SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS
    • By Type
      Passive Bookshelf Speakers Passive Floor-standing Speakers Passive Center Channel Speakers Passive In-wall Speakers All Passive Speakers Powered Subwoofers Powered Stereo Speakers
      By Brand
      Acoustic Energy Audio-Technica Audioengine Bluesound Bowers Wilkins Buchardt Cambridge Audio DALI Definitive Technology Dynaudio ELAC Emotiva Fluance Focal Genelec GoldenEar Harbeth Jamo JBL Kanto KEF KLH Klipsch Leak Mackie MartinLogan McIntosh Mission MoFi Monitor Audio Nuvo Onkyo OSD Paradigm Polk Audio PS Audio PSB Q Acoustics REL Revel Russound Sennheiser Sonos Sonus faber Sony SVS Technics Triangle Velodyne Victrola Wharfedale Wilson Audio
  • AMPLIFIERS
    • By Type
      All Amplifiers Integrated Amplifiers Stereo Receivers Streaming Amplifiers Power Amplifiers
      By Brand
      Advance Paris Anthem Arcam AudioControl Audioengine Audiolab Bluesound Bose Buchardt Cambridge Audio Denon Devialet ELAC FiiO HiFi Rose Integra JBL LEAK Marantz Mark Levinson McIntosh Michi MISSION NAD Naim Onkyo OSD Parasound Peachtree Primare PS Audio Rega Roksan Rotel Sonos Sony SVS TEAC Technics WiiM Yamaha
  • SMART FIND
  • TOOLS
  • BLOG
  1. Home
  2. Passive Bookshelf Speakers
  3. Klipsch RP-400M vs KEF Q150

Klipsch RP-400M vs KEF Q150 Comparison

x
Speaker to replace
Change

Klipsch RP-400M

Passive Bookshelf | 52-25k Hz

Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-400M
Check price atAmazon›
Change
    
KEF Q150

Passive Bookshelf | 51-28k Hz

KEF Q150
Check price atAmazon›
Klipsch RP-400M Klipsch RP-400M
Check price atAmazon›
KEF Q150 KEF Q150
Check price atAmazon›
Klipsch RP-400M
See at AMAZON
KEF Q150
See at AMAZON

Klipsch RP-400M vs KEF Q150 Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing RP-400M and Q150, two Passive Bookshelf speakers from Klipsch and KEF.

Let's have a brief look at the main features of Klipsch RP-400M and KEF Q150 first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Key SpecsKlipsch RP-400MKEF Q150
Design2-way2-way
Uni-Q driver—11th Generation Uni-Q
Tweeter1" Tractrix Horn1" Dome
Woofer4" Cerametallic5.25" Aluminum
Frequency response52-25k Hz51-28k Hz
Sensitivity93 dB86 dB
Impedance8 ohms8 ohms
Power rangeup to 50 watts10-100 watts
Weight4.10kg / 9lbs5.60kg / 12.3lbs
Dimensions (H x W x D)11.7" x 5.6" x 7.5"
298.0 x 144.0 x 191.0mm
11.9" x 7.0" x 10.9"
303.0 x 180.0 x 278.0mm

What size room are the Klipsch RP-400M and KEF Q150 speakers good for?

The size of the room in which you are planning to use these loudspeakers is an important decision factor. Here we have compared their suitability to various sizes of environments considering their size and max power parameters:

Listening Environment* Klipsch RP-400M KEF Q150
Near-field Good Average
Small Room Good Good
Mid-size Room Average Average
Large Room Poor Poor
Very Large Room No way Bad

(* Approximate Room sizes: Small < 100sq. ft / 9 m2, Mid-size: 100-220 sq. ft / 9-20 m2, Large 220-400 sq. ft / 20-36 m2, Very Large: > 400 sq. ft / 36 m2. Average Floor Height: 9" / 2.7m. Typical room sizes differ from country to country, and the actual listening experience changes depending on floor height, room shape, surface materials, listening position, speaker locations, etc.)

The sections below take each area in turn: drivers, frequency response, physical size and what you get in the box.


**This post contains affiliate links, and we will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through our links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.


Drivers

Both RP-400M and Q150 are 2-way speakers.

Tweeter - 1 inchWoofer - 4 inch
Klipsch RP-400M
Tweeter - 1 inchWoofer - 5.25 inch
KEF Q150

TweeterWoofer

Front view, drawn to scale - cabinets and drivers share one scale, so sizes are directly comparable. Hover a driver for its size.

Driver Klipsch RP-400M KEF Q150
Driver Setup 2-way 2-way
Tweeter 1-inch 1-inch
Midrange - -
Woofer 1 x 4-inch 1 x 5.25-inch

RP-400M features a 1" Tractrix Horn Tweeter and 1 x 4" Cerametallic Woofer with a Crossover frequency at 1500Hz. On the other hand, the Q150 features a 1" vented aluminum Dome Tweeter and 1 x 5.25" Aluminum Woofer with a Crossover frequency at 2500Hz.

