SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS
    • By Type
      Passive Bookshelf Speakers Passive Floor-standing Speakers Passive Center Channel Speakers Passive In-wall Speakers All Passive Speakers Powered Subwoofers Powered Stereo Speakers
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Front Firing Port Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      By Brand
      Acoustic Energy Aperion ATC Audio-Technica Audioengine Bluesound Bowers Wilkins Buchardt Cambridge Audio Canton DALI Definitive Technology Dynaudio ELAC Emotiva Fluance Focal Fyne Audio Genelec GoldenEar Harbeth Jamo JBL Kanto KEF KLH Klipsch Leak Mackie Magnepan MartinLogan McIntosh Mission MoFi Monitor Audio Nuvo Onkyo OSD Paradigm Perlisten Polk Audio PS Audio PSB Q Acoustics REL Revel Russound Sennheiser Sonos Sonus faber Sony Spendor SVS Tannoy Technics Triangle Velodyne Victrola Wharfedale Wilson Audio Yamaha
  • AMPLIFIERS
    • By Type
      All Amplifiers Integrated Amplifiers Stereo Receivers Streaming Amplifiers Power Amplifiers Compact Amplifiers
      By Power
      Up to 60 watts 61 to 90 watts 91 to 120 watts 121 to 180 watts Over 180 watts
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      Home Theater
      All Home Theater Receivers Anthem ARCAM Denon Integra JBL Marantz McIntosh NAD Onkyo Sony Yamaha
      Headphone Amps
      All Headphone Amplifiers Cambridge Audio iFi Audio McIntosh Naim Pro-Ject Rotel Schiit Audio Sennheiser Yamaha
      Multi-Zone
      All Multi-Zone Amplifiers JBL McIntosh OSD Rotel Russound Sonos
      By Brand
      Accuphase Advance Paris Anthem Arcam Audio Research AudioControl Audioengine Audiolab Bluesound Bose Buchardt Cambridge Audio Cayin Denon Devialet ELAC Emotiva Eversolo FiiO Fosi Audio Hegel HiFi Rose Integra JBL Layer Audio Design LEAK Luxman Marantz Mark Levinson McIntosh Michi MISSION MOON Musical Fidelity NAD Naim Onkyo OSD Parasound Pass Labs Peachtree PrimaLuna Primare PS Audio Rega Rogue Audio Roksan Rotel Schiit Audio Sonos Sony SVS T+A TEAC Technics Vincent WiiM Yamaha
  • SMART FIND
  • TOOLS
  • BLOG
  1. Home
  2. Passive Floor-standing Speakers
  3. Q Acoustics Concept 500 vs GoldenEar Triton Five

Q Acoustics Concept 500 vs GoldenEar Triton Five Comparison

x
Speaker to replace
Change

Q Acoustics Concept 500

Passive Floor-standing | 41-30k Hz

Q Acoustics Concept 500
Check price atAmazon›
Change
    
GoldenEar Triton Five

Passive Floor-standing | 26-35k Hz

GoldenEar Triton Five
Check price atAmazon›
Q Acoustics Concept 500 Q Acoustics Concept...
Check price atAmazon›
GoldenEar Triton Five GoldenEar Triton Fiv...
Check price atAmazon›
Q Acoustics Concept...
See at AMAZON
GoldenEar Triton Fiv...
See at AMAZON

Q Acoustics Concept 500 vs GoldenEar Triton Five Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing Concept 500 and Triton Five, two Passive Floor-standing speakers from Q Acoustics and GoldenEar.

Let's have a brief look at the main features of Q Acoustics Concept 500 and GoldenEar Triton Five first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Key SpecsQ Acoustics Concept 500GoldenEar Triton Five
BrandQ Acoustics
United Kingdom · founded 2006
GoldenEar
United States · founded 2010
Design2-way2-way
Tweeter1.1" DomeFolded Ribbon
Woofer2 x 6.5" Paper composite2 x 6" Polypropylene
Frequency response41-30k Hz26-35k Hz
Sensitivity90 dB90 dB
Impedance6 ohms8 ohms
Power range25-200 watts15-400 watts
Weight42.00kg / 92.4lbs18.18kg / 40lbs
Dimensions (H x W x D)46-1/4" x 15-3/4" x 14-3/4"
1175.0 x 400.0 x 375.0mm
44-1/2" x 11-1/16" x 16-9/16"
1131.0 x 281.0 x 421.0mm

What size room are the Q Acoustics Concept 500 and GoldenEar Triton Five speakers good for?

