SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS
    • By Type
      Passive Bookshelf Speakers Passive Floor-standing Speakers Passive Center Channel Speakers Passive In-wall Speakers All Passive Speakers Powered Subwoofers Powered Stereo Speakers
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Front Firing Port Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      By Brand
      Acoustic Energy Aperion ATC Audio-Technica Audioengine Bluesound Bowers Wilkins Buchardt Cambridge Audio Canton DALI Definitive Technology Dynaudio ELAC Emotiva Fluance Focal Fyne Audio Genelec GoldenEar Harbeth Jamo JBL Kanto KEF KLH Klipsch Leak Mackie Magnepan MartinLogan McIntosh Mission MoFi Monitor Audio Nuvo Onkyo OSD Paradigm Perlisten Polk Audio PS Audio PSB Q Acoustics REL Revel Russound Sennheiser Sonos Sonus faber Sony Spendor SVS Tannoy Technics Triangle Velodyne Victrola Wharfedale Wilson Audio Yamaha
  • AMPLIFIERS
    • By Type
      All Amplifiers Integrated Amplifiers Stereo Receivers Streaming Amplifiers Power Amplifiers Compact Amplifiers
      By Power
      Up to 60 watts 61 to 90 watts 91 to 120 watts 121 to 180 watts Over 180 watts
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      Home Theater
      All Home Theater Receivers Anthem ARCAM Denon Integra JBL Marantz McIntosh NAD Onkyo Sony Yamaha
      Headphone Amps
      All Headphone Amplifiers Cambridge Audio iFi Audio McIntosh Naim Pro-Ject Rotel Schiit Audio Sennheiser Yamaha
      Multi-Zone
      All Multi-Zone Amplifiers JBL McIntosh OSD Rotel Russound Sonos
      By Brand
      Accuphase Advance Paris Anthem Arcam Audio Research AudioControl Audioengine Audiolab Bluesound Bose Buchardt Cambridge Audio Cayin Denon Devialet ELAC Emotiva Eversolo FiiO Fosi Audio Hegel HiFi Rose Integra JBL Layer Audio Design LEAK Luxman Marantz Mark Levinson McIntosh Michi MISSION MOON Musical Fidelity NAD Naim Onkyo OSD Parasound Pass Labs Peachtree PrimaLuna Primare PS Audio Rega Rogue Audio Roksan Rotel Schiit Audio Sonos Sony SVS T+A TEAC Technics Vincent WiiM Yamaha
  • SMART FIND
  • TOOLS
  • BLOG
  1. Home
  2. Passive Floor-standing Speakers
  3. MartinLogan Motion XT F200 vs Polk R700

MartinLogan Motion XT F200 vs Polk R700 Comparison

x
Speaker to replace
Change

MartinLogan Motion XT F200

Passive Floor-standing | 27-25k Hz

MartinLogan Motion® XT F200
Check price atAmazon›
Change
    
Polk R700

Passive Floor-standing | 38-38k Hz

Polk Audio Reserve R700
Check price atAmazon›
MartinLogan Motion XT F200 MartinLogan Motion X...
Check price atAmazon›
Polk R700 Polk R700
Check price atAmazon›
MartinLogan Motion X...
See at AMAZON
Polk R700
See at AMAZON

MartinLogan Motion XT F200 vs Polk R700 Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing Motion XT F200 and R700, two Passive Floor-standing speakers from MartinLogan and Polk Audio.

Let's have a brief look at the main features of MartinLogan Motion XT F200 and Polk R700 first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Key SpecsMartinLogan Motion XT F200Polk R700
BrandMartinLogan
United States · founded 1982
Polk Audio
United States · founded 1972
Design3-way3-way
Tweeter1.25 x 2.4" Folded Motion XT1" Pinnacle Ring Radiator
Midrange6.5"6.5"
Woofer3 x 8" Aluminum2 x 8" Polypropylene
Frequency response27-25k Hz38-38k Hz
Sensitivity92 dB88 dB
Impedance4 ohms8 ohms
Power range20-600 watts50-300 watts
Weight39.00kg / 85.8lbs35.90kg / 79lbs
Dimensions (H x W x D)50-3/4" x 13-3/4" x 16-1/2"
1289 x 349 x 419mm
45" x 12.6" x 16.9"
1143.8 x 320.7 x 428.3mm

What size room are the MartinLogan Motion XT F200 and Polk R700 speakers good for?

