SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS
    • By Type
      Passive Bookshelf Speakers Passive Floor-standing Speakers Passive Center Channel Speakers Passive In-wall Speakers All Passive Speakers Powered Subwoofers Powered Stereo Speakers
      By Brand
      Acoustic Energy Aperion ATC Audio-Technica Audioengine Bluesound Bowers Wilkins Buchardt Cambridge Audio Canton DALI Definitive Technology Dynaudio ELAC Emotiva Fluance Focal Fyne Audio Genelec GoldenEar Harbeth Jamo JBL Kanto KEF KLH Klipsch Leak Mackie Magnepan MartinLogan McIntosh Mission MoFi Monitor Audio Nuvo Onkyo OSD Paradigm Perlisten Polk Audio PS Audio PSB Q Acoustics REL Revel Russound Sennheiser Sonos Sonus faber Sony Spendor SVS Tannoy Technics Triangle Velodyne Victrola Wharfedale Wilson Audio Yamaha
  • AMPLIFIERS
    • By Type
      All Amplifiers Integrated Amplifiers Stereo Receivers Streaming Amplifiers Power Amplifiers
      By Brand
      Accuphase Advance Paris Anthem Arcam Audio Research AudioControl Audioengine Audiolab Bluesound Bose Buchardt Cambridge Audio Denon Devialet ELAC Emotiva Eversolo FiiO Fosi Audio Hegel HiFi Rose Integra JBL LEAK Luxman Marantz Mark Levinson McIntosh Michi MISSION MOON Musical Fidelity NAD Naim Onkyo OSD Parasound Pass Labs Peachtree PrimaLuna Primare PS Audio Rega Rogue Audio Roksan Rotel Schiit Audio Sonos Sony SVS T+A TEAC Technics Vincent WiiM Yamaha
  • SMART FIND
  • TOOLS
  • BLOG
  1. Home
  2. Passive Floor-standing Speakers
  3. MartinLogan ESL vs Klipsch R-820F

MartinLogan ESL vs Klipsch R-820F Comparison

x
Speaker to replace
Change

MartinLogan ESL

Passive Floor-standing | 42-22k Hz

MartinLogan ElectroMotion ESL
Check price atAmazon›
Change
    
Klipsch R-820F

Passive Floor-standing | 35-21k Hz

Klipsch Reference R-820F
Check price atAmazon›
MartinLogan ESL MartinLogan ESL
Check price atAmazon›
Klipsch R-820F Klipsch R-820F
Check price atAmazon›
MartinLogan ESL
See at AMAZON
Klipsch R-820F
See at AMAZON

MartinLogan ESL vs Klipsch R-820F Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing ESL and R-820F, two Passive Floor-standing speakers from MartinLogan and Klipsch.

Let's have a brief look at the main features of MartinLogan ESL and Klipsch R-820F first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Key SpecsMartinLogan ESLKlipsch R-820F
Design2-way2-way
Tweeter8.6x34" curved electrostatic transducer1"
Woofer8" high-excursion paper cone2 x 8" Copper-spun IMG
Frequency response42-22k Hz35-21k Hz
Sensitivity91 dB97 dB
Impedance6 ohms8 ohms
Power range20-300 wattsup to 150 watts
Weight16.14kg / 35.5lbs24.55kg / 54lbs
Dimensions (H x W x D)53-1/8" x 9-5/16" x 16-1/2"
1350.0 x 237.0 x 420.0mm
43-1/8" x 10-7/8" x 16-3/4"
1096.0 x 277.0 x 426.0mm

What size room are the MartinLogan ESL and Klipsch R-820F speakers good for?

The size of the room in which you are planning to use these loudspeakers is an important decision factor. Here we have compared their suitability to various sizes of environments considering their size and max power parameters:

Listening Environment* MartinLogan ESL Klipsch R-820F
Near-field Bad Bad
Small Room Poor Poor
Mid-size Room Average Good
Large Room Good Good
Very Large Room Average Poor

(* Approximate Room sizes: Small < 100sq. ft / 9 m2, Mid-size: 100-220 sq. ft / 9-20 m2, Large 220-400 sq. ft / 20-36 m2, Very Large: > 400 sq. ft / 36 m2. Average Floor Height: 9" / 2.7m. Typical room sizes differ from country to country, and the actual listening experience changes depending on floor height, room shape, surface materials, listening position, speaker locations, etc.)

The sections below take each area in turn: drivers, frequency response, physical size and what you get in the box.


**This post contains affiliate links, and we will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through our links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.


Drivers

Both ESL and R-820F are 2-way speakers.