Frequency Response

RP-400M has a frequency range of 52-25k Hz whereas Q150 has a frequency range of 51-28k Hz. With a minimum frequency of 51Hz, the Q150 can go slightly deeper then the RP-400M's min frequency of 52Hz.

The graph below depicts how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average Low Frequency values of other speakers in the Bookshelf class in our database.

Low Frequency

Bookshelf Speakers

RP-400M
Q150
Min
Average
Median

Neither pair reaches down to 20Hz, the usual definition of full-range, which is normal for speakers of this size. If you want the bottom octave for movies or bass-heavy music, add a subwoofer to whichever you choose. Visit our Powered Subwoofers section to find out more about the available options.

Impedance and Sensitivity

RP-400M and Q150 have the same Impedance of 8 ohms but where they differ is the sensitivity levels. RP-400M sensitivity is rated at 93 dB and the Q150's is at 86 dB. This 7 dB difference makes the Klipsch RP-400M a more sensitive speaker compared to KEF Q150, hence will play louder with the same amount of watts.

Sensitivity

Bookshelf Speakers

RP-400M
Q150
Min
Average
Median

Power Range

Power range is the range of input power in watts RMS that a loudspeaker is designed to handle. Staying within that range gives nominal performance; driving the speaker beyond its maximum wattage can damage it.

Q150 can handle a max power of 100 watts RMS, whereas RP-400M has a max power handling value of 50 watts RMS, 50 watts less than the Q150.

Note that higher power handling does not make a speaker louder: that depends mainly on sensitivity and impedance. The calculator below shows how loud each of these actually plays on a real amplifier.

Which plays louder on your amplifier?

Starting with a popular amplifier — change it to the one you own, or any you are considering, and watch both numbers move.

Klipsch RP-400M
 
KEF Q150
 

Input Type and Bi-Amping / Bi-Wiring

RP-400M features Post type posts and Q150 has a Post type posts. None of these speakers feature bi-amping/bi-wiring.

Klipsch RP-400M Terminals
Klipsch RP-400M's Single binding posts terminals

KEF Q150 Terminals
KEF Q150's Post terminals

Cabinet Type and Port Position

Both RP-400M and Q150 have rear firing ports. Rear ported speakers generally need more room between the backside of the speaker and the wall compared to sealed and front/bottom ported speakers. Placing the speakers too close to the walls may cause the bass to sound boomy.

If you are limited in space and can't get the speakers away from the backwall, check our Speakers with Front Firing Ports page.

Klipsch RP-400M  Port
Klipsch RP-400M Tractrix horn-shaped Port

KEF Q150  Port
KEF Q150 Port

Physical Specs

The size of a speaker can sometimes be an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare Klipsch RP-400M's and KEF Q150's external dimensions. Klipsch RP-400M has external dimensions of 298.0 x 144.0 x 191.0mm (11.7 x 5.6 x 7.5inch) whereas KEF Q150 has external dimensions of 303.0 x 180.0 x 278.0mm (11.9 x 7.0 x 10.9inch).

KEF Q150 is clearly the larger of the two speakers. Its body is 36mm wider, 5mm taller and 87mm deeper than Klipsch RP-400M.

Below you can see the front view size comparison of Klipsch RP-400M and KEF Q150 in scale.

Klipsch RP-400M vs KEF Q150 Size Comparison - Front View
Comparison image of Klipsch RP-400M and KEF Q150 Size and External Dimensions

Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited. The base surface area of the Klipsch RP-400M is approximately 275.0cm2 / 42.6inch2 and base area of the KEF Q150 is approximately 500.4cm2 / 77.6inch2. The RP-400M requires 45% less surface area than the Q150 which gives it a small advantage on placement in tight spaces.

Here is another comparison that shows both speakers on a BDI Octave Media Cabinet, next to a standard size amplifier and turntable in scale:

Klipsch RP-400M vs KEF Q150 Size Comparison on a Media Console
Size Comparison image of Klipsch RP-400M and KEF Q150 on a Media Console
Weight Comparison

The weight of a loudspeaker can become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often. Weight of a speaker can also "sometimes" be an indicator of the rigidity of the enclosure and the quality of the internal components used. The Klipsch RP-400M weighs 4.10kg / 9lbs and the KEF Q150 weighs 5.60kg / 12.3lbs. This makes the Q150 37% heavier than the RP-400M.

Here is a comparison of how RP-400M and Q150's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Passive Bookshelf class.

Weight
All Bookshelf Speakers
Klipsch RP-400M
KEF Q150
Min
Average
Max

What's in the Box of Klipsch RP-400M?

Here are the items that are included inside the box of RP-400M:
  • 2 Bookshelf loudspeakers
  • 2 Grilles (installed)
  • 8 Self-adhesive rubber feet
  • User Manual
  • Important Safety Instructions
  • Warranty Information

What's in the Box of KEF Q150?

