.0 x 380.0mm (40-3/16 x 8-5/16 x 14-15/16inch).

Wilson Audio WATT/Puppy is clearly the larger of the two speakers. Its body is 93mm wider, 29mm taller and 94mm deeper than KLH Kendall.

Size, drawn to scale

FRONTWilson Audio WATT/Puppy front: 305 x 1050 mm (12 x 41.3 in)KLH Kendall front: 212 x 1021 mm (8.3 x 40.2 in)Wilson Audio WATT/Puppy305 × 1050 mmKLH Kendall212 × 1021 mmTOP / FOOTPRINTWilson Audio WATT/Puppy footprint: 305 x 474 mm (12 x 18.7 in)KLH Kendall footprint: 212 x 380 mm (8.3 x 15 in)Wilson Audio WATT/Puppy305 × 474 mmKLH Kendall212 × 380 mm
Both speakers and both views share one scale, so everything here is directly comparable. Hover a box for its dimensions.

One scale for both, standing on the same surface and pushed back to the same wall, so the deeper one visibly sticks out further.

Wilson Audio WATT/Puppy needs about 79% more floor or shelf area. Wilson Audio WATT/Puppy is 94mm deeper, so it stands that much further out from the wall. Wilson Audio WATT/Puppy is 29mm taller.

Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited. The base surface area of the Wilson Audio WATT/Puppy is approximately 1445.7cm2 / 224.1inch2 and base area of the KLH Kendall is approximately 805.6cm2 / 124.9inch2. The WATT/Puppy requires 79% more surface area than the Kendall which gives it a small disadvantage on placement in tight spaces.

Weight Comparison

The weight of a loudspeaker can become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often. Weight of a speaker can also "sometimes" be an indicator of the rigidity of the enclosure and the quality of the internal components used. The Wilson Audio WATT/Puppy weighs 72.57kg / 159.7lbs and the KLH Kendall weighs 22.14kg / 48.7lbs. This makes the WATT/Puppy 228% heavier than the Kendall.

Here is a comparison of how WATT/Puppy and Kendall's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Passive Floor-standing class.

Weight
All Floor-standing Speakers
Wilson Audio WATT/Puppy
KLH Kendall
Min
Average
Max

What's in the Box of KLH Kendall?

Here are the items that come with the Kendall:
  • Floorstanding loudspeaker
  • Grille
  • Foam port
  • 4 Rubber feet
  • 4 Spike feet (with nuts)
  • 4 Protective discs
  • Manual


Reasons to choose Wilson Audio WATT/Puppy over KLH Kendall

Woofer Size 8 inches vs 6.5 inches Larger woofer
High Frequency Response 30k Hz vs 23k Hz Generates higher frequency

Reasons to choose KLH Kendall over Wilson Audio WATT/Puppy

Sensitivity 96 dB vs 89 dB Play louder with same amount of amplification power
Nominal Impedance 8 ohms vs 4 ohms Less selective with amplifiers
Low Frequency Response 25 Hz vs 26 Hz Generates deeper bass
Bi-Amping and Bi-Wiring Yes vs No Allows bi-amping and bi-wiring connections
Height 1021mm vs 1050mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces
Base Surface Area 805cm2 vs 1445cm2 Takes less floor space
Price per pair* 1500USD vs 41500USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)

Wilson Audio WATT/Puppy vs KLH Kendall Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications
General Wilson Audio WATT/Puppy KLH Kendall
Brand Wilson Audio KLH
Speaker Type Floor-standing speaker Floor-standing speaker
Power Range from 25 watts up to 250 watts
Sensitivity 89 dB 96 dB
Impedance 4 ohms 8 ohms
Impedance 2.87 ohms n/a
Frequency Response 26-30k Hz 25-23k Hz
Drivers
Woofer Quantity 2 2
Woofer Size 8" 6.5"
Woofer Composition Paper pulp Woven Kevlar
Woofer Surround Material n/a Butyl Rubber
Tweeter Size 1" 1"
Tweeter Type Dome n/a
Aimable Tweeter No No
Midrange Driver 7" 5.25"
Firing Direction rear n/a
Physical Specs
Height 1050.0mm (41.3") 1021.0mm (40.2")
Width 305.0mm (12") 212.0mm (8.3")
Depth 474.0mm (18.7") 380.0mm (15")
Weight 72.57kg (159.7lbs) 22.14kg (48.7lbs)
Enclosure Bass Reflex Bass Reflex
Finish n/a MDF/Wood Veneer
Available Colors n/a Black
Grille Yes Yes
Moisture Resistancy No No
Connections
Biamp Inputs No Yes
Other
Parts Warranty 5 Years 10 Years
Labor Warranty 5 Years 10 Years

Verdict

These sit in different price classes - Wilson Audio WATT/Puppy costs roughly 27.7x what KLH Kendall does. Expect it to lead on paper; the question is whether the gap is audible enough in your room to be worth it.

AreaBetterWhy
Bassevenly matchedMuch the same reach (26Hz vs 25Hz).
Amplifier needsBKLH Kendall is more sensitive (96dB vs 89dB), so it goes louder on the same amplifier.
Amplifier matchBKLH Kendall is the easier load at 8 ohms; the other is 4 ohms and wants an amplifier rated for it.
SizedependsKLH Kendall is easier to place; Wilson Audio WATT/Puppy is bigger, which usually goes with fuller bass. Your room decides.
ExpandabilityBKLH Kendall: bi-amping.
PriceBKLH Kendall is cheaper - $1,500 against $41,500, about 96% less; arguably a different class.

A Wilson Audio WATT/Puppy  B KLH Kendall
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both speakers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.

Which should you choose?

KLH Kendall is the easier recommendation: it leads on most of the measured areas and costs less. Take Wilson Audio WATT/Puppy if its size, looks or fit in your room suit you better. In a large or open-plan room, Wilson Audio WATT/Puppy has the cabinet volume to fill it more easily; in a small room, near a wall or at desk distance, KLH Kendall is the easier speaker to get right. If your amplifier is modest, vintage or valve-based, KLH Kendall is the safer partner - the other will want more current or more watts to sound its best.

And remember what a spec sheet cannot show: how each looks in your room and whether the finish suits it, what dealer support and warranty are like where you live, and how they actually sound to you. If you can hear them first - ideally with your own music - that will tell you more than any number above.


Most Popular Speakers
Klipsch Reference R-51M
Klipsch R-51M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
2-way | 87 dB | 6 ohms
Wharfedale Elysian 2
Wharfedale Elysian 2
3-way | 89 dB | 4 ohms
KEF Q150
KEF Q150
2-way | 86 dB | 8 ohms
Bowers & Wilkins 606 S2 Anniversary Edition
B&W 606 S2
2-way | 88 dB | 8 ohms
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-500M
Klipsch RP-500M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
Wharfedale EVO5.1
Wharfedale EVO5.1
2-way | 87 dB | 4 ohms
Wharfedale EVO4.1
Wharfedale EVO4.1
2-way | 87 dB | 8 ohms
This site contains affiliate links. We may be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through one of them. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Copyright © 2026 by SpeakerDecision
About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

Report a Correction