These sit in different price classes - Q Acoustics Q Active 200 costs roughly 2.2x what Klipsch The Fives does. Expect it to lead on paper; the question is whether the gap is audible enough in your room to be worth it.
| Area | Better | Why |
|---|
| Bass | A | Q Acoustics Q Active 200 digs deeper - 46Hz against 50Hz. A subwoofer would even that out. |
| Built-in power | B | Klipsch The Fives has the bigger amplifier (160W vs 100W RMS). |
| Connections | A | Q Acoustics Q Active 200 adds Wi-Fi and streaming. |
| Size | depends | Similar cabinet size - neither is easier to fit. |
| Expandability | depends | Q Acoustics Q Active 200: a sub output; Klipsch The Fives: a sub output. |
| Price | B | Klipsch The Fives is cheaper - $969 against $2,098, about 54% less; arguably a different class. |
A Q Acoustics Q Active 200 B Klipsch The Fives
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both speakers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.
Which should you choose?
Q Acoustics Q Active 200 is ahead, but only on 1 of the measured areas, and it costs about 117% more. That is a lot of money for a narrow margin on paper - Klipsch The Fives looks like the sensible buy unless something else about the Q Acoustics Q Active 200 appeals to you. Think about the whole system, not just the speakers: the roughly $1,129 saved by taking the cheaper pair would buy a subwoofer or a better amplifier, and either usually does more for the sound than the difference between these two.
And remember what a spec sheet cannot show: how each looks in your room and whether the finish suits it, what dealer support and warranty are like where you live, and how they actually sound to you. If you can hear them first - ideally with your own music - that will tell you more than any number above.