SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS
    • By Type
      Passive Bookshelf Speakers Passive Floor-standing Speakers Passive Center Channel Speakers Passive In-wall Speakers All Passive Speakers Powered Subwoofers Powered Stereo Speakers
      By Brand
      Acoustic Energy Aperion ATC Audio-Technica Audioengine Bluesound Bowers Wilkins Buchardt Cambridge Audio Canton DALI Definitive Technology Dynaudio ELAC Emotiva Fluance Focal Fyne Audio Genelec GoldenEar Harbeth Jamo JBL Kanto KEF KLH Klipsch Leak Mackie Magnepan MartinLogan McIntosh Mission MoFi Monitor Audio Nuvo Onkyo OSD Paradigm Perlisten Polk Audio PS Audio PSB Q Acoustics REL Revel Russound Sennheiser Sonos Sonus faber Sony Spendor SVS Tannoy Technics Triangle Velodyne Victrola Wharfedale Wilson Audio Yamaha
  • AMPLIFIERS
    • By Type
      All Amplifiers Integrated Amplifiers Stereo Receivers Streaming Amplifiers Power Amplifiers
      By Brand
      Accuphase Advance Paris Anthem Arcam Audio Research AudioControl Audioengine Audiolab Bluesound Bose Buchardt Cambridge Audio Denon Devialet ELAC Emotiva Eversolo FiiO Fosi Audio Hegel HiFi Rose Integra JBL LEAK Luxman Marantz Mark Levinson McIntosh Michi MISSION MOON Musical Fidelity NAD Naim Onkyo OSD Parasound Pass Labs Peachtree PrimaLuna Primare PS Audio Rega Rogue Audio Roksan Rotel Schiit Audio Sonos Sony SVS T+A TEAC Technics Vincent WiiM Yamaha
  • SMART FIND
  • TOOLS
  • BLOG
  1. Home
  2. Passive Floor-standing Speakers
  3. MartinLogan ESL vs Polk R700

MartinLogan ESL vs Polk R700 Comparison

x
Speaker to replace
Change

MartinLogan ESL

Passive Floor-standing | 42-22k Hz

MartinLogan ElectroMotion ESL
Check price atAmazon›
Change
    
Polk R700

Passive Floor-standing | 38-38k Hz

Polk Audio Reserve R700
Check price atAmazon›
MartinLogan ESL MartinLogan ESL
Check price atAmazon›
Polk R700 Polk R700
Check price atAmazon›
MartinLogan ESL
See at AMAZON
Polk R700
See at AMAZON

MartinLogan ESL vs Polk R700 Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing ESL and R700, two Passive Floor-standing speakers from MartinLogan and Polk Audio.

Let's have a brief look at the main features of MartinLogan ESL and Polk R700 first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Key SpecsMartinLogan ESLPolk R700
Design2-way3-way
Tweeter8.6x34" curved electrostatic transducer1" Pinnacle Ring Radiator
Midrange—6.5"
Woofer8" high-excursion paper cone2 x 8" Polypropylene
Frequency response42-22k Hz38-38k Hz
Sensitivity91 dB88 dB
Impedance6 ohms8 ohms
Power range20-300 watts50-300 watts
Weight16.14kg / 35.5lbs35.90kg / 79lbs
Dimensions (H x W x D)53-1/8" x 9-5/16" x 16-1/2"
1350.0 x 237.0 x 420.0mm
45" x 12.6" x 16.9"
1143.8 x 320.7 x 428.3mm

What size room are the MartinLogan ESL and Polk R700 speakers good for?

The size of the room in which you are planning to use these loudspeakers is an important decision factor. Here we have compared their suitability to various sizes of environments considering their size and max power parameters:

Listening Environment* MartinLogan ESL Polk R700
Near-field Bad Bad
Small Room Poor Poor
Mid-size Room Average Average
Large Room Good Good
Very Large Room Average Average

(* Approximate Room sizes: Small < 100sq. ft / 9 m2, Mid-size: 100-220 sq. ft / 9-20 m2, Large 220-400 sq. ft / 20-36 m2, Very Large: > 400 sq. ft / 36 m2. Average Floor Height: 9" / 2.7m. Typical room sizes differ from country to country, and the actual listening experience changes depending on floor height, room shape, surface materials, listening position, speaker locations, etc.)

The sections below take each area in turn: drivers, frequency response, physical size and what you get in the box.


**This post contains affiliate links, and we will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through our links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.


Drivers

One of the fundamental differences between these two speakers is that ESL is a 2-way design whereas the R700 is a 3-way speaker. 3-way designs utilize a midrange driver in addition to the tweeter and woofer on 2-way designs. Designing a crossover for a 3-way speaker is a complicated process and generally increases the overall cost of the speaker.

