SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS
    • By Type
      Passive Bookshelf Speakers Passive Floor-standing Speakers Passive Center Channel Speakers Passive In-wall Speakers All Passive Speakers Powered Subwoofers Powered Stereo Speakers
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Front Firing Port Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      By Brand
      Acoustic Energy Aperion ATC Audio-Technica Audioengine Bluesound Bowers Wilkins Buchardt Cambridge Audio Canton DALI Definitive Technology Dynaudio ELAC Emotiva Fluance Focal Fyne Audio Genelec GoldenEar Harbeth Jamo JBL Kanto KEF KLH Klipsch Leak Mackie Magnepan MartinLogan McIntosh Mission MoFi Monitor Audio Nuvo Onkyo OSD Paradigm Perlisten Polk Audio PS Audio PSB Q Acoustics REL Revel Russound Sennheiser Sonos Sonus faber Sony Spendor SVS Tannoy Technics Triangle Velodyne Victrola Wharfedale Wilson Audio Yamaha
  • AMPLIFIERS
    • By Type
      All Amplifiers Integrated Amplifiers Stereo Receivers Streaming Amplifiers Power Amplifiers Compact Amplifiers
      By Power
      Up to 60 watts 61 to 90 watts 91 to 120 watts 121 to 180 watts Over 180 watts
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      Home Theater
      All Home Theater Receivers Anthem ARCAM Denon Integra JBL Marantz McIntosh NAD Onkyo Sony Yamaha
      Headphone Amps
      All Headphone Amplifiers Cambridge Audio iFi Audio McIntosh Naim Pro-Ject Rotel Schiit Audio Sennheiser Yamaha
      Multi-Zone
      All Multi-Zone Amplifiers JBL McIntosh OSD Rotel Russound Sonos
      By Brand
      Accuphase Advance Paris Anthem Arcam Audio Research AudioControl Audioengine Audiolab Bluesound Bose Buchardt Cambridge Audio Denon Devialet ELAC Emotiva Eversolo FiiO Fosi Audio Hegel HiFi Rose Integra JBL LEAK Luxman Marantz Mark Levinson McIntosh Michi MISSION MOON Musical Fidelity NAD Naim Onkyo OSD Parasound Pass Labs Peachtree PrimaLuna Primare PS Audio Rega Rogue Audio Roksan Rotel Schiit Audio Sonos Sony SVS T+A TEAC Technics Vincent WiiM Yamaha
  • SMART FIND
  • TOOLS
  • BLOG
  1. Home
  2. Passive Floor-standing Speakers
  3. KEF Q750 vs B&W 603

KEF Q750 vs B&W 603 Comparison

x
Speaker to replace
Change

KEF Q750

Passive Floor-standing | 48-28k Hz

KEF Q750
Check price atAmazon›
Change
    
B&W 603

Passive Floor-standing | 48-28k Hz

Bowers & Wilkins 603
Check price atAmazon›
KEF Q750 KEF Q750
Check price atAmazon›
B&W 603 B&W 603
Check price atAmazon›
KEF Q750
See at AMAZON
B&W 603
See at AMAZON

KEF Q750 vs B&W 603 Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing Q750 and BW 603, two Passive Floor-standing speakers from KEF and Bowers Wilkins.

Let's have a brief look at the main features of KEF Q750 and B&W 603 first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Key SpecsKEF Q750B&W 603
BrandKEF
United Kingdom · founded 1961
Bowers Wilkins
United Kingdom · founded 1966
Design2-way3-way
Uni-Q driver11th Generation Uni-Q—
Tweeter1" Dome1"
Midrange—6"
Woofer2 x 6.5" Aluminum2 x 6.5" Paper
Frequency response48-28k Hz48-28k Hz
Sensitivity88 dB88.5 dB
Impedance8 ohms8 ohms
Power range15-150 watts30-200 watts
Weight16.59kg / 36.5lbs24.14kg / 53.1lbs
Dimensions (H x W x D)37-3/16" x 12-7/8" x 12-3/8"
945.0 x 328.0 x 315.0mm
38.7" x 7.4" x 13.3"
985.0 x 190.0 x 340.0mm

What size room are the KEF Q750 and B&W 603 speakers good for?

The size of the room in which you are planning to use these loudspeakers is an important decision factor. Here we have compared their suitability to various sizes of environments considering their size and max power parameters:

Listening Environment* KEF Q750 B&W 603
Near-field Bad Bad
Small Room Poor Poor
Mid-size Room Good Good
Large Room Good Good
Very Large Room Poor Poor

(* Approximate Room sizes: Small < 100sq. ft / 9 m2, Mid-size: 100-220 sq. ft / 9-20 m2, Large 220-400 sq. ft / 20-36 m2, Very Large: > 400 sq. ft / 36 m2. Average Floor Height: 9" / 2.7m. Typical room sizes differ from country to country, and the actual listening experience changes depending on floor height, room shape, surface materials, listening position, speaker locations, etc.)

The sections below take each area in turn: drivers, frequency response, physical size and what you get in the box.