Woofer - 8 inch
MartinLogan ESL
Tweeter - 1 inchWoofer - 8 inchWoofer - 8 inch
Klipsch R-820F

TweeterWoofer

Front view, drawn to scale - cabinets and drivers share one scale, so sizes are directly comparable. Hover a driver for its size.

Driver MartinLogan ESL Klipsch R-820F
Driver Setup 2-way 2-way
Tweeter 8.6x34-inch 1-inch
Midrange - -
Woofer 1 x 8-inch 2 x 8-inch

ESL features a 8.6x34" curved electrostatic transducer Tweeter and 1 x 8" high-excursion paper cone Woofer. On the other hand, the R-820F features a 1" Tweeter and 2 x 8" Copper-spun IMG Woofer.

Frequency Response

ESL has a frequency range of 42-22k Hz whereas R-820F has a frequency range of 35-21k Hz. With a minimum frequency of 35Hz, the R-820F can go significantly deeper on the low side and provide stronger bass compared to the ESL's min frequency of 42Hz.

The graph below depicts how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average Low Frequency values of other speakers in the Floor-standing class in our database.

Low Frequency

Floor-standing Speakers

ESL
R-820F
Min
Average
Median

Neither pair reaches down to 20Hz, the usual definition of full-range, which is normal for speakers of this size. If you want the bottom octave for movies or bass-heavy music, add a subwoofer to whichever you choose. Visit our Powered Subwoofers section to find out more about the available options.

Impedance and Sensitivity

ESL is a 6 ohms speaker compared to the R-820F which has a nominal impedance of 8 ohms.

These two speakers also have different sensitivity levels. ESL sensitivity is rated at 91 dB and the R-820F's is rated at 97 dB. This 6 dB difference makes the Klipsch R-820F a more sensitive speaker compared to MartinLogan ESL, hence will play louder with the same amount of watts.

Sensitivity

Floor-standing Speakers

ESL
R-820F
Min
Average
Median

Power Range

Power range is the range of input power in watts RMS that a loudspeaker is designed to handle. Staying within that range gives nominal performance; driving the speaker beyond its maximum wattage can damage it.

ESL can handle a max power of 300 watts RMS, whereas R-820F has a max power handling value of 150 watts RMS, 150 watts less than the ESL.

Note that higher power handling does not make a speaker louder: that depends mainly on sensitivity and impedance. The calculator below shows how loud each of these actually plays on a real amplifier.

Which plays louder on your amplifier?

Starting with a popular amplifier — change it to the one you own, or any you are considering, and watch both numbers move.

MartinLogan ESL
 
Klipsch R-820F
 

Input Type and Bi-Amping / Bi-Wiring

ESL features Post type posts and R-820F has a Post type posts. None of these speakers feature bi-amping/bi-wiring.

Physical Specs

The size of a speaker can sometimes be an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare MartinLogan ESL's and Klipsch R-820F's external dimensions. MartinLogan ESL has external dimensions of 1350.0 x 237.0 x 420.0mm (53-1/8 x 9-5/16 x 16-1/2inch) whereas Klipsch R-820F has external dimensions of 1096.0 x 277.0 x 426.0mm (43-1/8 x 10-7/8 x 16-3/4inch).

MartinLogan ESL is 40mm narrower and 6mm less deeper than Klipsch R-820F but it is also 254mm taller.

Below you can see the front view size comparison of MartinLogan ESL and Klipsch R-820F in scale.

MartinLogan ESL vs Klipsch R-820F Size Comparison - Front View
Comparison image of MartinLogan ESL and Klipsch R-820F Size and External Dimensions

Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited. The base surface area of the MartinLogan ESL is approximately 995.4cm2 / 154.3inch2 and base area of the Klipsch R-820F is approximately 1180.0cm2 / 182.9inch2. The ESL requires 16% less surface area than the R-820F which gives it a small advantage on placement in tight spaces.

Weight Comparison

The weight of a loudspeaker can become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often. Weight of a speaker can also "sometimes" be an indicator of the rigidity of the enclosure and the quality of the internal components used. The MartinLogan ESL weighs 16.14kg / 35.5lbs and the Klipsch R-820F weighs 24.55kg / 54lbs. This makes the R-820F 52% heavier than the ESL.

Here is a comparison of how ESL and R-820F's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Passive Floor-standing class.

Weight
All Floor-standing Speakers
MartinLogan ESL
Klipsch R-820F
Min
Average
Max

What's in the Box of MartinLogan ESL?

Here are the items that are included inside the box of ESL:
  • Floor-standing hybrid electrostatic loudspeaker
  • AC power adapter (w/ attached 10-feet DC cord)
  • Cloth grille (installed)
  • 4 Pre-installed feet
  • Users Manual (En/Fr)
  • Product Registration Card

What's in the Box of Klipsch R-820F?

