SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS
    • By Type
      Passive Bookshelf Speakers Passive Floor-standing Speakers Passive Center Channel Speakers Passive In-wall Speakers All Passive Speakers Powered Subwoofers Powered Stereo Speakers
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Front Firing Port Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      By Brand
      Acoustic Energy Aperion ATC Audio-Technica Audioengine Bluesound Bowers Wilkins Buchardt Cambridge Audio Canton DALI Definitive Technology Dynaudio ELAC Emotiva Fluance Focal Fyne Audio Genelec GoldenEar Harbeth Jamo JBL Kanto KEF KLH Klipsch Leak Mackie Magnepan MartinLogan McIntosh Mission MoFi Monitor Audio Nuvo Onkyo OSD Paradigm Perlisten Polk Audio PS Audio PSB Q Acoustics REL Revel Russound Sennheiser Sonos Sonus faber Sony Spendor SVS Tannoy Technics Triangle Velodyne Victrola Wharfedale Wilson Audio Yamaha
  • AMPLIFIERS
    • By Type
      All Amplifiers Integrated Amplifiers Stereo Receivers Streaming Amplifiers Power Amplifiers Compact Amplifiers
      By Power
      Up to 60 watts 61 to 90 watts 91 to 120 watts 121 to 180 watts Over 180 watts
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      Home Theater
      All Home Theater Receivers Anthem ARCAM Denon Integra JBL Marantz McIntosh NAD Onkyo Sony Yamaha
      Headphone Amps
      All Headphone Amplifiers Cambridge Audio iFi Audio McIntosh Naim Pro-Ject Rotel Schiit Audio Sennheiser Yamaha
      Multi-Zone
      All Multi-Zone Amplifiers JBL McIntosh OSD Rotel Russound Sonos
      By Brand
      Accuphase Advance Paris Anthem Arcam Audio Research AudioControl Audioengine Audiolab Bluesound Bose Buchardt Cambridge Audio Cayin Denon Devialet ELAC Emotiva Eversolo FiiO Fosi Audio Hegel HiFi Rose Integra JBL Layer Audio Design LEAK Luxman Marantz Mark Levinson McIntosh Michi MISSION MOON Musical Fidelity NAD Naim Onkyo OSD Parasound Pass Labs Peachtree PrimaLuna Primare PS Audio Rega Rogue Audio Roksan Rotel Schiit Audio Sonos Sony SVS T+A TEAC Technics Vincent WiiM Yamaha
  • SMART FIND
  • TOOLS
  • BLOG
  1. Home
  2. Passive Floor-standing Speakers
  3. Mission LX-5 MKII vs Jamo S 809

Mission LX-5 MKII vs Jamo S 809 Comparison

x
Speaker to replace
Change

Mission LX-5 MKII

Passive Floor-standing | 42-20k Hz

Mission LX-5 MKII
Check price atAmazon›
Change
    
Jamo S 809

Passive Floor-standing | 37-26k Hz

Jamo Studio S 809
Check price atAmazon›
Mission LX-5 MKII Mission LX-5 MKII
Check price atAmazon›
Jamo S 809 Jamo S 809
Check price atAmazon›
Mission LX-5 MKII
See at AMAZON
Jamo S 809
See at AMAZON

Mission LX-5 MKII vs Jamo S 809 Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing LX-5 MKII and S 809, two Passive Floor-standing speakers from Mission and Jamo.

Let's have a brief look at the main features of Mission LX-5 MKII and Jamo S 809 first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Key SpecsMission LX-5 MKIIJamo S 809
BrandMission
United Kingdom · founded 1977
Jamo
Denmark · founded 1966
Design2-way2-way
Tweeter1" Soft-Dome1"
Woofer2 x 6.5" Composite fibre3 x 5" Aluminized Polyfiber
Frequency response42-20k Hz37-26k Hz
Sensitivity90 dB90 dB
Impedance8 ohms8 ohms
Power range30-150 watts120 watts
Weight19.10kg / 42lbs13.60kg / 29.9lbs
Dimensions (H x W x D)39-3/16" x 8-7/8" x 12-1/8"
995.0 x 226.0 x 308.0mm
41.0" x 7.5" x 9.9"
1042.0 x 191.0 x 252.0mm

What size room are the Mission LX-5 MKII and Jamo S 809 speakers good for?