Drivers

One of the fundamental differences between these two speakers is that Q750 is a 2-way design whereas the BW 603 is a 3-way speaker. 3-way designs utilize a midrange driver in addition to the tweeter and woofer on 2-way designs. Designing a crossover for a 3-way speaker is a complicated process and generally increases the overall cost of the speaker.

Tweeter - 1 inchWoofer - 6.5 inchWoofer - 6.5 inch
KEF Q750
Tweeter - 1 inchMidrange - 6 inchWoofer - 6.5 inchWoofer - 6.5 inch
B&W 603

TweeterMidrangeWoofer

Front view, drawn to scale - cabinets and drivers share one scale, so sizes are directly comparable. Hover a driver for its size.

Driver KEF Q750 B&W 603
Driver Setup 2-way 3-way
Tweeter 1-inch 1-inch
Midrange - 1 x 6-inch
Woofer 2 x 6.5-inch 2 x 6.5-inch

Q750 features a 1" vented aluminum Dome Tweeter and 2 x 6.5" Aluminum Woofer with a Crossover frequency at 2500Hz. On the other hand, the BW 603 features a 1" Tweeter, a 6" Midrange and 2 x 6.5" Paper Woofer.

Frequency Response

Q750 and BW 603 has exactly the same frequency range of 48-28k Hz.

The graph below depicts how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average Low Frequency values of other speakers in the Floor-standing class in our database.

Low Frequency

Floor-standing Speakers

Q750
BW 603
Min
Average
Median

Neither pair reaches down to 20Hz, the usual definition of full-range, which is normal for speakers of this size. If you want the bottom octave for movies or bass-heavy music, add a subwoofer to whichever you choose. Visit our Powered Subwoofers section to find out more about the available options.

Impedance and Sensitivity

Q750 and BW 603 have the same Impedance of 8 ohms but where they differ is the sensitivity levels. Q750 sensitivity is rated at 88 dB and the BW 603's is at 88.5 dB. This 1 dB difference makes the B&W 603 a more sensitive speaker compared to KEF Q750, hence will play louder with the same amount of watts.

Sensitivity

Floor-standing Speakers

Q750
BW 603
Min
Average
Median

Power Range

Power range is the range of input power in watts RMS that a loudspeaker is designed to handle. Staying within that range gives nominal performance; driving the speaker beyond its maximum wattage can damage it.

BW 603 can handle a max power of 200 watts RMS, whereas Q750 has a max power handling value of 150 watts RMS, 50 watts less than the BW 603.

Note that higher power handling does not make a speaker louder: that depends mainly on sensitivity and impedance. The calculator below shows how loud each of these actually plays on a real amplifier.

Which plays louder on your amplifier?

Starting with a popular amplifier - change it to the one you own, or any you are considering, and watch both numbers move.

KEF Q750
 
B&W 603
 

Input Type and Bi-Amping / Bi-Wiring

BW 603 features Post posts which make bi-amping or bi-wiring possible. Q750 has a Binding post which doesn't feature bi-amping/bi-wiring.

KEF Q750 Terminals
KEF Q750's Binding post terminals

Cabinet Type and Port Position

Q750 has a front firing port whereas BW 603 has a rear firing ports. KEF Q750's front-firing port gives more flexibility in placement in regards to proximity to walls compared to B&W 603 with its rear-firing port.

Physical Specs

The size of a speaker can sometimes be an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare KEF Q750's and B&W 603's external dimensions. KEF Q750 has external dimensions of 945.0 x 328.0 x 315.0mm (37-3/16 x 12-7/8 x 12-3/8inch) whereas B&W 603 has external dimensions of 985.0 x 190.0 x 340.0mm (38.7 x 7.4 x 13.3inch).

KEF Q750 is 40mm shorter and 25mm less deeper than B&W 603 but it is also 138mm wider.

Below you can see the front view size comparison of KEF Q750 and B&W 603 in scale.

KEF Q750 vs B&W 603 Size Comparison - Front View
Comparison image of KEF Q750 and B&W 603 Size and External Dimensions

Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited. The base surface area of the KEF Q750 is approximately 1033.2cm2 / 160.1inch2 and base area of the B&W 603 is approximately 646.0cm2 / 100.1inch2. The Q750 requires 60% more surface area than the BW 603 which gives it a small disadvantage on placement in tight spaces.

Weight Comparison

The weight of a loudspeaker can become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often. Weight of a speaker can also "sometimes" be an indicator of the rigidity of the enclosure and the quality of the internal components used. The KEF Q750 weighs 16.59kg / 36.5lbs and the B&W 603 weighs 24.14kg / 53.1lbs. This makes the BW 603 46% heavier than the Q750.

Here is a comparison of how Q750 and BW 603's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Passive Floor-standing class.

Weight
All Floor-standing Speakers
KEF Q750
B&W 603
Min
Average
Max

What's in the Box of KEF Q750?