The size of the room in which you are planning to use these loudspeakers is an important decision factor. Here we have compared their suitability to various sizes of environments considering their size and max power parameters:

Listening Environment* MartinLogan Motion XT F200 Polk R700
Near-field Are you nuts? Bad
Small Room Poor Poor
Mid-size Room Average Average
Large Room Good Good
Very Large Room Good Average

(* Approximate Room sizes: Small < 100sq. ft / 9 m2, Mid-size: 100-220 sq. ft / 9-20 m2, Large 220-400 sq. ft / 20-36 m2, Very Large: > 400 sq. ft / 36 m2. Average Floor Height: 9" / 2.7m. Typical room sizes differ from country to country, and the actual listening experience changes depending on floor height, room shape, surface materials, listening position, speaker locations, etc.)

The sections below take each area in turn: drivers, frequency response, physical size and what you get in the box.


Drivers

Both Motion XT F200 and R700 are 3-way speakers.

Midrange - 6.5 inchWoofer - 8 inchWoofer - 8 inchWoofer - 8 inch
MartinLogan Motion XT F200
Tweeter - 1 inchMidrange - 6.5 inchWoofer - 8 inchWoofer - 8 inch
Polk R700

TweeterMidrangeWoofer

Front view, drawn to scale - cabinets and drivers share one scale, so sizes are directly comparable. Hover a driver for its size.

Driver MartinLogan Motion XT F200 Polk R700
Driver Setup 3-way 3-way
Tweeter 1.25 x 2.4-inch 1-inch
Midrange 1 x 6.5-inch 1 x 6.5-inch
Woofer 3 x 8-inch 2 x 8-inch

Motion XT F200 features a 1.25 x 2.4" Folded Motion XT Tweeter, a 6.5" Midrange and 3 x 8" Aluminum Woofer with a Crossover frequency at 300Hz and 2600Hz. On the other hand, the R700 features a 1" Pinnacle Ring Radiator Tweeter, a 6.5" Midrange and 2 x 8" Polypropylene Woofer with a Crossover frequency at 350Hz and 2700Hz.

MartinLogan Motion XT F200 driver frequency bandsMartinLogan Motion XT F200Polk R70027-30038-350Woofer300-2.6k350-2.7kMidrange2.6k-25k2.7k-38kTweeter20501002005001k2k5k10k20k40kHz, log scale

Frequency Response

Motion XT F200 has a frequency range of 27-25k Hz whereas R700 has a frequency range of 38-38k Hz. With a minimum frequency of 27Hz, the Motion XT F200 can go significantly deeper on the low side and provide stronger bass compared to the R700's min frequency of 38Hz.

The graph below depicts how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average Low Frequency values of other speakers in the Floor-standing class in our database.

Low Frequency

Floor-standing Speakers

Motion XT F200
R700
Min
Average
Median

Neither pair reaches down to 20Hz, the usual definition of full-range, which is normal for speakers of this size. If you want the bottom octave for movies or bass-heavy music, add a subwoofer to whichever you choose. Visit our Powered Subwoofers section to find out more about the available options.

Impedance and Sensitivity

Motion XT F200 is a 4 ohms speaker compared to the R700 which has a nominal impedance of 8 ohms. Lower impedance speakers, especially the ones that are rated at 4 ohms may put more pressure on the amplifier unit especially when played at high volume levels, so make sure the amp you pair with the Motion XT F200 can provide this impedance level.

These two speakers also have different sensitivity levels. Motion XT F200 sensitivity is rated at 92 dB and the R700's is rated at 88 dB. This 4 dB difference makes the MartinLogan Motion XT F200 a more sensitive speaker compared to Polk R700, hence will play louder with the same amount of watts.

Sensitivity

Floor-standing Speakers

Motion XT F200
R700
Min
Average
Median

Power Range

Power range is the range of input power in watts RMS that a loudspeaker is designed to handle. Staying within that range gives nominal performance; driving the speaker beyond its maximum wattage can damage it.

