SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS
    • By Type
      Passive Bookshelf Speakers Passive Floor-standing Speakers Passive Center Channel Speakers Passive In-wall Speakers All Passive Speakers Powered Subwoofers Powered Stereo Speakers
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Front Firing Port Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      By Brand
      Acoustic Energy Aperion ATC Audio-Technica Audioengine Bluesound Bowers Wilkins Buchardt Cambridge Audio Canton DALI Definitive Technology Dynaudio ELAC Emotiva Fluance Focal Fyne Audio Genelec GoldenEar Harbeth Jamo JBL Kanto KEF KLH Klipsch Leak Mackie Magnepan MartinLogan McIntosh Mission MoFi Monitor Audio Nuvo Onkyo OSD Paradigm Perlisten Polk Audio PS Audio PSB Q Acoustics REL Revel Russound Sennheiser Sonos Sonus faber Sony Spendor SVS Tannoy Technics Triangle Velodyne Victrola Wharfedale Wilson Audio Yamaha
  • AMPLIFIERS
    • By Type
      All Amplifiers Integrated Amplifiers Stereo Receivers Streaming Amplifiers Power Amplifiers Compact Amplifiers
      By Power
      Up to 60 watts 61 to 90 watts 91 to 120 watts 121 to 180 watts Over 180 watts
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      Home Theater
      All Home Theater Receivers Anthem ARCAM Denon Integra JBL Marantz McIntosh NAD Onkyo Sony Yamaha
      Headphone Amps
      All Headphone Amplifiers Cambridge Audio iFi Audio McIntosh Naim Pro-Ject Rotel Schiit Audio Sennheiser Yamaha
      Multi-Zone
      All Multi-Zone Amplifiers JBL McIntosh OSD Rotel Russound Sonos
      By Brand
      Accuphase Advance Paris Anthem Arcam Audio Research AudioControl Audioengine Audiolab Bluesound Bose Buchardt Cambridge Audio Denon Devialet ELAC Emotiva Eversolo FiiO Fosi Audio Hegel HiFi Rose Integra JBL LEAK Luxman Marantz Mark Levinson McIntosh Michi MISSION MOON Musical Fidelity NAD Naim Onkyo OSD Parasound Pass Labs Peachtree PrimaLuna Primare PS Audio Rega Rogue Audio Roksan Rotel Schiit Audio Sonos Sony SVS T+A TEAC Technics Vincent WiiM Yamaha
  • SMART FIND
  • TOOLS
  • BLOG
  1. Home
  2. Passive In-wall Speakers
  3. Polk Audio 265-LS vs Klipsch R-5502-W II

Polk Audio 265-LS vs Klipsch R-5502-W II Comparison

x
Speaker to replace
Change

Polk Audio 265-LS

Passive In-wall | 28-33kHz

Polk Audio 265-LS
Check price atAmazon›
Change
    
Klipsch R-5502-W II

Passive In-wall | 46-20kHz

Klipsch R-5502-W II
Check price atAmazon›
Polk Audio 265-LS Polk Audio 265-LS
Check price atAmazon›
Klipsch R-5502-W II Klipsch R-5502-W II
Check price atAmazon›
Polk Audio 265-LS
See at AMAZON
Klipsch R-5502-W II
See at AMAZON

Polk Audio 265-LS vs Klipsch R-5502-W II Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing 265-LS and R-5502-W II, two Passive In-wall speakers from Polk Audio and Klipsch.

Let's have a brief look at the main features of Polk Audio 265-LS and Klipsch R-5502-W II first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Key SpecsPolk Audio 265-LSKlipsch R-5502-W II
BrandPolk Audio
United States · founded 1972
Klipsch
United States · founded 1946
Design3-way2-way
Tweeter1" Ring Radiator1" Horn-loaded
Midrange6.5"—
Woofer6.5" Aerated polypropylene2 x 5.25" Cerametallic
Frequency response28-33kHz46-20kHz
Sensitivity91 dB92 dB
Impedance8 ohms8 ohms
Power range10-200 wattsup to 75 watts
Weight4.09kg / 9lbs2.95kg / 6.5lbs
Dimensions (H x W x D)19.1875" x 7.2500" x 3-3/4"
488.0 x 185.0 x 95.3mm
16.3750" x 6.5000" x 3.3750"
416.0 x 166.0 x 86.0mm

What size room are the Polk Audio 265-LS and Klipsch R-5502-W II speakers good for?

The size of the room in which you are planning to use these loudspeakers is an important decision factor. Here we have compared their suitability to various sizes of environments considering their size and max power parameters:

Listening Environment* Polk Audio 265-LS Klipsch R-5502-W II
Near-field Poor Good
Small Room Average Good
Mid-size Room Good Average
Large Room Average Poor
Very Large Room Poor No way

(* Approximate Room sizes: Small < 100sq. ft / 9 m2, Mid-size: 100-220 sq. ft / 9-20 m2, Large 220-400 sq. ft / 20-36 m2, Very Large: > 400 sq. ft / 36 m2. Average Floor Height: 9" / 2.7m. Typical room sizes differ from country to country, and the actual listening experience changes depending on floor height, room shape, surface materials, listening position, speaker locations, etc.)