The size of the room in which you are planning to use these loudspeakers is an important decision factor. Here we have compared their suitability to various sizes of environments considering their size and max power parameters:

Listening Environment* Mission LX-5 MKII Jamo S 809
Near-field Bad Bad
Small Room Poor Poor
Mid-size Room Average Good
Large Room Good Good
Very Large Room Average Poor

(* Approximate Room sizes: Small < 100sq. ft / 9 m2, Mid-size: 100-220 sq. ft / 9-20 m2, Large 220-400 sq. ft / 20-36 m2, Very Large: > 400 sq. ft / 36 m2. Average Floor Height: 9" / 2.7m. Typical room sizes differ from country to country, and the actual listening experience changes depending on floor height, room shape, surface materials, listening position, speaker locations, etc.)

The sections below take each area in turn: drivers, frequency response, physical size and what you get in the box.


Drivers

Both LX-5 MKII and S 809 are 2-way speakers.

Tweeter - 1 inchWoofer - 6.5 inchWoofer - 6.5 inch
Mission LX-5 MKII
Tweeter - 1 inchWoofer - 5 inchWoofer - 5 inchWoofer - 5 inch
Jamo S 809

TweeterWoofer

Front view, drawn to scale - cabinets and drivers share one scale, so sizes are directly comparable. Hover a driver for its size.

Driver Mission LX-5 MKII Jamo S 809
Driver Setup 2-way 2-way
Tweeter 1-inch 1-inch
Midrange - -
Woofer 2 x 6.5-inch 3 x 5-inch

LX-5 MKII features a 1" Microfibre Soft-Dome Tweeter and 2 x 6.5" Composite fibre Woofer with a Crossover frequency at 2.3kHz. On the other hand, the S 809 features a 1" Tweeter and 3 x 5" Aluminized Polyfiber Woofer with a Crossover frequency at 2000Hz.

Mission LX-5 MKII driver frequency bandsMission LX-5 MKIIJamo S 80942-2.3k37-2kWoofer2.3k-20k2k-26kTweeter20501002005001k2k5k10k20k40kHz, log scale

Frequency Response

LX-5 MKII has a frequency range of 42-20k Hz whereas S 809 has a frequency range of 37-26k Hz. With a minimum frequency of 37Hz, the S 809 can go significantly deeper on the low side and provide stronger bass compared to the LX-5 MKII's min frequency of 42Hz.

The graph below depicts how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average Low Frequency values of other speakers in the Floor-standing class in our database.

Low Frequency

Floor-standing Speakers

LX-5 MKII
S 809
Min
Average
Median

Neither pair reaches down to 20Hz, the usual definition of full-range, which is normal for speakers of this size. If you want the bottom octave for movies or bass-heavy music, add a subwoofer to whichever you choose. Visit our Powered Subwoofers section to find out more about the available options.

Impedance and Sensitivity

LX-5 MKII and S 809 have the same Impedance of 8 ohms and their sensitivity is also same at 90 dB.

Sensitivity

Floor-standing Speakers

LX-5 MKII
S 809
Min
Average
Median

Power Range

Power range is the range of input power in watts RMS that a loudspeaker is designed to handle. Staying within that range gives nominal performance; driving the speaker beyond its maximum wattage can damage it.

LX-5 MKII can handle a max power of 150 watts RMS, whereas S 809 has a max power handling value of 120 watts RMS, 30 watts less than the LX-5 MKII.

Note that higher power handling does not make a speaker louder: that depends mainly on sensitivity and impedance. The calculator below shows how loud each of these actually plays on a real amplifier.