Here are the items that are included inside the box of Q750:
  • Floorstanding loudspeaker
  • 2 Outrigger feet
  • 4 Spikes
  • 6 Screws
  • 6 Washers
  • 4 Rubber inserts
  • Hex-key
  • Owners Manual
  • Warranty Information

What's in the Box of B&W 603?

Here are the items that come with the BW 603:
  • Floorstanding loudspeaker
  • Grille
  • Plinith (base)
  • 2 Jumper-straps (pre-installed)
  • 4 Rubber feet
  • 4 Spike feet
  • 4 Hex-nuts
  • 4 Screws
  • 4 Washers
  • 4 Lock-washers
  • Two-piece foam port plug
  • Hex-key
  • Manual
  • Bowers & Wilkins brochure
  • Warranty Information


Reasons to choose KEF Q750 over Bowers & Wilkins 603

Port Position Front vs Rear Gives more flexibility placing close to walls
Passive Radiator 2 x 6.25-inch vs None Increases the bass performance
Dolby Atmos Drivers Optional vs No Dolby Atmos Compatibility
Height 945mm vs 985mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces

Reasons to choose Bowers & Wilkins 603 over KEF Q750

Max Input Power 200 watts vs 150 watts Handle more power from your amplifier
Driver Setup 3-way vs 2-way Have a dedicated mid-range driver
Sensitivity 89 dB vs 88 dB Play louder with same amount of amplification power
Bi-Amping and Bi-Wiring Yes vs No Allows bi-amping and bi-wiring connections
Base Surface Area 646cm2 vs 1033cm2 Takes less floor space

KEF Q750 vs B&W 603 Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications
General KEF Q750 Bowers & Wilkins 603
Brand KEF Bowers Wilkins
Speaker Type Floor-standing speaker Floor-standing speaker
Power Range 15-150 watts 30-200 watts
Sensitivity 88 dB 88.5 dB
Impedance 8 ohms 8 ohms
Impedance 3.8 ohms n/a
Frequency Response 48-28k Hz 48-28k Hz
Drivers
Woofer Quantity 2 2
Woofer Size 6.5" 6.5"
Woofer Composition Aluminum Paper
Woofer Surround Material Rubber Rubber
Tweeter Size 1" 1"
Tweeter Type Dome n/a
Aimable Tweeter No No
Midrange Driver No 6"
Crossover Frequency 2500Hz n/a
Firing Direction front rear
Physical Specs
Height 945.0mm (37.2") 985.0mm (38.8")
Width 328.0mm (12.9") 190.0mm (7.5")
Depth 315.0mm (12.4") 340.0mm (13.4")
Weight 16.59kg (36.5lbs) 24.14kg (53.1lbs)
Enclosure Passive Radiator Bass Reflex
Finish MDF/Wood-grain vinyl MDF/Vinyl
Available Colors Walnut Black, White, Oak
Grille n/a Yes
Moisture Resistancy No No
Connections
Biamp Inputs No Yes
Other
Parts Warranty 5 Years 5 Years
Labor Warranty 5 Years 5 Years

Verdict

No single best speaker here - they are built to different priorities, and the right one depends on your room, your amplifier and what you listen to.

AreaBetterWhy
Bassevenly matchedMuch the same reach (48Hz vs 48Hz).
Amplifier needsevenly matchedSimilar sensitivity (88dB vs 89dB) - both want much the same power.
HeadroomBB&W 603 takes more power (200W vs 150W) - more in hand in a big room.
SizedependsB&W 603 is easier to place; KEF Q750 is bigger, which usually goes with fuller bass. Your room decides.
CabinetdependsPassive Radiator vs Ported.
ExpandabilitydependsKEF Q750: Atmos drivers; B&W 603: bi-amping. KEF Q750 sits in a wider range (7 models), so a matched surround system is easier later.

A KEF Q750  B B&W 603
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both speakers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.

Which should you choose?

B&W 603 has the edge on paper, though the margin is not large. The rows marked "depends" may matter more to you than the score does. In a large or open-plan room, KEF Q750 has the cabinet volume to fill it more easily; in a small room, near a wall or at desk distance, B&W 603 is the easier speaker to get right.

And remember what a spec sheet cannot show: how each looks in your room and whether the finish suits it, what dealer support and warranty are like where you live, and how they actually sound to you. If you can hear them first - ideally with your own music - that will tell you more than any number above.


Most Popular Speakers
Klipsch Reference R-51M
Klipsch R-51M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
2-way | 87 dB | 6 ohms
Wharfedale Elysian 2
Wharfedale Elysian 2
3-way | 89 dB | 4 ohms
KEF Q150
KEF Q150
2-way | 86 dB | 8 ohms
Bowers & Wilkins 606 S2 Anniversary Edition
B&W 606 S2
2-way | 88 dB | 8 ohms
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-500M
Klipsch RP-500M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
Wharfedale EVO5.1
Wharfedale EVO5.1
2-way | 87 dB | 4 ohms
Wharfedale EVO4.1
Wharfedale EVO4.1
2-way | 87 dB | 8 ohms
This site contains affiliate links. We may be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through one of them. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Copyright © 2026 by SpeakerDecision
About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

Report a Correction