SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS
    • By Type
      Passive Bookshelf Speakers Passive Floor-standing Speakers Passive Center Channel Speakers Passive In-wall Speakers All Passive Speakers Powered Subwoofers Powered Stereo Speakers
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Front Firing Port Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      By Brand
      Acoustic Energy Aperion ATC Audio-Technica Audioengine Bluesound Bowers Wilkins Buchardt Cambridge Audio Canton DALI Definitive Technology Dynaudio ELAC Emotiva Fluance Focal Fyne Audio Genelec GoldenEar Harbeth Jamo JBL Kanto KEF KLH Klipsch Leak Mackie Magnepan MartinLogan McIntosh Mission MoFi Monitor Audio Nuvo Onkyo OSD Paradigm Perlisten Polk Audio PS Audio PSB Q Acoustics REL Revel Russound Sennheiser Sonos Sonus faber Sony Spendor SVS Tannoy Technics Triangle Velodyne Victrola Wharfedale Wilson Audio Yamaha
  • AMPLIFIERS
    • By Type
      All Amplifiers Integrated Amplifiers Stereo Receivers Streaming Amplifiers Power Amplifiers Compact Amplifiers
      Home Theater
      All Home Theater Receivers AnthemARCAMDenonIntegraJBLMarantzMcIntoshNADOnkyoSonyYamaha
      By Power
      Up to 60 watts 61 to 90 watts 91 to 120 watts 121 to 180 watts Over 180 watts
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      By Brand
      Accuphase Advance Paris Anthem Arcam Audio Research AudioControl Audioengine Audiolab Bluesound Bose Buchardt Cambridge Audio Denon Devialet ELAC Emotiva Eversolo FiiO Fosi Audio Hegel HiFi Rose Integra JBL LEAK Luxman Marantz Mark Levinson McIntosh Michi MISSION MOON Musical Fidelity NAD Naim Onkyo OSD Parasound Pass Labs Peachtree PrimaLuna Primare PS Audio Rega Rogue Audio Roksan Rotel Schiit Audio Sonos Sony SVS T+A TEAC Technics Vincent WiiM Yamaha
  • SMART FIND
  • TOOLS
  • BLOG
  1. Home
  2. Passive Bookshelf Speakers
  3. Wharfedale EVO5.2 vs B&W 707 S3

Wharfedale EVO5.2 vs B&W 707 S3 Comparison

x
Speaker to replace
Change

Wharfedale EVO5.2

Passive Bookshelf | 44-24k Hz

Wharfedale EVO5.2
Check price atAmazon›
Change
    
B&W 707 S3

Passive Bookshelf | 50-28k Hz

Bowers & Wilkins 707 S3
Check price atAmazon›
Wharfedale EVO5.2 Wharfedale EVO5.2
Check price atAmazon›
B&W 707 S3 B&W 707 S3
Check price atAmazon›
Wharfedale EVO5.2
See at AMAZON
B&W 707 S3
See at AMAZON

Wharfedale EVO5.2 vs B&W 707 S3 Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing EVO5.2 and 707 S3, two Passive Bookshelf speakers from Wharfedale and Bowers Wilkins.

Let's have a brief look at the main features of Wharfedale EVO5.2 and B&W 707 S3 first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Key SpecsWharfedale EVO5.2B&W 707 S3
BrandWharfedale
United Kingdom · founded 1932
Bowers Wilkins
United Kingdom · founded 1966
Design3-way2-way
Tweeter1.375" AMT (Ribbon)1" Decoupled Carbon Dome
Midrange2"—
Woofer6.5" woven Kevlar5" Continuum
Frequency response44-24k Hz50-28k Hz
Sensitivity88 dB84 dB
Impedance4 ohms8 ohms
Power range25-120 watts30-100 watts
Weight15.05kg / 33.1lbs6.16kg / 13.6lbs
Dimensions (H x W x D)19.6" x 10.2" x 15.4"
497.0 x 260.0 x 391.0mm
11.8" x 6.5" x 11.2"
300.0 x 165.0 x 284.0mm

What size room are the Wharfedale EVO5.2 and B&W 707 S3 speakers good for?