Here are the items that come with the R-820F:
  • Floorstanding loudspeaker
  • Grille (installed)
  • 2 Feet
  • 4 Screws
  • Quick Setup Guide
  • Important Safety Instructions
  • Warranty Information
  • Loudspeaker Feet note


Reasons to choose MartinLogan ElectroMotion ESL over Klipsch Reference R-820F

Max Input Power 300 watts vs 150 watts Handle more power from your amplifier
High Frequency Response 22k Hz vs 21k Hz Generates higher frequency
Base Surface Area 995cm2 vs 1180cm2 Takes less floor space

Reasons to choose Klipsch Reference R-820F over MartinLogan ElectroMotion ESL

Sensitivity 97 dB vs 91 dB Play louder with same amount of amplification power
Nominal Impedance 8 ohms vs 6 ohms Less selective with amplifiers
Number of Woofers 2 vs 1 More woofers
Low Frequency Response 35 Hz vs 42 Hz Generates deeper bass
Height 1096mm vs 1350mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces

MartinLogan ESL vs Klipsch R-820F Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications
General MartinLogan ElectroMotion ESL Klipsch Reference R-820F
Brand MartinLogan Klipsch
Speaker Type Floor-standing speaker Floor-standing speaker
Power Range 20-300 watts up to 150 watts
Sensitivity 91 dB 97 dB
Impedance 6 ohms 8 ohms
Frequency Response 42-22k Hz 35-21k Hz
Drivers
Woofer Quantity 1 2
Woofer Size 8" 8"
Woofer Composition high-excursion paper cone Copper-spun IMG
Woofer Surround Material Rubber Rubber
Tweeter Size 8.6x34" 1"
Tweeter Type curved electrostatic transducer n/a
Aimable Tweeter No No
Midrange Driver No No
Physical Specs
Height 1350.0mm (53.1") 1096.0mm (43.1")
Width 237.0mm (9.3") 277.0mm (10.9")
Depth 420.0mm (16.5") 426.0mm (16.8")
Weight 16.14kg (35.5lbs) 24.55kg (54lbs)
Enclosure Bass Reflex Bass Reflex
Finish Composite MDF/Wood-grain vinyl
Available Colors Black Black
Grille Yes Yes
Moisture Resistancy No No
Connections
Biamp Inputs No No
Other
Parts Warranty 5 Yrs w/ Registration 5 Years
Labor Warranty 5 Yrs w/ Registration 5 Years

Verdict

A generation apart: Klipsch R-820F is the newer design, against a 2011 model. Newer is not automatically better, but the older one is more likely to be discounted or near run-out.

AreaBetterWhy
Bass B Klipsch R-820F digs deeper - 35Hz against 42Hz. A subwoofer would even that out.
Amplifier needs B Klipsch R-820F is more sensitive (97dB vs 91dB), so it goes louder on the same amplifier.
Amplifier match B Klipsch R-820F is the easier load at 8 ohms.
Headroom A MartinLogan ESL takes more power (300W vs 150W) - more in hand in a big room.
Size depends Similar cabinet size - neither is easier to fit.

A MartinLogan ESL   B Klipsch R-820F
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, placement or how you will use them. Only specs published for both speakers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.

Which should you choose?

Klipsch R-820F has the edge on paper, though the margin is not large. The rows marked "depends" may matter more to you than the score does. If a subwoofer is in your plans, the bass gap largely stops mattering - you would be crossing over above 42Hz anyway, so judge these on the other rows instead. Match it to your room: we rate MartinLogan ESL the better fit for a very large room, and Klipsch R-820F for a mid-size room.

And remember what a spec sheet cannot show: how each looks in your room and whether the finish suits it, what dealer support and warranty are like where you live, and how they actually sound to you. If you can hear them first - ideally with your own music - that will tell you more than any number above.


Most Popular Speakers
Klipsch Reference R-51M
Klipsch R-51M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
2-way | 87 dB | 6 ohms
Wharfedale Elysian 2
Wharfedale Elysian 2
3-way | 89 dB | 4 ohms
KEF Q150
KEF Q150
2-way | 86 dB | 8 ohms
Bowers & Wilkins 606 S2 Anniversary Edition
B&W 606 S2
2-way | 88 dB | 8 ohms
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-500M
Klipsch RP-500M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
Wharfedale EVO5.1
Wharfedale EVO5.1
2-way | 87 dB | 4 ohms
Wharfedale EVO4.1
Wharfedale EVO4.1
2-way | 87 dB | 8 ohms
Copyright © 2026 by SpeakerDecision
About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

Report a Correction