In this review, we will be comparing EVO5.2 and R3 Meta, two Passive Bookshelf speakers from Wharfedale and KEF.
Let's have a brief look at the main features
of Wharfedale EVO5.2 and KEF R3 Meta first before getting into our more
detailed comparison.
Wharfedale EVO5.2 Key Specs
- 3-way Design
- 1.375" AMT (Ribbon) Tweeter
- 2" Midrange
- 6.5" woven Kevlar Woofer
- 44-24k Hz Frequency Response
- 88 dB Sensitivity
- Impedance: 4ohms
- Power Range:25-120watts
- Weight:15.00kg
- Dimensions (H x W x D): 497.0" x 10.2" x 15.4"( 497.0 x 260.0 x 350.0mm )
KEF R3 Meta Key Specs
- 3-way Design
- 12th Generation Uni-Q Driver
- 1" Hard-Dome Tweeter
- 5" Midrange
- 6.5" Hybrid Aluminum Woofer
- 5" Midrange
- 58-28k Hz Frequency Response
- 87 dB Sensitivity
- Impedance: 4ohms
- Power Range:15-180watts
- Weight:12.41kg
- Dimensions (H x W x D): 423.0" x 7-15/16" x 13-1/4"( 423.0 x 202.0 x 337.0mm )
What size room are the Wharfedale EVO5.2 and KEF R3 Meta speakers good for?
The size of the room in which you are planning to use these loudspeakers is an important decision
factor. Here we have compared their suitability to various sizes of environments considering their size
and max power parameters:
Listening Environment* |
Wharfedale EVO5.2 |
KEF R3 Meta |
Near-field |
Poor |
Poor |
Small Room |
Average |
Poor |
Mid-size Room |
Good |
Good |
Large Room |
Average |
Good |
Very Large Room |
Poor |
Average |
(* Approximate Room sizes: Small < 100sq. ft / 9 m2,
Mid-size: 100-220 sq. ft / 9-20 m2, Large 220-400 sq. ft / 20-36 m2, Very Large: >
400 sq. ft / 36 m2.
Average Floor Height: 9" / 2.7m. Typical room sizes differ from country to country, and the actual
listening experience changes depending on floor height, room shape, surface materials, listening
position, speaker locations, etc.)
In the following sections, we will get into more detail in order to better understand how the Wharfedale EVO5.2 and KEF R3 Meta compare and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one of these loudspeakers is the better choice for you.
**This post contains affiliate links, and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking
through my links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Drivers
Both EVO5.2 and R3 Meta are 3-way speakers.
Driver |
Wharfedale EVO5.2 |
KEF R3 Meta |
Driver Setup
|
3-way
|
3-way
|
Tweeter
|
1.375-inch
|
1-inch
|
Midrange
|
1 x 2-inch |
1 x 5-inch |
Woofer
|
1 x 6.5-inch
|
1 x 6.5-inch
|
EVO5.2 features a 1.375" SilentWeave cotton and felt damping fiber AMT (Ribbon) Tweeter , a 2" Midrange and 1 x 6.5" woven Kevlar Woofer with a Crossover frequency at 800 Hz and 4.3 kHz. On the other hand, the R3 Meta features a 1" Aluminum with MAT absorber Hard-Dome Tweeter , a 5" Midrange and 1 x 6.5" Hybrid Aluminum Woofer with a Crossover frequency at 420Hz and 2300Hz.
Frequency Response
EVO5.2 has a frequency range of 44-24k Hz whereas R3 Meta has a frequency range of 58-28k Hz. With a minimum frequency of 44Hz, the EVO5.2 can go significantly deeper on the low side and provide stronger bass compared to the R3 Meta's min frequency of 58Hz.
Below graphs depict how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average values of the Min and Max Frequencies of other speakers in the Bookshelf class in our database.
Low Frequency
Bookshelf Speakers
High Frequency
Bookshelf Speakers
None of these speakers achieves full range experience which is commonly agreed as 20Hz-20kHz. In order to achieve lower lows / deeper bass, we recommend you pair these with a subwoofer. Visit our Powered Subwoofers section to find out more about the available options.
Impedance and Sensitivity
EVO5.2 and R3 Meta have the same Impedance of 4 ohms but where they differ is the sensitivity levels. EVO5.2 sensitivity is rated at 88 dB and the R3 Meta's is at 87 dB. This 1 dB difference makes the Wharfedale EVO5.2 a more sensitive speaker compared to KEF R3 Meta, hence will play louder with the same amount of watts.
One thing to keep in mind that the lower impedance speakers, especially the ones that are rated at 4 ohms may put more pressure on the amplifier unit comared to higher impedance speakers especially at high volume levels, so make sure the amp you pair with the EVO5.2 and the EVO5.2 can provide this impedance level.
Sensitivity
Bookshelf Speakers
Power Range
Power
range is the range of input power in watts RMS that a loudspeaker is designed to handle. While using
an amplifier within this range ensures the nominal performance , inputting a power that is higher than the
max wattage can result in a damaged speaker.
EVO5.2 can handle a max power of 180 watts RMS from the amp the whereas EVO5.2 has a max power handling value of 120 watts RMS , 60 watts less than the R3 Meta.
Keep in mind that a higher max power handling value doesn't necessarily make that a louder speaker
compared to a lower max handling speaker. Loudness or the sound level is also impacted by parameters
such as Impedance, sensitivity and system efficiencies.
