SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS
    • By Type
      Passive Bookshelf Speakers Passive Floor-standing Speakers Passive Center Channel Speakers Passive In-wall Speakers All Passive Speakers Powered Subwoofers Powered Stereo Speakers
      By Brand
      Acoustic Energy Audio-Technica Audioengine Bluesound Bowers Wilkins Buchardt Cambridge Audio DALI Definitive Technology Dynaudio ELAC Emotiva Fluance Focal Genelec GoldenEar Harbeth Jamo JBL Kanto KEF KLH Klipsch Leak Mackie MartinLogan McIntosh Mission MoFi Monitor Audio Nuvo Onkyo OSD Paradigm Polk Audio PS Audio PSB Q Acoustics REL Revel Russound Sennheiser Sonos Sonus faber Sony SVS Technics Triangle Velodyne Victrola Wharfedale Wilson Audio
  • AMPLIFIERS
    • By Type
      All Amplifiers Integrated Amplifiers Stereo Receivers Streaming Amplifiers Power Amplifiers
      By Brand
      Advance Paris Anthem Arcam AudioControl Audioengine Audiolab Bluesound Bose Buchardt Cambridge Audio Denon Devialet ELAC FiiO HiFi Rose Integra JBL LEAK Marantz Mark Levinson McIntosh Michi MISSION NAD Naim Onkyo OSD Parasound Peachtree Primare PS Audio Rega Roksan Rotel Sonos Sony SVS TEAC Technics WiiM Yamaha
  • SMART FIND
  • TOOLS
  • BLOG
  1. Home
  2. Passive Bookshelf Speakers
  3. Klipsch RP-160M vs KEF Q350

Klipsch RP-160M vs KEF Q350 Comparison

x
Speaker to replace
Change

Klipsch RP-160M

Passive Bookshelf | 45-25k Hz

Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-160M
Check price atAmazon›
Change
    
KEF Q350

Passive Bookshelf | 63-28k Hz

KEF Q350
Check price atAmazon›
Klipsch RP-160M Klipsch RP-160M
Check price atAmazon›
KEF Q350 KEF Q350
Check price atAmazon›
Klipsch RP-160M
See at AMAZON
KEF Q350
See at AMAZON

Klipsch RP-160M vs KEF Q350 Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing RP-160M and Q350, two Passive Bookshelf speakers from Klipsch and KEF.

Let's have a brief look at the main features of Klipsch RP-160M and KEF Q350 first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Key SpecsKlipsch RP-160MKEF Q350
Design2-way2-way
Uni-Q driver—11th Generation Uni-Q
Tweeter1" Tractrix Horn1" Dome
Woofer6.5" Cerametallic6.5" Aluminum
Frequency response45-25k Hz63-28k Hz
Sensitivity95 dB87 dB
Impedance8 ohms8 ohms
Power rangeup to 100 watts10-120 watts
Weight9.03kg / 19.9lbs7.60kg / 16.7lbs
Dimensions (H x W x D)16.6" x 8.8" x 12.8"
424.0 x 224.0 x 327.0mm
14.0" x 8.2" x 12.0"
358.0 x 210.0 x 306.0mm

What size room are the Klipsch RP-160M and KEF Q350 speakers good for?

The size of the room in which you are planning to use these loudspeakers is an important decision factor. Here we have compared their suitability to various sizes of environments considering their size and max power parameters:

Listening Environment* Klipsch RP-160M KEF Q350
Near-field Average Poor
Small Room Good Average
Mid-size Room Average Good
Large Room Poor Average
Very Large Room Bad Poor

(* Approximate Room sizes: Small < 100sq. ft / 9 m2, Mid-size: 100-220 sq. ft / 9-20 m2, Large 220-400 sq. ft / 20-36 m2, Very Large: > 400 sq. ft / 36 m2. Average Floor Height: 9" / 2.7m. Typical room sizes differ from country to country, and the actual listening experience changes depending on floor height, room shape, surface materials, listening position, speaker locations, etc.)

The sections below take each area in turn: drivers, frequency response, physical size and what you get in the box.


**This post contains affiliate links, and we will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through our links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.


Drivers

Both RP-160M and Q350 are 2-way speakers.

Tweeter - 1 inchWoofer - 6.5 inch
Klipsch RP-160M
Tweeter - 1 inchWoofer - 6.5 inch
KEF Q350

TweeterWoofer

Front view, drawn to scale - cabinets and drivers share one scale, so sizes are directly comparable. Hover a driver for its size.

Driver Klipsch RP-160M KEF Q350
Driver Setup 2-way 2-way
Tweeter 1-inch 1-inch
Midrange - -
Woofer 1 x 6.5-inch 1 x 6.5-inch

RP-160M features a 1" Tractrix Horn Tweeter and 1 x 6.5" Cerametallic Woofer with a Crossover frequency at 1500Hz. On the other hand, the Q350 features a 1" vented aluminum Dome Tweeter and 1 x 6.5" Aluminum Woofer with a Crossover frequency at 2500Hz.