The size of the room in which you are planning to use these loudspeakers is an important decision factor. Here we have compared their suitability to various sizes of environments considering their size and max power parameters:

Listening Environment* Q Acoustics Concept 500 GoldenEar Triton Five
Near-field Bad Are you nuts?
Small Room Poor Poor
Mid-size Room Average Average
Large Room Good Good
Very Large Room Average Good

(* Approximate Room sizes: Small < 100sq. ft / 9 m2, Mid-size: 100-220 sq. ft / 9-20 m2, Large 220-400 sq. ft / 20-36 m2, Very Large: > 400 sq. ft / 36 m2. Average Floor Height: 9" / 2.7m. Typical room sizes differ from country to country, and the actual listening experience changes depending on floor height, room shape, surface materials, listening position, speaker locations, etc.)

The sections below take each area in turn: drivers, frequency response, physical size and what you get in the box.


Drivers

Both Concept 500 and Triton Five are 2-way speakers.

Tweeter - 1.1 inchWoofer - 6.5 inchWoofer - 6.5 inch
Q Acoustics Concept 500
Woofer - 6 inchWoofer - 6 inch
GoldenEar Triton Five

TweeterWoofer

Front view, drawn to scale - cabinets and drivers share one scale, so sizes are directly comparable. Hover a driver for its size.

Driver Q Acoustics Concept 500 GoldenEar Triton Five
Driver Setup 2-way 2-way
Tweeter 1.1-inch -inch
Midrange - -
Woofer 2 x 6.5-inch 2 x 6-inch

Concept 500 features a 1.1" Dome Tweeter and 2 x 6.5" Paper composite Woofer with a Crossover frequency at 2500Hz. On the other hand, the Triton Five features a " Folded Ribbon Tweeter and 2 x 6" Polypropylene Woofer.

Frequency Response

Concept 500 has a frequency range of 41-30k Hz whereas Triton Five has a frequency range of 26-35k Hz. With a minimum frequency of 26Hz, the Triton Five can go significantly deeper on the low side and provide stronger bass compared to the Concept 500's min frequency of 41Hz.

The graph below depicts how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average Low Frequency values of other speakers in the Floor-standing class in our database.

Low Frequency

Floor-standing Speakers

Concept 500
Triton Five
Min
Average
Median

Neither pair reaches down to 20Hz, the usual definition of full-range, which is normal for speakers of this size. If you want the bottom octave for movies or bass-heavy music, add a subwoofer to whichever you choose. Visit our Powered Subwoofers section to find out more about the available options.

Impedance and Sensitivity

Concept 500 is a 6 ohms speaker compared to the Triton Five which has a nominal impedance of 8 ohms.

On the other hand, they have the same sensitivity of 90 dBdB.

Sensitivity

Floor-standing Speakers

Concept 500
Triton Five
Min
Average
Median

Power Range

Power range is the range of input power in watts RMS that a loudspeaker is designed to handle. Staying within that range gives nominal performance; driving the speaker beyond its maximum wattage can damage it.

Triton Five can handle a max power of 400 watts RMS, whereas Concept 500 has a max power handling value of 200 watts RMS, 200 watts less than the Triton Five.

Note that higher power handling does not make a speaker louder: that depends mainly on sensitivity and impedance. The calculator below shows how loud each of these actually plays on a real amplifier.

Which plays louder on your amplifier?

Starting with a popular amplifier - change it to the one you own, or any you are considering, and watch both numbers move.

Q Acoustics Concept 500
 
GoldenEar Triton Five
 

Input Type and Bi-Amping / Bi-Wiring

Concept 500 features Binding post posts which make bi-amping or bi-wiring possible. Triton Five has a 5-way Post which doesn't feature bi-amping/bi-wiring.