The size of the room in which you are planning to use these loudspeakers is an important decision factor. Here we have compared their suitability to various sizes of environments considering their size and max power parameters:

Listening Environment* Wharfedale EVO5.2 B&W 707 S3
Near-field Poor Average
Small Room Average Good
Mid-size Room Good Average
Large Room Average Poor
Very Large Room Poor Bad

(* Approximate Room sizes: Small < 100sq. ft / 9 m2, Mid-size: 100-220 sq. ft / 9-20 m2, Large 220-400 sq. ft / 20-36 m2, Very Large: > 400 sq. ft / 36 m2. Average Floor Height: 9" / 2.7m. Typical room sizes differ from country to country, and the actual listening experience changes depending on floor height, room shape, surface materials, listening position, speaker locations, etc.)

The sections below take each area in turn: drivers, frequency response, physical size and what you get in the box.


**This post contains affiliate links, and we will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through our links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.


Drivers

One of the fundamental differences between these two speakers is that EVO5.2 is a 3-way design whereas the 707 S3 is a 2-way speaker. 3-way designs utilize a midrange driver in addition to the tweeter and woofer on 2-way designs. Designing a crossover for a 3-way speaker is a complicated process and generally increases the overall cost of the speaker.

Tweeter - 1.38 inchMidrange - 2 inchWoofer - 6.5 inch
Wharfedale EVO5.2
Tweeter - 1 inchWoofer - 5 inch
B&W 707 S3

TweeterMidrangeWoofer

Front view, drawn to scale - cabinets and drivers share one scale, so sizes are directly comparable. Hover a driver for its size.

Driver Wharfedale EVO5.2 B&W 707 S3
Driver Setup 3-way 2-way
Tweeter 1.375-inch 1-inch
Midrange 1 x 2-inch -
Woofer 1 x 6.5-inch 1 x 5-inch

EVO5.2 features a 1.375" SilentWeave cotton and felt damping fiber AMT (Ribbon) Tweeter, a 2" Midrange and 1 x 6.5" woven Kevlar Woofer with a Crossover frequency at 800 Hz and 4.3 kHz. On the other hand, the 707 S3 features a 1" Decoupled Carbon Dome Tweeter and 1 x 5" Continuum Woofer.

Frequency Response

EVO5.2 has a frequency range of 44-24k Hz whereas 707 S3 has a frequency range of 50-28k Hz. With a minimum frequency of 44Hz, the EVO5.2 can go significantly deeper on the low side and provide stronger bass compared to the 707 S3's min frequency of 50Hz.

The graph below depicts how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average Low Frequency values of other speakers in the Bookshelf class in our database.

Low Frequency

Bookshelf Speakers

EVO5.2
707 S3
Min
Average
Median

Neither pair reaches down to 20Hz, the usual definition of full-range, which is normal for speakers of this size. If you want the bottom octave for movies or bass-heavy music, add a subwoofer to whichever you choose. Visit our Powered Subwoofers section to find out more about the available options.

Impedance and Sensitivity

EVO5.2 is a 4 ohms speaker compared to the 707 S3 which has a nominal impedance of 8 ohms. Lower impedance speakers, especially the ones that are rated at 4 ohms may put more pressure on the amplifier unit especially when played at high volume levels, so make sure the amp you pair with the EVO5.2 can provide this impedance level.

These two speakers also have different sensitivity levels. EVO5.2 sensitivity is rated at 88 dB and the 707 S3's is rated at 84 dB. This 4 dB difference makes the Wharfedale EVO5.2 a more sensitive speaker compared to B&W 707 S3, hence will play louder with the same amount of watts.

Sensitivity

Bookshelf Speakers

EVO5.2
707 S3
Min
Average
Median

Power Range

Power range is the range of input power in watts RMS that a loudspeaker is designed to handle. Staying within that range gives nominal performance; driving the speaker beyond its maximum wattage can damage it.

EVO5.2 can handle a max power of 120 watts RMS, whereas 707 S3 has a max power handling value of 100 watts RMS, 20 watts less than the EVO5.2.

Note that higher power handling does not make a speaker louder: that depends mainly on sensitivity and impedance. The calculator below shows how loud each of these actually plays on a real amplifier.

Which plays louder on your amplifier?

Starting with a popular amplifier - change it to the one you own, or any you are considering, and watch both numbers move.

Wharfedale EVO5.2
 
B&W 707 S3
 

Input Type and Bi-Amping / Bi-Wiring

707 S3 features Binding post posts which make bi-amping or bi-wiring possible. EVO5.2 has a Binding post which doesn't feature bi-amping/bi-wiring.

