SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS
    • By Type
      Passive Bookshelf Speakers Passive Floor-standing Speakers Passive Center Channel Speakers Passive In-wall Speakers All Passive Speakers Powered Subwoofers Powered Stereo Speakers
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Front Firing Port Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      By Brand
      Acoustic Energy Aperion ATC Audio-Technica Audioengine Bluesound Bowers Wilkins Buchardt Cambridge Audio Canton DALI Definitive Technology Dynaudio ELAC Emotiva Fluance Focal Fyne Audio Genelec GoldenEar Harbeth Jamo JBL Kanto KEF KLH Klipsch Leak Mackie Magnepan MartinLogan McIntosh Mission MoFi Monitor Audio Nuvo Onkyo OSD Paradigm Perlisten Polk Audio PS Audio PSB Q Acoustics REL Revel Russound Sennheiser Sonos Sonus faber Sony Spendor SVS Tannoy Technics Triangle Velodyne Victrola Wharfedale Wilson Audio Yamaha
  • AMPLIFIERS
    • By Type
      All Amplifiers Integrated Amplifiers Stereo Receivers Streaming Amplifiers Power Amplifiers Compact Amplifiers
      By Power
      Up to 60 watts 61 to 90 watts 91 to 120 watts 121 to 180 watts Over 180 watts
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      Home Theater
      All Home Theater Receivers Anthem ARCAM Denon Integra JBL Marantz McIntosh NAD Onkyo Sony Yamaha
      Headphone Amps
      All Headphone Amplifiers Cambridge Audio iFi Audio McIntosh Naim Pro-Ject Rotel Schiit Audio Sennheiser Yamaha
      Multi-Zone
      All Multi-Zone Amplifiers JBL McIntosh OSD Rotel Russound Sonos
      By Brand
      Accuphase Advance Paris Anthem Arcam Audio Research AudioControl Audioengine Audiolab Bluesound Bose Buchardt Cambridge Audio Denon Devialet ELAC Emotiva Eversolo FiiO Fosi Audio Hegel HiFi Rose Integra JBL LEAK Luxman Marantz Mark Levinson McIntosh Michi MISSION MOON Musical Fidelity NAD Naim Onkyo OSD Parasound Pass Labs Peachtree PrimaLuna Primare PS Audio Rega Rogue Audio Roksan Rotel Schiit Audio Sonos Sony SVS T+A TEAC Technics Vincent WiiM Yamaha
  • SMART FIND
  • TOOLS
  • BLOG
  1. Home
  2. Passive In-wall Speakers
  3. MartinLogan Motion CI MW4-LCR vs Polk Audio 265-LS

MartinLogan Motion CI MW4-LCR vs Polk Audio 265-LS Comparison

x
Speaker to replace
Change

MartinLogan Motion CI MW4-LCR

Passive In-wall | 78-25kHz

MartinLogan Motion CI MW4-LCR
Check price atAmazon›
Change
    
Polk Audio 265-LS

Passive In-wall | 28-33kHz

Polk Audio 265-LS
Check price atAmazon›
MartinLogan Motion CI MW4-LCR MartinLogan Motion C...
Check price atAmazon›
Polk Audio 265-LS Polk Audio 265-LS
Check price atAmazon›
MartinLogan Motion C...
See at AMAZON
Polk Audio 265-LS
See at AMAZON

MartinLogan Motion CI MW4-LCR vs Polk Audio 265-LS Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing Motion CI MW4-LCR and 265-LS, two Passive In-wall speakers from MartinLogan and Polk Audio.

Let's have a brief look at the main features of MartinLogan Motion CI MW4-LCR and Polk Audio 265-LS first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Key SpecsMartinLogan Motion CI MW4-LCRPolk Audio 265-LS
BrandMartinLogan
United States · founded 1982
Polk Audio
United States · founded 1972
Design2-way3-way
Tweeter1" Folded Motion Ribbon1" Ring Radiator
Midrange—6.5"
Woofer2 x 4" Fiberglass6.5" Aerated polypropylene
Frequency response78-25kHz28-33kHz
Sensitivity93 dB91 dB
Impedance8 ohms8 ohms
Power range50-100 watts10-200 watts
Weight2.77kg / 6.1lbs4.09kg / 9lbs
Dimensions (H x W x D)5.2500" x 11.8750" x 2.6875"
134.0 x 302.0 x 69.0mm
19.1875" x 7.2500" x 3-3/4"
488.0 x 185.0 x 95.3mm

What size room are the MartinLogan Motion CI MW4-LCR and Polk Audio 265-LS speakers good for?

The size of the room in which you are planning to use these loudspeakers is an important decision factor. Here we have compared their suitability to various sizes of environments considering their size and max power parameters:

Listening Environment* MartinLogan Motion CI MW4-LCR Polk Audio 265-LS
Near-field Average Poor
Small Room Good Average
Mid-size Room Average Good
Large Room Poor Average
Very Large Room Bad Poor

(* Approximate Room sizes: Small < 100sq. ft / 9 m2, Mid-size: 100-220 sq. ft / 9-20 m2, Large 220-400 sq. ft / 20-36 m2, Very Large: > 400 sq. ft / 36 m2. Average Floor Height: 9" / 2.7m. Typical room sizes differ from country to country, and the actual listening experience changes depending on floor height, room shape, surface materials, listening position, speaker locations, etc.)