Motion XT F200 can handle a max power of 600 watts RMS, whereas R700 has a max power handling value of 300 watts RMS, 300 watts less than the Motion XT F200.

Note that higher power handling does not make a speaker louder: that depends mainly on sensitivity and impedance. The calculator below shows how loud each of these actually plays on a real amplifier.

Which plays louder on your amplifier?

Starting with a popular amplifier - change it to the one you own, or any you are considering, and watch both numbers move.

MartinLogan Motion XT F200
 
Polk R700
 

Input Type and Bi-Amping / Bi-Wiring

Both Motion XT F200 and R700 features dual binding post speaker terminals for bi-amping or bi-wiring.

MartinLogan Motion XT F200 Terminals
MartinLogan Motion XT F200's Custom 5-way bi-wire tool-less binding posts terminals allows Bi-amping or bi-wiring

Polk R700Post Terminals
Polk R700's Post terminals allows Bi-amping or bi-wiring

Cabinet Type and Port Position

Both Motion XT F200 and R700 have bottom firing ports.

Polk R700  Port
Polk R700 Port

Physical Specs

The size of a speaker can sometimes be an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare MartinLogan Motion XT F200's and Polk R700's external dimensions. MartinLogan Motion XT F200 has external dimensions of 1289 x 349 x 419mm (50-3/4inch x 13-3/4inch x 16-1/2inch) whereas Polk R700 has external dimensions of 1143.8 x 320.7 x 428.3mm (45 x 12.6 x 16.9inch).

Polk R700 is 28.3mm narrower and 145.2mm shorter than MartinLogan Motion XT F200 but it is also 9.3mm deeper.

Below you can see the front view size comparison of MartinLogan Motion XT F200 and Polk R700 in scale.

MartinLogan Motion XT F200 vs Polk R700 Size Comparison - Front View
Comparison image of MartinLogan Motion XT F200 and Polk R700 Size and External Dimensions

Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited. The base surface area of the MartinLogan Motion XT F200 is approximately 1462.3cm2 / 226.7inch2 and base area of the Polk R700 is approximately 1373.6cm2 / 212.9inch2. The Motion XT F200 requires 6% more surface area than the R700 which gives it a small disadvantage on placement in tight spaces.

Weight Comparison

The weight of a loudspeaker can become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often. Weight of a speaker can also "sometimes" be an indicator of the rigidity of the enclosure and the quality of the internal components used. The MartinLogan Motion XT F200 weighs 39.00kg / 85.8lbs and the Polk R700 weighs 35.90kg / 79lbs. This makes the Motion XT F200 9% heavier than the R700.

Here is a comparison of how Motion XT F200 and R700's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Passive Floor-standing class.

Weight
All Floor-standing Speakers
MartinLogan Motion XT F200
Polk R700
Min
Average
Max

What's in the Box of Polk R700?

Here are the items that come with the R700:
  • Floorstanding loudspeaker
  • 4 Outrigger feet (pre-installed)
  • 4 Rubber feet (pre-installed)
  • 4 Spike feet (pre-installed)
  • Grille
  • Hex-key
  • Owner's Manual
  • Online Registration


Reasons to choose MartinLogan Motion® XT F200 over Polk Audio Reserve R700

Max Input Power 600 watts vs 300 watts Handle more power from your amplifier
Sensitivity 92 dB vs 88 dB Play louder with same amount of amplification power
Number of Woofers 3 vs 2 More woofers
Low Frequency Response 27 Hz vs 38 Hz Generates deeper bass

Reasons to choose Polk Audio Reserve R700 over MartinLogan Motion® XT F200

Nominal Impedance 8 ohms vs 4 ohms Less selective with amplifiers
High Frequency Response 38k Hz vs 25k Hz Generates higher frequency
Height 1143mm vs 1289mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces
Base Surface Area 1373cm2 vs 1462cm2 Takes less floor space
Price per pair* 2198USD vs 5498USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)

