SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS
    • By Type
      Passive Bookshelf Speakers Passive Floor-standing Speakers Passive Center Channel Speakers Passive In-wall Speakers All Passive Speakers Powered Subwoofers Powered Stereo Speakers
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Front Firing Port Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      By Brand
      Acoustic Energy Aperion ATC Audio-Technica Audioengine Bluesound Bowers Wilkins Buchardt Cambridge Audio Canton DALI Definitive Technology Dynaudio ELAC Emotiva Fluance Focal Fyne Audio Genelec GoldenEar Harbeth Jamo JBL Kanto KEF KLH Klipsch Leak Mackie Magnepan MartinLogan McIntosh Mission MoFi Monitor Audio Nuvo Onkyo OSD Paradigm Perlisten Polk Audio PS Audio PSB Q Acoustics REL Revel Russound Sennheiser Sonos Sonus faber Sony Spendor SVS Tannoy Technics Triangle Velodyne Victrola Wharfedale Wilson Audio Yamaha
  • AMPLIFIERS
    • By Type
      All Amplifiers Integrated Amplifiers Stereo Receivers Streaming Amplifiers Power Amplifiers Compact Amplifiers
      By Power
      Up to 60 watts 61 to 90 watts 91 to 120 watts 121 to 180 watts Over 180 watts
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      Home Theater
      All Home Theater Receivers Anthem ARCAM Denon Integra JBL Marantz McIntosh NAD Onkyo Sony Yamaha
      Headphone Amps
      All Headphone Amplifiers Cambridge Audio iFi Audio McIntosh Naim Pro-Ject Rotel Schiit Audio Sennheiser Yamaha
      Multi-Zone
      All Multi-Zone Amplifiers JBL McIntosh OSD Rotel Russound Sonos
      By Brand
      Accuphase Advance Paris Anthem Arcam Audio Research AudioControl Audioengine Audiolab Bluesound Bose Buchardt Cambridge Audio Cayin Denon Devialet ELAC Emotiva Eversolo FiiO Fosi Audio Hegel HiFi Rose Integra JBL Layer Audio Design LEAK Luxman Marantz Mark Levinson McIntosh Michi MISSION MOON Musical Fidelity NAD Naim Onkyo OSD Parasound Pass Labs Peachtree PrimaLuna Primare PS Audio Rega Rogue Audio Roksan Rotel Schiit Audio Sonos Sony SVS T+A TEAC Technics Vincent WiiM Yamaha
  • SMART FIND
  • TOOLS
  • BLOG
  1. Home
  2. Passive In-wall Speakers
  3. Revel W253L vs Klipsch R-5650-S II

Revel W253L vs Klipsch R-5650-S II Comparison

x
Speaker to replace
Change

Revel W253L

Passive In-wall | 55-18kHz

Revel W253L
Check price atAmazon›
Change
    
Klipsch R-5650-S II

Passive In-wall | 60-23kHz

Klipsch R-5650-S II
Check price atAmazon›
Revel W253L Revel W253L
Check price atAmazon›
Klipsch R-5650-S II Klipsch R-5650-S II
Check price atAmazon›
Revel W253L
See at AMAZON
Klipsch R-5650-S II
See at AMAZON

Revel W253L vs Klipsch R-5650-S II Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing W253L and R-5650-S II, two Passive In-wall speakers from Revel and Klipsch.

Let's have a brief look at the main features of Revel W253L and Klipsch R-5650-S II first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Key SpecsRevel W253LKlipsch R-5650-S II
BrandRevel
United States · founded 1996
Klipsch
United States · founded 1946
Design2-way2-way
Tweeter1" Hard-Dome1" Horn-loaded dome
Woofer2 x 5.25" Aluminum6.5" Cerametallic
Frequency response55-18kHz60-23kHz
Sensitivity91 dB92 dB
Impedance8 ohms8 ohms
Power range10-130 wattsup to 50 watts
Weight2.54kg / 5.6lbs3.27kg / 7.2lbs
Dimensions (H x W x D)14.1250" x 6.4375" x 3.4375"
359.0 x 164.0 x 88.0mm
13.0000" x 8.0000" x 3.6875"
331.0 x 204.0 x 94.0mm

What size room are the Revel W253L and Klipsch R-5650-S II speakers good for?

The size of the room in which you are planning to use these loudspeakers is an important decision factor. Here we have compared their suitability to various sizes of environments considering their size and max power parameters:

Listening Environment* Revel W253L Klipsch R-5650-S II
Near-field Poor Good
Small Room Average Good
Mid-size Room Good Average
Large Room Average Poor
Very Large Room Poor No way

(* Approximate Room sizes: Small < 100sq. ft / 9 m2, Mid-size: 100-220 sq. ft / 9-20 m2, Large 220-400 sq. ft / 20-36 m2, Very Large: > 400 sq. ft / 36 m2. Average Floor Height: 9" / 2.7m. Typical room sizes differ from country to country, and the actual listening experience changes depending on floor height, room shape, surface materials, listening position, speaker locations, etc.)

