SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS
    • By Type
      Passive Bookshelf Speakers Passive Floor-standing Speakers Passive Center Channel Speakers Passive In-wall Speakers All Passive Speakers Powered Subwoofers Powered Stereo Speakers
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Front Firing Port Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      By Brand
      Acoustic Energy Aperion ATC Audio-Technica Audioengine Bluesound Bowers Wilkins Buchardt Cambridge Audio Canton DALI Definitive Technology Dynaudio ELAC Emotiva Fluance Focal Fyne Audio Genelec GoldenEar Harbeth Jamo JBL Kanto KEF KLH Klipsch Leak Mackie Magnepan MartinLogan McIntosh Mission MoFi Monitor Audio Nuvo Onkyo OSD Paradigm Perlisten Polk Audio PS Audio PSB Q Acoustics REL Revel Russound Sennheiser Sonos Sonus faber Sony Spendor SVS Tannoy Technics Triangle Velodyne Victrola Wharfedale Wilson Audio Yamaha
  • AMPLIFIERS
    • By Type
      All Amplifiers Integrated Amplifiers Stereo Receivers Streaming Amplifiers Power Amplifiers Compact Amplifiers
      By Power
      Up to 60 watts 61 to 90 watts 91 to 120 watts 121 to 180 watts Over 180 watts
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      Home Theater
      All Home Theater Receivers Anthem ARCAM Denon Integra JBL Marantz McIntosh NAD Onkyo Sony Yamaha
      Headphone Amps
      All Headphone Amplifiers Cambridge Audio iFi Audio McIntosh Naim Pro-Ject Rotel Schiit Audio Sennheiser Yamaha
      Multi-Zone
      All Multi-Zone Amplifiers JBL McIntosh OSD Rotel Russound Sonos
      By Brand
      Accuphase Advance Paris Anthem Arcam Audio Research AudioControl Audioengine Audiolab Bluesound Bose Buchardt Cambridge Audio Denon Devialet ELAC Emotiva Eversolo FiiO Fosi Audio Hegel HiFi Rose Integra JBL LEAK Luxman Marantz Mark Levinson McIntosh Michi MISSION MOON Musical Fidelity NAD Naim Onkyo OSD Parasound Pass Labs Peachtree PrimaLuna Primare PS Audio Rega Rogue Audio Roksan Rotel Schiit Audio Sonos Sony SVS T+A TEAC Technics Vincent WiiM Yamaha
  • SMART FIND
  • TOOLS
  • BLOG
  1. Home
  2. Passive Floor-standing Speakers
  3. KEF R5 Meta vs KLH Kendall

KEF R5 Meta vs KLH Kendall Comparison

x
Speaker to replace
Change

KEF R5 Meta

Passive Floor-standing | 52-28k Hz

KEF R5 Meta
Check price atAmazon›
Change
    
KLH Kendall

Passive Floor-standing | 25-23k Hz

KLH Kendall
Check price atAmazon›
KEF R5 Meta KEF R5 Meta
Check price atAmazon›
KLH Kendall KLH Kendall
Check price atAmazon›
KEF R5 Meta
See at AMAZON
KLH Kendall
See at AMAZON

KEF R5 Meta vs KLH Kendall Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing R5 Meta and Kendall, two Passive Floor-standing speakers from KEF and KLH.

Let's have a brief look at the main features of KEF R5 Meta and KLH Kendall first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Key SpecsKEF R5 MetaKLH Kendall
BrandKEF
United Kingdom · founded 1961
KLH
United States · founded 1957
Design3-way3-way
Uni-Q driver12th Generation Uni-Q—
Tweeter1" Vented dome1"
Midrange5"5.25"
Woofer2 x 5.25" Hybrid Aluminum2 x 6.5" Woven Kevlar
Frequency response52-28k Hz25-23k Hz
Sensitivity87 dB96 dB
Impedance4 ohms8 ohms
Power range15-200 wattsup to 250 watts
Weight24.55kg / 54lbs22.14kg / 48.7lbs
Dimensions (H x W x D)42-1/4" x 10-3/4" x 13-1/2"
1074.0 x 274.0 x 343.0mm
40-3/16" x 8-5/16" x 14-15/16"
1021.0 x 212.0 x 380.0mm

The sections below take each area in turn: drivers, frequency response, physical size and what you get in the box.


Drivers

Both R5 Meta and Kendall are 3-way speakers.

Tweeter - 1 inchMidrange - 5 inchWoofer - 5.25 inchWoofer - 5.25 inch
KEF R5 Meta
Tweeter - 1 inchMidrange - 5.25 inchWoofer - 6.5 inchWoofer - 6.5 inch
KLH Kendall

TweeterMidrangeWoofer

Front view, drawn to scale - cabinets and drivers share one scale, so sizes are directly comparable. Hover a driver for its size.