Frequency Response

RP-160M has a frequency range of 45-25k Hz whereas Q350 has a frequency range of 63-28k Hz. With a minimum frequency of 45Hz, the RP-160M can go significantly deeper on the low side and provide stronger bass compared to the Q350's min frequency of 63Hz.

The graph below depicts how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average Low Frequency values of other speakers in the Bookshelf class in our database.

Low Frequency

Bookshelf Speakers

RP-160M
Q350
Min
Average
Median

Neither pair reaches down to 20Hz, the usual definition of full-range, which is normal for speakers of this size. If you want the bottom octave for movies or bass-heavy music, add a subwoofer to whichever you choose. Visit our Powered Subwoofers section to find out more about the available options.

Impedance and Sensitivity

RP-160M and Q350 have the same Impedance of 8 ohms but where they differ is the sensitivity levels. RP-160M sensitivity is rated at 95 dB and the Q350's is at 87 dB. This 8 dB difference makes the Klipsch RP-160M a more sensitive speaker compared to KEF Q350, hence will play louder with the same amount of watts.

Sensitivity

Bookshelf Speakers

RP-160M
Q350
Min
Average
Median

Power Range

Power range is the range of input power in watts RMS that a loudspeaker is designed to handle. Staying within that range gives nominal performance; driving the speaker beyond its maximum wattage can damage it.

Q350 can handle a max power of 120 watts RMS, whereas RP-160M has a max power handling value of 100 watts RMS, 20 watts less than the Q350.

Note that higher power handling does not make a speaker louder: that depends mainly on sensitivity and impedance. The calculator below shows how loud each of these actually plays on a real amplifier.

Which plays louder on your amplifier?

Starting with a popular amplifier — change it to the one you own, or any you are considering, and watch both numbers move.

Klipsch RP-160M
 
KEF Q350
 

Input Type and Bi-Amping / Bi-Wiring

RP-160M features Dual binding posts posts which make bi-amping or bi-wiring possible. Q350 has a Post which doesn't feature bi-amping/bi-wiring.

Klipsch RP-160M Terminals
Klipsch RP-160M's Dual binding posts terminals allows Bi-amping or bi-wiring

KEF Q350Post Terminals
KEF Q350's Post terminals

Cabinet Type and Port Position

Both RP-160M and Q350 have rear firing ports. Rear ported speakers generally need more room between the backside of the speaker and the wall compared to sealed and front/bottom ported speakers. Placing the speakers too close to the walls may cause the bass to sound boomy.

If you are limited in space and can't get the speakers away from the backwall, check our Speakers with Front Firing Ports page.

Physical Specs

The size of a speaker can sometimes be an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare Klipsch RP-160M's and KEF Q350's external dimensions. Klipsch RP-160M has external dimensions of 424.0 x 224.0 x 327.0mm (16.6 x 8.8 x 12.8inch) whereas KEF Q350 has external dimensions of 358.0 x 210.0 x 306.0mm (14.0 x 8.2 x 12.0inch).

Klipsch RP-160M is clearly the larger of the two speakers. Its body is 14mm wider, 66mm taller and 21mm deeper than KEF Q350.

Below you can see the front view size comparison of Klipsch RP-160M and KEF Q350 in scale.

Klipsch RP-160M vs KEF Q350 Size Comparison - Front View
Comparison image of Klipsch RP-160M and KEF Q350 Size and External Dimensions

Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited. The base surface area of the Klipsch RP-160M is approximately 732.5cm2 / 113.5inch2 and base area of the KEF Q350 is approximately 642.6cm2 / 99.6inch2. The RP-160M requires 14% more surface area than the Q350 which gives it a small disadvantage on placement in tight spaces.

Here is another comparison that shows both speakers on a BDI Octave Media Cabinet, next to a standard size amplifier and turntable in scale:

Klipsch RP-160M vs KEF Q350 Size Comparison on a Media Console
Size Comparison image of Klipsch RP-160M and KEF Q350 on a Media Console
Weight Comparison

The weight of a loudspeaker can become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often. Weight of a speaker can also "sometimes" be an indicator of the rigidity of the enclosure and the quality of the internal components used. The Klipsch RP-160M weighs 9.03kg / 19.9lbs and the KEF Q350 weighs 7.60kg / 16.7lbs. This makes the RP-160M 19% heavier than the Q350.

Here is a comparison of how RP-160M and Q350's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Passive Bookshelf class.

Weight
All Bookshelf Speakers
Klipsch RP-160M
KEF Q350
Min
Average
Max

What's in the Box of Klipsch RP-160M?