The sections below take each area in turn: drivers, frequency response, physical size and what you get in the box.


Drivers

Both W253L and R-5650-S II are 2-way speakers.

Tweeter - 1 inchWoofer - 5.25 inchWoofer - 5.25 inch
Revel W253L
Tweeter - 1 inchWoofer - 6.5 inch
Klipsch R-5650-S II

TweeterWoofer

Front view, drawn to scale - cabinets and drivers share one scale, so sizes are directly comparable. Hover a driver for its size.

Driver Revel W253L Klipsch R-5650-S II
Driver Setup 2-way 2-way
Tweeter 1-inch 1-inch
Midrange - -
Woofer 2 x 5.25-inch 1 x 6.5-inch

W253L features a 1" Hard-Dome Tweeter and 2 x 5.25" Aluminum Woofer. On the other hand, the R-5650-S II features a 1" Horn-loaded dome Tweeter and 1 x 6.5" Cerametallic Woofer with a Crossover frequency at 3400 Hz.

Frequency Response

W253L has a frequency range of 55-18kHz whereas R-5650-S II has a frequency range of 60-23kHz. With a minimum frequency of 55Hz, the W253L can go significantly deeper on the low side and provide stronger bass compared to the R-5650-S II's min frequency of 60Hz.

The graph below depicts how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average Low Frequency values of other speakers in the In-wall class in our database.

Low Frequency

In-wall Speakers

W253L
R-5650-S II
Min
Average
Median

Neither pair reaches down to 20Hz, the usual definition of full-range, which is normal for speakers of this size. If you want the bottom octave for movies or bass-heavy music, add a subwoofer to whichever you choose. Visit our Powered Subwoofers section to find out more about the available options.

Impedance and Sensitivity

W253L and R-5650-S II have the same Impedance of 8 ohms but where they differ is the sensitivity levels. W253L sensitivity is rated at 91 dB and the R-5650-S II's is at 92 dB. This 1 dB difference makes the Klipsch R-5650-S II a more sensitive speaker compared to Revel W253L, hence will play louder with the same amount of watts.

Sensitivity

In-wall Speakers

W253L
R-5650-S II
Min
Average
Median

Power Range

Power range is the range of input power in watts RMS that a loudspeaker is designed to handle. Staying within that range gives nominal performance; driving the speaker beyond its maximum wattage can damage it.

W253L can handle a max power of 130 watts RMS, whereas R-5650-S II has a max power handling value of 50 watts RMS, 80 watts less than the W253L.

Note that higher power handling does not make a speaker louder: that depends mainly on sensitivity and impedance. The calculator below shows how loud each of these actually plays on a real amplifier.

Which plays louder on your amplifier?

Starting with a popular amplifier - change it to the one you own, or any you are considering, and watch both numbers move.

Revel W253L
 
Klipsch R-5650-S II
 

Input Type and Bi-Amping / Bi-Wiring

W253L features Spring Posts type posts and R-5650-S II has a Spring Posts type posts. None of these speakers feature bi-amping/bi-wiring.

Physical Specs

The size of a speaker can sometimes be an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare Revel W253L's and Klipsch R-5650-S II's external dimensions. Revel W253L has external dimensions of 359.0 x 164.0 x 88.0mm (14.1250-inch x 6.4375-inch x 3.4375-inch) whereas Klipsch R-5650-S II has external dimensions of 331.0 x 204.0 x 94.0mm (13.0000-inch x 8.0000-inch x 3.6875-inch).

Revel W253L is 40mm narrower and 6mm less deeper than Klipsch R-5650-S II but it is also 28mm taller.

Size, drawn to scale

FRONTRevel W253L front: 164 x 359 mm (6.5 x 14.1 in)Klipsch R-5650-S II front: 204 x 331 mm (8 x 13 in)Revel W253L164 × 359 mmKlipsch R-5650-S II204 × 331 mmTOP / FOOTPRINTRevel W253L footprint: 164 x 88 mm (6.5 x 3.5 in)Klipsch R-5650-S II footprint: 204 x 94 mm (8 x 3.7 in)Revel W253L164 × 88 mmKlipsch R-5650-S II204 × 94 mm
Both speakers and both views share one scale, so everything here is directly comparable. Hover a box for its dimensions.

One scale for both, standing on the same surface and pushed back to the same wall, so the deeper one visibly sticks out further.

Klipsch R-5650-S II needs about 33% more floor or shelf area. Revel W253L is 28mm taller.

Weight Comparison

The weight of a loudspeaker can become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often. Weight of a speaker can also "sometimes" be an indicator of the rigidity of the enclosure and the quality of the internal components used. The Revel W253L weighs 2.54kg / 5.6lbs and the Klipsch R-5650-S II weighs 3.27kg / 7.2lbs. This makes the R-5650-S II 29% heavier than the W253L.

Here is a comparison of how W253L and R-5650-S II's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Passive In-wall class.

