SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS
    • By Type
      Passive Bookshelf Speakers Passive Floor-standing Speakers Passive Center Channel Speakers Passive In-wall Speakers All Passive Speakers Powered Subwoofers Powered Stereo Speakers
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Front Firing Port Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      By Brand
      Acoustic Energy Aperion ATC Audio-Technica Audioengine Bluesound Bowers Wilkins Buchardt Cambridge Audio Canton DALI Definitive Technology Dynaudio ELAC Emotiva Fluance Focal Fyne Audio Genelec GoldenEar Harbeth Jamo JBL Kanto KEF KLH Klipsch Leak Mackie Magnepan MartinLogan McIntosh Mission MoFi Monitor Audio Nuvo Onkyo OSD Paradigm Perlisten Polk Audio PS Audio PSB Q Acoustics REL Revel Russound Sennheiser Sonos Sonus faber Sony Spendor SVS Tannoy Technics Triangle Velodyne Victrola Wharfedale Wilson Audio Yamaha
  • AMPLIFIERS
    • By Type
      All Amplifiers Integrated Amplifiers Stereo Receivers Streaming Amplifiers Power Amplifiers Compact Amplifiers
      By Power
      Up to 60 watts 61 to 90 watts 91 to 120 watts 121 to 180 watts Over 180 watts
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      Home Theater
      All Home Theater Receivers Anthem ARCAM Denon Integra JBL Marantz McIntosh NAD Onkyo Sony Yamaha
      Headphone Amps
      All Headphone Amplifiers Cambridge Audio iFi Audio McIntosh Naim Pro-Ject Rotel Schiit Audio Sennheiser Yamaha
      Multi-Zone
      All Multi-Zone Amplifiers JBL McIntosh OSD Rotel Russound Sonos
      By Brand
      Accuphase Advance Paris Anthem Arcam Audio Research AudioControl Audioengine Audiolab Bluesound Bose Buchardt Cambridge Audio Cayin Denon Devialet ELAC Emotiva Eversolo FiiO Fosi Audio Hegel HiFi Rose Integra JBL Layer Audio Design LEAK Luxman Marantz Mark Levinson McIntosh Michi MISSION MOON Musical Fidelity NAD Naim Onkyo OSD Parasound Pass Labs Peachtree PrimaLuna Primare PS Audio Rega Rogue Audio Roksan Rotel Schiit Audio Sonos Sony SVS T+A TEAC Technics Vincent WiiM Yamaha
  • SMART FIND
  • TOOLS
  • BLOG
  1. Home
  2. Passive Floor-standing Speakers
  3. Klipsch OJAS kO-R2 vs MartinLogan Motion XT F200

Klipsch OJAS kO-R2 vs MartinLogan Motion XT F200 Comparison

x
Speaker to replace
Change

Klipsch OJAS kO-R2

Passive Floor-standing | 39-20k Hz

Klipsch OJAS kO-R2
Check price atAmazon›
Change
    
MartinLogan Motion XT F200

Passive Floor-standing | 27-25k Hz

MartinLogan Motion® XT F200
Check price atAmazon›
Klipsch OJAS kO-R2 Klipsch OJAS kO-R2
Check price atAmazon›
MartinLogan Motion XT F200 MartinLogan Motion X...
Check price atAmazon›
Klipsch OJAS kO-R2
See at AMAZON
MartinLogan Motion X...
See at AMAZON

Klipsch OJAS kO-R2 vs MartinLogan Motion XT F200 Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing kO-R2 and Motion XT F200, two Passive Floor-standing speakers from Klipsch and MartinLogan.

Let's have a brief look at the main features of Klipsch OJAS kO-R2 and MartinLogan Motion XT F200 first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Key SpecsKlipsch OJAS kO-R2MartinLogan Motion XT F200
BrandKlipsch
United States · founded 1946
MartinLogan
United States · founded 1982
Design2-way3-way
TweeterCompression Horn1.25 x 2.4" Folded Motion XT
Midrange—6.5"
Woofer15" Paper3 x 8" Aluminum
Frequency response39-20k Hz27-25k Hz
Sensitivity97 dB92 dB
Impedance8 ohms4 ohms
Power rangeup to 300 watts20-600 watts
Weight54.65kg / 120.2lbs39.00kg / 85.8lbs
Dimensions (H x W x D)45-1/2" x 25-3/8" x 22-1/4"
1156.0 x 645.0 x 565.0mm
50-3/4" x 13-3/4" x 16-1/2"
1289 x 349 x 419mm

What size room are the Klipsch OJAS kO-R2 and MartinLogan Motion XT F200 speakers good for?

