SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS
    • By Type
      Passive Bookshelf Speakers Passive Floor-standing Speakers Passive Center Channel Speakers Passive In-wall Speakers All Passive Speakers Powered Subwoofers Powered Stereo Speakers
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Front Firing Port Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      By Brand
      Acoustic Energy Aperion ATC Audio-Technica Audioengine Bluesound Bowers Wilkins Buchardt Cambridge Audio Canton DALI Definitive Technology Dynaudio ELAC Emotiva Fluance Focal Fyne Audio Genelec GoldenEar Harbeth Jamo JBL Kanto KEF KLH Klipsch Leak Mackie Magnepan MartinLogan McIntosh Mission MoFi Monitor Audio Nuvo Onkyo OSD Paradigm Perlisten Polk Audio PS Audio PSB Q Acoustics REL Revel Russound Sennheiser Sonos Sonus faber Sony Spendor SVS Tannoy Technics Triangle Velodyne Victrola Wharfedale Wilson Audio Yamaha
  • AMPLIFIERS
    • By Type
      All Amplifiers Integrated Amplifiers Stereo Receivers Streaming Amplifiers Power Amplifiers Compact Amplifiers
      By Power
      Up to 60 watts 61 to 90 watts 91 to 120 watts 121 to 180 watts Over 180 watts
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      Home Theater
      All Home Theater Receivers Anthem ARCAM Denon Integra JBL Marantz McIntosh NAD Onkyo Sony Yamaha
      Headphone Amps
      All Headphone Amplifiers Cambridge Audio iFi Audio McIntosh Naim Pro-Ject Rotel Schiit Audio Sennheiser Yamaha
      Multi-Zone
      All Multi-Zone Amplifiers JBL McIntosh OSD Rotel Russound Sonos
      By Brand
      Accuphase Advance Paris Anthem Arcam Audio Research AudioControl Audioengine Audiolab Bluesound Bose Buchardt Cambridge Audio Cayin Denon Devialet ELAC Emotiva Eversolo FiiO Fosi Audio Hegel HiFi Rose Integra JBL Layer Audio Design LEAK Luxman Marantz Mark Levinson McIntosh Michi MISSION MOON Musical Fidelity NAD Naim Onkyo OSD Parasound Pass Labs Peachtree PrimaLuna Primare PS Audio Rega Rogue Audio Roksan Rotel Schiit Audio Sonos Sony SVS T+A TEAC Technics Vincent WiiM Yamaha
  • SOUNDBARS
    • Soundbars
      Soundbars Home All Soundbars (filter + sort) Size Simulator
      By TV Size
      43-50 inch TVs 55 inch TVs 65 inch and larger
      By Feature
      Dolby Atmos height channels Subwoofer included Can add rear speakers Compact (30 in or narrower) Under $500
      By Brand
      Bluesound Bose Denon Devialet Dual Furrion Harman Kardon JBL KEF Klipsch Marshall Polk Audio Samsung Sennheiser Sonos Sony WiiM Yamaha
  • SMART FIND
  • TOOLS
  • BLOG
  1. Home
  2. Passive Floor-standing Speakers
  3. Wharfedale EVO4.3 vs Polk ES60

Wharfedale EVO4.3 vs Polk ES60 Comparison

x
Speaker to replace
Change

Wharfedale EVO4.3

Passive Floor-standing | 48-22k Hz

Wharfedale EVO4.3
Check price atAmazon›
Change
    
Polk ES60

Passive Floor-standing | 32-40k Hz

Polk Audio Signature Elite ES60
Check price atAmazon›
Wharfedale EVO4.3 Wharfedale EVO4.3
Check price atAmazon›
Polk ES60 Polk ES60
Check price atAmazon›
Wharfedale EVO4.3
See at AMAZON
Polk ES60
See at AMAZON

Wharfedale EVO4.3 vs Polk ES60 Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing EVO4.3 and ES60, two Passive Floor-standing speakers from Wharfedale and Polk Audio.