Driver KEF R5 Meta KLH Kendall
Driver Setup 3-way 3-way
Tweeter 1-inch 1-inch
Midrange 1 x 5-inch 1 x 5.25-inch
Woofer 2 x 5.25-inch 2 x 6.5-inch

R5 Meta features a 1" Aluminum with MAT absorber Vented dome Tweeter, a 5" Midrange and 2 x 5.25" Hybrid Aluminum Woofer with a Crossover frequency at 400Hz and 2700Hz. On the other hand, the Kendall features a 1" anodized aluminum Tweeter, a 5.25" Midrange and 2 x 6.5" Woven Kevlar Woofer.

Frequency Response

R5 Meta has a frequency range of 52-28k Hz whereas Kendall has a frequency range of 25-23k Hz. With a minimum frequency of 25Hz, the Kendall can go significantly deeper on the low side and provide stronger bass compared to the R5 Meta's min frequency of 52Hz.

The graph below depicts how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average Low Frequency values of other speakers in the Floor-standing class in our database.

Low Frequency

Floor-standing Speakers

R5 Meta
Kendall
Min
Average
Median

Neither pair reaches down to 20Hz, the usual definition of full-range, which is normal for speakers of this size. If you want the bottom octave for movies or bass-heavy music, add a subwoofer to whichever you choose. Visit our Powered Subwoofers section to find out more about the available options.

Impedance and Sensitivity

R5 Meta is a 4 ohms speaker compared to the Kendall which has a nominal impedance of 8 ohms. Lower impedance speakers, especially the ones that are rated at 4 ohms may put more pressure on the amplifier unit especially when played at high volume levels, so make sure the amp you pair with the R5 Meta can provide this impedance level.

These two speakers also have different sensitivity levels. R5 Meta sensitivity is rated at 87 dB and the Kendall's is rated at 96 dB. This 9 dB difference makes the KLH Kendall a more sensitive speaker compared to KEF R5 Meta, hence will play louder with the same amount of watts.

Sensitivity

Floor-standing Speakers

R5 Meta
Kendall
Min
Average
Median

Power Range

Power range is the range of input power in watts RMS that a loudspeaker is designed to handle. Staying within that range gives nominal performance; driving the speaker beyond its maximum wattage can damage it.

Kendall can handle a max power of 250 watts RMS, whereas R5 Meta has a max power handling value of 200 watts RMS, 50 watts less than the Kendall.

Note that higher power handling does not make a speaker louder: that depends mainly on sensitivity and impedance. The calculator below shows how loud each of these actually plays on a real amplifier.

Which plays louder on your amplifier?

Starting with a popular amplifier - change it to the one you own, or any you are considering, and watch both numbers move.

KEF R5 Meta
 
KLH Kendall
 

Input Type and Bi-Amping / Bi-Wiring

Both R5 Meta and Kendall features dual binding post speaker terminals for bi-amping or bi-wiring.

KEF R5 Meta Terminals
KEF R5 Meta's Custom 5-way bi-wire tool-less binding posts terminals allows Bi-amping or bi-wiring

KLH KendallBinding post Terminals
KLH Kendall's Binding post terminals allows Bi-amping or bi-wiring

Physical Specs

The size of a speaker can sometimes be an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare KEF R5 Meta's and KLH Kendall's external dimensions. KEF R5 Meta has external dimensions of 1074.0 x 274.0 x 343.0mm (42-1/4-inch x 10-3/4-inch x 13-1/2-inch) whereas KLH Kendall has external dimensions of 1021.0 x 212.0 x 380.0mm (40-3/16 x 8-5/16 x 14-15/16inch).

KLH Kendall is 62mm narrower and 53mm shorter than KEF R5 Meta but it is also 37mm deeper.

Below you can see the front view size comparison of KEF R5 Meta and KLH Kendall in scale.

KEF R5 Meta vs KLH Kendall Size Comparison - Front View
Comparison image of KEF R5 Meta and KLH Kendall Size and External Dimensions

Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited. The base surface area of the KEF R5 Meta is approximately 939.8cm2 / 145.7inch2 and base area of the KLH Kendall is approximately 805.6cm2 / 124.9inch2. The R5 Meta requires 17% more surface area than the Kendall which gives it a small disadvantage on placement in tight spaces.

Weight Comparison

The weight of a loudspeaker can become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often. Weight of a speaker can also "sometimes" be an indicator of the rigidity of the enclosure and the quality of the internal components used. The KEF R5 Meta weighs 24.55kg / 54lbs and the KLH Kendall weighs 22.14kg / 48.7lbs. This makes the R5 Meta 11% heavier than the Kendall.

Here is a comparison of how R5 Meta and Kendall's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Passive Floor-standing class.

Weight
All Floor-standing Speakers
KEF R5 Meta
KLH Kendall
Min
Average
Max

What's in the Box of KEF R5 Meta?

Here are the items that are included inside the box of R5 Meta:
  • R5 Meta
  • Microfiber grille
  • Plinth and spike accessories
  • Port bungs
  • User manual and warranty information

What's in the Box of KLH Kendall?