Cabinet Type and Port Position

Both Concept 500 and Triton Five have rear firing ports. Rear ported speakers generally need more room between the backside of the speaker and the wall compared to sealed and front/bottom ported speakers. Placing the speakers too close to the walls may cause the bass to sound boomy.

If you are limited in space and can't get the speakers away from the backwall, check our Speakers with Front Firing Ports page.

Physical Specs

The size of a speaker can sometimes be an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare Q Acoustics Concept 500's and GoldenEar Triton Five's external dimensions. Q Acoustics Concept 500 has external dimensions of 1175.0 x 400.0 x 375.0mm (46-1/4 x 15-3/4 x 14-3/4inch) whereas GoldenEar Triton Five has external dimensions of 1131.0 x 281.0 x 421.0mm (44-1/2 x 11-1/16 x 16-9/16inch).

GoldenEar Triton Five is 119mm narrower and 44mm shorter than Q Acoustics Concept 500 but it is also 46mm deeper.

Size, drawn to scale

FRONTQ Acoustics Concept 500 front: 400 x 1175 mm (15.7 x 46.3 in)GoldenEar Triton Five front: 281 x 1131 mm (11.1 x 44.5 in)Q Acoustics Concept 500400 × 1175 mmGoldenEar Triton Five281 × 1131 mmTOP / FOOTPRINTQ Acoustics Concept 500 footprint: 400 x 375 mm (15.7 x 14.8 in)GoldenEar Triton Five footprint: 281 x 421 mm (11.1 x 16.6 in)Q Acoustics Concept 500400 × 375 mmGoldenEar Triton Five281 × 421 mm
Both speakers and both views share one scale, so everything here is directly comparable. Hover a box for its dimensions.

One scale for both, standing on the same surface and pushed back to the same wall, so the deeper one visibly sticks out further.

Q Acoustics Concept 500 needs about 27% more floor or shelf area. GoldenEar Triton Five is 46mm deeper, so it stands that much further out from the wall. Q Acoustics Concept 500 is 44mm taller.

Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited. The base surface area of the Q Acoustics Concept 500 is approximately 1500.0cm2 / 232.5inch2 and base area of the GoldenEar Triton Five is approximately 1183.0cm2 / 183.4inch2. The Concept 500 requires 27% more surface area than the Triton Five which gives it a small disadvantage on placement in tight spaces.

Weight Comparison

The weight of a loudspeaker can become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often. Weight of a speaker can also "sometimes" be an indicator of the rigidity of the enclosure and the quality of the internal components used. The Q Acoustics Concept 500 weighs 42.00kg / 92.4lbs and the GoldenEar Triton Five weighs 18.18kg / 40lbs. This makes the Concept 500 131% heavier than the Triton Five.

Here is a comparison of how Concept 500 and Triton Five's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Passive Floor-standing class.

Weight
All Floor-standing Speakers
Q Acoustics Concept 500
GoldenEar Triton Five
Min
Average
Max

What's in the Box of GoldenEar Triton Five?

Here are the items that come with the Triton Five:
  • Floorstanding loudspeaker
  • 4 Rubber feet (pre-installed)
  • 4 Spikes
  • 4 Locking nuts
  • Owners Manual


Reasons to choose Q Acoustics Concept 500 over GoldenEar Triton Five

Woofer Size 6.5 inches vs 6 inches Larger woofer
Bi-Amping and Bi-Wiring Yes vs No Allows bi-amping and bi-wiring connections

Reasons to choose GoldenEar Triton Five over Q Acoustics Concept 500

Max Input Power 400 watts vs 200 watts Handle more power from your amplifier
Nominal Impedance 8 ohms vs 6 ohms Less selective with amplifiers
Low Frequency Response 26 Hz vs 41 Hz Generates deeper bass
High Frequency Response 35k Hz vs 30k Hz Generates higher frequency
Passive Radiator four 8-inch infrasonic planar sub-bass vs None Increases the bass performance
Height 1131mm vs 1175mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces
Base Surface Area 1183cm2 vs 1500cm2 Takes less floor space
Price per pair* 2398USD vs 4599USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)

