SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS
    • By Type
      Passive Bookshelf Speakers Passive Floor-standing Speakers Passive Center Channel Speakers Passive In-wall Speakers All Passive Speakers Powered Subwoofers Powered Stereo Speakers
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Front Firing Port Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      By Brand
      Acoustic Energy Aperion ATC Audio-Technica Audioengine Bluesound Bowers Wilkins Buchardt Cambridge Audio Canton DALI Definitive Technology Dynaudio ELAC Emotiva Fluance Focal Fyne Audio Genelec GoldenEar Harbeth Jamo JBL Kanto KEF KLH Klipsch Leak Mackie Magnepan MartinLogan McIntosh Mission MoFi Monitor Audio Nuvo Onkyo OSD Paradigm Perlisten Polk Audio PS Audio PSB Q Acoustics REL Revel Russound Sennheiser Sonos Sonus faber Sony Spendor SVS Tannoy Technics Triangle Velodyne Victrola Wharfedale Wilson Audio Yamaha
  • AMPLIFIERS
    • By Type
      All Amplifiers Integrated Amplifiers Stereo Receivers Streaming Amplifiers Power Amplifiers Compact Amplifiers
      By Power
      Up to 60 watts 61 to 90 watts 91 to 120 watts 121 to 180 watts Over 180 watts
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      Home Theater
      All Home Theater Receivers Anthem ARCAM Denon Integra JBL Marantz McIntosh NAD Onkyo Sony Yamaha
      Headphone Amps
      All Headphone Amplifiers Cambridge Audio iFi Audio McIntosh Naim Pro-Ject Rotel Schiit Audio Sennheiser Yamaha
      Multi-Zone
      All Multi-Zone Amplifiers JBL McIntosh OSD Rotel Russound Sonos
      By Brand
      Accuphase Advance Paris Anthem Arcam Audio Research AudioControl Audioengine Audiolab Bluesound Bose Buchardt Cambridge Audio Cayin Denon Devialet ELAC Emotiva Eversolo FiiO Fosi Audio Hegel HiFi Rose Integra JBL Layer Audio Design LEAK Luxman Marantz Mark Levinson McIntosh Michi MISSION MOON Musical Fidelity NAD Naim Onkyo OSD Parasound Pass Labs Peachtree PrimaLuna Primare PS Audio Rega Rogue Audio Roksan Rotel Schiit Audio Sonos Sony SVS T+A TEAC Technics Vincent WiiM Yamaha
  • SMART FIND
  • TOOLS
  • BLOG
  1. Home
  2. Passive Floor-standing Speakers
  3. Polk XT60 vs Jamo S 807

Polk XT60 vs Jamo S 807 Comparison

x
Speaker to replace
Change

Polk XT60

Passive Floor-standing | 38-40k Hz

Polk Audio Monitor XT60
Check price atAmazon›
Change
    
Jamo S 807

Passive Floor-standing | 42-26k Hz

Jamo Studio S 807
Check price atAmazon›
Polk  XT60 Polk XT60
Check price atAmazon›
Jamo S 807 Jamo S 807
Check price atAmazon›
Polk XT60
See at AMAZON
Jamo S 807
See at AMAZON

Polk XT60 vs Jamo S 807 Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing XT60 and S 807, two Passive Floor-standing speakers from Polk Audio and Jamo.

Let's have a brief look at the main features of Polk XT60 and Jamo S 807 first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Key SpecsPolk XT60Jamo S 807
BrandPolk Audio
United States · founded 1972
Jamo
Denmark · founded 1966
Design2-way2-way
Tweeter1" dome1"
Woofer6.5" Bi-laminate paper2 x 5" Aluminized Polyfiber
Frequency response38-40k Hz42-26k Hz
Sensitivity86 dB90 dB
Impedance8 ohms8 ohms
Power range25-200 wattsup to 100 watts
Weight9.09kg / 20lbs11.80kg / 26lbs
Dimensions (H x W x D)36-9/16" x 9-1/16" x 9-15/16"
929.0 x 231.0 x 253.0mm
36" x 7-1/2" x 9-15/16"
915 x 191 x 252 mm

What size room are the Polk XT60 and Jamo S 807 speakers good for?

The size of the room in which you are planning to use these loudspeakers is an important decision factor. Here we have compared their suitability to various sizes of environments considering their size and max power parameters:

Listening Environment* Polk XT60 Jamo S 807
Near-field Bad Poor
Small Room Poor Average
Mid-size Room Good Good
Large Room Good Poor
Very Large Room Poor Bad

(* Approximate Room sizes: Small < 100sq. ft / 9 m2, Mid-size: 100-220 sq. ft / 9-20 m2, Large 220-400 sq. ft / 20-36 m2, Very Large: > 400 sq. ft / 36 m2. Average Floor Height: 9" / 2.7m. Typical room sizes differ from country to country, and the actual listening experience changes depending on floor height, room shape, surface materials, listening position, speaker locations, etc.)

