SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS
    • By Type
      Passive Bookshelf Speakers Passive Floor-standing Speakers Passive Center Channel Speakers Passive In-wall Speakers All Passive Speakers Powered Subwoofers Powered Stereo Speakers
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Front Firing Port Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      By Brand
      Acoustic Energy Aperion ATC Audio-Technica Audioengine Bluesound Bowers Wilkins Buchardt Cambridge Audio Canton DALI Definitive Technology Dynaudio ELAC Emotiva Fluance Focal Fyne Audio Genelec GoldenEar Harbeth Jamo JBL Kanto KEF KLH Klipsch Leak Mackie Magnepan MartinLogan McIntosh Mission MoFi Monitor Audio Nuvo Onkyo OSD Paradigm Perlisten Polk Audio PS Audio PSB Q Acoustics REL Revel Russound Sennheiser Sonos Sonus faber Sony Spendor SVS Tannoy Technics Triangle Velodyne Victrola Wharfedale Wilson Audio Yamaha
  • AMPLIFIERS
    • By Type
      All Amplifiers Integrated Amplifiers Stereo Receivers Streaming Amplifiers Power Amplifiers Compact Amplifiers
      Home Theater
      All Home Theater Receivers AnthemARCAMDenonIntegraJBLMarantzMcIntoshNADOnkyoSonyYamaha
      By Power
      Up to 60 watts 61 to 90 watts 91 to 120 watts 121 to 180 watts Over 180 watts
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      By Brand
      Accuphase Advance Paris Anthem Arcam Audio Research AudioControl Audioengine Audiolab Bluesound Bose Buchardt Cambridge Audio Denon Devialet ELAC Emotiva Eversolo FiiO Fosi Audio Hegel HiFi Rose Integra JBL LEAK Luxman Marantz Mark Levinson McIntosh Michi MISSION MOON Musical Fidelity NAD Naim Onkyo OSD Parasound Pass Labs Peachtree PrimaLuna Primare PS Audio Rega Rogue Audio Roksan Rotel Schiit Audio Sonos Sony SVS T+A TEAC Technics Vincent WiiM Yamaha
  • SMART FIND
  • TOOLS
  • BLOG
  1. Home
  2. Passive In-wall Speakers
  3. Klipsch R-1650-W vs Polk Audio 65 RT

Klipsch R-1650-W vs Polk Audio 65 RT Comparison

x
Speaker to replace
Change

Klipsch R-1650-W

Passive In-wall | 53-20kHz

Klipsch R-1650-W
Check price atAmazon›
Change
    
Polk Audio 65 RT

Passive In-wall | 50-25kHz

Polk Audio 65 RT
Check price atAmazon›
Klipsch R-1650-W Klipsch R-1650-W
Check price atAmazon›
Polk Audio 65 RT Polk Audio 65 RT
Check price atAmazon›
Klipsch R-1650-W
See at AMAZON
Polk Audio 65 RT
See at AMAZON

Klipsch R-1650-W vs Polk Audio 65 RT Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing R-1650-W and 65 RT, two Passive In-wall speakers from Klipsch and Polk Audio.

Let's have a brief look at the main features of Klipsch R-1650-W and Polk Audio 65 RT first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Key SpecsKlipsch R-1650-WPolk Audio 65 RT
BrandKlipsch
United States · founded 1946
Polk Audio
United States · founded 1972
Design2-way2-way
Tweeter1" Soft-Dome1" Soft-Dome
Woofer6.5" Poly6.5" Polymer Composite
Frequency response53-20kHz50-25kHz
Sensitivity88 dB90 dB
Impedance8 ohms8 ohms
Power rangeup to 35 watts10-125 watts
Weight2.95kg / 6.5lbs—
Dimensions (H x W x D)13.0000" x 8.0000" x 3.0000"
331.0 x 204.0 x 77.0mm
12.7500" x 7.2500" x 3-1/2"
324.0 x 185.0 x 88.9mm

What size room are the Klipsch R-1650-W and Polk Audio 65 RT speakers good for?

