SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS
    • By Type
      Passive Bookshelf Speakers Passive Floor-standing Speakers Passive Center Channel Speakers Passive In-wall Speakers All Passive Speakers Powered Subwoofers Powered Stereo Speakers
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Front Firing Port Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      By Brand
      Acoustic Energy Aperion ATC Audio-Technica Audioengine Bluesound Bowers Wilkins Buchardt Cambridge Audio Canton DALI Definitive Technology Dynaudio ELAC Emotiva Fluance Focal Fyne Audio Genelec GoldenEar Harbeth Jamo JBL Kanto KEF KLH Klipsch Leak Mackie Magnepan MartinLogan McIntosh Mission MoFi Monitor Audio Nuvo Onkyo OSD Paradigm Perlisten Polk Audio PS Audio PSB Q Acoustics REL Revel Russound Sennheiser Sonos Sonus faber Sony Spendor SVS Tannoy Technics Triangle Velodyne Victrola Wharfedale Wilson Audio Yamaha
  • AMPLIFIERS
    • By Type
      All Amplifiers Integrated Amplifiers Stereo Receivers Streaming Amplifiers Power Amplifiers Compact Amplifiers
      By Power
      Up to 60 watts 61 to 90 watts 91 to 120 watts 121 to 180 watts Over 180 watts
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      Home Theater
      All Home Theater Receivers Anthem ARCAM Denon Integra JBL Marantz McIntosh NAD Onkyo Sony Yamaha
      Headphone Amps
      All Headphone Amplifiers Cambridge Audio iFi Audio McIntosh Naim Pro-Ject Rotel Schiit Audio Sennheiser Yamaha
      Multi-Zone
      All Multi-Zone Amplifiers JBL McIntosh OSD Rotel Russound Sonos
      By Brand
      Accuphase Advance Paris Anthem Arcam Audio Research AudioControl Audioengine Audiolab Bluesound Bose Buchardt Cambridge Audio Cayin Denon Devialet ELAC Emotiva Eversolo FiiO Fosi Audio Hegel HiFi Rose Integra JBL Layer Audio Design LEAK Luxman Marantz Mark Levinson McIntosh Michi MISSION MOON Musical Fidelity NAD Naim Onkyo OSD Parasound Pass Labs Peachtree PrimaLuna Primare PS Audio Rega Rogue Audio Roksan Rotel Schiit Audio Sonos Sony SVS T+A TEAC Technics Vincent WiiM Yamaha
  • SMART FIND
  • TOOLS
  • BLOG
  1. Home
  2. Passive In-wall Speakers
  3. Polk Audio 265 RT vs Polk Audio 255C-RT

Polk Audio 265 RT vs Polk Audio 255C-RT Comparison

x
Speaker to replace
Change

Polk Audio 265 RT

Passive In-wall | 45-25kHz

Polk Audio 265 RT
Check price atAmazon›
Change
    
Polk Audio 255C-RT

Passive In-wall | 50-25kHz

Polk Audio 255C-RT
Check price atAmazon›
Polk Audio 265 RT Polk Audio 265 RT
Check price atAmazon›
Polk Audio 255C-RT Polk Audio 255C-RT
Check price atAmazon›
Polk Audio 265 RT
See at AMAZON
Polk Audio 255C-RT
See at AMAZON

Polk Audio 265 RT vs Polk Audio 255C-RT Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing 265 RT and 255C-RT, two Passive In-wall speakers by Polk Audio.

Let's have a brief look at the main features of Polk Audio 265 RT and Polk Audio 255C-RT first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Key SpecsPolk Audio 265 RTPolk Audio 255C-RT
BrandPolk Audio
United States · founded 1972
Polk Audio
United States · founded 1972
Design2-way2-way
Tweeter1" Soft-Dome1" Soft-Dome
Woofer2 x 6.5" Polymer Composite2 x 5.25" Polymer Composite
Frequency response45-25kHz50-25kHz
Sensitivity91 dB90 dB
Impedance8 ohms8 ohms
Power range10-200 watts10-150 watts
Dimensions (H x W x D)19.1875" x 7.2500" x 3-9/16"
488.0 x 185.0 x 90.4mm
7.5625" x 13.0625" x 3-7/8"
193.0 x 332.0 x 98.4mm

265 RT and 255C-RT are members of Polk Audio's RT series of speakers. Below you can find the loudspeakers from this series.

Polk Audio RT Series History
Model Body Frequency SensitivityImpedance Woofer
Polk Audio 65 RT
  
In-wall 50-25kHz 90 dB8Ω 1 x 6.5"
Polk Audio 255C-RT
In-wall 50-25kHz 90 dB8Ω 2 x 5.25"
Polk Audio 265 RT
In-wall 45-25kHz 91 dB8Ω 2 x 6.5"

What size room are the Polk Audio 265 RT and Polk Audio 255C-RT speakers good for?

