SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS by TYPE
    • Passive Bookshelf Speakers
    • Passive Floor-standing Speakers
    • Passive Center Channel Speakers
    • Passive In-wall Speakers
    • All Passive Speakers
    • Powered Subwoofers
    • Powered Stereo Speakers
  • AMPLIFIERS
  • SMART FIND

Klipsch R-34C vs Polk ES35 Comparison

x
Speaker to replace
Change

Klipsch R-34C

Passive Center Channel | 82-21k Hz

Klipsch Reference R-34C
CHECK PRICE
Change
    
Polk ES35

Passive Center Channel | 66-40k Hz

Polk Audio Signature Elite ES35
CHECK PRICE
Klipsch R-34C Klipsch R-34C
See at AMAZON
Polk ES35 Polk ES35
See at AMAZON
Klipsch R-34C
See at AMAZON
Polk ES35
See at AMAZON
Klipsch R-34C vs Polk ES35 Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing R-34C and ES35, two Passive Center Channel speakers from Klipsch and Polk Audio.

Let's have a brief look at the main features of Klipsch R-34C and Polk ES35 first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Klipsch R-34C Key Specs

  • 2-way Design
  • 1" Tractrix horn Tweeter
  • 4 x 3.5" copper spun IMG Woofer
  • 82-21k Hz Frequency Response
  • 96 dB Sensitivity
  • Impedance: 8ohms
  • Power Range:up to 100watts
  • Weight:5.91kg
  • Dimensions (H x W x D): 126.0" x 26-1/16" x 6-1/4"( 126.0 x 662.0 x 159.0mm )

Polk ES35 Key Specs

  • 2-way Design
  • 1" High-res dome Tweeter
  • 6 x 3" mica-reinforced polypropylene Dynamic Balance Woofer
  • 66-40k Hz Frequency Response
  • 89 dB Sensitivity
  • Impedance: 8ohms
  • Power Range:20-150watts
  • Weight:6.36kg
  • Dimensions (H x W x D): 107.0" x 24-7/16" x 6-1/16"( 107.0 x 621.0 x 154.0mm )

What size room are the Klipsch R-34C and Polk ES35 speakers good for?

The size of the room in which you are planning to use these loudspeakers is an important decision factor. Here we have compared their suitability to various sizes of environments considering their size and max power parameters:

Listening Environment* Klipsch R-34C Polk ES35
Near-field Average Poor
Small Room Good Average
Mid-size Room Average Good
Large Room Poor Average
Very Large Room Bad Poor

(* Approximate Room sizes: Small < 100sq. ft / 9 m2, Mid-size: 100-220 sq. ft / 9-20 m2, Large 220-400 sq. ft / 20-36 m2, Very Large: > 400 sq. ft / 36 m2. Average Floor Height: 9" / 2.7m. Typical room sizes differ from country to country, and the actual listening experience changes depending on floor height, room shape, surface materials, listening position, speaker locations, etc.)

In the following sections, we will get into more detail in order to better understand how the Klipsch R-34C and Polk ES35 compare and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one of these loudspeakers is the better choice for you.


**This post contains affiliate links, and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through my links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.


Drivers

Both R-34C and ES35 are 2-way speakers.

Driver Klipsch R-34C Polk ES35
Driver Setup 2-way 2-way
Tweeter 1-inch 1-inch
Midrange - -
Woofer 4 x 3.5-inch 6 x 3-inch

R-34C features a 1" aluminum Tractrix horn Tweeter and 4 x 3.5" copper spun IMG Woofer . On the other hand, the ES35 features a 1" Terylene High-res dome Tweeter and 6 x 3" mica-reinforced polypropylene Dynamic Balance Woofer .

Frequency Response

R-34C has a frequency range of 82-21k Hz whereas ES35 has a frequency range of 66-40k Hz. With a minimum frequency of 66Hz, the ES35 can go significantly deeper on the low side and provide stronger bass compared to the R-34C's min frequency of 82Hz.

Below graphs depict how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average values of the Min and Max Frequencies of other speakers in the Center Channel class in our database.

Low Frequency

Center Channel Speakers

R-34C
ES35
Min
Average
Max
High Frequency

Center Channel Speakers

Klipsch R-34C
Polk ES35
Min
Average
Max

None of these speakers achieves full range experience which is commonly agreed as 20Hz-20kHz. In order to achieve lower lows / deeper bass, we recommend you pair these with a subwoofer. Visit our Powered Subwoofers section to find out more about the available options.

Impedance and Sensitivity

R-34C and ES35 have the same Impedance of 8 ohms but where they differ is the sensitivity levels. R-34C sensitivity is rated at 96 dB and the ES35's is at 89 dB. This 7 dB difference makes the Klipsch R-34C a more sensitive speaker compared to Polk ES35, hence will play louder with the same amount of watts.

Sensitivity

Center Channel Speakers

R-34C
ES35
Min
Average
Max

Power Range

Power range is the range of input power in watts RMS that a loudspeaker is designed to handle. While using an amplifier within this range ensures the nominal performance , inputting a power that is higher than the max wattage can result in a damaged speaker.

R-34C can handle a max power of 150 watts RMS from the amp the whereas R-34C has a max power handling value of 100 watts RMS , 50 watts less than the ES35.

Keep in mind that a higher max power handling value doesn't necessarily make that a louder speaker compared to a lower max handling speaker. Loudness or the sound level is also impacted by parameters such as Impedance, sensitivity and system efficiencies.