Woofer - 8 inch
MartinLogan ESL
Tweeter - 1 inchMidrange - 6.5 inchWoofer - 8 inchWoofer - 8 inch
Polk R700

TweeterMidrangeWoofer

Front view, drawn to scale - cabinets and drivers share one scale, so sizes are directly comparable. Hover a driver for its size.

Driver MartinLogan ESL Polk R700
Driver Setup 2-way 3-way
Tweeter 8.6x34-inch 1-inch
Midrange - 1 x 6.5-inch
Woofer 1 x 8-inch 2 x 8-inch

ESL features a 8.6x34" curved electrostatic transducer Tweeter and 1 x 8" high-excursion paper cone Woofer. On the other hand, the R700 features a 1" Pinnacle Ring Radiator Tweeter, a 6.5" Midrange and 2 x 8" Polypropylene Woofer with a Crossover frequency at 350Hz and 2700Hz.

Frequency Response

ESL has a frequency range of 42-22k Hz whereas R700 has a frequency range of 38-38k Hz. With a minimum frequency of 38Hz, the R700 can go slightly deeper then the ESL's min frequency of 42Hz.

The graph below depicts how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average Low Frequency values of other speakers in the Floor-standing class in our database.

Low Frequency

Floor-standing Speakers

ESL
R700
Min
Average
Median

Neither pair reaches down to 20Hz, the usual definition of full-range, which is normal for speakers of this size. If you want the bottom octave for movies or bass-heavy music, add a subwoofer to whichever you choose. Visit our Powered Subwoofers section to find out more about the available options.

Impedance and Sensitivity

ESL is a 6 ohms speaker compared to the R700 which has a nominal impedance of 8 ohms.

These two speakers also have different sensitivity levels. ESL sensitivity is rated at 91 dB and the R700's is rated at 88 dB. This 3 dB difference makes the MartinLogan ESL a more sensitive speaker compared to Polk R700, hence will play louder with the same amount of watts.

Sensitivity

Floor-standing Speakers

ESL
R700
Min
Average
Median

Power Range

Power range is the range of input power in watts RMS that a loudspeaker is designed to handle. Staying within that range gives nominal performance; driving the speaker beyond its maximum wattage can damage it.

Both handle the same maximum of 300 watts RMS, though ESL is rated 20-300 watts and R700 50-300 watts.

Note that higher power handling does not make a speaker louder: that depends mainly on sensitivity and impedance. The calculator below shows how loud each of these actually plays on a real amplifier.

Which plays louder on your amplifier?

Starting with a popular amplifier — change it to the one you own, or any you are considering, and watch both numbers move.

MartinLogan ESL
 
Polk R700
 

Input Type and Bi-Amping / Bi-Wiring

R700 features Post posts which make bi-amping or bi-wiring possible. ESL has a Spring post which doesn't feature bi-amping/bi-wiring.

Polk R700Post Terminals
Polk R700's Post terminals allows Bi-amping or bi-wiring

Polk R700  Port
Polk R700 Port

Physical Specs

The size of a speaker can sometimes be an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare MartinLogan ESL's and Polk R700's external dimensions. MartinLogan ESL has external dimensions of 1350.0 x 237.0 x 420.0mm (53-1/8 x 9-5/16 x 16-1/2inch) whereas Polk R700 has external dimensions of 1143.8 x 320.7 x 428.3mm (45 x 12.6 x 16.9inch).

MartinLogan ESL is 83.7mm narrower and 8.3mm less deeper than Polk R700 but it is also 206.2mm taller.

Below you can see the front view size comparison of MartinLogan ESL and Polk R700 in scale.

MartinLogan ESL vs Polk R700 Size Comparison - Front View
Comparison image of MartinLogan ESL and Polk R700 Size and External Dimensions

Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited. The base surface area of the MartinLogan ESL is approximately 995.4cm2 / 154.3inch2 and base area of the Polk R700 is approximately 1373.6cm2 / 212.9inch2. The ESL requires 28% less surface area than the R700 which gives it a small advantage on placement in tight spaces.

Weight Comparison

The weight of a loudspeaker can become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often. Weight of a speaker can also "sometimes" be an indicator of the rigidity of the enclosure and the quality of the internal components used. The MartinLogan ESL weighs 16.14kg / 35.5lbs and the Polk R700 weighs 35.90kg / 79lbs. This makes the R700 122% heavier than the ESL.

Here is a comparison of how ESL and R700's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Passive Floor-standing class.

Weight
All Floor-standing Speakers
MartinLogan ESL
Polk R700
Min
Average
Max

What's in the Box of MartinLogan ESL?

Here are the items that are included inside the box of ESL:
  • Floor-standing hybrid electrostatic loudspeaker
  • AC power adapter (w/ attached 10-feet DC cord)
  • Cloth grille (installed)
  • 4 Pre-installed feet
  • Users Manual (En/Fr)
  • Product Registration Card

What's in the Box of Polk R700?

