SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS
    • By Type
      Passive Bookshelf Speakers Passive Floor-standing Speakers Passive Center Channel Speakers Passive In-wall Speakers All Passive Speakers Powered Subwoofers Powered Stereo Speakers
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Front Firing Port Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      By Brand
      Acoustic Energy Aperion ATC Audio-Technica Audioengine Bluesound Bowers Wilkins Buchardt Cambridge Audio Canton DALI Definitive Technology Dynaudio ELAC Emotiva Fluance Focal Fyne Audio Genelec GoldenEar Harbeth Jamo JBL Kanto KEF KLH Klipsch Leak Mackie Magnepan MartinLogan McIntosh Mission MoFi Monitor Audio Nuvo Onkyo OSD Paradigm Perlisten Polk Audio PS Audio PSB Q Acoustics REL Revel Russound Sennheiser Sonos Sonus faber Sony Spendor SVS Tannoy Technics Triangle Velodyne Victrola Wharfedale Wilson Audio Yamaha
  • AMPLIFIERS
    • By Type
      All Amplifiers Integrated Amplifiers Stereo Receivers Streaming Amplifiers Power Amplifiers Compact Amplifiers
      Home Theater
      All Home Theater Receivers AnthemARCAMDenonIntegraJBLMarantzMcIntoshNADOnkyoSonyYamaha
      By Power
      Up to 60 watts 61 to 90 watts 91 to 120 watts 121 to 180 watts Over 180 watts
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      By Brand
      Accuphase Advance Paris Anthem Arcam Audio Research AudioControl Audioengine Audiolab Bluesound Bose Buchardt Cambridge Audio Denon Devialet ELAC Emotiva Eversolo FiiO Fosi Audio Hegel HiFi Rose Integra JBL LEAK Luxman Marantz Mark Levinson McIntosh Michi MISSION MOON Musical Fidelity NAD Naim Onkyo OSD Parasound Pass Labs Peachtree PrimaLuna Primare PS Audio Rega Rogue Audio Roksan Rotel Schiit Audio Sonos Sony SVS T+A TEAC Technics Vincent WiiM Yamaha
  • SMART FIND
  • TOOLS
  • BLOG
  1. Home
  2. Passive Center Channel Speakers
  3. Klipsch RC-64 III vs Klipsch RP-504C

Klipsch RC-64 III vs Klipsch RP-504C Comparison

x
Speaker to replace
Change

Klipsch RC-64 III

Passive Center Channel | 57-24k Hz

Klipsch RC-64 III
Check price atAmazon›
Change
    
Klipsch RP-504C

Passive Center Channel | 58-25k Hz

Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-504C
Check price atAmazon›
Klipsch RC-64 III Klipsch RC-64 III
Check price atAmazon›
Klipsch RP-504C Klipsch RP-504C
Check price atAmazon›
Klipsch RC-64 III
See at AMAZON
Klipsch RP-504C
See at AMAZON

Klipsch RC-64 III vs Klipsch RP-504C Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing RC-64 III and RP-504C, two Passive Center Channel speakers by Klipsch.

Let's have a brief look at the main features of Klipsch RC-64 III and Klipsch RP-504C first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Key SpecsKlipsch RC-64 IIIKlipsch RP-504C
BrandKlipsch
United States · founded 1946
Klipsch
United States · founded 1946
Design2-way2-way
Tweeter1-3/4" Tractrix horn1" Tractrix horn
Woofer4 x 6.5" Cerametallic cone4 x 5.25" Cerametallic cone
Frequency response57-24k Hz58-25k Hz
Sensitivity99 dB97 dB
Impedance8 ohms8 ohms
Power rangeup to 200 wattsup to 150 watts
Weight25.00kg / 55lbs15.45kg / 34lbs
Dimensions (H x W x D)8" x 35-3/4" x 15-1/4"
204.0 x 909.0 x 388.0mm
6-7/8" x 31-3/16" x 14-7/16"
175.0 x 793.0 x 367.0mm

What size room are the Klipsch RC-64 III and Klipsch RP-504C speakers good for?

The size of the room in which you are planning to use these loudspeakers is an important decision factor. Here we have compared their suitability to various sizes of environments considering their size and max power parameters:

Listening Environment* Klipsch RC-64 III Klipsch RP-504C
Near-field Poor Poor
Small Room Average Average
Mid-size Room Good Good
Large Room Average Average
Very Large Room Poor Poor

(* Approximate Room sizes: Small < 100sq. ft / 9 m2, Mid-size: 100-220 sq. ft / 9-20 m2, Large 220-400 sq. ft / 20-36 m2, Very Large: > 400 sq. ft / 36 m2. Average Floor Height: 9" / 2.7m. Typical room sizes differ from country to country, and the actual listening experience changes depending on floor height, room shape, surface materials, listening position, speaker locations, etc.)

The sections below take each area in turn: drivers, frequency response, physical size and what you get in the box.


**This post contains affiliate links, and we will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through our links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.


Drivers

Both RC-64 III and RP-504C are 2-way speakers.