Input Type and Bi-Amping / Bi-Wiring
R3 Meta features Custom 5-way bi-wire tool-less binding posts posts which make bi-amping or bi-wiring possible. EVO5.2 has a Binding post which doesn't feature bi-amping/bi-wiring.
Wharfedale EVO5.2's Binding post terminals
KEF R3 Meta's Custom 5-way bi-wire tool-less binding posts terminals allows Bi-amping or bi-wiring
Cabinet Type and Port Position
EVO5.2 has a bottom firing port whereas R3 Meta has a rear firing ports. Wharfedale EVO5.2's bottom-firing port gives more flexibility in placement in regards to proximity to walls compared to KEF R3 Meta with its rear-firing port.
Physical Specs
Size of a speaker can sometimes become an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare Wharfedale EVO5.2's and KEF R3 Meta's external dimensions. Wharfedale EVO5.2 has external dimensions of 497.0 x 260.0 x 350.0mm ( 19.6" × 10.2" × 15.4") whereas KEF R3 Meta has external dimensions of 423.0 x 202.0 x 337.0mm ( 16-5/8-inch x 7-15/16-inch x 13-1/4-inch) .
Wharfedale EVO5.2 is clearly the larger of the two speakers. Its body is 58mm wider, 74mm taller and 13mm deeper than KEF R3 Meta.
Below you can see the front view size comparison of Wharfedale EVO5.2 and KEF R3 Meta in scale.
Comparison image of Wharfedale EVO5.2 and KEF R3 Meta Size and External Dimensions
Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited.
The base surface area of the Wharfedale EVO5.2 is approximately 910.0cm2 / 141.1inch2 and base area of the KEF R3 Meta is approximately 680.7cm2 / 105.5inch2. The EVO5.2 requires 34% more surface area than the R3 Meta which gives it a small disadvantage on placement in tight spaces.
Weight Comparison The weight of a loudspeaker can become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often. Weight of a speaker can also "sometimes" be an indicator of the rigidity of the enclosure and the quality of the internal components used. The Wharfedale EVO5.2 weighs 15.00kg / 33lbs and the KEF R3 Meta weighs 12.41kg / 27.3lbs. This makes the EVO5.2 21% heavier than the R3 Meta.
Here is a comparison of how EVO5.2 and R3 Meta's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Passive Bookshelf class.
Weight
All Bookshelf Speakers
What's in the Box of Wharfedale EVO5.2?
Here are the items that are included inside the box of EVO5.2:
2 Bookshelf loudspeakers 2 Grilles 4 Jumper-bars (pre-installed) 8 Self-adhesive rubber feet Pair of white cloth gloves User Manual
What's in the Box of KEF R3 Meta?
Here are the items that come with the R3 Meta:
1 pair of R3 Meta loudspeakers 1 pair of microfiber grilles Rubber feet Port bungs User manual and warranty information
Sensitivity |
88 dB
vs
87 dB
|
Play louder with same amount of amplification power |
Low Frequency Response |
44 Hz
vs
58 Hz
|
Generates deeper bass |
Price per pair* |
1299USD
vs
2199USD
|
costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time) |
Max Input Power |
180 watts
vs
120 watts
|
Handle more power from your amplifier |
High Frequency Response |
28k Hz
vs
24k Hz
|
Generates higher frequency |
Bi-Amping and Bi-Wiring |
Yes
vs
No
|
Allows bi-amping and bi-wiring connections |
Height |
423mm
vs
497mm
|
Easier to fit in smaller spaces |
Base Surface Area |
680cm2
vs
910cm2
|
Takes less floor space |
General |
Wharfedale EVO5.2 |
KEF R3 Meta |
Brand |
Wharfedale |
KEF |
Speaker Type |
Bookshelf speakers |
Bookshelf speakers |
Power Range |
25-120 watts |
15-180 watts |
Sensitivity |
88 dB |
87 dB |
Impedance |
4 ohms |
4 ohms |
Impedance |
3.2 ohms |
3.2 ohms |
Frequency Response |
44-24k Hz |
58-28k Hz |
Drivers |
|
|
Woofer Quantity |
1 |
1 |
Woofer Size |
6.5" |
6.5" |
Woofer Composition |
woven Kevlar |
Hybrid Aluminum |
Woofer Surround Material |
Rubber |
Rubber |
Tweeter Size |
1.375" |
1" |
Tweeter Type |
AMT (Ribbon) |
Hard-Dome |
Aimable Tweeter |
No |
No |
Midrange Driver |
2" |
5" |
Crossover Frequency |
800 Hz and 4.3 kHz |
420Hz and 2300Hz |
Firing Direction |
bottom |
rear |
Physical Specs |
|
|
Height |
497.0mm (19.6") |
423.0mm (16.7") |
Width |
260.0mm (10.2") |
202.0mm (8") |
Depth |
350.0mm (13.8") |
337.0mm (13.3") |
Weight |
15.00kg (33lbs) |
12.41kg (27.3lbs) |
Enclosure |
Bass Reflex |
Bass Reflex |
Finish |
MDF/Wood-veneer |
n/a |
Available Colors |
Walnut, Grey. Black, White |
Black Gloss, White Gloss, Walnut, Indigo Gloss Special Edition |
Mounting Bracket |
No |
No |
Recommended Stand Height |
18-22" |
n/a |
Grille |
Yes |
n/a |
Moisture Resistancy |
No |
No |
Connections |
|
|
Biamp Inputs |
No |
Yes |
Other |
|
|
Parts Warranty |
5 Years |
5 years |
Labor Warranty |
5 Years |
5 years |