The size of the room in which you are planning to use these loudspeakers is an important decision factor. Here we have compared their suitability to various sizes of environments considering their size and max power parameters:

Listening Environment* Klipsch OJAS kO-R2 MartinLogan Motion XT F200
Near-field Are you nuts? Are you nuts?
Small Room Poor Poor
Mid-size Room Average Average
Large Room Good Good
Very Large Room Good Good

(* Approximate Room sizes: Small < 100sq. ft / 9 m2, Mid-size: 100-220 sq. ft / 9-20 m2, Large 220-400 sq. ft / 20-36 m2, Very Large: > 400 sq. ft / 36 m2. Average Floor Height: 9" / 2.7m. Typical room sizes differ from country to country, and the actual listening experience changes depending on floor height, room shape, surface materials, listening position, speaker locations, etc.)

The sections below take each area in turn: drivers, frequency response, physical size and what you get in the box.


Drivers

One of the fundamental differences between these two speakers is that kO-R2 is a 2-way design whereas the Motion XT F200 is a 3-way speaker. 3-way designs utilize a midrange driver in addition to the tweeter and woofer on 2-way designs. Designing a crossover for a 3-way speaker is a complicated process and generally increases the overall cost of the speaker.

Woofer - 15 inch
Klipsch OJAS kO-R2
Midrange - 6.5 inchWoofer - 8 inchWoofer - 8 inchWoofer - 8 inch
MartinLogan Motion XT F200

MidrangeWoofer

Front view, drawn to scale - cabinets and drivers share one scale, so sizes are directly comparable. Hover a driver for its size.

Driver Klipsch OJAS kO-R2 MartinLogan Motion XT F200
Driver Setup 2-way 3-way
Tweeter -inch 1.25 x 2.4-inch
Midrange - 1 x 6.5-inch
Woofer 1 x 15-inch 3 x 8-inch

kO-R2 features a " K-706 driver Compression Horn Tweeter and 1 x 15" Paper Woofer with a Crossover frequency at 760Hz. On the other hand, the Motion XT F200 features a 1.25 x 2.4" Folded Motion XT Tweeter, a 6.5" Midrange and 3 x 8" Aluminum Woofer with a Crossover frequency at 300Hz and 2600Hz.

Klipsch OJAS kO-R2 driver frequency bandsKlipsch OJAS kO-R2MartinLogan Motion XT F20039-76027-300Woofer300-2.6kMidrange760-20k2.6k-25kTweeter20501002005001k2k5k10k20k40kHz, log scale

Frequency Response

kO-R2 has a frequency range of 39-20k Hz whereas Motion XT F200 has a frequency range of 27-25k Hz. With a minimum frequency of 27Hz, the Motion XT F200 can go significantly deeper on the low side and provide stronger bass compared to the kO-R2's min frequency of 39Hz.

The graph below depicts how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average Low Frequency values of other speakers in the Floor-standing class in our database.

Low Frequency

Floor-standing Speakers

kO-R2
Motion XT F200
Min
Average
Median

Neither pair reaches down to 20Hz, the usual definition of full-range, which is normal for speakers of this size. If you want the bottom octave for movies or bass-heavy music, add a subwoofer to whichever you choose. Visit our Powered Subwoofers section to find out more about the available options.

Impedance and Sensitivity

kO-R2 is a 8 ohms speaker compared to the Motion XT F200 which has a nominal impedance of 4 ohms. Lower impedance speakers, especially the ones that are rated at 4 ohms may put more pressure on the amplifier unit especially when played at high volume levels, so make sure the amp you pair with the Motion XT F200 can provide this impedance level.

These two speakers also have different sensitivity levels. kO-R2 sensitivity is rated at 97 dB and the Motion XT F200's is rated at 92 dB. This 5 dB difference makes the Klipsch OJAS kO-R2 a more sensitive speaker compared to MartinLogan Motion XT F200, hence will play louder with the same amount of watts.

Sensitivity

Floor-standing Speakers

kO-R2
Motion XT F200
Min
Average
Median

Power Range

Power range is the range of input power in watts RMS that a loudspeaker is designed to handle. Staying within that range gives nominal performance; driving the speaker beyond its maximum wattage can damage it.

Motion XT F200 can handle a max power of 600 watts RMS, whereas kO-R2 has a max power handling value of 300 watts RMS, 300 watts less than the Motion XT F200.

Note that higher power handling does not make a speaker louder: that depends mainly on sensitivity and impedance. The calculator below shows how loud each of these actually plays on a real amplifier.

