In this review, we will be comparing 265 RT and R-5502-W II, two Passive In-wall speakers from Polk Audio and Klipsch. Let's have a brief look at the main features
of Polk Audio 265 RT and Klipsch R-5502-W II first before getting into our more
detailed comparison.
Polk Audio 265 RT Key Specs
- 2-way Design
- 1" Soft-Dome Tweeter
- 2 x 6.5" Polymer Composite Woofer
- 45-25kHz Frequency Response
- 91 dB Sensitivity
- Impedance: 8ohms
- Power Range:10-200watts
- Dimensions (H x W x D): 488.0" x 7.2500" x 0.0000"
Klipsch R-5502-W II Key Specs
- 2-way Design
- 1" Horn-loaded Tweeter
- 2 x 5.25" Cerametallic Woofer
- 46-20kHz Frequency Response
- 92 dB Sensitivity
- Impedance: 8ohms
- Power Range:up to 75watts
- Dimensions (H x W x D): 416.0" x 6.5000" x 3.3750"( 416.0 x 166.0 x 86.0mm )
What size room are the Polk Audio 265 RT and Klipsch R-5502-W II speakers good for?
The size of the room in which you are planning to use these loudspeakers is an important decision factor. Here we have compared their suitability to various sizes of environments considering their size and max power parameters:
| Listening Environment* |
Polk Audio 265 RT |
Klipsch R-5502-W II |
| Near-field |
Poor |
Good |
| Small Room |
Average |
Good |
| Mid-size Room |
Good |
Average |
| Large Room |
Average |
Poor |
| Very Large Room |
Poor |
No way |
(* Approximate Room sizes: Small < 100sq. ft / 9 m2, Mid-size: 100-220 sq. ft / 9-20 m2, Large 220-400 sq. ft / 20-36 m2, Very Large: > 400 sq. ft / 36 m2.
Average Floor Height: 9" / 2.7m. Typical room sizes differ from country to country, and the actual listening experience changes depending on floor height, room shape, surface materials, listening position, speaker locations, etc.)
In the following sections, we will get into more detail in order to better understand how the Polk Audio 265 RT and Klipsch R-5502-W II compare and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one of these loudspeakers is the better choice for you.
**This post contains affiliate links, and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking
through my links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Drivers
Both 265 RT and R-5502-W II are 2-way speakers.
| Driver |
Polk Audio 265 RT |
Klipsch R-5502-W II |
|
Driver Setup
|
2-way
|
2-way
|
|
Tweeter
|
1-inch
|
1-inch
|
|
Midrange
|
- |
- |
|
Woofer
|
2 x 6.5-inch
|
2 x 5.25-inch
|
265 RT features a 1" Soft-Dome Tweeter and 2 x 6.5" Polymer Composite Woofer . On the other hand, the R-5502-W II features a 1" Horn-loaded Tweeter and 2 x 5.25" Cerametallic Woofer .
Frequency Response
265 RT has a frequency range of 45-25kHz whereas R-5502-W II has a frequency range of 46-20kHz. With a minimum frequency of 45Hz, the 265 RT can go slightly deeper then the R-5502-W II's min frequency of 46Hz.
Below graphs depict how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average values of the Min and Max Frequencies of other speakers in the In-wall class in our database.
Low Frequency
In-wall Speakers
High Frequency
In-wall Speakers
None of these speakers achieves full range experience which is commonly agreed as 20Hz-20kHz. In order to achieve lower lows / deeper bass, we recommend you pair these with a subwoofer. Visit our Powered Subwoofers section to find out more about the available options.
Impedance and Sensitivity
265 RT and R-5502-W II have the same Impedance of 8 ohms but where they differ is the sensitivity levels. 265 RT sensitivity is rated at 91 dB and the R-5502-W II's is at 92 dB. This 1 dB difference makes the Klipsch R-5502-W II a more sensitive speaker compared to Polk Audio 265 RT, hence will play louder with the same amount of watts.
Sensitivity
In-wall Speakers
Power Range
Power
range is the range of input power in watts RMS that a loudspeaker is designed to handle. While using an amplifier within this range ensures the nominal performance , inputting a power that is higher than the max wattage can result in a damaged speaker.
265 RT can handle a max power of 200 watts RMS from the amp the whereas R-5502-W II has a max power handling value of 75 watts RMS, 125 watts less than the 265 RT.
Keep in mind that a higher max power handling value doesn't necessarily make that a louder speaker
compared to a lower max handling speaker. Loudness or the sound level is also impacted by parameters
such as Impedance, sensitivity and system efficiencies.
Input Type and Bi-Amping / Bi-Wiring
265 RT features Spring post type posts and R-5502-W II has a Spring post type posts. None of these speakers feature bi-amping/bi-wiring.
Physical Specs
Size of a speaker can sometimes become an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare Polk Audio 265 RT's and Klipsch R-5502-W II's external dimensions. Polk Audio 265 RT has external dimensions of ( 19.1875-inch x 7.2500-inch x 0.0000-inch) whereas Klipsch R-5502-W II has external dimensions of 416.0 x 166.0 x 86.0mm ( 16.3750-inch x 6.5000-inch x 3.3750-inch) .
Klipsch R-5502-W II is 19mm narrower and 72mm shorter than Polk Audio 265 RT but it is also 86mm deeper.
What's in the Box of Polk Audio 265 RT?
Here are the items that are included inside the box of 265 RT:
In-wall speakerFoam rubber port plugWhite metal grilleMounting templateOwners ManualSheer-Grille Painting instructionsOnline Registration CardPolk Audio product brochure
What's in the Box of Klipsch R-5502-W II?
Here are the items that come with the R-5502-W II:
In-wall speakerWhite metal mesh grilleCardboard templateOwners Manual (En/Fr/Sp)
Max Input Power 
Woofer Size 
High Frequency Response 
Base Surface Area 
Sensitivity 
Height 
Price per pair*