SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS
    • By Type
      Passive Bookshelf Speakers Passive Floor-standing Speakers Passive Center Channel Speakers Passive In-wall Speakers All Passive Speakers Powered Subwoofers Powered Stereo Speakers
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Front Firing Port Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      By Brand
      Acoustic Energy Aperion ATC Audio-Technica Audioengine Bluesound Bowers Wilkins Buchardt Cambridge Audio Canton DALI Definitive Technology Dynaudio ELAC Emotiva Fluance Focal Fyne Audio Genelec GoldenEar Harbeth Jamo JBL Kanto KEF KLH Klipsch Leak Mackie Magnepan MartinLogan McIntosh Mission MoFi Monitor Audio Nuvo Onkyo OSD Paradigm Perlisten Polk Audio PS Audio PSB Q Acoustics REL Revel Russound Sennheiser Sonos Sonus faber Sony Spendor SVS Tannoy Technics Triangle Velodyne Victrola Wharfedale Wilson Audio Yamaha
  • AMPLIFIERS
    • By Type
      All Amplifiers Integrated Amplifiers Stereo Receivers Streaming Amplifiers Power Amplifiers Compact Amplifiers
      By Power
      Up to 60 watts 61 to 90 watts 91 to 120 watts 121 to 180 watts Over 180 watts
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      Home Theater
      All Home Theater Receivers Anthem ARCAM Denon Integra JBL Marantz McIntosh NAD Onkyo Sony Yamaha
      Headphone Amps
      All Headphone Amplifiers Cambridge Audio iFi Audio McIntosh Naim Pro-Ject Rotel Schiit Audio Sennheiser Yamaha
      Multi-Zone
      All Multi-Zone Amplifiers JBL McIntosh OSD Rotel Russound Sonos
      By Brand
      Accuphase Advance Paris Anthem Arcam Audio Research AudioControl Audioengine Audiolab Bluesound Bose Buchardt Cambridge Audio Cayin Denon Devialet ELAC Emotiva Eversolo FiiO Fosi Audio Hegel HiFi Rose Integra JBL Layer Audio Design LEAK Luxman Marantz Mark Levinson McIntosh Michi MISSION MOON Musical Fidelity NAD Naim Onkyo OSD Parasound Pass Labs Peachtree PrimaLuna Primare PS Audio Rega Rogue Audio Roksan Rotel Schiit Audio Sonos Sony SVS T+A TEAC Technics Vincent WiiM Yamaha
  • SOUNDBARS
    • Soundbars
      Soundbars Home All Soundbars (filter + sort) Size Simulator
      By TV Size
      43-50 inch TVs 55 inch TVs 65 inch and larger
      By Feature
      Dolby Atmos height channels Subwoofer included Can add rear speakers Compact (30 in or narrower) Under $500
      By Brand
      Bluesound Bose Denon Devialet Dual Furrion Harman Kardon JBL KEF Klipsch Marshall Polk Audio Samsung Sennheiser Sonos Sony WiiM Yamaha
  • SMART FIND
  • TOOLS
  • BLOG
  1. Home
  2. Passive In-wall Speakers
  3. Polk Audio 255c-LS vs Polk Audio 65 RT

Polk Audio 255c-LS vs Polk Audio 65 RT Comparison

x
Speaker to replace
Change

Polk Audio 255c-LS

Passive In-wall | 44-29kHz

Polk Audio 255c-LS
Check price atAmazon›
Change
    
Polk Audio 65 RT

Passive In-wall | 50-25kHz

Polk Audio 65 RT
Check price atAmazon›
Polk Audio 255c-LS Polk Audio 255c-LS
Check price atAmazon›
Polk Audio 65 RT Polk Audio 65 RT
Check price atAmazon›
Polk Audio 255c-LS
See at AMAZON
Polk Audio 65 RT
See at AMAZON

Polk Audio 255c-LS vs Polk Audio 65 RT Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing 255c-LS and 65 RT, two Passive In-wall speakers by Polk Audio.

Let's have a brief look at the main features of Polk Audio 255c-LS and Polk Audio 65 RT first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Key SpecsPolk Audio 255c-LSPolk Audio 65 RT
BrandPolk Audio
United States · founded 1972
Polk Audio
United States · founded 1972
Design2-way2-way
Tweeter1.0" Ring radiator1" Soft-Dome
Woofer2 x 5.25" Aerated polypropylene6.5" Polymer Composite
Frequency response44-29kHz50-25kHz
Sensitivity91 dB90 dB
Impedance8 ohms8 ohms
Power range10-150 watts10-125 watts
Weight3.12kg / 6.9lbs—
Dimensions (H x W x D)7.6250" x 13.1250" x 7-3/8"
194.0 x 334.0 x 187.5mm
12.7500" x 7.2500" x 3-1/2"
324.0 x 185.0 x 88.9mm

What size room are the Polk Audio 255c-LS and Polk Audio 65 RT speakers good for?