Woofer - 6.5 inchWoofer - 6.5 inchWoofer - 6.5 inchWoofer - 6.5 inch
Klipsch RC-64 III
Woofer - 5.25 inchWoofer - 5.25 inchTweeter - 1 inchWoofer - 5.25 inchWoofer - 5.25 inch
Klipsch RP-504C

TweeterWoofer

Front view, drawn to scale - cabinets and drivers share one scale, so sizes are directly comparable. Hover a driver for its size.

Driver Klipsch RC-64 III Klipsch RP-504C
Driver Setup 2-way 2-way
Tweeter 1-3/4-inch 1-inch
Midrange - -
Woofer 4 x 6.5-inch 4 x 5.25-inch

RC-64 III features a 1-3/4" titanium Tractrix horn Tweeter and 4 x 6.5" Cerametallic cone Woofer. On the other hand, the RP-504C features a 1" titanium Tractrix horn Tweeter and 4 x 5.25" Cerametallic cone Woofer.

Frequency Response

RC-64 III has a frequency range of 57-24k Hz whereas RP-504C has a frequency range of 58-25k Hz. With a minimum frequency of 57Hz, the RC-64 III can go slightly deeper then the RP-504C's min frequency of 58Hz.

The graph below depicts how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average Low Frequency values of other speakers in the Center Channel class in our database.

Low Frequency

Center Channel Speakers

RC-64 III
RP-504C
Min
Average
Median

Neither pair reaches down to 20Hz, the usual definition of full-range, which is normal for speakers of this size. If you want the bottom octave for movies or bass-heavy music, add a subwoofer to whichever you choose. Visit our Powered Subwoofers section to find out more about the available options.

Impedance and Sensitivity

RC-64 III and RP-504C have the same Impedance of 8 ohms but where they differ is the sensitivity levels. RC-64 III sensitivity is rated at 99 dB and the RP-504C's is at 97 dB. This 2 dB difference makes the Klipsch RC-64 III a more sensitive speaker compared to Klipsch RP-504C, hence will play louder with the same amount of watts.

Sensitivity

Center Channel Speakers

RC-64 III
RP-504C
Min
Average
Median

Power Range

Power range is the range of input power in watts RMS that a loudspeaker is designed to handle. Staying within that range gives nominal performance; driving the speaker beyond its maximum wattage can damage it.

RC-64 III can handle a max power of 200 watts RMS, whereas RP-504C has a max power handling value of 150 watts RMS, 50 watts less than the RC-64 III.

Note that higher power handling does not make a speaker louder: that depends mainly on sensitivity and impedance. The calculator below shows how loud each of these actually plays on a real amplifier.

Which plays louder on your amplifier?

Starting with a popular amplifier - change it to the one you own, or any you are considering, and watch both numbers move.

Klipsch RC-64 III
 
Klipsch RP-504C
 

Input Type and Bi-Amping / Bi-Wiring

RC-64 III features Binding post posts which make bi-amping or bi-wiring possible. RP-504C has a Binding post which doesn't feature bi-amping/bi-wiring.

Klipsch RC-64 III Terminals
Klipsch RC-64 III's Binding post terminals allows Bi-amping or bi-wiring

Klipsch RP-504CBinding post Terminals
Klipsch RP-504C's Binding post terminals

Physical Specs

The size of a speaker can sometimes be an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare Klipsch RC-64 III's and Klipsch RP-504C's external dimensions. Klipsch RC-64 III has external dimensions of 204.0 x 909.0 x 388.0mm (8 x 35-3/4 x 15-1/4inch) whereas Klipsch RP-504C has external dimensions of 175.0 x 793.0 x 367.0mm (6-7/8 x 31-3/16 x 14-7/16inch).

Klipsch RC-64 III is clearly the larger of the two speakers. Its body is 116mm wider, 29mm taller and 21mm deeper than Klipsch RP-504C.

Below you can see the front view size comparison of Klipsch RC-64 III and Klipsch RP-504C in scale.

Klipsch RC-64 III vs Klipsch RP-504C Size Comparison - Front View
Comparison image of Klipsch RC-64 III and Klipsch RP-504C Size and External Dimensions

Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited. The base surface area of the Klipsch RC-64 III is approximately 3526.9cm2 / 546.7inch2 and base area of the Klipsch RP-504C is approximately 2910.3cm2 / 451.1inch2. The RC-64 III requires 21% more surface area than the RP-504C which gives it a small disadvantage on placement in tight spaces.

Weight Comparison

The weight of a loudspeaker can become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often. Weight of a speaker can also "sometimes" be an indicator of the rigidity of the enclosure and the quality of the internal components used. The Klipsch RC-64 III weighs 25.00kg / 55lbs and the Klipsch RP-504C weighs 15.45kg / 34lbs. This makes the RC-64 III 62% heavier than the RP-504C.

Here is a comparison of how RC-64 III and RP-504C's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Passive Center Channel class.

Weight
All Center Channel Speakers
Klipsch RC-64 III
Klipsch RP-504C
Min
Average
Max

What's in the Box of Klipsch RC-64 III?