Input Type and Bi-Amping / Bi-Wiring

R-34C features 5-Way post type posts and ES35 has a 5-Way post type posts. None of these speakers feature bi-amping/bi-wiring.

Klipsch R-34C Terminals
Klipsch R-34C's Binding post terminals

Polk ES355-Way post Terminals
Polk ES35's 5-Way post terminals

Polk ES35  Port
Polk ES35 Port

Physical Specs

Size of a speaker can sometimes become an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare Klipsch R-34C's and Polk ES35's external dimensions. Klipsch R-34C has external dimensions of 126.0 x 662.0 x 159.0mm ( 4-15/16 x 26-1/16 x 6-1/4inch) whereas Polk ES35 has external dimensions of 107.0 x 621.0 x 154.0mm ( 4-3/16 x 24-7/16 x 6-1/16inch) .

Klipsch R-34C is clearly the larger of the two speakers. Its body is 41mm wider, 19mm taller and 5mm deeper than Polk ES35.

Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited. The base surface area of the Klipsch R-34C is approximately 1052.6cm2 / 163.2inch2 and base area of the Polk ES35 is approximately 956.3cm2 / 148.2inch2. The R-34C requires 10% more surface area than the ES35 which gives it a small disadvantage on placement in tight spaces.

Weight Comparison

The weight of a loudspeaker can become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often. Weight of a speaker can also "sometimes" be an indicator of the rigidity of the enclosure and the quality of the internal components used. The Klipsch R-34C weighs 5.91kg / 13lbs and the Polk ES35 weighs 6.36kg / 14lbs. This makes the ES35 8% heavier than the R-34C.

Here is a comparison of how R-34C and ES35's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Passive Center Channel class.

Weight
All Center Channel Speakers
Klipsch R-34C
Polk ES35
Min
Average
Max

What's in the Box of Klipsch R-34C?

Here are the items that are included inside the box of R-34C:
  • Center-channel loudspeaker
  • Grille (installed)
  • 8 Self-adhesive rubber feet
  • Quick Setup Guide
  • Important Safety Instructions
  • Warranty Information
  • What's in the Box of Polk ES35?

    Here are the items that come with the ES35:
  • LCR loudspeaker
  • Grille (attached)
  • 4 Self-adhesive rubber feet
  • Wall-mount template
  • Owners Manual
  • Online Product Registration

  • Reasons to choose Klipsch Reference R-34C over Polk Audio Signature Elite ES35
    Sensitivity 96 dB vs 89 dB Play louder with same amount of amplification power
    Woofer Size 3.5 inches vs 3 inches Larger woofer

    Reasons to choose Polk Audio Signature Elite ES35 over Klipsch Reference R-34C

    Max Input Power 150 watts vs 100 watts Handle more power from your amplifier
    Number of Woofers 6 vs 4 More woofers
    Low Frequency Response 66 Hz vs 82 Hz Generates deeper bass
    High Frequency Response 40k Hz vs 21k Hz Generates higher frequency
    Height 107mm vs 126mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces
    Base Surface Area 956cm2 vs 1052cm2 Takes less floor space
    Klipsch R-34C vs Polk ES35 Specs Table
    Detailed comparison of specifications
    General Klipsch Reference R-34C Polk Audio Signature Elite ES35
    Brand Klipsch Polk Audio
    Speaker Type Center channel speaker Low-profile center channel speaker
    Power Range up to 100 watts 20-150 watts
    Sensitivity 96 dB 89 dB
    Impedance 8 ohms 8 ohms
    Frequency Response 82-21k Hz 66-40k Hz
    Drivers
    Woofer Quantity 4 6
    Woofer Size 3.5" 3"
    Woofer Composition copper spun IMG mica-reinforced polypropylene Dynamic Balance
    Tweeter Size 1" 1"
    Tweeter Type Tractrix horn High-res dome
    Aimable Tweeter No No
    Midrange Driver N/A" N/A"
    Firing Direction n/a rear
    Physical Specs
    Height 126.0mm (5") 107.0mm (4.2")
    Width 662.0mm (26.1") 621.0mm (24.4")
    Depth 159.0mm (6.3") 154.0mm (6.1")
    Weight 5.91kg (13lbs) 6.36kg (14lbs)
    Enclosure Bass Reflex Bass Reflex
    Finish textured wood grain viny MDF, Wood-grain vinyl
    Available Colors Black Black, Walnut, White
    Grille Yes Yes
    Moisture Resistancy No No
    Connections
    Other
    Parts Warranty 5 Years 5 Years
    Labor Warranty 5 Years 5 Years

    Most Popular Speakers
    Klipsch Reference R-51M
    Klipsch R-51M
    2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
    Wharfedale Elysian 2
    Wharfedale Elysian 2
    3-way | 89 dB | 4 ohms
    ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
    ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
    2-way | 87 dB | 6 ohms
    Bowers & Wilkins 606 S2 Anniversary Edition
    B&W 606 S2
    2-way | 88 dB | 8 ohms
    KEF Q150
    KEF Q150
    2-way | 86 dB | 8 ohms
    Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-500M
    Klipsch RP-500M
    2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
    Wharfedale EVO4.1
    Wharfedale EVO4.1
    2-way | 87 dB | 8 ohms
    Bowers & Wilkins 606
    B&W 606
    2-way | 88 dB | 8 ohms
    Copyright © 2025 by SpeakerDecision
    About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

    Report a Correction