The sections below take each area in turn: drivers, frequency response, physical size and what you get in the box.


Drivers

One of the fundamental differences between these two speakers is that 265-LS is a 3-way design whereas the R-5502-W II is a 2-way speaker. 3-way designs utilize a midrange driver in addition to the tweeter and woofer on 2-way designs. Designing a crossover for a 3-way speaker is a complicated process and generally increases the overall cost of the speaker.

Tweeter - 1 inchMidrange - 6.5 inchWoofer - 6.5 inch
Polk Audio 265-LS
Tweeter - 1 inchWoofer - 5.25 inchWoofer - 5.25 inch
Klipsch R-5502-W II

TweeterMidrangeWoofer

Front view, drawn to scale - cabinets and drivers share one scale, so sizes are directly comparable. Hover a driver for its size.

Driver Polk Audio 265-LS Klipsch R-5502-W II
Driver Setup 3-way 2-way
Tweeter 1-inch 1-inch
Midrange 1 x 6.5-inch -
Woofer 1 x 6.5-inch 2 x 5.25-inch

265-LS features a 1" Ring Radiator Tweeter, a 6.5" Midrange and 1 x 6.5" Aerated polypropylene Woofer. On the other hand, the R-5502-W II features a 1" Horn-loaded Tweeter and 2 x 5.25" Cerametallic Woofer with a Crossover frequency at 2200 Hz.

Frequency Response

265-LS has a frequency range of 28-33kHz whereas R-5502-W II has a frequency range of 46-20kHz. With a minimum frequency of 28Hz, the 265-LS can go significantly deeper on the low side and provide stronger bass compared to the R-5502-W II's min frequency of 46Hz.

The graph below depicts how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average Low Frequency values of other speakers in the In-wall class in our database.

Low Frequency

In-wall Speakers

265-LS
R-5502-W II
Min
Average
Median

Neither pair reaches down to 20Hz, the usual definition of full-range, which is normal for speakers of this size. If you want the bottom octave for movies or bass-heavy music, add a subwoofer to whichever you choose. Visit our Powered Subwoofers section to find out more about the available options.

Impedance and Sensitivity

265-LS and R-5502-W II have the same Impedance of 8 ohms but where they differ is the sensitivity levels. 265-LS sensitivity is rated at 91 dB and the R-5502-W II's is at 92 dB. This 1 dB difference makes the Klipsch R-5502-W II a more sensitive speaker compared to Polk Audio 265-LS, hence will play louder with the same amount of watts.

Sensitivity

In-wall Speakers

265-LS
R-5502-W II
Min
Average
Median

Power Range

Power range is the range of input power in watts RMS that a loudspeaker is designed to handle. Staying within that range gives nominal performance; driving the speaker beyond its maximum wattage can damage it.

265-LS can handle a max power of 200 watts RMS, whereas R-5502-W II has a max power handling value of 75 watts RMS, 125 watts less than the 265-LS.

Note that higher power handling does not make a speaker louder: that depends mainly on sensitivity and impedance. The calculator below shows how loud each of these actually plays on a real amplifier.

Which plays louder on your amplifier?

Starting with a popular amplifier - change it to the one you own, or any you are considering, and watch both numbers move.

Polk Audio 265-LS
 
Klipsch R-5502-W II
 

Input Type and Bi-Amping / Bi-Wiring

265-LS features Spring post type posts and R-5502-W II has a Spring post type posts. None of these speakers feature bi-amping/bi-wiring.

Physical Specs

The size of a speaker can sometimes be an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare Polk Audio 265-LS's and Klipsch R-5502-W II's external dimensions. Polk Audio 265-LS has external dimensions of 488.0 x 185.0 x 95.3mm (19.1875-inch x 7.2500-inch x 0.0000-inch) whereas Klipsch R-5502-W II has external dimensions of 416.0 x 166.0 x 86.0mm (16.3750-inch x 6.5000-inch x 3.3750-inch).

Polk Audio 265-LS is clearly the larger of the two speakers. Its body is 19mm wider, 72mm taller and 9.3mm deeper than Klipsch R-5502-W II.

Weight Comparison

The weight of a loudspeaker can become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often. Weight of a speaker can also "sometimes" be an indicator of the rigidity of the enclosure and the quality of the internal components used. The Polk Audio 265-LS weighs 4.09kg / 9lbs and the Klipsch R-5502-W II weighs 2.95kg / 6.5lbs. This makes the 265-LS 39% heavier than the R-5502-W II.

Here is a comparison of how 265-LS and R-5502-W II's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Passive In-wall class.

Weight
All In-wall Speakers
Polk Audio 265-LS
Klipsch R-5502-W II
Min
Average
Max

What's in the Box of Polk Audio 265-LS?

Here are the items that are included inside the box of 265-LS:
  • In-wall loudspeaker
  • White metal grille
  • Power Port plug
  • Mounting template
  • Owners Manual

What's in the Box of Klipsch R-5502-W II?

