SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS
    • By Type
      Passive Bookshelf Speakers Passive Floor-standing Speakers Passive Center Channel Speakers Passive In-wall Speakers All Passive Speakers Powered Subwoofers Powered Stereo Speakers
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Front Firing Port Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      By Brand
      Acoustic Energy Aperion ATC Audio-Technica Audioengine Bluesound Bowers Wilkins Buchardt Cambridge Audio Canton DALI Definitive Technology Dynaudio ELAC Emotiva Fluance Focal Fyne Audio Genelec GoldenEar Harbeth Jamo JBL Kanto KEF KLH Klipsch Leak Mackie Magnepan MartinLogan McIntosh Mission MoFi Monitor Audio Nuvo Onkyo OSD Paradigm Perlisten Polk Audio PS Audio PSB Q Acoustics REL Revel Russound Sennheiser Sonos Sonus faber Sony Spendor SVS Tannoy Technics Triangle Velodyne Victrola Wharfedale Wilson Audio Yamaha
  • AMPLIFIERS
    • By Type
      All Amplifiers Integrated Amplifiers Stereo Receivers Streaming Amplifiers Power Amplifiers Compact Amplifiers
      By Power
      Up to 60 watts 61 to 90 watts 91 to 120 watts 121 to 180 watts Over 180 watts
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      Home Theater
      All Home Theater Receivers Anthem ARCAM Denon Integra JBL Marantz McIntosh NAD Onkyo Sony Yamaha
      Headphone Amps
      All Headphone Amplifiers Cambridge Audio iFi Audio McIntosh Naim Pro-Ject Rotel Schiit Audio Sennheiser Yamaha
      Multi-Zone
      All Multi-Zone Amplifiers JBL McIntosh OSD Rotel Russound Sonos
      By Brand
      Accuphase Advance Paris Anthem Arcam Audio Research AudioControl Audioengine Audiolab Bluesound Bose Buchardt Cambridge Audio Cayin Denon Devialet ELAC Emotiva Eversolo FiiO Fosi Audio Hegel HiFi Rose Integra JBL Layer Audio Design LEAK Luxman Marantz Mark Levinson McIntosh Michi MISSION MOON Musical Fidelity NAD Naim Onkyo OSD Parasound Pass Labs Peachtree PrimaLuna Primare PS Audio Rega Rogue Audio Roksan Rotel Schiit Audio Sonos Sony SVS T+A TEAC Technics Vincent WiiM Yamaha
  • SMART FIND
  • TOOLS
  • BLOG
  1. Home
  2. Passive Center Channel Speakers
  3. KEF Reference 4 Meta vs Wharfedale Elysian C

KEF Reference 4 Meta vs Wharfedale Elysian C Comparison

x
Speaker to replace
Change

KEF Reference 4 Meta

Passive Center Channel | 48-35k Hz

KEF Reference 4 Meta
Check price atAmazon›
Change
    
Wharfedale Elysian C

Passive Center Channel | 35-22k Hz

Wharfedale Elysian C
Check price atAmazon›
KEF Reference 4 Meta KEF Reference 4 Meta
Check price atAmazon›
Wharfedale Elysian C Wharfedale Elysian C
Check price atAmazon›
KEF Reference 4 Meta
See at AMAZON
Wharfedale Elysian C
See at AMAZON

KEF Reference 4 Meta vs Wharfedale Elysian C Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing Reference 4 Meta and Elysian C, two Passive Center Channel speakers from KEF and Wharfedale.

Let's have a brief look at the main features of KEF Reference 4 Meta and Wharfedale Elysian C first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Key SpecsKEF Reference 4 MetaWharfedale Elysian C
BrandKEF
United Kingdom · founded 1961
Wharfedale
United Kingdom · founded 1932
Design3-way3-way
Uni-Q driver12th Generation Uni-Q—
Tweeter1" aluminium dome with MAT27 x 45mm" Air Motion Transformer (AMT)
Midrange5"6"
Woofer4 x 6.5" aluminium cone2 x 8.5" coated fiberglass matrix
Frequency response48-35k Hz35-22k Hz
Sensitivity88 dB91 dB
Impedance4 ohms6 ohms
Power range50-400 watts50-250 watts
Weight45.20kg / 99.4lbs30.23kg / 66.5lbs
Dimensions (H x W x D)8.1" x 42.9" x 18.2"
205 x 1090 x 463 mm
12-5/8" x 32-11/16" x 14-9/16"
321.0 x 831.0 x 370.0mm

What size room are the KEF Reference 4 Meta and Wharfedale Elysian C speakers good for?