Let's have a brief look at the main features of Wharfedale EVO4.3 and Polk ES60 first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Key SpecsWharfedale EVO4.3Polk ES60
BrandWharfedale
United Kingdom · founded 1932
Polk Audio
United States · founded 1972
Design3-way2-way
Tweeter1.18x2.36" AMT (Ribbon)1" Soft-Dome
Midrange2"—
Woofer2 x 5" Kevlar3 x 6.5" Mica-reinforced polypropylene
Frequency response48-22k Hz32-40k Hz
Sensitivity89 dB90 dB
Impedance8 ohms8 ohms
Power range25-150 watts50-300 watts
Weight—23.60kg / 51.9lbs
Dimensions (H x W x D)34-1/2" x 9-1/4" x 13-1/4"
877.0 x 235.0 x 337.0mm
44-1/2" x 8-1/2" x 15-3/4"
1131.0 x 216.0 x 401.0mm

What size room are the Wharfedale EVO4.3 and Polk ES60 speakers good for?

The size of the room in which you are planning to use these loudspeakers is an important decision factor. Here we have compared their suitability to various sizes of environments considering their size and max power parameters:

Listening Environment* Wharfedale EVO4.3 Polk ES60
Near-field Bad Bad
Small Room Poor Poor
Mid-size Room Good Average
Large Room Good Good
Very Large Room Poor Average

(* Approximate Room sizes: Small < 100sq. ft / 9 m2, Mid-size: 100-220 sq. ft / 9-20 m2, Large 220-400 sq. ft / 20-36 m2, Very Large: > 400 sq. ft / 36 m2. Average Floor Height: 9" / 2.7m. Typical room sizes differ from country to country, and the actual listening experience changes depending on floor height, room shape, surface materials, listening position, speaker locations, etc.)

The sections below take each area in turn: drivers, frequency response, physical size and what you get in the box.


Drivers

One of the fundamental differences between these two speakers is that EVO4.3 is a 3-way design whereas the ES60 is a 2-way speaker. 3-way designs utilize a midrange driver in addition to the tweeter and woofer on 2-way designs. Designing a crossover for a 3-way speaker is a complicated process and generally increases the overall cost of the speaker.

Midrange - 2 inchWoofer - 5 inchWoofer - 5 inch
Wharfedale EVO4.3
Tweeter - 1 inchWoofer - 6.5 inchWoofer - 6.5 inchWoofer - 6.5 inch
Polk ES60

TweeterMidrangeWoofer

Front view, drawn to scale - cabinets and drivers share one scale, so sizes are directly comparable. Hover a driver for its size.

Driver Wharfedale EVO4.3 Polk ES60
Driver Setup 3-way 2-way
Tweeter 1.18x2.36-inch 1-inch
Midrange 1 x 2-inch -
Woofer 2 x 5-inch 3 x 6.5-inch

EVO4.3 features a 1.18x2.36" AMT (Ribbon) Tweeter, a 2" Midrange and 2 x 5" Kevlar Woofer. On the other hand, the ES60 features a 1" Terylene High-Res Soft-Dome Tweeter and 3 x 6.5" Mica-reinforced polypropylene Woofer with a Crossover frequency at 2500Hz.

Frequency Response

EVO4.3 has a frequency range of 48-22k Hz whereas ES60 has a frequency range of 32-40k Hz. With a minimum frequency of 32Hz, the ES60 can go significantly deeper on the low side and provide stronger bass compared to the EVO4.3's min frequency of 48Hz.

The graph below depicts how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average Low Frequency values of other speakers in the Floor-standing class in our database.

Low Frequency

Floor-standing Speakers

EVO4.3
ES60
Min
Average
Median

Neither pair reaches down to 20Hz, the usual definition of full-range, which is normal for speakers of this size. If you want the bottom octave for movies or bass-heavy music, add a subwoofer to whichever you choose. Visit our Powered Subwoofers section to find out more about the available options.