The size of the room in which you are planning to use these loudspeakers is an important decision factor. Here we have compared their suitability to various sizes of environments considering their size and max power parameters:

Listening Environment* Polk Audio 255c-LS Polk Audio 65 RT
Near-field Poor Poor
Small Room Average Average
Mid-size Room Good Good
Large Room Average Average
Very Large Room Poor Poor

(* Approximate Room sizes: Small < 100sq. ft / 9 m2, Mid-size: 100-220 sq. ft / 9-20 m2, Large 220-400 sq. ft / 20-36 m2, Very Large: > 400 sq. ft / 36 m2. Average Floor Height: 9" / 2.7m. Typical room sizes differ from country to country, and the actual listening experience changes depending on floor height, room shape, surface materials, listening position, speaker locations, etc.)

The sections below take each area in turn: drivers, frequency response, physical size and what you get in the box.


Drivers

Both 255c-LS and 65 RT are 2-way speakers.

Woofer - 5.25 inchTweeter - 1 inchWoofer - 5.25 inch
Polk Audio 255c-LS
Tweeter - 1 inchWoofer - 6.5 inch
Polk Audio 65 RT

TweeterWoofer

Front view, drawn to scale - cabinets and drivers share one scale, so sizes are directly comparable. Hover a driver for its size.

Driver Polk Audio 255c-LS Polk Audio 65 RT
Driver Setup 2-way 2-way
Tweeter 1.0-inch 1-inch
Midrange - -
Woofer 2 x 5.25-inch 1 x 6.5-inch

255c-LS features a 1.0" Ring radiator Tweeter and 2 x 5.25" Aerated polypropylene Woofer. On the other hand, the 65 RT features a 1" Soft-Dome Tweeter and 1 x 6.5" Polymer Composite Woofer.

Frequency Response

255c-LS has a frequency range of 44-29kHz whereas 65 RT has a frequency range of 50-25kHz. With a minimum frequency of 44Hz, the 255c-LS can go significantly deeper on the low side and provide stronger bass compared to the 65 RT's min frequency of 50Hz.

The graph below depicts how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average Low Frequency values of other speakers in the In-wall class in our database.

Low Frequency

In-wall Speakers

255c-LS
65 RT
Min
Average
Median

Neither pair reaches down to 20Hz, the usual definition of full-range, which is normal for speakers of this size. If you want the bottom octave for movies or bass-heavy music, add a subwoofer to whichever you choose. Visit our Powered Subwoofers section to find out more about the available options.

Impedance and Sensitivity

255c-LS and 65 RT have the same Impedance of 8 ohms but where they differ is the sensitivity levels. 255c-LS sensitivity is rated at 91 dB and the 65 RT's is at 90 dB. This 1 dB difference makes the Polk Audio 255c-LS a more sensitive speaker compared to Polk Audio 65 RT, hence will play louder with the same amount of watts.

Sensitivity

In-wall Speakers

255c-LS
65 RT
Min
Average
Median

Power Range

Power range is the range of input power in watts RMS that a loudspeaker is designed to handle. Staying within that range gives nominal performance; driving the speaker beyond its maximum wattage can damage it.

255c-LS can handle a max power of 150 watts RMS, whereas 65 RT has a max power handling value of 125 watts RMS, 25 watts less than the 255c-LS.

Note that higher power handling does not make a speaker louder: that depends mainly on sensitivity and impedance. The calculator below shows how loud each of these actually plays on a real amplifier.

Which plays louder on your amplifier?

Starting with a popular amplifier - change it to the one you own, or any you are considering, and watch both numbers move.

Polk Audio 255c-LS
 
Polk Audio 65 RT
 

Input Type and Bi-Amping / Bi-Wiring

255c-LS features Spring post type posts and 65 RT has a Spring post type posts. None of these speakers feature bi-amping/bi-wiring.

Physical Specs

The size of a speaker can sometimes be an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare Polk Audio 255c-LS's and Polk Audio 65 RT's external dimensions. Polk Audio 255c-LS has external dimensions of 194.0 x 334.0 x 187.5mm (7.6250-inch x 13.1250-inch x 0.0000-inch) whereas Polk Audio 65 RT has external dimensions of 324.0 x 185.0 x 88.9mm (12.7500-inch x 7.2500-inch x 0.0000-inch).

Polk Audio 65 RT is 149mm narrower and 98.6mm less deeper than Polk Audio 255c-LS but it is also 130mm taller.

Size, drawn to scale

FRONTPolk Audio 255c-LS front: 334 x 194 mm (13.1 x 7.6 in)Polk Audio 65 RT front: 185 x 324 mm (7.3 x 12.8 in)Polk Audio 255c-LS334 × 194 mmPolk Audio 65 RT185 × 324 mmTOP / FOOTPRINTPolk Audio 255c-LS footprint: 334 x 188 mm (13.1 x 7.4 in)Polk Audio 65 RT footprint: 185 x 89 mm (7.3 x 3.5 in)Polk Audio 255c-LS334 × 188 mmPolk Audio 65 RT185 × 89 mm
Both speakers and both views share one scale, so everything here is directly comparable. Hover a box for its dimensions.

One scale for both, standing on the same surface and pushed back to the same wall, so the deeper one visibly sticks out further.