The size of the room in which you are planning to use these loudspeakers is an important decision factor. Here we have compared their suitability to various sizes of environments considering their size and max power parameters:

Listening Environment* KEF Reference 4 Meta Wharfedale Elysian C
Near-field Are you nuts? Poor
Small Room Bad Average
Mid-size Room Poor Good
Large Room Good Average
Very Large Room Good Poor

(* Approximate Room sizes: Small < 100sq. ft / 9 m2, Mid-size: 100-220 sq. ft / 9-20 m2, Large 220-400 sq. ft / 20-36 m2, Very Large: > 400 sq. ft / 36 m2. Average Floor Height: 9" / 2.7m. Typical room sizes differ from country to country, and the actual listening experience changes depending on floor height, room shape, surface materials, listening position, speaker locations, etc.)

The sections below take each area in turn: drivers, frequency response, physical size and what you get in the box.


Drivers

Both Reference 4 Meta and Elysian C are 3-way speakers.

Woofer - 6.5 inchWoofer - 6.5 inchTweeter - 1 inchMidrange - 5 inchWoofer - 6.5 inchWoofer - 6.5 inch
KEF Reference 4 Meta
Woofer - 8.5 inchMidrange - 6 inchWoofer - 8.5 inch
Wharfedale Elysian C

TweeterMidrangeWoofer

Front view, drawn to scale - cabinets and drivers share one scale, so sizes are directly comparable. Hover a driver for its size.

Driver KEF Reference 4 Meta Wharfedale Elysian C
Driver Setup 3-way 3-way
Tweeter 1-inch 27 x 45mm-inch
Midrange 1 x 5-inch 1 x 6-inch
Woofer 4 x 6.5-inch 2 x 8.5-inch

Reference 4 Meta features a 1" aluminium dome with MAT Tweeter, a 5" Midrange and 4 x 6.5" aluminium cone Woofer with a Crossover frequency at 450Hz and 2100Hz. On the other hand, the Elysian C features a 27 x 45mm" Air Motion Transformer (AMT) Tweeter, a 6" Midrange and 2 x 8.5" coated fiberglass matrix Woofer with a Crossover frequency at 360Hz and 2900HZ.

KEF Reference 4 Meta driver frequency bandsKEF Reference 4 MetaWharfedale Elysian C48-45035-360Woofer450-2.1k360-2.9kMidrange2.1k-35k2.9k-22kTweeter20501002005001k2k5k10k20k40kHz, log scale

Frequency Response

Reference 4 Meta has a frequency range of 48-35k Hz whereas Elysian C has a frequency range of 35-22k Hz. With a minimum frequency of 35Hz, the Elysian C can go significantly deeper on the low side and provide stronger bass compared to the Reference 4 Meta's min frequency of 48Hz.

The graph below depicts how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average Low Frequency values of other speakers in the Center Channel class in our database.

Low Frequency

Center Channel Speakers

Reference 4 Meta
Elysian C
Min
Average
Median

Neither pair reaches down to 20Hz, the usual definition of full-range, which is normal for speakers of this size. If you want the bottom octave for movies or bass-heavy music, add a subwoofer to whichever you choose. Visit our Powered Subwoofers section to find out more about the available options.

Impedance and Sensitivity

Reference 4 Meta is a 4 ohms speaker compared to the Elysian C which has a nominal impedance of 6 ohms. Lower impedance speakers, especially the ones that are rated at 4 ohms may put more pressure on the amplifier unit especially when played at high volume levels, so make sure the amp you pair with the Reference 4 Meta can provide this impedance level.

These two speakers also have different sensitivity levels. Reference 4 Meta sensitivity is rated at 88 dB and the Elysian C's is rated at 91 dB. This 3 dB difference makes the Wharfedale Elysian C a more sensitive speaker compared to KEF Reference 4 Meta, hence will play louder with the same amount of watts.

Sensitivity

Center Channel Speakers

Reference 4 Meta
Elysian C
Min
Average
Median

Power Range

Power range is the range of input power in watts RMS that a loudspeaker is designed to handle. Staying within that range gives nominal performance; driving the speaker beyond its maximum wattage can damage it.