Which plays louder on your amplifier?

Starting with a popular amplifier - change it to the one you own, or any you are considering, and watch both numbers move.

Mission LX-5 MKII
 
Jamo S 809
 

Input Type and Bi-Amping / Bi-Wiring

LX-5 MKII features Binding post posts which make bi-amping or bi-wiring possible. S 809 has a Post which doesn't feature bi-amping/bi-wiring.

Jamo S 809Post Terminals
Jamo S 809's Post terminals

Jamo S 809  Port
Jamo S 809 Port

Physical Specs

The size of a speaker can sometimes be an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare Mission LX-5 MKII's and Jamo S 809's external dimensions. Mission LX-5 MKII has external dimensions of 995.0 x 226.0 x 308.0mm (39-3/16 x 8-7/8 x 12-1/8inch) whereas Jamo S 809 has external dimensions of 1042.0 x 191.0 x 252.0mm (41.0 x 7.5 x 9.9inch).

Jamo S 809 is 35mm narrower and 56mm less deeper than Mission LX-5 MKII but it is also 47mm taller.

Size, drawn to scale

FRONTMission LX-5 MKII front: 226 x 995 mm (8.9 x 39.2 in)Jamo S 809 front: 191 x 1042 mm (7.5 x 41 in)Mission LX-5 MKII226 × 995 mmJamo S 809191 × 1042 mmTOP / FOOTPRINTMission LX-5 MKII footprint: 226 x 308 mm (8.9 x 12.1 in)Jamo S 809 footprint: 191 x 252 mm (7.5 x 9.9 in)Mission LX-5 MKII226 × 308 mmJamo S 809191 × 252 mm
Both speakers and both views share one scale, so everything here is directly comparable. Hover a box for its dimensions.

One scale for both, standing on the same surface and pushed back to the same wall, so the deeper one visibly sticks out further.

Mission LX-5 MKII needs about 45% more floor or shelf area. Mission LX-5 MKII is 56mm deeper, so it stands that much further out from the wall. Jamo S 809 is 47mm taller.

Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited. The base surface area of the Mission LX-5 MKII is approximately 696.1cm2 / 107.9inch2 and base area of the Jamo S 809 is approximately 481.3cm2 / 74.6inch2. The LX-5 MKII requires 45% more surface area than the S 809 which gives it a small disadvantage on placement in tight spaces.

Weight Comparison

The weight of a loudspeaker can become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often. Weight of a speaker can also "sometimes" be an indicator of the rigidity of the enclosure and the quality of the internal components used. The Mission LX-5 MKII weighs 19.10kg / 42lbs and the Jamo S 809 weighs 13.60kg / 29.9lbs. This makes the LX-5 MKII 40% heavier than the S 809.

Here is a comparison of how LX-5 MKII and S 809's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Passive Floor-standing class.

Weight
All Floor-standing Speakers
Mission LX-5 MKII
Jamo S 809
Min
Average
Max

What's in the Box of Jamo S 809?

Here are the items that come with the S 809:
  • 2 Floorstanding loudspeakers
  • 2 Grilles
  • 8 Mounting feet
  • 16 Screws
  • User Manual
  • Important Safety Instructions
  • Warranty Information


Reasons to choose Mission LX-5 MKII over Jamo Studio S 809

Max Input Power 150 watts vs 120 watts Handle more power from your amplifier
Woofer Size 6.5 inches vs 5 inches Larger woofer
Bi-Amping and Bi-Wiring Yes vs No Allows bi-amping and bi-wiring connections
Height 995mm vs 1042mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces

Reasons to choose Jamo Studio S 809 over Mission LX-5 MKII

Number of Woofers 3 vs 2 More woofers
Low Frequency Response 37 Hz vs 42 Hz Generates deeper bass
High Frequency Response 26k Hz vs 20k Hz Generates higher frequency
Dolby Atmos Drivers Optional Jamo S 8 ATM Dolby Atmos upward-firing speakers vs No Dolby Atmos Compatibility
Base Surface Area 481cm2 vs 696cm2 Takes less floor space
Price per pair* 634USD vs 740USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)