Here are the items that are included inside the box of RP-160M:
  • 2 Bookshelf loudspeakers
  • 2 Detachable magnetic grilles
  • User Manual
  • Warranty Information
  • Important Safety Instructions

What's in the Box of KEF Q350?

Here are the items that come with the Q350:
  • 2 Bookshelf loudspeakers
  • 2 Foam port plugs
  • 8 Self-adhesive rubber feet
  • Owner's Manual
  • Warranty Registration Card


Reasons to choose Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-160M over KEF Q350

Sensitivity 95 dB vs 87 dB Play louder with same amount of amplification power
Low Frequency Response 45 Hz vs 63 Hz Generates deeper bass
Bi-Amping and Bi-Wiring Yes vs No Allows bi-amping and bi-wiring connections

Reasons to choose KEF Q350 over Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-160M

Max Input Power 120 watts vs 100 watts Handle more power from your amplifier
High Frequency Response 28k Hz vs 25k Hz Generates higher frequency
Height 358mm vs 424mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces
Base Surface Area 642cm2 vs 732cm2 Takes less floor space

Klipsch RP-160M vs KEF Q350 Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications
General Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-160M KEF Q350
Brand Klipsch KEF
Speaker Type Bookshelf speakers Bookshelf speakers
Power Range up to 100 watts 10-120 watts
Sensitivity 95 dB 87 dB
Impedance 8 ohms 8 ohms
Impedance n/a 3.7 ohms
Frequency Response 45-25k Hz 63-28k Hz
Drivers
Woofer Quantity 1 1
Woofer Size 6.5" 6.5"
Woofer Composition Cerametallic Aluminum
Woofer Surround Material Rubber Rubber
Tweeter Size 1" 1"
Tweeter Type Tractrix Horn Dome
Aimable Tweeter No No
Midrange Driver No No
Crossover Frequency 1500Hz 2500Hz
Firing Direction rear rear
Physical Specs
Height 424.0mm (16.7") 358.0mm (14.1")
Width 224.0mm (8.8") 210.0mm (8.3")
Depth 327.0mm (12.9") 306.0mm (12")
Weight 9.03kg (19.9lbs) 7.60kg (16.7lbs)
Enclosure Bass Reflex Bass Reflex
Finish MDF/Wood-grain vinyl MDF/Vinyl-wrapped
Available Colors Ebony, Cherry Black, Walnut, White
Mounting Bracket No No
Recommended Stand Height 24-28" 18-24"
Grille Yes Yes
Moisture Resistancy No No
Connections
Biamp Inputs Yes No
Other
Parts Warranty 5 Years 5 Years
Labor Warranty 5 Years 5 Years

Verdict

No single best speaker here - they are built to different priorities, and the right one depends on your room, your amplifier and what you listen to.

AreaBetterWhy
Bass A Klipsch RP-160M digs deeper - 45Hz against 63Hz.
Amplifier needs A Klipsch RP-160M is more sensitive (95dB vs 87dB), so it goes louder on the same amplifier.
Headroom evenly matched Similar power handling (100W vs 120W).
Size depends KEF Q350 is easier to place; Klipsch RP-160M is bigger, which usually goes with fuller bass. Your room decides.
Expandability A Klipsch RP-160M: bi-amping. Klipsch RP-160M sits in a wider range (17 models), so a matched surround system is easier later.

A Klipsch RP-160M   B KEF Q350
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, placement or how you will use them. Only specs published for both speakers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.

Which should you choose?

Klipsch RP-160M has the edge on paper, though the margin is not large. The rows marked "depends" may matter more to you than the score does. If a subwoofer is in your plans, the bass gap largely stops mattering - you would be crossing over above 63Hz anyway, so judge these on the other rows instead. Match it to your room: we rate Klipsch RP-160M the better fit for near-field listening and a small room, and KEF Q350 for a mid-size room and a large room.

And remember what a spec sheet cannot show: how each looks in your room and whether the finish suits it, what dealer support and warranty are like where you live, and how they actually sound to you. If you can hear them first - ideally with your own music - that will tell you more than any number above.


Most Popular Speakers
Klipsch Reference R-51M
Klipsch R-51M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
2-way | 87 dB | 6 ohms
Wharfedale Elysian 2
Wharfedale Elysian 2
3-way | 89 dB | 4 ohms
KEF Q150
KEF Q150
2-way | 86 dB | 8 ohms
Bowers & Wilkins 606 S2 Anniversary Edition
B&W 606 S2
2-way | 88 dB | 8 ohms
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-500M
Klipsch RP-500M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
Wharfedale EVO5.1
Wharfedale EVO5.1
2-way | 87 dB | 4 ohms
Wharfedale EVO4.1
Wharfedale EVO4.1
2-way | 87 dB | 8 ohms
Copyright © 2026 by SpeakerDecision
About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

Report a Correction