The size of the room in which you are planning to use these loudspeakers is an important decision factor. Here we have compared their suitability to various sizes of environments considering their size and max power parameters:

Listening Environment* Klipsch R-1650-W Polk Audio 65 RT
Near-field Good Poor
Small Room Good Average
Mid-size Room Average Good
Large Room Poor Average
Very Large Room No way Poor

(* Approximate Room sizes: Small < 100sq. ft / 9 m2, Mid-size: 100-220 sq. ft / 9-20 m2, Large 220-400 sq. ft / 20-36 m2, Very Large: > 400 sq. ft / 36 m2. Average Floor Height: 9" / 2.7m. Typical room sizes differ from country to country, and the actual listening experience changes depending on floor height, room shape, surface materials, listening position, speaker locations, etc.)

The sections below take each area in turn: drivers, frequency response, physical size and what you get in the box.


**This post contains affiliate links, and we will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through our links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.


Drivers

Both R-1650-W and 65 RT are 2-way speakers.

Tweeter - 1 inchWoofer - 6.5 inch
Klipsch R-1650-W
Tweeter - 1 inchWoofer - 6.5 inch
Polk Audio 65 RT

TweeterWoofer

Front view, drawn to scale - cabinets and drivers share one scale, so sizes are directly comparable. Hover a driver for its size.

Driver Klipsch R-1650-W Polk Audio 65 RT
Driver Setup 2-way 2-way
Tweeter 1-inch 1-inch
Midrange - -
Woofer 1 x 6.5-inch 1 x 6.5-inch

R-1650-W features a 1" Soft-Dome Tweeter and 1 x 6.5" Poly Woofer. On the other hand, the 65 RT features a 1" Soft-Dome Tweeter and 1 x 6.5" Polymer Composite Woofer.

Frequency Response

R-1650-W has a frequency range of 53-20kHz whereas 65 RT has a frequency range of 50-25kHz. With a minimum frequency of 50Hz, the 65 RT can go slightly deeper then the R-1650-W's min frequency of 53Hz.

The graph below depicts how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average Low Frequency values of other speakers in the In-wall class in our database.

Low Frequency

In-wall Speakers

R-1650-W
65 RT
Min
Average
Median

Neither pair reaches down to 20Hz, the usual definition of full-range, which is normal for speakers of this size. If you want the bottom octave for movies or bass-heavy music, add a subwoofer to whichever you choose. Visit our Powered Subwoofers section to find out more about the available options.

Impedance and Sensitivity

R-1650-W and 65 RT have the same Impedance of 8 ohms but where they differ is the sensitivity levels. R-1650-W sensitivity is rated at 88 dB and the 65 RT's is at 90 dB. This 2 dB difference makes the Polk Audio 65 RT a more sensitive speaker compared to Klipsch R-1650-W, hence will play louder with the same amount of watts.

Sensitivity

In-wall Speakers

R-1650-W
65 RT
Min
Average
Median

Power Range

Power range is the range of input power in watts RMS that a loudspeaker is designed to handle. Staying within that range gives nominal performance; driving the speaker beyond its maximum wattage can damage it.

65 RT can handle a max power of 125 watts RMS, whereas R-1650-W has a max power handling value of 35 watts RMS, 90 watts less than the 65 RT.

Note that higher power handling does not make a speaker louder: that depends mainly on sensitivity and impedance. The calculator below shows how loud each of these actually plays on a real amplifier.

Which plays louder on your amplifier?

Starting with a popular amplifier - change it to the one you own, or any you are considering, and watch both numbers move.

Klipsch R-1650-W
 
Polk Audio 65 RT
 

Input Type and Bi-Amping / Bi-Wiring

R-1650-W features Spring post type posts and 65 RT has a Spring post type posts. None of these speakers feature bi-amping/bi-wiring.

Physical Specs

The size of a speaker can sometimes be an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare Klipsch R-1650-W's and Polk Audio 65 RT's external dimensions. Klipsch R-1650-W has external dimensions of 331.0 x 204.0 x 77.0mm (13.0000-inch x 8.0000-inch x 3.0000-inch) whereas Polk Audio 65 RT has external dimensions of 324.0 x 185.0 x 88.9mm (12.7500-inch x 7.2500-inch x 0.0000-inch).

Polk Audio 65 RT is 19mm narrower and 7mm shorter than Klipsch R-1650-W but it is also 11.9mm deeper.

What's in the Box of Klipsch R-1650-W?

Here are the items that are included inside the box of R-1650-W:
  • Rectangular in-wall speaker
  • White metal mesh grille
  • Plastic paint mask
  • Cardboard template
  • Plastic paint shield
  • Owners Manual (Eng/Fre/Spa/Ger/Ita/Por/Chi/Jap)

What's in the Box of Polk Audio 65 RT?