Impedance and Sensitivity

EVO4.3 and ES60 have the same Impedance of 8 ohms but where they differ is the sensitivity levels. EVO4.3 sensitivity is rated at 89 dB and the ES60's is at 90 dB. This 1 dB difference makes the Polk ES60 a more sensitive speaker compared to Wharfedale EVO4.3, hence will play louder with the same amount of watts.

Sensitivity

Floor-standing Speakers

EVO4.3
ES60
Min
Average
Median

Power Range

Power range is the range of input power in watts RMS that a loudspeaker is designed to handle. Staying within that range gives nominal performance; driving the speaker beyond its maximum wattage can damage it.

ES60 can handle a max power of 300 watts RMS, whereas EVO4.3 has a max power handling value of 150 watts RMS, 150 watts less than the ES60.

Note that higher power handling does not make a speaker louder: that depends mainly on sensitivity and impedance. The calculator below shows how loud each of these actually plays on a real amplifier.

Which plays louder on your amplifier?

Starting with a popular amplifier - change it to the one you own, or any you are considering, and watch both numbers move.

Wharfedale EVO4.3
 
Polk ES60
 

Input Type and Bi-Amping / Bi-Wiring

Both EVO4.3 and ES60 features dual binding post speaker terminals for bi-amping or bi-wiring.

Cabinet Type and Port Position

Both EVO4.3 and ES60 have bottom firing ports.

Physical Specs

The size of a speaker can sometimes be an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare Wharfedale EVO4.3's and Polk ES60's external dimensions. Wharfedale EVO4.3 has external dimensions of 877.0 x 235.0 x 337.0mm (34-1/2 x 9-1/4 x 13-1/4inch) whereas Polk ES60 has external dimensions of 1131.0 x 216.0 x 401.0mm (44-1/2 x 8-1/2 x 15-3/4inch).

Wharfedale EVO4.3 is 254mm shorter and 64mm less deeper than Polk ES60 but it is also 19mm wider.

Below you can see the front view size comparison of Wharfedale EVO4.3 and Polk ES60 in scale.

Wharfedale EVO4.3 vs Polk ES60 Size Comparison - Front View
Comparison image of Wharfedale EVO4.3 and Polk ES60 Size and External Dimensions

Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited. The base surface area of the Wharfedale EVO4.3 is approximately 792.0cm2 / 122.8inch2 and base area of the Polk ES60 is approximately 866.2cm2 / 134.3inch2. The EVO4.3 requires 9% less surface area than the ES60 which gives it a small advantage on placement in tight spaces.

What's in the Box of Wharfedale EVO4.3?

Here are the items that are included inside the box of EVO4.3:
  • Floorstanding loudspeaker
  • Grille
  • 4 Outrigger feet (pre-installed)
  • 4 Spikes (pre-installed)
  • 4 Isolation pucks
  • 2 Jumper-bars (pre-installed)
  • Pair of white cloth gloves
  • User Manual

What's in the Box of Polk ES60?

Here are the items that come with the ES60:
  • Floorstanding loudspeaker
  • Grille (attached)
  • 4 Feet (pre-installed)
  • Owners Manual
  • Online Product Registration


Reasons to choose Wharfedale EVO4.3 over Polk Audio Signature Elite ES60

Driver Setup 3-way vs 2-way Have a dedicated mid-range driver
Height 877mm vs 1131mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces
Base Surface Area 792cm2 vs 866cm2 Takes less floor space

Reasons to choose Polk Audio Signature Elite ES60 over Wharfedale EVO4.3

Max Input Power 300 watts vs 150 watts Handle more power from your amplifier
Sensitivity 90 dB vs 89 dB Play louder with same amount of amplification power
Woofer Size 6.5 inches vs 5 inches Larger woofer
Number of Woofers 3 vs 2 More woofers
Low Frequency Response 32 Hz vs 48 Hz Generates deeper bass
High Frequency Response 40k Hz vs 22k Hz Generates higher frequency
Price per pair* 1098USD vs 1698USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)