The sections below take each area in turn: drivers, frequency response, physical size and what you get in the box.


Drivers

Both XT60 and S 807 are 2-way speakers.

Tweeter - 1 inchWoofer - 6.5 inch
Polk XT60
Tweeter - 1 inchWoofer - 5 inchWoofer - 5 inch
Jamo S 807

TweeterWoofer

Front view, drawn to scale - cabinets and drivers share one scale, so sizes are directly comparable. Hover a driver for its size.

Driver Polk XT60 Jamo S 807
Driver Setup 2-way 2-way
Tweeter 1-inch 1-inch
Midrange - -
Woofer 1 x 6.5-inch 2 x 5-inch

XT60 features a 1" Terylene dome Tweeter and 1 x 6.5" Bi-laminate paper Woofer. On the other hand, the S 807 features a 1" Tweeter and 2 x 5" Aluminized Polyfiber Woofer with a Crossover frequency at 2000Hz.

Frequency Response

XT60 has a frequency range of 38-40k Hz whereas S 807 has a frequency range of 42-26k Hz. With a minimum frequency of 38Hz, the XT60 can go slightly deeper then the S 807's min frequency of 42Hz.

The graph below depicts how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average Low Frequency values of other speakers in the Floor-standing class in our database.

Low Frequency

Floor-standing Speakers

XT60
S 807
Min
Average
Median

Neither pair reaches down to 20Hz, the usual definition of full-range, which is normal for speakers of this size. If you want the bottom octave for movies or bass-heavy music, add a subwoofer to whichever you choose. Visit our Powered Subwoofers section to find out more about the available options.

Impedance and Sensitivity

XT60 and S 807 have the same Impedance of 8 ohms but where they differ is the sensitivity levels. XT60 sensitivity is rated at 86 dB and the S 807's is at 90 dB. This 4 dB difference makes the Jamo S 807 a more sensitive speaker compared to Polk XT60, hence will play louder with the same amount of watts.

Sensitivity

Floor-standing Speakers

XT60
S 807
Min
Average
Median

Power Range

Power range is the range of input power in watts RMS that a loudspeaker is designed to handle. Staying within that range gives nominal performance; driving the speaker beyond its maximum wattage can damage it.

XT60 can handle a max power of 200 watts RMS, whereas S 807 has a max power handling value of 100 watts RMS, 100 watts less than the XT60.

Note that higher power handling does not make a speaker louder: that depends mainly on sensitivity and impedance. The calculator below shows how loud each of these actually plays on a real amplifier.

Which plays louder on your amplifier?

Starting with a popular amplifier - change it to the one you own, or any you are considering, and watch both numbers move.

Polk XT60
 
Jamo S 807
 

Input Type and Bi-Amping / Bi-Wiring

XT60 features Binding post type posts and S 807 has a Binding post type posts. None of these speakers feature bi-amping/bi-wiring.

Jamo S 807Binding post Terminals
Jamo S 807's Binding post terminals

Jamo S 807  Port
Jamo S 807 Port

Physical Specs

The size of a speaker can sometimes be an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare Polk XT60's and Jamo S 807's external dimensions. Polk XT60 has external dimensions of 929.0 x 231.0 x 253.0mm (36-9/16 x 9-1/16 x 9-15/16inch) whereas Jamo S 807 has external dimensions of 915 x 191 x 252 mm (36 x 7-1/2 x 9-15/16 inch).

Polk XT60 is clearly the larger of the two speakers. Its body is 40mm wider, 14mm taller and 1mm deeper than Jamo S 807.

Below you can see the front view size comparison of Polk XT60 and Jamo S 807 in scale.

Polk  XT60 vs Jamo S 807 Size Comparison - Front View
Comparison image of Polk XT60 and Jamo S 807 Size and External Dimensions

Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited. The base surface area of the Polk XT60 is approximately 584.4cm2 / 90.6inch2 and base area of the Jamo S 807 is approximately 481.3cm2 / 74.6inch2. The XT60 requires 21% more surface area than the S 807 which gives it a small disadvantage on placement in tight spaces.

Weight Comparison

The weight of a loudspeaker can become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often. Weight of a speaker can also "sometimes" be an indicator of the rigidity of the enclosure and the quality of the internal components used. The Polk XT60 weighs 9.09kg / 20lbs and the Jamo S 807 weighs 11.80kg / 26lbs. This makes the S 807 30% heavier than the XT60.

Here is a comparison of how XT60 and S 807's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Passive Floor-standing class.

Weight
All Floor-standing Speakers
Polk XT60
Jamo S 807
Min
Average
Max

What's in the Box of Polk XT60?

Here are the items that are included inside the box of XT60:
  • Floorstanding loudspeaker
  • Grille (attached)
  • Owners Manual
  • Online Product Registration

What's in the Box of Jamo S 807?