The size of the room in which you are planning to use these loudspeakers is an important decision factor. Here we have compared their suitability to various sizes of environments considering their size and max power parameters:

Listening Environment* Polk Audio 265 RT Polk Audio 255C-RT
Near-field Poor Poor
Small Room Average Average
Mid-size Room Good Good
Large Room Average Average
Very Large Room Poor Poor

(* Approximate Room sizes: Small < 100sq. ft / 9 m2, Mid-size: 100-220 sq. ft / 9-20 m2, Large 220-400 sq. ft / 20-36 m2, Very Large: > 400 sq. ft / 36 m2. Average Floor Height: 9" / 2.7m. Typical room sizes differ from country to country, and the actual listening experience changes depending on floor height, room shape, surface materials, listening position, speaker locations, etc.)

The sections below take each area in turn: drivers, frequency response, physical size and what you get in the box.


Drivers

Both 265 RT and 255C-RT are 2-way speakers.

Tweeter - 1 inchWoofer - 6.5 inchWoofer - 6.5 inch
Polk Audio 265 RT
Woofer - 5.25 inchTweeter - 1 inchWoofer - 5.25 inch
Polk Audio 255C-RT

TweeterWoofer

Front view, drawn to scale - cabinets and drivers share one scale, so sizes are directly comparable. Hover a driver for its size.

Driver Polk Audio 265 RT Polk Audio 255C-RT
Driver Setup 2-way 2-way
Tweeter 1-inch 1-inch
Midrange - -
Woofer 2 x 6.5-inch 2 x 5.25-inch

265 RT features a 1" Soft-Dome Tweeter and 2 x 6.5" Polymer Composite Woofer. On the other hand, the 255C-RT features a 1" Soft-Dome Tweeter and 2 x 5.25" Polymer Composite Woofer.

Frequency Response

265 RT has a frequency range of 45-25kHz whereas 255C-RT has a frequency range of 50-25kHz. With a minimum frequency of 45Hz, the 265 RT can go significantly deeper on the low side and provide stronger bass compared to the 255C-RT's min frequency of 50Hz.

The graph below depicts how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average Low Frequency values of other speakers in the In-wall class in our database.

Low Frequency

In-wall Speakers

265 RT
255C-RT
Min
Average
Median

Neither pair reaches down to 20Hz, the usual definition of full-range, which is normal for speakers of this size. If you want the bottom octave for movies or bass-heavy music, add a subwoofer to whichever you choose. Visit our Powered Subwoofers section to find out more about the available options.

Impedance and Sensitivity

265 RT and 255C-RT have the same Impedance of 8 ohms but where they differ is the sensitivity levels. 265 RT sensitivity is rated at 91 dB and the 255C-RT's is at 90 dB. This 1 dB difference makes the Polk Audio 265 RT a more sensitive speaker compared to Polk Audio 255C-RT, hence will play louder with the same amount of watts.

Sensitivity

In-wall Speakers

265 RT
255C-RT
Min
Average
Median

Power Range

Power range is the range of input power in watts RMS that a loudspeaker is designed to handle. Staying within that range gives nominal performance; driving the speaker beyond its maximum wattage can damage it.

265 RT can handle a max power of 200 watts RMS, whereas 255C-RT has a max power handling value of 150 watts RMS, 50 watts less than the 265 RT.

Note that higher power handling does not make a speaker louder: that depends mainly on sensitivity and impedance. The calculator below shows how loud each of these actually plays on a real amplifier.

Which plays louder on your amplifier?

Starting with a popular amplifier - change it to the one you own, or any you are considering, and watch both numbers move.

Polk Audio 265 RT
 
Polk Audio 255C-RT
 

Input Type and Bi-Amping / Bi-Wiring

265 RT features Spring post type posts and 255C-RT has a Spring post type posts. None of these speakers feature bi-amping/bi-wiring.

Physical Specs

The size of a speaker can sometimes be an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare Polk Audio 265 RT's and Polk Audio 255C-RT's external dimensions. Polk Audio 265 RT has external dimensions of 488.0 x 185.0 x 90.4mm (19.1875-inch x 7.2500-inch x 0.0000-inch) whereas Polk Audio 255C-RT has external dimensions of 193.0 x 332.0 x 98.4mm (7.5625-inch x 13.0625-inch x 0.0000-inch).

Polk Audio 265 RT is 147mm narrower and 8mm less deeper than Polk Audio 255C-RT but it is also 295mm taller.

Below you can see the front view size comparison of Polk Audio 265 RT and Polk Audio 255C-RT in scale.

Polk Audio 265 RT vs Polk Audio 255C-RT Size Comparison - Front View
Comparison image of Polk Audio 265 RT and Polk Audio 255C-RT Size and External Dimensions

What's in the Box of Polk Audio 265 RT?

