These sit in different price classes - Klipsch R-41PM costs roughly 1.9x what Audioengine A2+ Wireless does. Expect it to lead on paper; the question is whether the gap is audible enough in your room to be worth it.
| Area | Better | Why |
| Bass |
B |
Audioengine A2+ Wireless digs deeper - 65Hz against 76Hz. |
| Built-in power |
A |
Klipsch R-41PM has the bigger amplifier (70W vs 30W RMS). |
| Connections |
A |
Klipsch R-41PM adds phono and digital inputs. |
| Size |
depends |
Audioengine A2+ Wireless is easier to place; Klipsch R-41PM is bigger, which usually goes with fuller bass. Your room decides. |
| Expandability |
depends |
Klipsch R-41PM: a sub output; Audioengine A2+ Wireless: a sub output. |
| Price |
B |
Audioengine A2+ Wireless is cheaper - $269 against $499, about 46% less; arguably a different class. |
A Klipsch R-41PM
B Audioengine A2+ Wireless
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, placement or how you will use them.
Only specs published for both speakers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.
Which should you choose?
Klipsch R-41PM is ahead, but only on 1 of the measured areas, and it costs about 46% more. That is a lot of money for a narrow margin on paper - Audioengine A2+ Wireless looks like the sensible buy unless something else about the Klipsch R-41PM appeals to you. If a subwoofer is in your plans, the bass gap largely stops mattering - you would be crossing over above 76Hz anyway, so judge these on the other rows instead. In a large or open-plan room, Klipsch R-41PM has the cabinet volume to fill it more easily; in a small room, near a wall or at desk distance, Audioengine A2+ Wireless is the easier speaker to get right.
And remember what a spec sheet cannot show: how each looks in your room and whether the finish suits it, what dealer support and warranty are like where you live, and how they actually sound to you. If you can hear them first - ideally with your own music - that will tell you more than any number above.