The sections below take each area in turn: drivers, frequency response, physical size and what you get in the box.


Drivers

One of the fundamental differences between these two speakers is that Motion CI MW4-LCR is a 2-way design whereas the 265-LS is a 3-way speaker. 3-way designs utilize a midrange driver in addition to the tweeter and woofer on 2-way designs. Designing a crossover for a 3-way speaker is a complicated process and generally increases the overall cost of the speaker.

Woofer - 4 inchTweeter - 1 inchWoofer - 4 inch
MartinLogan Motion CI MW4-LCR
Tweeter - 1 inchMidrange - 6.5 inchWoofer - 6.5 inch
Polk Audio 265-LS

TweeterMidrangeWoofer

Front view, drawn to scale - cabinets and drivers share one scale, so sizes are directly comparable. Hover a driver for its size.

Driver MartinLogan Motion CI MW4-LCR Polk Audio 265-LS
Driver Setup 2-way 3-way
Tweeter 1-inch 1-inch
Midrange - 1 x 6.5-inch
Woofer 2 x 4-inch 1 x 6.5-inch

Motion CI MW4-LCR features a 1" Folded Motion Ribbon Tweeter and 2 x 4" Fiberglass Woofer. On the other hand, the 265-LS features a 1" Ring Radiator Tweeter, a 6.5" Midrange and 1 x 6.5" Aerated polypropylene Woofer.

Frequency Response

Motion CI MW4-LCR has a frequency range of 78-25kHz whereas 265-LS has a frequency range of 28-33kHz. With a minimum frequency of 28Hz, the 265-LS can go significantly deeper on the low side and provide stronger bass compared to the Motion CI MW4-LCR's min frequency of 78Hz.

The graph below depicts how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average Low Frequency values of other speakers in the In-wall class in our database.

Low Frequency

In-wall Speakers

Motion CI MW4-LCR
265-LS
Min
Average
Median

Neither pair reaches down to 20Hz, the usual definition of full-range, which is normal for speakers of this size. If you want the bottom octave for movies or bass-heavy music, add a subwoofer to whichever you choose. Visit our Powered Subwoofers section to find out more about the available options.

Impedance and Sensitivity

Motion CI MW4-LCR and 265-LS have the same Impedance of 8 ohms but where they differ is the sensitivity levels. Motion CI MW4-LCR sensitivity is rated at 93 dB and the 265-LS's is at 91 dB. This 2 dB difference makes the MartinLogan Motion CI MW4-LCR a more sensitive speaker compared to Polk Audio 265-LS, hence will play louder with the same amount of watts.

Sensitivity

In-wall Speakers

Motion CI MW4-LCR
265-LS
Min
Average
Median

Power Range

Power range is the range of input power in watts RMS that a loudspeaker is designed to handle. Staying within that range gives nominal performance; driving the speaker beyond its maximum wattage can damage it.

265-LS can handle a max power of 200 watts RMS, whereas Motion CI MW4-LCR has a max power handling value of 100 watts RMS, 100 watts less than the 265-LS.

Note that higher power handling does not make a speaker louder: that depends mainly on sensitivity and impedance. The calculator below shows how loud each of these actually plays on a real amplifier.

Which plays louder on your amplifier?

Starting with a popular amplifier - change it to the one you own, or any you are considering, and watch both numbers move.

MartinLogan Motion CI MW4-LCR
 
Polk Audio 265-LS
 

Input Type and Bi-Amping / Bi-Wiring

Motion CI MW4-LCR features Spring post type posts and 265-LS has a Spring post type posts. None of these speakers feature bi-amping/bi-wiring.

Physical Specs

The size of a speaker can sometimes be an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare MartinLogan Motion CI MW4-LCR's and Polk Audio 265-LS's external dimensions. MartinLogan Motion CI MW4-LCR has external dimensions of 134.0 x 302.0 x 69.0mm (5.2500-inch x 11.8750-inch x 2.6875-inch) whereas Polk Audio 265-LS has external dimensions of 488.0 x 185.0 x 95.3mm (19.1875-inch x 7.2500-inch x 0.0000-inch).

MartinLogan Motion CI MW4-LCR is 354mm shorter and 26.3mm less deeper than Polk Audio 265-LS but it is also 117mm wider.

Weight Comparison

The weight of a loudspeaker can become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often. Weight of a speaker can also "sometimes" be an indicator of the rigidity of the enclosure and the quality of the internal components used. The MartinLogan Motion CI MW4-LCR weighs 2.77kg / 6.1lbs and the Polk Audio 265-LS weighs 4.09kg / 9lbs. This makes the 265-LS 48% heavier than the Motion CI MW4-LCR.

Here is a comparison of how Motion CI MW4-LCR and 265-LS's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Passive In-wall class.

Weight
All In-wall Speakers
MartinLogan Motion CI MW4-LCR
Polk Audio 265-LS
Min
Average
Max

What's in the Box of MartinLogan Motion CI MW4-LCR?