Polk Audio 255c-LS needs about 281% more floor or shelf area. Polk Audio 255c-LS is 99mm deeper, so it stands that much further out from the wall. Polk Audio 65 RT is 130mm taller.

What's in the Box of Polk Audio 255c-LS?

Here are the items that are included inside the box of 255c-LS:
  • In-wall loudspeaker
  • White metal grille
  • Mounting template
  • Owners Manual

What's in the Box of Polk Audio 65 RT?

Here are the items that come with the 65 RT:
  • Rectangular in-wall speaker
  • Foam rubber port plug
  • White metal grille
  • Mounting template
  • Owners Manual
  • Sheer-Grille Painting instructions
  • Online Registration Card
  • Polk Audio product brochure


Reasons to choose Polk Audio 255c-LS over Polk Audio 65 RT

Max Input Power 150 watts vs 125 watts Handle more power from your amplifier
Sensitivity 91 dB vs 90 dB Play louder with same amount of amplification power
Number of Woofers 2 vs 1 More woofers
Low Frequency Response 44 Hz vs 50 Hz Generates deeper bass
High Frequency Response 29k Hz vs 25k Hz Generates higher frequency
Height 194mm vs 324mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces

Reasons to choose Polk Audio 65 RT over Polk Audio 255c-LS

Woofer Size 6.5 inches vs 5.25 inches Larger woofer
Base Surface Area 164cm2 vs 626cm2 Takes less floor space
Price per pair* 398USD vs 598USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)

Polk Audio 255c-LS vs Polk Audio 65 RT Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications
General Polk Audio 255c-LS Polk Audio 65 RT
Brand Polk Audio Polk Audio
Speaker Type Passive In-wall Speaker Passive In-wall Speaker
Power Range 10-150 watts 10-125 watts
Sensitivity 91 dB 90 dB
Impedance 8 ohms 8 ohms
Frequency Response 44-29kHz 50-25kHz
Drivers
Woofer Quantity 2 1
Woofer Size 5.25" 6.5"
Woofer Composition Aerated polypropylene Polymer Composite
Woofer Surround Material Rubber Rubber
Tweeter Size 1.0" 1"
Tweeter Type Ring radiator Soft-Dome
Aimable Tweeter No Yes
Midrange Driver No No
Physical Specs
Height 194.0mm (7.6") 324.0mm (12.8")
Width 334.0mm (13.1") 185.0mm (7.3")
Depth 187.5mm (7.4") 88.9mm (3.5")
Weight 3.12kg (6.9lbs) n/a
Enclosure In-wall In-wall
Moisture Resistancy No No
Connections
Biamp Inputs No No
Other
Parts Warranty Lifetime Lifetime
Labor Warranty Lifetime Lifetime

Verdict

A generation apart: Polk Audio 65 RT is the newer design, against a 2010 model. Newer is not automatically better, but the older one is more likely to be discounted or near run-out.

AreaBetterWhy
BassAPolk Audio 255c-LS digs deeper - 44Hz against 50Hz. A subwoofer would even that out.
Amplifier needsevenly matchedSimilar sensitivity (91dB vs 90dB) - both want much the same power.
Headroomevenly matchedSimilar power handling (150W vs 125W).
SizedependsPolk Audio 65 RT is easier to place; Polk Audio 255c-LS is bigger, which usually goes with fuller bass. Your room decides.
PriceBPolk Audio 65 RT is cheaper - $398 against $598, about 33% less.

A Polk Audio 255c-LS  B Polk Audio 65 RT
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both speakers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.

Which should you choose?

Polk Audio 255c-LS is ahead, but only on 1 of the measured areas, and it costs about 50% more. That is a lot of money for a narrow margin on paper - Polk Audio 65 RT looks like the sensible buy unless something else about the Polk Audio 255c-LS appeals to you. If a subwoofer is in your plans, the bass gap largely stops mattering - you would be crossing over above 50Hz anyway, which makes the cheaper Polk Audio 65 RT much easier to justify. In a large or open-plan room, Polk Audio 255c-LS has the cabinet volume to fill it more easily; in a small room, near a wall or at desk distance, Polk Audio 65 RT is the easier speaker to get right.

And remember what a spec sheet cannot show: how each looks in your room and whether the finish suits it, what dealer support and warranty are like where you live, and how they actually sound to you. If you can hear them first - ideally with your own music - that will tell you more than any number above.


Most Popular Speakers
Klipsch Reference R-51M
Klipsch R-51M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
2-way | 87 dB | 6 ohms
Wharfedale Elysian 2
Wharfedale Elysian 2
3-way | 89 dB | 4 ohms
KEF Q150
KEF Q150
2-way | 86 dB | 8 ohms
Bowers & Wilkins 606 S2 Anniversary Edition
B&W 606 S2
2-way | 88 dB | 8 ohms
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-500M
Klipsch RP-500M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
Wharfedale EVO5.1
Wharfedale EVO5.1
2-way | 87 dB | 4 ohms
Wharfedale EVO4.1
Wharfedale EVO4.1
2-way | 87 dB | 8 ohms
This site contains affiliate links. We may be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through one of them. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Copyright © 2026 by SpeakerDecision
About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

Report a Correction