Which plays louder on your amplifier?

Starting with a popular amplifier - change it to the one you own, or any you are considering, and watch both numbers move.

Klipsch OJAS kO-R2
 
MartinLogan Motion XT F200
 

Input Type and Bi-Amping / Bi-Wiring

Motion XT F200 features Custom 5-way bi-wire tool-less binding posts posts which make bi-amping or bi-wiring possible. kO-R2 has a Binding post which doesn't feature bi-amping/bi-wiring.

MartinLogan Motion XT F200Custom 5-way bi-wire tool-less binding posts Terminals
MartinLogan Motion XT F200's Custom 5-way bi-wire tool-less binding posts terminals allows Bi-amping or bi-wiring

Cabinet Type and Port Position

kO-R2 has a front firing port whereas Motion XT F200 has a bottom firing ports. Klipsch OJAS kO-R2's front-firing port gives more flexibility in placement in regards to proximity to walls compared to MartinLogan Motion XT F200 with its rear-firing port.

Physical Specs

The size of a speaker can sometimes be an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare Klipsch OJAS kO-R2's and MartinLogan Motion XT F200's external dimensions. Klipsch OJAS kO-R2 has external dimensions of 1156.0 x 645.0 x 565.0mm (45-1/2 x 25-3/8 x 22-1/4inch) whereas MartinLogan Motion XT F200 has external dimensions of 1289 x 349 x 419mm (50-3/4inch x 13-3/4inch x 16-1/2inch).

MartinLogan Motion XT F200 is 296mm narrower and 146mm less deeper than Klipsch OJAS kO-R2 but it is also 133mm taller.

Size, drawn to scale

FRONTKlipsch OJAS kO-R2 front: 645 x 1156 mm (25.4 x 45.5 in)MartinLogan Motion XT F200 front: 349 x 1289 mm (13.7 x 50.7 in)Klipsch OJAS kO-R2645 × 1156 mmMartinLogan Motion XT F200349 × 1289 mmTOP / FOOTPRINTKlipsch OJAS kO-R2 footprint: 645 x 565 mm (25.4 x 22.2 in)MartinLogan Motion XT F200 footprint: 349 x 419 mm (13.7 x 16.5 in)Klipsch OJAS kO-R2645 × 565 mmMartinLogan Motion XT F200349 × 419 mm
Both speakers and both views share one scale, so everything here is directly comparable. Hover a box for its dimensions.

One scale for both, standing on the same surface and pushed back to the same wall, so the deeper one visibly sticks out further.

Klipsch OJAS kO-R2 needs about 149% more floor or shelf area. Klipsch OJAS kO-R2 is 146mm deeper, so it stands that much further out from the wall. MartinLogan Motion XT F200 is 133mm taller.

Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited. The base surface area of the Klipsch OJAS kO-R2 is approximately 3644.3cm2 / 564.9inch2 and base area of the MartinLogan Motion XT F200 is approximately 1462.3cm2 / 226.7inch2. The kO-R2 requires 149% more surface area than the Motion XT F200 which gives it a small disadvantage on placement in tight spaces.

Weight Comparison

The weight of a loudspeaker can become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often. Weight of a speaker can also "sometimes" be an indicator of the rigidity of the enclosure and the quality of the internal components used. The Klipsch OJAS kO-R2 weighs 54.65kg / 120.2lbs and the MartinLogan Motion XT F200 weighs 39.00kg / 85.8lbs. This makes the kO-R2 40% heavier than the Motion XT F200.

Here is a comparison of how kO-R2 and Motion XT F200's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Passive Floor-standing class.

Weight
All Floor-standing Speakers
Klipsch OJAS kO-R2
MartinLogan Motion XT F200
Min
Average
Max

Reasons to choose Klipsch OJAS kO-R2 over MartinLogan Motion® XT F200

Sensitivity 97 dB vs 92 dB Play louder with same amount of amplification power
Nominal Impedance 8 ohms vs 4 ohms Less selective with amplifiers
Woofer Size 15 inches vs 8 inches Larger woofer
Height 1156mm vs 1289mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces

Reasons to choose MartinLogan Motion® XT F200 over Klipsch OJAS kO-R2

Max Input Power 600 watts vs 300 watts Handle more power from your amplifier
Driver Setup 3-way vs 2-way Have a dedicated mid-range driver
Number of Woofers 3 vs 1 More woofers
Low Frequency Response 27 Hz vs 39 Hz Generates deeper bass
High Frequency Response 25k Hz vs 20k Hz Generates higher frequency
Base Surface Area 1462cm2 vs 3644cm2 Takes less floor space
Price per pair* 5498USD vs 8498USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)