Here are the items that come with the 65 RT:
  • Rectangular in-wall speaker
  • Foam rubber port plug
  • White metal grille
  • Mounting template
  • Owners Manual
  • Sheer-Grille Painting instructions
  • Online Registration Card
  • Polk Audio product brochure


Reasons to choose Klipsch R-1650-W over Polk Audio 65 RT

Base Surface Area 157cm2 vs 164cm2 Takes less floor space
Price per pair* 318USD vs 398USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)

Reasons to choose Polk Audio 65 RT over Klipsch R-1650-W

Max Input Power 125 watts vs 35 watts Handle more power from your amplifier
Sensitivity 90 dB vs 88 dB Play louder with same amount of amplification power
Low Frequency Response 50 Hz vs 53 Hz Generates deeper bass
High Frequency Response 25k Hz vs 20k Hz Generates higher frequency
Height 324mm vs 331mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces

Klipsch R-1650-W vs Polk Audio 65 RT Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications
General Klipsch R-1650-W Polk Audio 65 RT
Brand Klipsch Polk Audio
Speaker Type Passive In-wall Speaker Passive In-wall Speaker
Power Range up to 35 watts 10-125 watts
Sensitivity 88 dB 90 dB
Impedance 8 ohms 8 ohms
Frequency Response 53-20kHz 50-25kHz
Drivers
Woofer Quantity 1 1
Woofer Size 6.5" 6.5"
Woofer Composition Poly Polymer Composite
Woofer Surround Material Rubber Rubber
Tweeter Size 1" 1"
Tweeter Type Soft-Dome Soft-Dome
Aimable Tweeter No Yes
Midrange Driver No No
Physical Specs
Height 331.0mm (13") 324.0mm (12.8")
Width 204.0mm (8") 185.0mm (7.3")
Depth 77.0mm (3") 88.9mm (3.5")
Weight 2.95kg (6.5lbs) n/a
Enclosure In-wall In-wall
Moisture Resistancy Yes No
Connections
Biamp Inputs No No
Other
Parts Warranty Ltd. Lifetime Lifetime
Labor Warranty Ltd. Lifetime Lifetime

Verdict

No single best speaker here - they are built to different priorities, and the right one depends on your room, your amplifier and what you listen to.

AreaBetterWhy
BassBPolk Audio 65 RT digs deeper - 50Hz against 53Hz. A subwoofer would even that out.
Amplifier needsBPolk Audio 65 RT is more sensitive (90dB vs 88dB), so it goes louder on the same amplifier.
HeadroomBPolk Audio 65 RT takes more power (125W vs 35W) - more in hand in a big room.
SizedependsSimilar cabinet size - neither is easier to fit.
PriceAKlipsch R-1650-W is cheaper - $318 against $398, about 20% less.

A Klipsch R-1650-W  B Polk Audio 65 RT
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both speakers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.

Which should you choose?

Polk Audio 65 RT leads across most of the measured areas for a fairly modest premium, which makes it the easier pick if the budget stretches. Klipsch R-1650-W is the one to take if it does not. Match it to your room: we rate Klipsch R-1650-W the better fit for near-field listening and a small room, and Polk Audio 65 RT for a mid-size room and a large room. If your amplifier is modest, vintage or valve-based, Polk Audio 65 RT is the safer partner - the other will want more current or more watts to sound its best.

And remember what a spec sheet cannot show: how each looks in your room and whether the finish suits it, what dealer support and warranty are like where you live, and how they actually sound to you. If you can hear them first - ideally with your own music - that will tell you more than any number above.


Most Popular Speakers
Klipsch Reference R-51M
Klipsch R-51M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
2-way | 87 dB | 6 ohms
Wharfedale Elysian 2
Wharfedale Elysian 2
3-way | 89 dB | 4 ohms
KEF Q150
KEF Q150
2-way | 86 dB | 8 ohms
Bowers & Wilkins 606 S2 Anniversary Edition
B&W 606 S2
2-way | 88 dB | 8 ohms
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-500M
Klipsch RP-500M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
Wharfedale EVO5.1
Wharfedale EVO5.1
2-way | 87 dB | 4 ohms
Wharfedale EVO4.1
Wharfedale EVO4.1
2-way | 87 dB | 8 ohms
Copyright © 2026 by SpeakerDecision
About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

Report a Correction