Reference 4 Meta can handle a max power of 400 watts RMS, whereas Elysian C has a max power handling value of 250 watts RMS, 150 watts less than the Reference 4 Meta.

Note that higher power handling does not make a speaker louder: that depends mainly on sensitivity and impedance. The calculator below shows how loud each of these actually plays on a real amplifier.

Which plays louder on your amplifier?

Starting with a popular amplifier - change it to the one you own, or any you are considering, and watch both numbers move.

KEF Reference 4 Meta
 
Wharfedale Elysian C
 

Input Type and Bi-Amping / Bi-Wiring

Both Reference 4 Meta and Elysian C features dual binding post speaker terminals for bi-amping or bi-wiring.

KEF Reference 4 Meta Terminals
KEF Reference 4 Meta's Custom 5-way bi-wire tool-less binding posts terminals allows Bi-amping or bi-wiring

Wharfedale Elysian CBinding post Terminals
Wharfedale Elysian C's Binding post terminals allows Bi-amping or bi-wiring

Cabinet Type and Port Position

Both Reference 4 Meta and Elysian C have rear firing ports. Rear ported speakers generally need more room between the backside of the speaker and the wall compared to sealed and front/bottom ported speakers. Placing the speakers too close to the walls may cause the bass to sound boomy.

If you are limited in space and can't get the speakers away from the backwall, check our Speakers with Front Firing Ports page.

Physical Specs

The size of a speaker can sometimes be an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare KEF Reference 4 Meta's and Wharfedale Elysian C's external dimensions. KEF Reference 4 Meta has external dimensions of 205 x 1090 x 463 mm (8.1 x 42.9 x 18.2 in.) whereas Wharfedale Elysian C has external dimensions of 321.0 x 831.0 x 370.0mm (12-5/8 x 32-11/16 x 14-9/16inch).

Wharfedale Elysian C is 259mm narrower and 93mm less deeper than KEF Reference 4 Meta but it is also 116mm taller.

Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited. The base surface area of the KEF Reference 4 Meta is approximately 5046.7cm2 / 782.2inch2 and base area of the Wharfedale Elysian C is approximately 3074.7cm2 / 476.6inch2. The Reference 4 Meta requires 64% more surface area than the Elysian C which gives it a small disadvantage on placement in tight spaces.

Weight Comparison

The weight of a loudspeaker can become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often. Weight of a speaker can also "sometimes" be an indicator of the rigidity of the enclosure and the quality of the internal components used. The KEF Reference 4 Meta weighs 45.20kg / 99.4lbs and the Wharfedale Elysian C weighs 30.23kg / 66.5lbs. This makes the Reference 4 Meta 50% heavier than the Elysian C.

Here is a comparison of how Reference 4 Meta and Elysian C's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Passive Center Channel class.

Weight
All Center Channel Speakers
KEF Reference 4 Meta
Wharfedale Elysian C
Min
Average
Max

What's in the Box of Wharfedale Elysian C?

Here are the items that come with the Elysian C:
  • Center channel loudspeaker
  • Grille
  • 2 Terminal-jumpers
  • User Manual


Reasons to choose KEF Reference 4 Meta over Wharfedale Elysian C

Max Input Power 400 watts vs 250 watts Handle more power from your amplifier
Number of Woofers 4 vs 2 More woofers
High Frequency Response 35k Hz vs 22k Hz Generates higher frequency
Height 205mm vs 321mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces

Reasons to choose Wharfedale Elysian C over KEF Reference 4 Meta

Sensitivity 91 dB vs 88 dB Play louder with same amount of amplification power
Nominal Impedance 6 ohms vs 4 ohms Less selective with amplifiers
Minimum Impedance 3.5 ohms vs 3.2 ohms Very low impedance levels puts more pressure on amplifier
Woofer Size 8.5 inches vs 6.5 inches Larger woofer
Low Frequency Response 35 Hz vs 48 Hz Generates deeper bass
Passive Radiator Foamed Rubber vs None Increases the bass performance
Base Surface Area 3074cm2 vs 5046cm2 Takes less floor space
Price per pair* 4995USD vs 8000USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)