Here are the items that come with the Q150:
  • 2 Bookshelf loudspeakers
  • 2 Foam port plugs
  • 8 Self-adhesive rubber feet
  • Owner's Manual
  • Warranty Registration Card


Reasons to choose Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-400M over KEF Q150

Sensitivity 93 dB vs 86 dB Play louder with same amount of amplification power
Mounting Bracket Yes vs No Allows mounting on walls
Height 298mm vs 303mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces
Base Surface Area 275cm2 vs 500cm2 Takes less floor space
Price per pair* 399USD vs 600USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)

Reasons to choose KEF Q150 over Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-400M

Max Input Power 100 watts vs 50 watts Handle more power from your amplifier
Woofer Size 5.25 inches vs 4 inches Larger woofer
Low Frequency Response 51 Hz vs 52 Hz Generates deeper bass
High Frequency Response 28k Hz vs 25k Hz Generates higher frequency

Klipsch RP-400M vs KEF Q150 Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications
General Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-400M KEF Q150
Brand Klipsch KEF
Speaker Type Bookshelf speakers Bookshelf speakers
Power Range up to 50 watts 10-100 watts
Sensitivity 93 dB 86 dB
Impedance 8 ohms 8 ohms
Impedance n/a 3.7 ohms
Frequency Response 52-25k Hz 51-28k Hz
Drivers
Woofer Quantity 1 1
Woofer Size 4" 5.25"
Woofer Composition Cerametallic Aluminum
Woofer Surround Material Rubber Rubber
Tweeter Size 1" 1"
Tweeter Type Tractrix Horn Dome
Aimable Tweeter No No
Midrange Driver No No
Crossover Frequency 1500Hz 2500Hz
Firing Direction rear rear
Physical Specs
Height 298.0mm (11.7") 303.0mm (11.9")
Width 144.0mm (5.7") 180.0mm (7.1")
Depth 191.0mm (7.5") 278.0mm (10.9")
Weight 4.10kg (9lbs) 5.60kg (12.3lbs)
Enclosure Bass Reflex Bass Reflex
Finish MDF/Wood-grain vinyl MDF/Vinyl-wrapped
Available Colors Ebony, Walnut, Piano Black Black, Walnut, White
Mounting Bracket Keyhole No
Recommended Stand Height 28-30" 18-24"
Grille Yes Yes
Moisture Resistancy No No
Connections
Biamp Inputs No No
Other
Parts Warranty 5 Years 5 Years
Labor Warranty 5 Years 5 Years

Verdict

No single best speaker here - they are built to different priorities, and the right one depends on your room, your amplifier and what you listen to.

AreaBetterWhy
Bass evenly matched Much the same reach (52Hz vs 51Hz).
Amplifier needs A Klipsch RP-400M is more sensitive (93dB vs 86dB), so it goes louder on the same amplifier.
Headroom B KEF Q150 takes more power (100W vs 50W) - more in hand in a big room.
Size depends Klipsch RP-400M is easier to place; KEF Q150 is bigger, which usually goes with fuller bass. Your room decides.
Expandability depends Neither adds bi-amping, a sub output or height drivers. Klipsch RP-400M sits in a wider range (17 models), so a matched surround system is easier later.
Price A Klipsch RP-400M is cheaper - $399 against $600, about 34% less.

A Klipsch RP-400M   B KEF Q150
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, placement or how you will use them. Only specs published for both speakers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.

Which should you choose?

Neither runs away with it - they trade advantages. Let the "depends" rows and your own room settle it. Match it to your room: we rate Klipsch RP-400M the better fit for near-field listening; elsewhere the two are rated the same. In a large or open-plan room, KEF Q150 has the cabinet volume to fill it more easily; in a small room, near a wall or at desk distance, Klipsch RP-400M is the easier speaker to get right.

And remember what a spec sheet cannot show: how each looks in your room and whether the finish suits it, what dealer support and warranty are like where you live, and how they actually sound to you. If you can hear them first - ideally with your own music - that will tell you more than any number above.


Most Popular Speakers
Klipsch Reference R-51M
Klipsch R-51M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
2-way | 87 dB | 6 ohms
Wharfedale Elysian 2
Wharfedale Elysian 2
3-way | 89 dB | 4 ohms
KEF Q150
KEF Q150
2-way | 86 dB | 8 ohms
Bowers & Wilkins 606 S2 Anniversary Edition
B&W 606 S2
2-way | 88 dB | 8 ohms
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-500M
Klipsch RP-500M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
Wharfedale EVO5.1
Wharfedale EVO5.1
2-way | 87 dB | 4 ohms
Wharfedale EVO4.1
Wharfedale EVO4.1
2-way | 87 dB | 8 ohms
Copyright © 2026 by SpeakerDecision
About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

Report a Correction