Here are the items that are included inside the box of 265 RT:
  • In-wall speaker
  • Foam rubber port plug
  • White metal grille
  • Mounting template
  • Owners Manual
  • Sheer-Grille Painting instructions
  • Online Registration Card
  • Polk Audio product brochure

What's in the Box of Polk Audio 255C-RT?

Here are the items that come with the 255C-RT:
  • In-wall center-channel loudspeaker
  • White metal grille
  • Mounting template
  • Owners Manual
  • Sheer-Grille Painting instructions
  • Online Registration Card
  • Polk Audio product brochure


Reasons to choose Polk Audio 265 RT over Polk Audio 255C-RT

Max Input Power 200 watts vs 150 watts Handle more power from your amplifier
Sensitivity 91 dB vs 90 dB Play louder with same amount of amplification power
Woofer Size 6.5 inches vs 5.25 inches Larger woofer
Low Frequency Response 45 Hz vs 50 Hz Generates deeper bass
Base Surface Area 167cm2 vs 326cm2 Takes less floor space

Reasons to choose Polk Audio 255C-RT over Polk Audio 265 RT

Height 193mm vs 488mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces
Price per pair* 398USD vs 558USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)

Polk Audio 265 RT vs Polk Audio 255C-RT Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications
General Polk Audio 265 RT Polk Audio 255C-RT
Brand Polk Audio Polk Audio
Speaker Type Passive In-wall Speaker Passive In-wall Speaker
Power Range 10-200 watts 10-150 watts
Sensitivity 91 dB 90 dB
Impedance 8 ohms 8 ohms
Frequency Response 45-25kHz 50-25kHz
Drivers
Woofer Quantity 2 2
Woofer Size 6.5" 5.25"
Woofer Composition Polymer Composite Polymer Composite
Woofer Surround Material Rubber Rubber
Tweeter Size 1" 1"
Tweeter Type Soft-Dome Soft-Dome
Aimable Tweeter No No
Midrange Driver No No
Physical Specs
Height 488.0mm (19.2") 193.0mm (7.6")
Width 185.0mm (7.3") 332.0mm (13.1")
Depth 90.4mm (3.6") 98.4mm (3.9")
Enclosure In-wall In-wall
Moisture Resistancy No No
Connections
Biamp Inputs No No
Other
Parts Warranty Lifetime Lifetime
Labor Warranty Lifetime Lifetime

Verdict

Siblings in Polk Audio's RT series, so they share a family sound. It comes down to size, output and price.

AreaBetterWhy
BassAPolk Audio 265 RT digs deeper - 45Hz against 50Hz. A subwoofer would even that out.
Amplifier needsevenly matchedSimilar sensitivity (91dB vs 90dB) - both want much the same power.
HeadroomAPolk Audio 265 RT takes more power (200W vs 150W) - more in hand in a big room.
SizedependsPolk Audio 255C-RT is easier to place; Polk Audio 265 RT is bigger, which usually goes with fuller bass. Your room decides.
PriceBPolk Audio 255C-RT is cheaper - $398 against $558, about 29% less.

A Polk Audio 265 RT  B Polk Audio 255C-RT
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both speakers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.

Which should you choose?

The usual trade-off: Polk Audio 265 RT measures better, Polk Audio 255C-RT costs about about 40% more% less. Whether that gap is worth the money is the call only you can make - and in a normal room it is often smaller than the numbers suggest. If a subwoofer is in your plans, the bass gap largely stops mattering - you would be crossing over above 50Hz anyway, which makes the cheaper Polk Audio 255C-RT much easier to justify. Think about the whole system, not just the speakers: the roughly $160 saved by taking the cheaper pair would buy a subwoofer or a better amplifier, and either usually does more for the sound than the difference between these two.

And remember what a spec sheet cannot show: how each looks in your room and whether the finish suits it, what dealer support and warranty are like where you live, and how they actually sound to you. If you can hear them first - ideally with your own music - that will tell you more than any number above.


Most Popular Speakers
Klipsch Reference R-51M
Klipsch R-51M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
2-way | 87 dB | 6 ohms
Wharfedale Elysian 2
Wharfedale Elysian 2
3-way | 89 dB | 4 ohms
KEF Q150
KEF Q150
2-way | 86 dB | 8 ohms
Bowers & Wilkins 606 S2 Anniversary Edition
B&W 606 S2
2-way | 88 dB | 8 ohms
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-500M
Klipsch RP-500M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
Wharfedale EVO5.1
Wharfedale EVO5.1
2-way | 87 dB | 4 ohms
Wharfedale EVO4.1
Wharfedale EVO4.1
2-way | 87 dB | 8 ohms
This site contains affiliate links. We may be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through one of them. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Copyright © 2026 by SpeakerDecision
About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

Report a Correction