MartinLogan Motion XT F200 vs Polk R700 Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications
General MartinLogan Motion® XT F200 Polk Audio Reserve R700
Brand MartinLogan Polk Audio
Speaker Type Floor-standing speaker Floor-standing speaker
Power Range 20-600 watts 50-300 watts
Sensitivity 92 dB 88 dB
Impedance 4 ohms 8 ohms
Impedance n/a 3.6 ohms
Frequency Response 27-25k Hz 38-38k Hz
Drivers
Woofer Quantity 3 2
Woofer Size 8" 8"
Woofer Composition Aluminum Polypropylene
Woofer Surround Material Rubber Rubber
Tweeter Size 1.25 x 2.4" 1"
Tweeter Type Folded Motion XT Pinnacle Ring Radiator
Aimable Tweeter No No
Midrange Driver 6.5" 6.5"
Crossover Frequency 300Hz and 2600Hz 350Hz and 2700Hz
Firing Direction bottom bottom
Suggested Break-in Period Allow 72 hours of break-in n/a
Physical Specs
Height 1289.0mm (50.7") 1143.8mm (45")
Width 349.0mm (13.7") 320.7mm (12.6")
Depth 419.0mm (16.5") 428.3mm (16.9")
Weight 39.00kg (85.8lbs) 35.90kg (79lbs)
Enclosure Bass Reflex Bass Reflex
Finish MDF/Wood veneer MDF/Vinyl
Available Colors Gloss Black, Walnut, and Satin White Black, Walnut, White
Grille Yes Yes
Moisture Resistancy No No
Connections
Biamp Inputs Yes Yes
Other
Parts Warranty 5 Years 5 Years
Labor Warranty 5 Years 5 Years

Verdict

These sit in different price classes - MartinLogan Motion XT F200 costs roughly 2.5x what Polk R700 does. Expect it to lead on paper; the question is whether the gap is audible enough in your room to be worth it.

AreaBetterWhy
BassAMartinLogan Motion XT F200 digs deeper - 27Hz against 38Hz.
Amplifier needsAMartinLogan Motion XT F200 is more sensitive (92dB vs 88dB), so it goes louder on the same amplifier.
Amplifier matchBPolk R700 is the easier load at 8 ohms; the other is 4 ohms and wants an amplifier rated for it.
HeadroomAMartinLogan Motion XT F200 takes more power (600W vs 300W) - more in hand in a big room.
SizedependsSimilar cabinet size - neither is easier to fit.
ExpandabilitydependsMartinLogan Motion XT F200: bi-amping; Polk R700: bi-amping. Polk R700 sits in a wider range (10 models), so a matched surround system is easier later.
PriceBPolk R700 is cheaper - $2,198 against $5,498, about 60% less; arguably a different class.

A MartinLogan Motion XT F200  B Polk R700
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both speakers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.

Which should you choose?

The usual trade-off: MartinLogan Motion XT F200 measures better, Polk R700 costs about about 2.5x the price% less. Whether that gap is worth the money is the call only you can make - and in a normal room it is often smaller than the numbers suggest. If a subwoofer is in your plans, the bass gap largely stops mattering - you would be crossing over above 38Hz anyway, which makes the cheaper Polk R700 much easier to justify. Match it to your room: we rate MartinLogan Motion XT F200 the better fit for a very large room; elsewhere the two are rated the same.

And remember what a spec sheet cannot show: how each looks in your room and whether the finish suits it, what dealer support and warranty are like where you live, and how they actually sound to you. If you can hear them first - ideally with your own music - that will tell you more than any number above.


Most Popular Speakers
Klipsch Reference R-51M
Klipsch R-51M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
2-way | 87 dB | 6 ohms
Wharfedale Elysian 2
Wharfedale Elysian 2
3-way | 89 dB | 4 ohms
KEF Q150
KEF Q150
2-way | 86 dB | 8 ohms
Bowers & Wilkins 606 S2 Anniversary Edition
B&W 606 S2
2-way | 88 dB | 8 ohms
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-500M
Klipsch RP-500M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
Wharfedale EVO5.1
Wharfedale EVO5.1
2-way | 87 dB | 4 ohms
Wharfedale EVO4.1
Wharfedale EVO4.1
2-way | 87 dB | 8 ohms
This site contains affiliate links. We may be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through one of them. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Copyright © 2026 by SpeakerDecision
About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

Report a Correction