KEF Reference 4 Meta vs Wharfedale Elysian C Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications
General KEF Reference 4 Meta Wharfedale Elysian C
Brand KEF Wharfedale
Speaker Type Center channel speaker Center channel speaker
Power Range 50-400 watts 50-250 watts
Sensitivity 88 dB 91 dB
Impedance 4 ohms 6 ohms
Impedance 3.2 ohms 3.5 ohms
Frequency Response 48-35k Hz 35-22k Hz
Drivers
Woofer Quantity 4 2
Woofer Size 6.5" 8.5"
Woofer Composition aluminium cone coated fiberglass matrix
Woofer Surround Material Rubber n/a
Tweeter Size 1" 27 x 45mm"
Tweeter Type aluminium dome with MAT Air Motion Transformer (AMT)
Aimable Tweeter No No
Midrange Driver 5" 6"
Crossover Frequency 450Hz and 2100Hz 360Hz and 2900HZ
Firing Direction rear rear
Physical Specs
Height 205.0mm (8.1") 321.0mm (12.6")
Width 1090.0mm (42.9") 831.0mm (32.7")
Depth 463.0mm (18.2") 370.0mm (14.6")
Weight 45.20kg (99.4lbs) 30.23kg (66.5lbs)
Enclosure Bass Reflex Bass Reflex
Finish n/a MDF/Lacquer
Available Colors High-Gloss White/Blue, High-Gloss White/Champagne, High-Gloss Black/ Grey, High-Gloss Black/Copper, Satin Walnut/Silver Piano Black, Piano Walnut,White
Grille n/a Yes
Moisture Resistancy No No
Connections
Biamp Inputs Yes Yes
Other
Parts Warranty 5 years 5 Years
Labor Warranty 5 years 5 Years

Verdict

These sit in different price classes - KEF Reference 4 Meta costs roughly 1.6x what Wharfedale Elysian C does. Expect it to lead on paper; the question is whether the gap is audible enough in your room to be worth it.

AreaBetterWhy
BassBWharfedale Elysian C digs deeper - 35Hz against 48Hz.
Amplifier needsBWharfedale Elysian C is more sensitive (91dB vs 88dB), so it goes louder on the same amplifier.
Amplifier matchBWharfedale Elysian C is the easier load at 6 ohms; the other is 4 ohms and wants an amplifier rated for it.
HeadroomAKEF Reference 4 Meta takes more power (400W vs 250W) - more in hand in a big room.
SizedependsSimilar cabinet size - neither is easier to fit.
ExpandabilitydependsKEF Reference 4 Meta: bi-amping; Wharfedale Elysian C: bi-amping.
PriceBWharfedale Elysian C is cheaper - $4,995 against $8,000, about 38% less; arguably a different class.

A KEF Reference 4 Meta  B Wharfedale Elysian C
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both speakers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.

Which should you choose?

Wharfedale Elysian C is the easier recommendation: it leads on most of the measured areas and costs less. Take KEF Reference 4 Meta if its size, looks or fit in your room suit you better. If a subwoofer is in your plans, the bass gap largely stops mattering - you would be crossing over above 48Hz anyway, so judge these on the other rows instead. Match it to your room: we rate KEF Reference 4 Meta the better fit for a large room and a very large room, and Wharfedale Elysian C for a small room and a mid-size room.

And remember what a spec sheet cannot show: how each looks in your room and whether the finish suits it, what dealer support and warranty are like where you live, and how they actually sound to you. If you can hear them first - ideally with your own music - that will tell you more than any number above.


Most Popular Speakers
Klipsch Reference R-51M
Klipsch R-51M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
2-way | 87 dB | 6 ohms
Wharfedale Elysian 2
Wharfedale Elysian 2
3-way | 89 dB | 4 ohms
KEF Q150
KEF Q150
2-way | 86 dB | 8 ohms
Bowers & Wilkins 606 S2 Anniversary Edition
B&W 606 S2
2-way | 88 dB | 8 ohms
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-500M
Klipsch RP-500M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
Wharfedale EVO5.1
Wharfedale EVO5.1
2-way | 87 dB | 4 ohms
Wharfedale EVO4.1
Wharfedale EVO4.1
2-way | 87 dB | 8 ohms
This site contains affiliate links. We may be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through one of them. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Copyright © 2026 by SpeakerDecision
About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

Report a Correction