Q Acoustics Concept 500 vs GoldenEar Triton Five Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications
General Q Acoustics Concept 500 GoldenEar Triton Five
Brand Q Acoustics GoldenEar
Speaker Type Floor-standing speaker Floor-standing speaker
Power Range 25-200 watts 15-400 watts
Sensitivity 90 dB 90 dB
Impedance 6 ohms 8 ohms
Impedance 3.7 ohms n/a
Frequency Response 41-30k Hz 26-35k Hz
Drivers
Woofer Quantity 2 2
Woofer Size 6.5" 6"
Woofer Composition Paper composite Polypropylene
Woofer Surround Material n/a Rubber
Tweeter Size 1.1" -
Tweeter Type Dome Folded Ribbon
Aimable Tweeter No No
Midrange Driver No No
Crossover Frequency 2500Hz n/a
Firing Direction rear rear
Physical Specs
Height 1175.0mm (46.3") 1131.0mm (44.5")
Width 400.0mm (15.7") 281.0mm (11.1")
Depth 375.0mm (14.8") 421.0mm (16.6")
Weight 42.00kg (92.4lbs) 18.18kg (40lbs)
Enclosure Bass Reflex Passive Radiator
Finish n/a MDF/Lacquer
Available Colors n/a Gloss Black
Grille Yes n/a
Moisture Resistancy No No
Connections
Biamp Inputs Yes No
Other
Parts Warranty 5 Years 5 Years
Labor Warranty 5 Years 5 Years

Verdict

These sit in different price classes - Q Acoustics Concept 500 costs roughly 1.9x what GoldenEar Triton Five does. Expect it to lead on paper; the question is whether the gap is audible enough in your room to be worth it.

AreaBetterWhy
BassBGoldenEar Triton Five digs deeper - 26Hz against 41Hz.
Amplifier needsevenly matchedSimilar sensitivity (90dB vs 90dB) - both want much the same power.
Amplifier matchBGoldenEar Triton Five is the easier load at 8 ohms.
HeadroomBGoldenEar Triton Five takes more power (400W vs 200W) - more in hand in a big room.
SizedependsGoldenEar Triton Five is easier to place; Q Acoustics Concept 500 is bigger, which usually goes with fuller bass. Your room decides.
CabinetdependsPorted vs Passive Radiator.
ExpandabilityAQ Acoustics Concept 500: bi-amping.
PriceBGoldenEar Triton Five is cheaper - $2,398 against $4,599, about 48% less; arguably a different class.

A Q Acoustics Concept 500  B GoldenEar Triton Five
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both speakers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.

Which should you choose?

GoldenEar Triton Five is the easier recommendation: it leads on most of the measured areas and costs less. Take Q Acoustics Concept 500 if its size, looks or fit in your room suit you better. If a subwoofer is in your plans, the bass gap largely stops mattering - you would be crossing over above 41Hz anyway, so judge these on the other rows instead. Match it to your room: we rate GoldenEar Triton Five the better fit for a very large room; elsewhere the two are rated the same.

And remember what a spec sheet cannot show: how each looks in your room and whether the finish suits it, what dealer support and warranty are like where you live, and how they actually sound to you. If you can hear them first - ideally with your own music - that will tell you more than any number above.


Most Popular Speakers
Klipsch Reference R-51M
Klipsch R-51M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
2-way | 87 dB | 6 ohms
Wharfedale Elysian 2
Wharfedale Elysian 2
3-way | 89 dB | 4 ohms
KEF Q150
KEF Q150
2-way | 86 dB | 8 ohms
Bowers & Wilkins 606 S2 Anniversary Edition
B&W 606 S2
2-way | 88 dB | 8 ohms
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-500M
Klipsch RP-500M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
Wharfedale EVO5.1
Wharfedale EVO5.1
2-way | 87 dB | 4 ohms
Wharfedale EVO4.1
Wharfedale EVO4.1
2-way | 87 dB | 8 ohms
This site contains affiliate links. We may be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through one of them. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Copyright © 2026 by SpeakerDecision
About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

Report a Correction