Wharfedale EVO5.2 Terminals
Wharfedale EVO5.2's Binding post terminals

B&W 707 S3Binding post Terminals
B&W 707 S3's Binding post terminals allows Bi-amping or bi-wiring

Cabinet Type and Port Position

EVO5.2 has a bottom firing port whereas 707 S3 has a rear firing ports. Wharfedale EVO5.2's bottom-firing port gives more flexibility in placement in regards to proximity to walls compared to B&W 707 S3 with its rear-firing port.

Physical Specs

The size of a speaker can sometimes be an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare Wharfedale EVO5.2's and B&W 707 S3's external dimensions. Wharfedale EVO5.2 has external dimensions of 497.0 x 260.0 x 391.0mm (19.6" × 10.2" × 15.4") whereas B&W 707 S3 has external dimensions of 300.0 x 165.0 x 284.0mm (1.8-inch x 6.5-inch x 11.2-inch).

Wharfedale EVO5.2 is clearly the larger of the two speakers. Its body is 95mm wider, 197mm taller and 107mm deeper than B&W 707 S3.

Below you can see the front view size comparison of Wharfedale EVO5.2 and B&W 707 S3 in scale.

Wharfedale EVO5.2 vs B&W 707 S3 Size Comparison - Front View
Comparison image of Wharfedale EVO5.2 and B&W 707 S3 Size and External Dimensions

Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited. The base surface area of the Wharfedale EVO5.2 is approximately 1016.6cm2 / 157.6inch2 and base area of the B&W 707 S3 is approximately 468.6cm2 / 72.6inch2. The EVO5.2 requires 117% more surface area than the 707 S3 which gives it a small disadvantage on placement in tight spaces.

Here is another comparison that shows both speakers on a BDI Octave Media Cabinet, next to a standard size amplifier and turntable in scale:

Wharfedale EVO5.2 vs B&W 707 S3 Size Comparison on a Media Console
Size Comparison image of Wharfedale EVO5.2 and B&W 707 S3 on a Media Console
Weight Comparison

The weight of a loudspeaker can become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often. Weight of a speaker can also "sometimes" be an indicator of the rigidity of the enclosure and the quality of the internal components used. The Wharfedale EVO5.2 weighs 15.05kg / 33.1lbs and the B&W 707 S3 weighs 6.16kg / 13.6lbs. This makes the EVO5.2 144% heavier than the 707 S3.

Here is a comparison of how EVO5.2 and 707 S3's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Passive Bookshelf class.

Weight
All Bookshelf Speakers
Wharfedale EVO5.2
B&W 707 S3
Min
Average
Max

What's in the Box of Wharfedale EVO5.2?

Here are the items that are included inside the box of EVO5.2:
  • 2 Bookshelf loudspeakers
  • 2 Grilles
  • 4 Jumper-bars (pre-installed)
  • 8 Self-adhesive rubber feet
  • Pair of white cloth gloves
  • User Manual

What's in the Box of B&W 707 S3?

Here are the items that come with the 707 S3:
  • 2 Bookshelf loudspeakers
  • 2 Grilles
  • 2 Two-piece foam port plugs
  • 8 Self-adhesive rubber feet
  • 4 Jumper-straps
  • Manual
  • Bowers & Wilkins brochure
  • Warranty Information


Reasons to choose Wharfedale EVO5.2 over Bowers & Wilkins 707 S3

Max Input Power 120 watts vs 100 watts Handle more power from your amplifier
Driver Setup 3-way vs 2-way Have a dedicated mid-range driver
Sensitivity 88 dB vs 84 dB Play louder with same amount of amplification power
Woofer Size 6.5 inches vs 5 inches Larger woofer
Low Frequency Response 44 Hz vs 50 Hz Generates deeper bass

Reasons to choose Bowers & Wilkins 707 S3 over Wharfedale EVO5.2

Nominal Impedance 8 ohms vs 4 ohms Less selective with amplifiers
Minimum Impedance 4.0 ohms vs 3.2 ohms Very low impedance levels puts more pressure on amplifier
High Frequency Response 28k Hz vs 24k Hz Generates higher frequency
Bi-Amping and Bi-Wiring Yes vs No Allows bi-amping and bi-wiring connections
Height 300mm vs 497mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces
Base Surface Area 468cm2 vs 1016cm2 Takes less floor space