Here are the items that come with the S 807:
  • 2 Floorstanding loudspeakers
  • 2 Grilles
  • 8 Mounting feet
  • 16 Screws
  • User Manual
  • Important Safety Instructions
  • Warranty Information


Reasons to choose Polk Audio Monitor XT60 over Jamo Studio S 807

Max Input Power 200 watts vs 100 watts Handle more power from your amplifier
Woofer Size 6.5 inches vs 5 inches Larger woofer
Low Frequency Response 38 Hz vs 42 Hz Generates deeper bass
High Frequency Response 40k Hz vs 26k Hz Generates higher frequency
Passive Radiator two 6-1/2-inch vs None Increases the bass performance
Price per pair* 498USD vs 519USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)

Reasons to choose Jamo Studio S 807 over Polk Audio Monitor XT60

Sensitivity 90 dB vs 86 dB Play louder with same amount of amplification power
Number of Woofers 2 vs 1 More woofers
Height 915mm vs 929mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces
Base Surface Area 481cm2 vs 584cm2 Takes less floor space

Polk XT60 vs Jamo S 807 Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications
General Polk Audio Monitor XT60 Jamo Studio S 807
Brand Polk Audio Jamo
Speaker Type Floor-standing speaker Floor-standing speaker
Power Range 25-200 watts up to 100 watts
Sensitivity 86 dB 90 dB
Impedance 8 ohms 8 ohms
Frequency Response 38-40k Hz 42-26k Hz
Drivers
Woofer Quantity 1 2
Woofer Size 6.5" 5"
Woofer Composition Bi-laminate paper Aluminized Polyfiber
Woofer Surround Material Rubber Rubber
Tweeter Size 1" 1"
Tweeter Type dome n/a
Aimable Tweeter No No
Midrange Driver No No
Crossover Frequency n/a 2000Hz
Firing Direction n/a front
Physical Specs
Height 929.0mm (36.6") 915.0mm (36")
Width 231.0mm (9.1") 191.0mm (7.5")
Depth 253.0mm (10") 252.0mm (9.9")
Weight 9.09kg (20lbs) 11.80kg (26lbs)
Enclosure Passive Radiator Bass Reflex
Finish MDF, Vinyl MDF/Vinyl
Available Colors Black Walnut
Grille Yes Yes
Moisture Resistancy No No
Connections
Biamp Inputs No No
Other
Parts Warranty 5 Years 5 Years
Labor Warranty 5 Years 5 Years

Verdict

A generation apart: Polk XT60 is the newer design, against a 2017 model. Newer is not automatically better, but the older one is more likely to be discounted or near run-out.

AreaBetterWhy
BassAPolk XT60 digs deeper - 38Hz against 42Hz. A subwoofer would even that out.
Amplifier needsBJamo S 807 is more sensitive (90dB vs 86dB), so it goes louder on the same amplifier.
HeadroomAPolk XT60 takes more power (200W vs 100W) - more in hand in a big room.
SizedependsSimilar cabinet size - neither is easier to fit.
CabinetdependsPassive Radiator vs Ported.
ExpandabilitydependsPolk XT60: Atmos drivers; Jamo S 807: Atmos drivers. Polk XT60 sits in a wider range (9 models), so a matched surround system is easier later.
Priceevenly matchedMuch the same money ($498 vs $519 a pair).

A Polk XT60  B Jamo S 807
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both speakers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.

Which should you choose?

Polk XT60 has the edge on paper, though the margin is not large. The rows marked "depends" may matter more to you than the score does. Match it to your room: we rate Polk XT60 the better fit for a large room, and Jamo S 807 for a small room. If your amplifier is modest, vintage or valve-based, Jamo S 807 is the safer partner - the other will want more current or more watts to sound its best.

And remember what a spec sheet cannot show: how each looks in your room and whether the finish suits it, what dealer support and warranty are like where you live, and how they actually sound to you. If you can hear them first - ideally with your own music - that will tell you more than any number above.


Most Popular Speakers
Klipsch Reference R-51M
Klipsch R-51M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
2-way | 87 dB | 6 ohms
Wharfedale Elysian 2
Wharfedale Elysian 2
3-way | 89 dB | 4 ohms
KEF Q150
KEF Q150
2-way | 86 dB | 8 ohms
Bowers & Wilkins 606 S2 Anniversary Edition
B&W 606 S2
2-way | 88 dB | 8 ohms
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-500M
Klipsch RP-500M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
Wharfedale EVO5.1
Wharfedale EVO5.1
2-way | 87 dB | 4 ohms
Wharfedale EVO4.1
Wharfedale EVO4.1
2-way | 87 dB | 8 ohms
This site contains affiliate links. We may be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through one of them. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Copyright © 2026 by SpeakerDecision
About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

Report a Correction