Here are the items that come with the R-5502-W II:
  • In-wall speaker
  • White metal mesh grille
  • Cardboard template
  • Owners Manual (En/Fr/Sp)


Reasons to choose Polk Audio 265-LS over Klipsch R-5502-W II

Max Input Power 200 watts vs 75 watts Handle more power from your amplifier
Driver Setup 3-way vs 2-way Have a dedicated mid-range driver
Woofer Size 6.5 inches vs 5.25 inches Larger woofer
Low Frequency Response 28 Hz vs 46 Hz Generates deeper bass
High Frequency Response 33k Hz vs 20k Hz Generates higher frequency

Reasons to choose Klipsch R-5502-W II over Polk Audio 265-LS

Sensitivity 92 dB vs 91 dB Play louder with same amount of amplification power
Number of Woofers 2 vs 1 More woofers
Height 416mm vs 488mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces
Base Surface Area 142cm2 vs 176cm2 Takes less floor space
Price per pair* 498USD vs 758USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)

Polk Audio 265-LS vs Klipsch R-5502-W II Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications
General Polk Audio 265-LS Klipsch R-5502-W II
Brand Polk Audio Klipsch
Speaker Type Passive In-wall Speaker Passive In-wall Speaker
Power Range 10-200 watts up to 75 watts
Sensitivity 91 dB 92 dB
Impedance 8 ohms 8 ohms
Frequency Response 28-33kHz 46-20kHz
Drivers
Woofer Quantity 1 2
Woofer Size 6.5" 5.25"
Woofer Composition Aerated polypropylene Cerametallic
Woofer Surround Material Rubber Rubber
Tweeter Size 1" 1"
Tweeter Type Ring Radiator Horn-loaded
Aimable Tweeter No No
Midrange Driver 6.5" No
Crossover Frequency n/a 2200 Hz
Physical Specs
Height 488.0mm (19.2") 416.0mm (16.4")
Width 185.0mm (7.3") 166.0mm (6.5")
Depth 95.3mm (3.8") 86.0mm (3.4")
Weight 4.09kg (9lbs) 2.95kg (6.5lbs)
Enclosure In-wall In-wall
Moisture Resistancy No No
Connections
Biamp Inputs No No
Other
Parts Warranty Lifetime Ltd. Lifetime
Labor Warranty Lifetime Ltd. Lifetime

Verdict

A generation apart: Klipsch R-5502-W II is the newer design, against a 2010 model. Newer is not automatically better, but the older one is more likely to be discounted or near run-out.

AreaBetterWhy
BassAPolk Audio 265-LS digs deeper - 28Hz against 46Hz.
Amplifier needsevenly matchedSimilar sensitivity (91dB vs 92dB) - both want much the same power.
HeadroomAPolk Audio 265-LS takes more power (200W vs 75W) - more in hand in a big room.
SizedependsKlipsch R-5502-W II is easier to place; Polk Audio 265-LS is bigger, which usually goes with fuller bass. Your room decides.
ExpandabilitydependsNeither adds bi-amping, a sub output or height drivers. Klipsch R-5502-W II sits in a wider range (7 models), so a matched surround system is easier later.
PriceBKlipsch R-5502-W II is cheaper - $498 against $758, about 34% less.

A Polk Audio 265-LS  B Klipsch R-5502-W II
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both speakers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.

Which should you choose?

The usual trade-off: Polk Audio 265-LS measures better, Klipsch R-5502-W II costs about about 52% more% less. Whether that gap is worth the money is the call only you can make - and in a normal room it is often smaller than the numbers suggest. If a subwoofer is in your plans, the bass gap largely stops mattering - you would be crossing over above 46Hz anyway, which makes the cheaper Klipsch R-5502-W II much easier to justify. Match it to your room: we rate Polk Audio 265-LS the better fit for a mid-size room and a large room, and Klipsch R-5502-W II for near-field listening and a small room.

And remember what a spec sheet cannot show: how each looks in your room and whether the finish suits it, what dealer support and warranty are like where you live, and how they actually sound to you. If you can hear them first - ideally with your own music - that will tell you more than any number above.


Most Popular Speakers
Klipsch Reference R-51M
Klipsch R-51M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
2-way | 87 dB | 6 ohms
Wharfedale Elysian 2
Wharfedale Elysian 2
3-way | 89 dB | 4 ohms
KEF Q150
KEF Q150
2-way | 86 dB | 8 ohms
Bowers & Wilkins 606 S2 Anniversary Edition
B&W 606 S2
2-way | 88 dB | 8 ohms
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-500M
Klipsch RP-500M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
Wharfedale EVO5.1
Wharfedale EVO5.1
2-way | 87 dB | 4 ohms
Wharfedale EVO4.1
Wharfedale EVO4.1
2-way | 87 dB | 8 ohms
This site contains affiliate links. We may be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through one of them. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Copyright © 2026 by SpeakerDecision
About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

Report a Correction