Here are the items that are included inside the box of RC-64 III:
  • Center channel loudspeaker
  • Grille
  • 6 Self-adhesive rubber feet
  • 2 Jumpers (pre-installed)
  • Owners Manual

What's in the Box of Klipsch RP-504C?

Here are the items that come with the RP-504C:
  • Center channel loudspeaker
  • Grille (installed)
  • 4 Self-adhesive rubber feet
  • User Manual
  • Important Safety Instructions
  • Warranty Information


Reasons to choose Klipsch RC-64 III over Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-504C

Max Input Power 200 watts vs 150 watts Handle more power from your amplifier
Sensitivity 99 dB vs 97 dB Play louder with same amount of amplification power
Woofer Size 6.5 inches vs 5.25 inches Larger woofer
Low Frequency Response 57 Hz vs 58 Hz Generates deeper bass

Reasons to choose Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-504C over Klipsch RC-64 III

High Frequency Response 25k Hz vs 24k Hz Generates higher frequency
Height 175mm vs 204mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces
Base Surface Area 2910cm2 vs 3526cm2 Takes less floor space
Price per pair* 399USD vs 1829USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)

Klipsch RC-64 III vs Klipsch RP-504C Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications
General Klipsch RC-64 III Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-504C
Brand Klipsch Klipsch
Speaker Type Center channel speaker Center channel speaker
Power Range up to 200 watts up to 150 watts
Sensitivity 99 dB 97 dB
Impedance 8 ohms 8 ohms
Frequency Response 57-24k Hz 58-25k Hz
Drivers
Woofer Quantity 4 4
Woofer Size 6.5" 5.25"
Woofer Composition Cerametallic cone Cerametallic cone
Woofer Surround Material n/a Rubber
Tweeter Size 1-3/4" 1"
Tweeter Type Tractrix horn Tractrix horn
Aimable Tweeter No No
Midrange Driver No No
Firing Direction n/a rear
Physical Specs
Height 204.0mm (8") 175.0mm (6.9")
Width 909.0mm (35.8") 793.0mm (31.2")
Depth 388.0mm (15.3") 367.0mm (14.4")
Weight 25.00kg (55lbs) 15.45kg (34lbs)
Enclosure Passive Radiator Bass Reflex
Finish furniture grade veneer MDF/Wood-grain vinyl
Available Colors Walnut Walnut, Black
Grille Yes Yes
Moisture Resistancy No No
Connections
Biamp Inputs Yes n/a
Other
Parts Warranty 5 Years 5 Years
Labor Warranty 5 Years 5 Years

Verdict

These sit in different price classes - Klipsch RC-64 III costs roughly 4.6x what Klipsch RP-504C does. Expect it to lead on paper; the question is whether the gap is audible enough in your room to be worth it.

AreaBetterWhy
Bassevenly matchedMuch the same reach (57Hz vs 58Hz).
Amplifier needsAKlipsch RC-64 III is more sensitive (99dB vs 97dB), so it goes louder on the same amplifier.
HeadroomAKlipsch RC-64 III takes more power (200W vs 150W) - more in hand in a big room.
SizedependsKlipsch RP-504C is easier to place; Klipsch RC-64 III is bigger, which usually goes with fuller bass. Your room decides.
CabinetdependsPassive Radiator vs Ported.
ExpandabilityAKlipsch RC-64 III: bi-amping.
PriceBKlipsch RP-504C is cheaper - $399 against $1,829, about 78% less; arguably a different class.

A Klipsch RC-64 III  B Klipsch RP-504C
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both speakers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.

Which should you choose?

The usual trade-off: Klipsch RC-64 III measures better, Klipsch RP-504C costs about about 4.6x the price% less. Whether that gap is worth the money is the call only you can make - and in a normal room it is often smaller than the numbers suggest. In a large or open-plan room, Klipsch RC-64 III has the cabinet volume to fill it more easily; in a small room, near a wall or at desk distance, Klipsch RP-504C is the easier speaker to get right. If your amplifier is modest, vintage or valve-based, Klipsch RC-64 III is the safer partner - the other will want more current or more watts to sound its best.

And remember what a spec sheet cannot show: how each looks in your room and whether the finish suits it, what dealer support and warranty are like where you live, and how they actually sound to you. If you can hear them first - ideally with your own music - that will tell you more than any number above.


Most Popular Speakers
Klipsch Reference R-51M
Klipsch R-51M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
2-way | 87 dB | 6 ohms
Wharfedale Elysian 2
Wharfedale Elysian 2
3-way | 89 dB | 4 ohms
KEF Q150
KEF Q150
2-way | 86 dB | 8 ohms
Bowers & Wilkins 606 S2 Anniversary Edition
B&W 606 S2
2-way | 88 dB | 8 ohms
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-500M
Klipsch RP-500M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
Wharfedale EVO5.1
Wharfedale EVO5.1
2-way | 87 dB | 4 ohms
Wharfedale EVO4.1
Wharfedale EVO4.1
2-way | 87 dB | 8 ohms
Copyright © 2026 by SpeakerDecision
About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

Report a Correction