Wharfedale EVO5.2 vs B&W 707 S3 Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications
General Wharfedale EVO5.2 Bowers & Wilkins 707 S3
Brand Wharfedale Bowers Wilkins
Speaker Type Bookshelf speakers Bookshelf speakers
Power Range 25-120 watts 30-100 watts
Sensitivity 88 dB 84 dB
Impedance 4 ohms 8 ohms
Impedance 3.2 ohms 4.0 ohms
Frequency Response 44-24k Hz 50-28k Hz
Drivers
Woofer Quantity 1 1
Woofer Size 6.5" 5"
Woofer Composition woven Kevlar Continuum
Woofer Surround Material Rubber Rubber
Tweeter Size 1.375" 1"
Tweeter Type AMT (Ribbon) Decoupled Carbon Dome
Aimable Tweeter No No
Midrange Driver 2" No
Crossover Frequency 800 Hz and 4.3 kHz n/a
Firing Direction bottom rear
Physical Specs
Height 497.0mm (19.6") 300.0mm (11.8")
Width 260.0mm (10.2") 165.0mm (6.5")
Depth 391.0mm (15.4") 284.0mm (11.2")
Weight 15.05kg (33.1lbs) 6.16kg (13.6lbs)
Enclosure Bass Reflex Bass Reflex
Finish MDF/Wood-veneer MDF/Wood veneer
Available Colors Walnut, Grey. Black, White Gloss Black,Satin White,Mocha,Rosenut
Mounting Bracket No No
Recommended Stand Height 18-22" 24-26"
Grille Yes Yes
Moisture Resistancy No No
Connections
Biamp Inputs No Yes
Other
Parts Warranty 5 Years 5 Years
Labor Warranty 5 Years 5 Years

Verdict

No single best speaker here - they are built to different priorities, and the right one depends on your room, your amplifier and what you listen to.

AreaBetterWhy
BassAWharfedale EVO5.2 digs deeper - 44Hz against 50Hz. A subwoofer would even that out.
Amplifier needsAWharfedale EVO5.2 is more sensitive (88dB vs 84dB), so it goes louder on the same amplifier.
Amplifier matchBB&W 707 S3 is the easier load at 8 ohms; the other is 4 ohms and wants an amplifier rated for it.
Headroomevenly matchedSimilar power handling (120W vs 100W).
SizedependsB&W 707 S3 is easier to place; Wharfedale EVO5.2 is bigger, which usually goes with fuller bass. Your room decides.
ExpandabilityBB&W 707 S3: bi-amping. B&W 707 S3 sits in a wider range (8 models), so a matched surround system is easier later.
Priceevenly matchedMuch the same money ($1,799 vs $1,799 a pair).

A Wharfedale EVO5.2  B B&W 707 S3
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both speakers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.

Which should you choose?

Neither runs away with it - they trade advantages. Let the "depends" rows and your own room settle it. If a subwoofer is in your plans, the bass gap largely stops mattering - you would be crossing over above 50Hz anyway, so judge these on the other rows instead. Match it to your room: we rate Wharfedale EVO5.2 the better fit for a mid-size room and a large room, and B&W 707 S3 for near-field listening and a small room.

And remember what a spec sheet cannot show: how each looks in your room and whether the finish suits it, what dealer support and warranty are like where you live, and how they actually sound to you. If you can hear them first - ideally with your own music - that will tell you more than any number above.


Most Popular Speakers
Klipsch Reference R-51M
Klipsch R-51M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
2-way | 87 dB | 6 ohms
Wharfedale Elysian 2
Wharfedale Elysian 2
3-way | 89 dB | 4 ohms
KEF Q150
KEF Q150
2-way | 86 dB | 8 ohms
Bowers & Wilkins 606 S2 Anniversary Edition
B&W 606 S2
2-way | 88 dB | 8 ohms
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-500M
Klipsch RP-500M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
Wharfedale EVO5.1
Wharfedale EVO5.1
2-way | 87 dB | 4 ohms
Wharfedale EVO4.1
Wharfedale EVO4.1
2-way | 87 dB | 8 ohms
Copyright © 2026 by SpeakerDecision
About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

Report a Correction