Here are the items that are included inside the box of Motion CI MW4-LCR:
  • In-wall loudspeaker
  • Grille
  • Torx-bit
  • User-feets Manual
  • Cutout Template

What's in the Box of Polk Audio 265-LS?

Here are the items that come with the 265-LS:
  • In-wall loudspeaker
  • White metal grille
  • Power Port plug
  • Mounting template
  • Owners Manual


Reasons to choose MartinLogan Motion CI MW4-LCR over Polk Audio 265-LS

Sensitivity 93 dB vs 91 dB Play louder with same amount of amplification power
Number of Woofers 2 vs 1 More woofers
Height 134mm vs 488mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces

Reasons to choose Polk Audio 265-LS over MartinLogan Motion CI MW4-LCR

Max Input Power 200 watts vs 100 watts Handle more power from your amplifier
Driver Setup 3-way vs 2-way Have a dedicated mid-range driver
Woofer Size 6.5 inches vs 4 inches Larger woofer
Low Frequency Response 28 Hz vs 78 Hz Generates deeper bass
High Frequency Response 33k Hz vs 25k Hz Generates higher frequency
Base Surface Area 176cm2 vs 208cm2 Takes less floor space
Price per pair* 758USD vs 1100USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)

MartinLogan Motion CI MW4-LCR vs Polk Audio 265-LS Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications
General MartinLogan Motion CI MW4-LCR Polk Audio 265-LS
Brand MartinLogan Polk Audio
Speaker Type Passive In-wall Speaker Passive In-wall Speaker
Power Range 50-100 watts 10-200 watts
Sensitivity 93 dB 91 dB
Impedance 8 ohms 8 ohms
Frequency Response 78-25kHz 28-33kHz
Drivers
Woofer Quantity 2 1
Woofer Size 4" 6.5"
Woofer Composition Fiberglass Aerated polypropylene
Woofer Surround Material Rubber Rubber
Tweeter Size 1" 1"
Tweeter Type Folded Motion Ribbon Ring Radiator
Aimable Tweeter No No
Midrange Driver No 6.5"
Physical Specs
Height 134.0mm (5.3") 488.0mm (19.2")
Width 302.0mm (11.9") 185.0mm (7.3")
Depth 69.0mm (2.7") 95.3mm (3.8")
Weight 2.77kg (6.1lbs) 4.09kg (9lbs)
Enclosure In-wall In-wall
Moisture Resistancy No No
Connections
Biamp Inputs No No
Other
Parts Warranty 5 Years Lifetime
Labor Warranty 5 Years Lifetime

Verdict

A generation apart: MartinLogan Motion CI MW4-LCR is the newer design, against a 2010 model. Newer is not automatically better, but the older one is more likely to be discounted or near run-out.

AreaBetterWhy
BassBPolk Audio 265-LS digs deeper - 28Hz against 78Hz.
Amplifier needsAMartinLogan Motion CI MW4-LCR is more sensitive (93dB vs 91dB), so it goes louder on the same amplifier.
HeadroomBPolk Audio 265-LS takes more power (200W vs 100W) - more in hand in a big room.
SizedependsMartinLogan Motion CI MW4-LCR is easier to place; Polk Audio 265-LS is bigger, which usually goes with fuller bass. Your room decides.
ExpandabilitydependsNeither adds bi-amping, a sub output or height drivers. MartinLogan Motion CI MW4-LCR sits in a wider range (18 models), so a matched surround system is easier later.
PriceBPolk Audio 265-LS is cheaper - $758 against $1,100, about 31% less.

A MartinLogan Motion CI MW4-LCR  B Polk Audio 265-LS
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both speakers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.

Which should you choose?

Polk Audio 265-LS has the edge on paper, though the margin is not large. The rows marked "depends" may matter more to you than the score does. If a subwoofer is in your plans, the bass gap largely stops mattering - you would be crossing over above 78Hz anyway, so judge these on the other rows instead. Match it to your room: we rate MartinLogan Motion CI MW4-LCR the better fit for near-field listening and a small room, and Polk Audio 265-LS for a mid-size room and a large room.

And remember what a spec sheet cannot show: how each looks in your room and whether the finish suits it, what dealer support and warranty are like where you live, and how they actually sound to you. If you can hear them first - ideally with your own music - that will tell you more than any number above.


Most Popular Speakers
Klipsch Reference R-51M
Klipsch R-51M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
2-way | 87 dB | 6 ohms
Wharfedale Elysian 2
Wharfedale Elysian 2
3-way | 89 dB | 4 ohms
KEF Q150
KEF Q150
2-way | 86 dB | 8 ohms
Bowers & Wilkins 606 S2 Anniversary Edition
B&W 606 S2
2-way | 88 dB | 8 ohms
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-500M
Klipsch RP-500M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
Wharfedale EVO5.1
Wharfedale EVO5.1
2-way | 87 dB | 4 ohms
Wharfedale EVO4.1
Wharfedale EVO4.1
2-way | 87 dB | 8 ohms
This site contains affiliate links. We may be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through one of them. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Copyright © 2026 by SpeakerDecision
About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

Report a Correction