Klipsch OJAS kO-R2 vs MartinLogan Motion XT F200 Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications
General Klipsch OJAS kO-R2 MartinLogan Motion® XT F200
Brand Klipsch MartinLogan
Speaker Type Floor-standing speaker Floor-standing speaker
Power Range up to 300 watts 20-600 watts
Sensitivity 97 dB 92 dB
Impedance 8 ohms 4 ohms
Impedance 4.2 ohms n/a
Frequency Response 39-20k Hz 27-25k Hz
Drivers
Woofer Quantity 1 3
Woofer Size 15" 8"
Woofer Composition Paper Aluminum
Woofer Surround Material n/a Rubber
Tweeter Size - 1.25 x 2.4"
Tweeter Type Compression Horn Folded Motion XT
Aimable Tweeter No No
Midrange Driver No 6.5"
Crossover Frequency 760Hz 300Hz and 2600Hz
Firing Direction front bottom
Suggested Break-in Period n/a Allow 72 hours of break-in
Physical Specs
Height 1156.0mm (45.5") 1289.0mm (50.7")
Width 645.0mm (25.4") 349.0mm (13.7")
Depth 565.0mm (22.2") 419.0mm (16.5")
Weight 54.65kg (120.2lbs) 39.00kg (85.8lbs)
Enclosure Horn Loaded Bass Reflex
Finish 13-ply Baltic birch plywood MDF/Wood veneer
Available Colors Red Oak, Hammertone Gloss Black, Walnut, and Satin White
Grille Yes Yes
Moisture Resistancy No No
Connections
Biamp Inputs n/a Yes
Other
Parts Warranty 5 Years 5 Years
Labor Warranty 5 Years 5 Years

Verdict

No single best speaker here - they are built to different priorities, and the right one depends on your room, your amplifier and what you listen to.

AreaBetterWhy
BassBMartinLogan Motion XT F200 digs deeper - 27Hz against 39Hz.
Amplifier needsAKlipsch OJAS kO-R2 is more sensitive (97dB vs 92dB), so it goes louder on the same amplifier.
Amplifier matchAKlipsch OJAS kO-R2 is the easier load at 8 ohms; the other is 4 ohms and wants an amplifier rated for it.
HeadroomBMartinLogan Motion XT F200 takes more power (600W vs 300W) - more in hand in a big room.
SizedependsMartinLogan Motion XT F200 is easier to place; Klipsch OJAS kO-R2 is bigger, which usually goes with fuller bass. Your room decides.
ExpandabilitydependsMartinLogan Motion XT F200: bi-amping. Klipsch OJAS kO-R2 sits in a wider range (12 models), so a matched surround system is easier later.
PriceBMartinLogan Motion XT F200 is cheaper - $5,498 against $8,498, about 35% less.

A Klipsch OJAS kO-R2  B MartinLogan Motion XT F200
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both speakers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.

Which should you choose?

Neither runs away with it - they trade advantages. Let the "depends" rows and your own room settle it. If a subwoofer is in your plans, the bass gap largely stops mattering - you would be crossing over above 39Hz anyway, so judge these on the other rows instead. In a large or open-plan room, Klipsch OJAS kO-R2 has the cabinet volume to fill it more easily; in a small room, near a wall or at desk distance, MartinLogan Motion XT F200 is the easier speaker to get right.

And remember what a spec sheet cannot show: how each looks in your room and whether the finish suits it, what dealer support and warranty are like where you live, and how they actually sound to you. If you can hear them first - ideally with your own music - that will tell you more than any number above.


Most Popular Speakers
Klipsch Reference R-51M
Klipsch R-51M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
2-way | 87 dB | 6 ohms
Wharfedale Elysian 2
Wharfedale Elysian 2
3-way | 89 dB | 4 ohms
KEF Q150
KEF Q150
2-way | 86 dB | 8 ohms
Bowers & Wilkins 606 S2 Anniversary Edition
B&W 606 S2
2-way | 88 dB | 8 ohms
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-500M
Klipsch RP-500M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
Wharfedale EVO5.1
Wharfedale EVO5.1
2-way | 87 dB | 4 ohms
Wharfedale EVO4.1
Wharfedale EVO4.1
2-way | 87 dB | 8 ohms
This site contains affiliate links. We may be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through one of them. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Copyright © 2026 by SpeakerDecision
About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

Report a Correction