Here are the items that come with the Kendall:
  • Floorstanding loudspeaker
  • Grille
  • Foam port
  • 4 Rubber feet
  • 4 Spike feet (with nuts)
  • 4 Protective discs
  • Manual


Reasons to choose KEF R5 Meta over KLH Kendall

High Frequency Response 28k Hz vs 23k Hz Generates higher frequency

Reasons to choose KLH Kendall over KEF R5 Meta

Max Input Power 250 watts vs 200 watts Handle more power from your amplifier
Sensitivity 96 dB vs 87 dB Play louder with same amount of amplification power
Nominal Impedance 8 ohms vs 4 ohms Less selective with amplifiers
Woofer Size 6.5 inches vs 5.25 inches Larger woofer
Low Frequency Response 25 Hz vs 52 Hz Generates deeper bass
Height 1021mm vs 1074mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces
Base Surface Area 805cm2 vs 939cm2 Takes less floor space
Price per pair* 1500USD vs 3998USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)

KEF R5 Meta vs KLH Kendall Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications
General KEF R5 Meta KLH Kendall
Brand KEF KLH
Speaker Type Floor-standing speaker Floor-standing speaker
Power Range 15-200 watts up to 250 watts
Sensitivity 87 dB 96 dB
Impedance 4 ohms 8 ohms
Impedance 3.2 ohms n/a
Frequency Response 52-28k Hz 25-23k Hz
Drivers
Woofer Quantity 2 2
Woofer Size 5.25" 6.5"
Woofer Composition Hybrid Aluminum Woven Kevlar
Woofer Surround Material Rubber Butyl Rubber
Tweeter Size 1" 1"
Tweeter Type Vented dome n/a
Aimable Tweeter No No
Midrange Driver 5" 5.25"
Crossover Frequency 400Hz and 2700Hz n/a
Firing Direction rear n/a
Physical Specs
Height 1074.0mm (42.3") 1021.0mm (40.2")
Width 274.0mm (10.8") 212.0mm (8.3")
Depth 343.0mm (13.5") 380.0mm (15")
Weight 24.55kg (54lbs) 22.14kg (48.7lbs)
Enclosure Bass Reflex Bass Reflex
Finish n/a MDF/Wood Veneer
Available Colors Black Gloss, White Gloss, Walnut Black
Grille n/a Yes
Moisture Resistancy No No
Connections
Biamp Inputs Yes Yes
Other
Parts Warranty 5 years 10 Years
Labor Warranty 5 years 10 Years

Verdict

These sit in different price classes - KEF R5 Meta costs roughly 2.7x what KLH Kendall does. Expect it to lead on paper; the question is whether the gap is audible enough in your room to be worth it.

AreaBetterWhy
BassBKLH Kendall digs deeper - 25Hz against 52Hz.
Amplifier needsBKLH Kendall is more sensitive (96dB vs 87dB), so it goes louder on the same amplifier.
Amplifier matchBKLH Kendall is the easier load at 8 ohms; the other is 4 ohms and wants an amplifier rated for it.
HeadroomBKLH Kendall takes more power (250W vs 200W) - more in hand in a big room.
SizedependsSimilar cabinet size - neither is easier to fit.
ExpandabilitydependsKEF R5 Meta: bi-amping; KLH Kendall: bi-amping. KEF R5 Meta sits in a wider range (7 models), so a matched surround system is easier later.
PriceBKLH Kendall is cheaper - $1,500 against $3,998, about 62% less; arguably a different class.

A KEF R5 Meta  B KLH Kendall
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both speakers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.

Which should you choose?

KLH Kendall is the easier recommendation: it leads on most of the measured areas and costs less. Take KEF R5 Meta if its size, looks or fit in your room suit you better. If a subwoofer is in your plans, the bass gap largely stops mattering - you would be crossing over above 52Hz anyway, so judge these on the other rows instead. If your amplifier is modest, vintage or valve-based, KLH Kendall is the safer partner - the other will want more current or more watts to sound its best.

And remember what a spec sheet cannot show: how each looks in your room and whether the finish suits it, what dealer support and warranty are like where you live, and how they actually sound to you. If you can hear them first - ideally with your own music - that will tell you more than any number above.


Most Popular Speakers
Klipsch Reference R-51M
Klipsch R-51M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
2-way | 87 dB | 6 ohms
Wharfedale Elysian 2
Wharfedale Elysian 2
3-way | 89 dB | 4 ohms
KEF Q150
KEF Q150
2-way | 86 dB | 8 ohms
Bowers & Wilkins 606 S2 Anniversary Edition
B&W 606 S2
2-way | 88 dB | 8 ohms
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-500M
Klipsch RP-500M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
Wharfedale EVO5.1
Wharfedale EVO5.1
2-way | 87 dB | 4 ohms
Wharfedale EVO4.1
Wharfedale EVO4.1
2-way | 87 dB | 8 ohms
This site contains affiliate links. We may be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through one of them. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Copyright © 2026 by SpeakerDecision
About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

Report a Correction