Mission LX-5 MKII vs Jamo S 809 Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications
General Mission LX-5 MKII Jamo Studio S 809
Brand Mission Jamo
Speaker Type Floor-standing speaker Floor-standing speaker
Power Range 30-150 watts 120 watts
Sensitivity 90 dB 90 dB
Impedance 8 ohms 8 ohms
Impedance 4.2 ohms n/a
Frequency Response 42-20k Hz 37-26k Hz
Drivers
Woofer Quantity 2 3
Woofer Size 6.5" 5"
Woofer Composition Composite fibre Aluminized Polyfiber
Woofer Surround Material n/a Rubber
Tweeter Size 1" 1"
Tweeter Type Soft-Dome n/a
Aimable Tweeter No No
Midrange Driver No No
Crossover Frequency 2.3kHz 2000Hz
Firing Direction n/a front
Physical Specs
Height 995.0mm (39.2") 1042.0mm (41")
Width 226.0mm (8.9") 191.0mm (7.5")
Depth 308.0mm (12.1") 252.0mm (9.9")
Weight 19.10kg (42lbs) 13.60kg (29.9lbs)
Enclosure Bass Reflex Bass Reflex
Finish n/a MDF/Vinyl
Available Colors n/a Walnut
Grille Yes Yes
Moisture Resistancy No No
Connections
Biamp Inputs Yes No
Other
Parts Warranty 5 Years
Labor Warranty 5 Years

Verdict

No single best speaker here - they are built to different priorities, and the right one depends on your room, your amplifier and what you listen to.

AreaBetterWhy
BassBJamo S 809 digs deeper - 37Hz against 42Hz. A subwoofer would even that out.
Amplifier needsevenly matchedSimilar sensitivity (90dB vs 90dB) - both want much the same power.
HeadroomAMission LX-5 MKII takes more power (150W vs 120W) - more in hand in a big room.
SizedependsJamo S 809 is easier to place; Mission LX-5 MKII is bigger, which usually goes with fuller bass. Your room decides.
ExpandabilitydependsMission LX-5 MKII: bi-amping; Jamo S 809: Atmos drivers. Mission LX-5 MKII sits in a wider range (10 models), so a matched surround system is easier later.
PriceBJamo S 809 is cheaper - $634 against $740, about 14% less.

A Mission LX-5 MKII  B Jamo S 809
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both speakers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.

Which should you choose?

Neither runs away with it - they trade advantages. Let the "depends" rows and your own room settle it. If a subwoofer is in your plans, the bass gap largely stops mattering - you would be crossing over above 42Hz anyway, so judge these on the other rows instead. Match it to your room: we rate Mission LX-5 MKII the better fit for a very large room, and Jamo S 809 for a mid-size room.

And remember what a spec sheet cannot show: how each looks in your room and whether the finish suits it, what dealer support and warranty are like where you live, and how they actually sound to you. If you can hear them first - ideally with your own music - that will tell you more than any number above.


Most Popular Speakers
Klipsch Reference R-51M
Klipsch R-51M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
2-way | 87 dB | 6 ohms
Wharfedale Elysian 2
Wharfedale Elysian 2
3-way | 89 dB | 4 ohms
KEF Q150
KEF Q150
2-way | 86 dB | 8 ohms
Bowers & Wilkins 606 S2 Anniversary Edition
B&W 606 S2
2-way | 88 dB | 8 ohms
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-500M
Klipsch RP-500M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
Wharfedale EVO5.1
Wharfedale EVO5.1
2-way | 87 dB | 4 ohms
Wharfedale EVO4.1
Wharfedale EVO4.1
2-way | 87 dB | 8 ohms
This site contains affiliate links. We may be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through one of them. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Copyright © 2026 by SpeakerDecision
About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

Report a Correction