Here are the items that come with the R700:
  • Floorstanding loudspeaker
  • 4 Outrigger feet (pre-installed)
  • 4 Rubber feet (pre-installed)
  • 4 Spike feet (pre-installed)
  • Grille
  • Hex-key
  • Owner's Manual
  • Online Registration


Reasons to choose MartinLogan ElectroMotion ESL over Polk Audio Reserve R700

Sensitivity 91 dB vs 88 dB Play louder with same amount of amplification power
Base Surface Area 995cm2 vs 1373cm2 Takes less floor space

Reasons to choose Polk Audio Reserve R700 over MartinLogan ElectroMotion ESL

Driver Setup 3-way vs 2-way Have a dedicated mid-range driver
Nominal Impedance 8 ohms vs 6 ohms Less selective with amplifiers
Number of Woofers 2 vs 1 More woofers
Low Frequency Response 38 Hz vs 42 Hz Generates deeper bass
High Frequency Response 38k Hz vs 22k Hz Generates higher frequency
Bi-Amping and Bi-Wiring Yes vs No Allows bi-amping and bi-wiring connections
Height 1143mm vs 1350mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces

MartinLogan ESL vs Polk R700 Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications
General MartinLogan ElectroMotion ESL Polk Audio Reserve R700
Brand MartinLogan Polk Audio
Speaker Type Floor-standing speaker Floor-standing speaker
Power Range 20-300 watts 50-300 watts
Sensitivity 91 dB 88 dB
Impedance 6 ohms 8 ohms
Impedance n/a 3.6 ohms
Frequency Response 42-22k Hz 38-38k Hz
Drivers
Woofer Quantity 1 2
Woofer Size 8" 8"
Woofer Composition high-excursion paper cone Polypropylene
Woofer Surround Material Rubber Rubber
Tweeter Size 8.6x34" 1"
Tweeter Type curved electrostatic transducer Pinnacle Ring Radiator
Aimable Tweeter No No
Midrange Driver No 6.5"
Crossover Frequency n/a 350Hz and 2700Hz
Firing Direction n/a bottom
Physical Specs
Height 1350.0mm (53.1") 1143.8mm (45")
Width 237.0mm (9.3") 320.7mm (12.6")
Depth 420.0mm (16.5") 428.3mm (16.9")
Weight 16.14kg (35.5lbs) 35.90kg (79lbs)
Enclosure Bass Reflex Bass Reflex
Finish Composite MDF/Vinyl
Available Colors Black Black, Walnut, White
Grille Yes Yes
Moisture Resistancy No No
Connections
Biamp Inputs No Yes
Other
Parts Warranty 5 Yrs w/ Registration 5 Years
Labor Warranty 5 Yrs w/ Registration 5 Years

Verdict

A generation apart: Polk R700 is the newer design, against a 2011 model. Newer is not automatically better, but the older one is more likely to be discounted or near run-out.

AreaBetterWhy
Bass B Polk R700 digs deeper - 38Hz against 42Hz. A subwoofer would even that out.
Amplifier needs A MartinLogan ESL is more sensitive (91dB vs 88dB), so it goes louder on the same amplifier.
Amplifier match B Polk R700 is the easier load at 8 ohms.
Headroom evenly matched Similar power handling (300W vs 300W).
Size depends Similar cabinet size - neither is easier to fit.
Expandability B Polk R700: bi-amping. Polk R700 sits in a wider range (10 models), so a matched surround system is easier later.

A MartinLogan ESL   B Polk R700
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, placement or how you will use them. Only specs published for both speakers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.

Which should you choose?

Polk R700 has the edge on paper, though the margin is not large. The rows marked "depends" may matter more to you than the score does. If your amplifier is modest, vintage or valve-based, MartinLogan ESL is the safer partner - the other will want more current or more watts to sound its best.

And remember what a spec sheet cannot show: how each looks in your room and whether the finish suits it, what dealer support and warranty are like where you live, and how they actually sound to you. If you can hear them first - ideally with your own music - that will tell you more than any number above.


Most Popular Speakers
Klipsch Reference R-51M
Klipsch R-51M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
2-way | 87 dB | 6 ohms
Wharfedale Elysian 2
Wharfedale Elysian 2
3-way | 89 dB | 4 ohms
KEF Q150
KEF Q150
2-way | 86 dB | 8 ohms
Bowers & Wilkins 606 S2 Anniversary Edition
B&W 606 S2
2-way | 88 dB | 8 ohms
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-500M
Klipsch RP-500M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
Wharfedale EVO5.1
Wharfedale EVO5.1
2-way | 87 dB | 4 ohms
Wharfedale EVO4.1
Wharfedale EVO4.1
2-way | 87 dB | 8 ohms
Copyright © 2026 by SpeakerDecision
About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

Report a Correction