Weight
All In-wall Speakers
Revel W253L
Klipsch R-5650-S II
Min
Average
Max

What's in the Box of Revel W253L?

Here are the items that are included inside the box of W253L:
  • In-wall loudspeaker
  • Grille
  • Scrim cloth
  • Cutout template
  • Instruction Manual

What's in the Box of Klipsch R-5650-S II?

Here are the items that come with the R-5650-S II:
  • In-wall speaker
  • White metal mesh grille
  • Cardboard template
  • Owners Manual (En/Fr/Sp)


Reasons to choose Revel W253L over Klipsch R-5650-S II

Max Input Power 130 watts vs 50 watts Handle more power from your amplifier
Number of Woofers 2 vs 1 More woofers
Low Frequency Response 55 Hz vs 60 Hz Generates deeper bass
Base Surface Area 144cm2 vs 191cm2 Takes less floor space

Reasons to choose Klipsch R-5650-S II over Revel W253L

Sensitivity 92 dB vs 91 dB Play louder with same amount of amplification power
Woofer Size 6.5 inches vs 5.25 inches Larger woofer
High Frequency Response 23k Hz vs 18k Hz Generates higher frequency
Height 331mm vs 359mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces
Price per pair* 458USD vs 660USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)

Revel W253L vs Klipsch R-5650-S II Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications
General Revel W253L Klipsch R-5650-S II
Brand Revel Klipsch
Speaker Type Passive In-wall Speaker Passive In-wall Speaker
Power Range 10-130 watts up to 50 watts
Sensitivity 91 dB 92 dB
Impedance 8 ohms 8 ohms
Frequency Response 55-18kHz 60-23kHz
Drivers
Woofer Quantity 2 1
Woofer Size 5.25" 6.5"
Woofer Composition Aluminum Cerametallic
Woofer Surround Material Rubber Rubber
Tweeter Size 1" 1"
Tweeter Type Hard-Dome Horn-loaded dome
Aimable Tweeter No No
Midrange Driver No No
Crossover Frequency n/a 3400 Hz
Physical Specs
Height 359.0mm (14.1") 331.0mm (13")
Width 164.0mm (6.5") 204.0mm (8")
Depth 88.0mm (3.5") 94.0mm (3.7")
Weight 2.54kg (5.6lbs) 3.27kg (7.2lbs)
Enclosure In-wall In-wall
Moisture Resistancy No No
Connections
Biamp Inputs No No
Other
Parts Warranty Lifetime Ltd. Lifetime
Labor Warranty Lifetime Ltd. Lifetime

Verdict

No single best speaker here - they are built to different priorities, and the right one depends on your room, your amplifier and what you listen to.

AreaBetterWhy
BassARevel W253L digs deeper - 55Hz against 60Hz. A subwoofer would even that out.
Amplifier needsevenly matchedSimilar sensitivity (91dB vs 92dB) - both want much the same power.
HeadroomARevel W253L takes more power (130W vs 50W) - more in hand in a big room.
SizedependsSimilar cabinet size - neither is easier to fit.
ExpandabilitydependsNeither adds bi-amping, a sub output or height drivers. Revel W253L sits in a wider range (12 models), so a matched surround system is easier later.
PriceBKlipsch R-5650-S II is cheaper - $458 against $660, about 31% less.

A Revel W253L  B Klipsch R-5650-S II
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both speakers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.

Which should you choose?

The usual trade-off: Revel W253L measures better, Klipsch R-5650-S II costs about about 44% more% less. Whether that gap is worth the money is the call only you can make - and in a normal room it is often smaller than the numbers suggest. If a subwoofer is in your plans, the bass gap largely stops mattering - you would be crossing over above 60Hz anyway, which makes the cheaper Klipsch R-5650-S II much easier to justify. Match it to your room: we rate Revel W253L the better fit for a mid-size room and a large room, and Klipsch R-5650-S II for near-field listening and a small room.

And remember what a spec sheet cannot show: how each looks in your room and whether the finish suits it, what dealer support and warranty are like where you live, and how they actually sound to you. If you can hear them first - ideally with your own music - that will tell you more than any number above.


Most Popular Speakers
Klipsch Reference R-51M
Klipsch R-51M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
2-way | 87 dB | 6 ohms
Wharfedale Elysian 2
Wharfedale Elysian 2
3-way | 89 dB | 4 ohms
KEF Q150
KEF Q150
2-way | 86 dB | 8 ohms
Bowers & Wilkins 606 S2 Anniversary Edition
B&W 606 S2
2-way | 88 dB | 8 ohms
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-500M
Klipsch RP-500M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
Wharfedale EVO5.1
Wharfedale EVO5.1
2-way | 87 dB | 4 ohms
Wharfedale EVO4.1
Wharfedale EVO4.1
2-way | 87 dB | 8 ohms
This site contains affiliate links. We may be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through one of them. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Copyright © 2026 by SpeakerDecision
About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

Report a Correction