Wharfedale EVO4.3 vs Polk ES60 Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications
General Wharfedale EVO4.3 Polk Audio Signature Elite ES60
Brand Wharfedale Polk Audio
Speaker Type Floor-standing speaker Floor-standing speaker
Power Range 25-150 watts 50-300 watts
Sensitivity 89 dB 90 dB
Impedance 8 ohms 8 ohms
Impedance 4.4 ohms n/a
Frequency Response 48-22k Hz 32-40k Hz
Drivers
Woofer Quantity 2 3
Woofer Size 5" 6.5"
Woofer Composition Kevlar Mica-reinforced polypropylene
Woofer Surround Material Rubber Butyl rubber
Tweeter Size 1.18x2.36" 1"
Tweeter Type AMT (Ribbon) Soft-Dome
Aimable Tweeter No No
Midrange Driver 2" No
Crossover Frequency n/a 2500Hz
Firing Direction bottom bottom
Physical Specs
Height 877.0mm (34.5") 1131.0mm (44.5")
Width 235.0mm (9.3") 216.0mm (8.5")
Depth 337.0mm (13.3") 401.0mm (15.8")
Weight n/a 23.60kg (51.9lbs)
Enclosure Bass Reflex Bass Reflex
Finish MDF/Wood-veneer MDF, Wood-grain vinyl
Available Colors Black Black
Grille Yes Yes
Moisture Resistancy No No
Connections
Biamp Inputs Yes Yes
Other
Parts Warranty 5 Years 5 Years
Labor Warranty 5 Years 5 Years

Verdict

No single best speaker here - they are built to different priorities, and the right one depends on your room, your amplifier and what you listen to.

AreaBetterWhy
BassBPolk ES60 digs deeper - 32Hz against 48Hz.
Amplifier needsevenly matchedSimilar sensitivity (89dB vs 90dB) - both want much the same power.
HeadroomBPolk ES60 takes more power (300W vs 150W) - more in hand in a big room.
SizedependsWharfedale EVO4.3 is easier to place; Polk ES60 is bigger, which usually goes with fuller bass. Your room decides.
ExpandabilitydependsWharfedale EVO4.3: bi-amping; Polk ES60: bi-amping. Polk ES60 sits in a wider range (12 models), so a matched surround system is easier later.
PriceBPolk ES60 is cheaper - $1,098 against $1,698, about 35% less.

A Wharfedale EVO4.3  B Polk ES60
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both speakers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.

Which should you choose?

Polk ES60 is the easier recommendation: it leads on most of the measured areas and costs less. Take Wharfedale EVO4.3 if its size, looks or fit in your room suit you better. If a subwoofer is in your plans, the bass gap largely stops mattering - you would be crossing over above 48Hz anyway, so judge these on the other rows instead. Match it to your room: we rate Wharfedale EVO4.3 the better fit for a mid-size room, and Polk ES60 for a very large room.

And remember what a spec sheet cannot show: how each looks in your room and whether the finish suits it, what dealer support and warranty are like where you live, and how they actually sound to you. If you can hear them first - ideally with your own music - that will tell you more than any number above.


Most Popular Speakers
Klipsch Reference R-51M
Klipsch R-51M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
2-way | 87 dB | 6 ohms
Wharfedale Elysian 2
Wharfedale Elysian 2
3-way | 89 dB | 4 ohms
KEF Q150
KEF Q150
2-way | 86 dB | 8 ohms
Bowers & Wilkins 606 S2 Anniversary Edition
B&W 606 S2
2-way | 88 dB | 8 ohms
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-500M
Klipsch RP-500M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
Wharfedale EVO5.1
Wharfedale EVO5.1
2-way | 87 dB | 4 ohms
Wharfedale EVO4.1
Wharfedale EVO4.1
2-way | 87 dB | 8 ohms
This site contains affiliate links. We may be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through one of them. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Copyright © 2026 by SpeakerDecision
About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

Report a Correction